Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Prolonged delay of treatment for periodontal diseases

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jonesy - 12 Mar 2005 21:40 GMT
Would appreciate an opinion about prognosis,
concerning a letter just received from one periodontist:

"It is necessary to start treatment for your periodotal infection.
Periodontal deseases are progressive, usually painless, and are the
major cause of tooth loss in adults.  It would be regretful if
prolonged delay led to the development of a condition that could not be
treated."

Question: What kind of regretful conditions could develop than can not
be treated?  Anything fatal or tragic?

MORE INFORMATION:
Removing  the infected  tooth (#12) is to leave two spaces since a
cantalever is resting on the infected tooth and it is said to be best
removed since it has no resting place.
I asked about a new 4 or 5 tooth bridge and was told that it wouldn't
last long since the dependent teeth are weak and for that reason, not
recommended.

Final diagnosis is: to remove ALL my upper teeth because they are weak.
I am over 60. Had gingvitus twenty-five years ago which was reversed.
I have  all crowns and bridges and but for the infected tooth, I think
they may still be of service for a number of years - but also (I am
told) it is doubtful and that it makes sense to make the bridge because
its expensive and painful (for me) and the DDS feels it would be
unethical for him to recommend this. This opinion has been seconded by
another periodontist.

I am mortified by the thought of removing all uppers at this time (or
anytime really) due an infection in one tooth - unless I want to go
around with obvious spaces which for practical, business and vanity
reasons I won't do. This is because 3 through 8 are one permanent
bridge. 9,10,11,12 are independent crowns. 13 is a space covered with a
cantelever solidly attached to 14. I can send full mouth exray jpg for
better picture.
The thing is:  They are my teeth and I want to continue to enjoy food,
looking and feeling good.  I would not be satisfied with anything but a
palatless perm denture or full implant which is a very large, time
consuming and expensive project. involving bone augmentation at time of
removal of any teeth. From what I've researched, bone augmentation is a
good idea even for regular dentures because it help prevent gums from
shrinkage - so that part I would do under any circumstances. I would
like to put removing all my teeth off as long as possible.

Why can't I just ignore the infection until it's too painful to live
with in which case I may see about finding a DDS who will make a bridge
in hope of hanging on to my teeth longer? What do DDS's mean when they
say the teeth are weak. Some of my crowns have been in twenty-five
years and still going - why cant those teeth be used as anchors?  I
don't understand.

But mainly, My Question is, if I ignore this infection, exactly what
regretful conditions am I risking? Anything fatal?
I will happily send jpg of full mouth exray if anyone requests.  Thanks
for reading this.
Jonesy, worried in CA
Joel M. Eichen - 12 Mar 2005 21:53 GMT
>Would appreciate an opinion about prognosis,
>concerning a letter just received from one periodontist:

got it!

>"It is necessary to start treatment for your periodotal infection.
>Periodontal deseases are progressive, usually painless, and are the
>major cause of tooth loss in adults.  It would be regretful if
>prolonged delay led to the development of a condition that could not be
>treated."

Diseases ......

>Question: What kind of regretful conditions could develop than can not
>be treated?  Anything fatal or tragic?

Loss of teeth! LOOSENING and coming out.

Does this really happen? YES.

>MORE INFORMATION:
>Removing  the infected  tooth (#12) is to leave two spaces since a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>last long since the dependent teeth are weak and for that reason, not
>recommended.

One should post x-rays so we can intelligently inform you what is
what. If they were my teeth and I found this great group of dentists I
sure would do it.

PS- Almost no one takes us up on this!

>Final diagnosis is: to remove ALL my upper teeth because they are weak.
>I am over 60.

You are too YOUNG for that.

> Had gingvitus twenty-five years ago which was reversed.
>I have  all crowns and bridges and but for the infected tooth, I think
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>unethical for him to recommend this. This opinion has been seconded by
>another periodontist.

X-rays .....

>I am mortified by the thought of removing all uppers at this time (or

Me too! I mean I am mortified for you.

>anytime really) due an infection in one tooth - unless I want to go
>around with obvious spaces which for practical, business and vanity
>reasons I won't do.

RECOMMENDATION: Quick Monodont bridge, if it goes it goes.

>This is because 3 through 8 are one permanent
>bridge. 9,10,11,12 are independent crowns. 13 is a space covered with a
>cantelever solidly attached to 14. I can send full mouth exray jpg for
>better picture.

YUP.

Do it.

Post at www.tinypic.com and then give us the URL right here.

>The thing is:  They are my teeth and I want to continue to enjoy food,
>looking and feeling good.

Who does not?

> I would not be satisfied with anything but a
>palatless perm denture or full implant which is a very large, time
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>shrinkage - so that part I would do under any circumstances. I would
>like to put removing all my teeth off as long as possible.

YUP, let's see the radiographs before you go pulling al lthe teeth
.....

>Why can't I just ignore the infection until it's too painful to live
>with in which case I may see about finding a DDS who will make a bridge

You can ,,,,,,, but sometimes this hastens mobility on other teeth
....

>in hope of hanging on to my teeth longer? What do DDS's mean when they
>say the teeth are weak.

Means that you will not be able to pull a locomotive from a dead stiop
using your teeth. I saw a picture of this once.

> Some of my crowns have been in twenty-five
>years and still going - why cant those teeth be used as anchors?  I
>don't understand.

They can ... maybe.... x-rays ???

>But mainly, My Question is, if I ignore this infection, exactly what
>regretful conditions am I risking? Anything fatal?

Nope.

>I will happily send jpg of full mouth exray if anyone requests.  Thanks
>for reading this.

YUP.

Joely

>Jonesy, worried in CA
Jonesy - 13 Mar 2005 05:39 GMT
 http://tinypic.com/view.html?p­ic=23p2d1
Jonesy - 13 Mar 2005 06:10 GMT
http://tinypic.com/view.html?p­ic=23p2d1
Jonesy - 13 Mar 2005 06:15 GMT
http://tinypic.com/view.html?pic=23p2d1
Jonesy - 13 Mar 2005 06:40 GMT
Monodont bridge - Yes, ok for one missing tooth, but what of two?  Is
it feasable for me to try to get the DSS removing that tooth to not
remove the canterlever?

The dentist who removes the tooth will be the same one to do bone
augmantation - but he wants to drill away the canterlever because of
too much stress on the rear tooth but why can't the canterlever just
rest on the gum and a monobridge be inserted
for cosmetic reasons or, if the canterlever must be removed, what about
a two teeth duo-dont bridge - if it exists? (it it removable or what?)
Or is it wiser to make a more permanent bridge even if the teeth are
"weak".   Many of the upper teeth are already loose - they have been
loose for years since a car accident. Thanks for telling me about the
monodent - BYW, I dont eat meat and foods that require alot of tearing
strength.
Jonesy
Joel M. Eichen - 13 Mar 2005 13:45 GMT
>Monodont bridge - Yes, ok for one missing tooth, but what of two?  Is
>it feasable for me to try to get the DSS removing that tooth to not
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>strength.
>Jonesy

Best bet is to post some x-rays .... .all cantivelers have different
forces upon them.

Joel
Dr. Steve - 13 Mar 2005 18:05 GMT
>Monodont bridge - Yes, ok for one missing tooth, but what of two?  

Only for very short  term use. A monodont replacing two or more teeth
will only last 6-8 months.

>Is
>it feasable for me to try to get the DSS removing that tooth to not
>remove the canterlever?

No

>The dentist who removes the tooth will be the same one to do bone
>augmantation - but he wants to drill away the canterlever because of
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>strength.
>Jonesy

there are many issues here. Your best bet is a second opinion in real
life. If you want to ask questions to help understand what is said to
you, this forum is ideal.
..
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA

I am writing on a Tablet-PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my handwriting.
Dr. Steve - 12 Mar 2005 22:57 GMT
>But mainly, My Question is, if I ignore this infection, exactly what
>regretful conditions am I risking? Anything fatal?
>I will happily send jpg of full mouth exray if anyone requests.  Thanks
>for reading this.
>Jonesy, worried in CA

Ignore the problem and you will likely lose teeth, perhaps soon. When
you lose the teeth, the bone will shirk faster due to the long
standing infection. the longer you wait the worse the subsequent
denture will fit.
..
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA

I am writing on a Tablet-PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my handwriting.
Jonesy - 13 Mar 2005 05:20 GMT
I will send exrays to address given above www.tinypic.com and give url
after this reply:

Won't bone augmentation procedure following tooth removal take care of
the shrinking gum problem?
Jonesy
Joel M. Eichen - 13 Mar 2005 13:46 GMT
>I will send exrays to address given above www.tinypic.com and give url
>after this reply:
>
>Won't bone augmentation procedure following tooth removal take care of
>the shrinking gum problem?
>Jonesy

OK bone augmentation ........ this is another pet peeve of mine. Many
times its not required. In theory it is good but bone resorbs and
remodels. It depends where in the mouth it is.

Joel
Dr. Steve - 13 Mar 2005 18:07 GMT
>>I will send exrays to address given above www.tinypic.com and give url
>>after this reply:
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Joel

Too many factors involved to comment without an exam.
..
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA

I am writing on a Tablet-PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my handwriting.
Jonesy - 13 Mar 2005 05:31 GMT
Jonesy teeth/panaramic:      http://tinypic.com/view.html?pic=23p2d1
Joel M. Eichen - 13 Mar 2005 13:55 GMT
>Jonesy teeth/panaramic:      http://tinypic.com/view.html?pic=23p2d1

Bad news!

http://tinypic.com/view.html?pic=23p2d1

When you uploaded, it failed!

Warning: mysql_connect(): Can't connect to MySQL server on '10.1.4.9'
(99) in /apache/htdocs/Objects.php on line 272
cannot myConnect to database

A tinypic URL looks like this:

http://tinypic.com/t56hg7

sample (made this up, its no picture)

Joel
Jonesy - 13 Mar 2005 05:30 GMT
Panaramic of Jonesys teeth:   http://tinypic.com/view.html?pic=23p2d1
Joel M. Eichen - 13 Mar 2005 13:55 GMT
>Panaramic of Jonesys teeth:   http://tinypic.com/view.html?pic=23p2d1

Click it! It fails.
Dr. Steve - 13 Mar 2005 18:12 GMT
>>Panaramic of Jonesys teeth:   http://tinypic.com/view.html?pic=23p2d1
>
>Click it! It fails.

Works now

Panoramic X-ray images are not good for evaluating periodontal health
..
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA

I am writing on a Tablet-PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my handwriting.
Joel M. Eichen - 13 Mar 2005 18:44 GMT
>>>Panaramic of Jonesys teeth:   http://tinypic.com/view.html?pic=23p2d1
>>
>>Click it! It fails.
>
>Works now

True, it works for me too.

Joel

>Panoramic X-ray images are not good for evaluating periodontal health
>..
>Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
>Troy, Michigan, USA
>
>I am writing on a Tablet-PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my handwriting.
Joel M. Eichen - 13 Mar 2005 18:45 GMT
>>>Panaramic of Jonesys teeth:   http://tinypic.com/view.html?pic=23p2d1
>>
>>Click it! It fails.
>
>Works now

Here is another view:

http://tinypic.com/23p2d1

>Panoramic X-ray images are not good for evaluating periodontal health
>..
>Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
>Troy, Michigan, USA
>
>I am writing on a Tablet-PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my handwriting.
Joel M. Eichen - 13 Mar 2005 18:53 GMT
Clarification needed.

Tooth #12 is the one with the infection, correct?

Tooth #13 is the missing tooth being replaced by the bridge.
(You call this cantalever (sic).

Tooth #14 has a crown.

You claim that 12-13-14 are all connected making that a "fixed"
non-removable bridge.

In that case it is not a cantilever.

A cantilever is a free ended support mechanism.

DEF

Projecting horizontal beam fixed at one end only
Construct such that only one end is fixed; as of girders and beams

This is similar to the verb, canted.
DEF Departing or being caused to depart from the true vertical or
horizontal

Or the noun, decanter

A bottle with a stopper; for serving wine or water

This is because one "cants" the mouth of the decanter so that you can
pour off the wine without pouring out sediment into your glass.

RECOMMENDATIONS WILL FOLLOW .....

Joel

>>>Panaramic of Jonesys teeth:   http://tinypic.com/view.html?pic=23p2d1
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>I am writing on a Tablet-PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my handwriting.
Joel M. Eichen - 13 Mar 2005 18:54 GMT
Quick diagnosis:

Is it time for upper denture (no teeth left)?

No.

Absolutely not.

Joel

>>>Panaramic of Jonesys teeth:   http://tinypic.com/view.html?pic=23p2d1
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>I am writing on a Tablet-PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my handwriting.
Jonesy - 14 Mar 2005 23:27 GMT
I have been to two periodontists and a prosthodondont who all agree to
remove all the uppers - which to me seems hasty.   I don't know if one
influenced the other; or of if they are basing their opinion on my
financial state, or what? All I know is, if I remove that tooth I will
have to do something if I want to be left with an acceptable smile -
either pull them all out, or make a four tooth bridge which they say is
a very bad idea - and that's what I don't get.  One also suggested
something might be "going one" on #8 but another one disagreed.

>>>You claim that 12-13-14 are all connected making that a "fixed"
non-removable bridge.<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

No, there no fixed bridge on 12,13,and 14.
#13 is a space.  #14 is a cantilever bridge - a fixed bridge made up of
two crowns - on the side of 13 adjacent to 12 is a tiny wire resting in
a tiny whole drilled into the side of crown #12.

#12 is an independent tooth with crown.

If infected tooth12 is pulled the periodontists say #13 should also be
removed by drilling, because it will then have nothing to support it on
the 12 side and therefore, will put extra stress on #14, an achor
tooth.  I think that's the only thing that makes any sense to me that I
can agree with -
But, when #12 is removed there will be remaining on that side of the
mouth:  9, 10, 11, and 14.  And both periodontists, and a
prosthodontist are in agreement hat it would be "wrong" to make a
bridge on weak teeth.

It wouldn't last long, they say and I don't understand why not?  The
infected tooth #12 received some oral surgury (osseous) about three
years ago but it did not improve.  It is now loose and sensitive.

I don't know if one influenced the other; or of if they are basing
their opinion on my financial state, or what? All I know is if I remove
that tooth I will have to do something - either pull them all out, or
make a four tooth bridge (or five is someone recommends) which they say
is a very bad idea!  (Why is it very bad?????)   They say:  it won't
last long and it's only a matter of time before another area of the
upper mouth will act up.  It will be a waster of pain, money and time.
When any tooth under the six tooth bridge on the other side "goes" it
will be curtains for that bridge.  It has two spaces now.

The reason for bone augmentation is because it is supposed to be best
(so I'm told) at time of tooth removal.

My head is just swimming with conflicting opinions about what to do.
I'm sure I can find a dentist to make me a four or five tooth bridge if
I look hard enough - but I keep hearing those periodontists and that
prosthdontist saying things like: no good DDS would do that.  They
don't think my teeth can be saved - period.

I'm left with getting that infected tooth out if it doesn't get better
(it's getting harder to live with) and having a perm bridge made
anyway... or having them all out and proceeding with a transplanted
denture about six months after the upper gum heals - using a regular
bridge in the mean times.  UGH!  I don't want any of these things.
Joel M. Eichen - 14 Mar 2005 23:35 GMT
>I have been to two periodontists and a prosthodondont who all agree to
>remove all the uppers - which to me seems hasty.   I don't know if one
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>two crowns - on the side of 13 adjacent to 12 is a tiny wire resting in
>a tiny whole drilled into the side of crown #12.

OK that is a cantilever, with an occlusal (biting surface) rest on
tooth #12.

I might recommend an endodontist and inquire if #12 can be treated by
drilling through the top of the crown and not disturbing the bridge.

SECOND IDEA:

Extract #12 if necessary, and then create a cantilever for #11 and
attaching #12 to that.

THIRD IDEA.

Pull the entire brisdge off, extract #12, and make a bridge for #11 to
#14.

None of these is ideal, but in my book, they are STILL more ideal than
the best of full upper dentures! I have made thousands of upper
dentures, by the way.

If you have a friendly dentist who will do all of this at less than
top-dollar fees, due to the fact that it will not last forever, then
you got something.

I used to do these jobs at COST-PLUS. Patients paid me by the hour,
plus they paid the lab bill. Why? Who knows how long it would last?

Its still a good dental service, although not ideal.

Joel

>#12 is an independent tooth with crown.
>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>denture about six months after the upper gum heals - using a regular
>bridge in the mean times.  UGH!  I don't want any of these things.
Jonesy - 15 Mar 2005 05:19 GMT
<<<< I might recommend an endodontist and inquire if #12 can be treated
by
drilling through the top of the crown and not disturbing the
bridge.>>>>

You are the first to recommend that - if It is a vialbe option, It
would be marvelous.  Sure couldn't hurt to ask a good endodontist his
opinion here. For some reason my primary DDS felt it was a problem for
the endodontist.  I think she was thinking long term and frowns on
short term.

>>>SECOND IDEA:

Extract #12 if necessary, and then create a cantilever for #11 and
attaching #12 to that.<<<<

There already is a cantilever on 14 extending over 13 that periodontist
recommends also come out due to stress on anchor in which case it will
leave two spaces. If 13 is left in place, can two cantilevers be side
by side?? Will there possibly be extra stress on the anchor if #14
cantalever is left in place? It doesnt seem to be soundly wired in to
12 now cause I can manage to get the floss easily around it.

THIRD IDEA.
Pull the entire brisdge off, extract #12, and make a bridge for #11 to
#14.
Sound idea.

>>If you have a friendly dentist who will do all of this at less than
top-dollar fees, due to the fact that it will not last forever, then
you got something.<<<  There are plenty of DDS's with dental plans or
discounted plans - if that's what you mean. I'll see if I can get it
cheaper.  It's not in the front so I won't be fussy.  My theory is I
might die from a nasty fall from a horse or in another accident of some
time - any time...  so why no drag out having my own teeth as long as
possible.  Thanks for understanding. I will really followin messages
now.
Joel M. Eichen - 15 Mar 2005 12:45 GMT
><<<< I might recommend an endodontist and inquire if #12 can be treated
>by
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>the endodontist.  I think she was thinking long term and frowns on
>short term.

Plus, when its YOUR teeth not someone else's the ideas seem more
tenable.

Joel
Joel M. Eichen - 15 Mar 2005 12:47 GMT
>There already is a cantilever on 14 extending over 13 that periodontist
>recommends also come out due to stress on anchor in which case it will
>leave two spaces. If 13 is left in place, can two cantilevers be side
>by side?? Will there possibly be extra stress on the anchor if #14
>cantalever is left in place? It doesnt seem to be soundly wired in to
>12 now cause I can manage to get the floss easily around it.

Even one cantilever is not good at best unless its a tiny, tiny space.
For example, a guy came to see me with a huge chicklet type tooth
covering his lower first molar. It had zero anatomy.

I popped it off and had the lab create a beautiful normal size,
beautifully detailed first molar (normal size) plus a very small extra
tooth CANTILEVERED onto the crown.

He was pleased.

Joel
Joel M. Eichen - 15 Mar 2005 12:50 GMT
> If 13 is left in place, can two cantilevers be side
>by side?? Will there possibly be extra stress on the anchor if #14
>cantalever is left in place?

Yes, this can be done. The two free end cantilevers will resist the
tipping force to some extent. They are butting up against EACH OTHER.
If I were doing this I would mill in (using a high speed turbine) a
channel so the second cantilever could be cast in, or fitted into the
first.

It will resist some force but AGAIN, this is not ideal.

It is stop-gap to delay dentures.

PS- I have DELAYED dentures for patients for 20-30 years. That's my
job, in general.

Joel
StovePipe - 19 Mar 2005 20:43 GMT
> Yes, this can be done. The two free end cantilevers will resist the
> tipping force to some extent. They are butting up against EACH OTHER.
> If I were doing this I would mill in (using a high speed turbine) a
> channel so the second cantilever could be cast in, or fitted into the
> f

What if one or both teeth walk and it opens up?
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

Joel M. Eichen - 19 Mar 2005 22:45 GMT
>> Yes, this can be done. The two free end cantilevers will resist the
>> tipping force to some extent. They are butting up against EACH OTHER.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>What if one or both teeth walk and it opens up?
>SP

You mean like an earthquake fissure and the teeth get swallowed up?
StovePipe - 20 Mar 2005 05:04 GMT
> >What if one or both teeth walk and it opens up?
> >SP
>
> You mean like an earthquake fissure and the teeth get swallowed up?

Non, No und Nein, silly JME: I mean that the attachment between the two
cantilevers is not a precision attachment, therefore, the parts could
come apart if one or the other tooth starts to walk. Then, there would
not be mutual support of the two cantilevers touching each other, as
they wouldn't be touching any more. Then, I would guesstimate that
lateral movement to one or the other tooth could cause more damage than
if the teeth had been joined in a fixed bridge.
Skoal
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

Joel M. Eichen - 20 Mar 2005 12:16 GMT
>> >What if one or both teeth walk and it opens up?
>> >SP
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>cantilevers is not a precision attachment, therefore, the parts could
>come apart if one or the other tooth starts to walk.

Yes, that's why its a stopgap measure, not as good as say several
implants.

Joel

> Then, there would
>not be mutual support of the two cantilevers touching each other, as
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Skoal
>SP
Joel M. Eichen - 15 Mar 2005 12:52 GMT
>>>If you have a friendly dentist who will do all of this at less than
>top-dollar fees, due to the fact that it will not last forever, then
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>possible.  Thanks for understanding. I will really followin messages
>now.

That's my thinking too. Often I see some bridge that looks a little
crappy, but it is not decaying or otherwise causing harm. I leave it!
I tell people to leave well enough alone!

Sometimes the gum shrinks leaving the bridge high and dry.

Do I replace it?

NO WAY.

Joel
Jonesy - 15 Mar 2005 05:34 GMT
Joel, I just removed a message I sent due to mistake so here it is
again.

<<<< I might recommend an endodontist and inquire if #12 can be treated

by
drilling through the top of the crown and not disturbing the
bridge.>>>>

I askied the periodontists and prosthodontist this same question and
they say no. But, I haven't been to an endodontist on my own to ask and
pershaps I should despite other's not recommending it. It would sure
solve the problem im a simple manner.

>>SECOND IDEA:

Extract #12 if necessary, and then create a cantilever for #11 and
attaching #12 to that.<<<<

There already is a cantilever on 14 extending over 13 that periodontist

recommends also come out due to stress on anchor in which case it will
leave two spaces. If 13 is left in place, can two cantilevers be side
by side?? Will there possibly be extra stress on the anchor if #14
cantalever is left in place? It doesnt seem to be soundly wired in to
12 now cause I can manage to get the floss easily around it.

THIRD IDEA.
Pull the entire bridge off, extract #12, and make a bridge for #11 to
#14.
Sound idea. I understand about it not lasting.

>>If you have a friendly dentist who will do all of this at less than
top-dollar fees, due to the fact that it will not last forever, then
you got something.<<<

There are plenty of DDS's with dental plans or
discounted plans - if that's what you mean. I'll see if I can get it
cheaper still.  It's not in the front so I won't be fussy.  My theory
is I
might die from a nasty fall from a horse or in another accident of some

time - any time.   So why not drag out having my own teeth as long as
possible.  Thanks for your valuable input. I will read following
messages
now.

Reply
Joel M. Eichen - 15 Mar 2005 12:53 GMT
>I askied the periodontists and prosthodontist this same question and
>they say no. But, I haven't been to an endodontist on my own to ask and
>pershaps I should despite other's not recommending it. It would sure
>solve the problem im a simple manner.

YUP, you may be asking the wrong people. I asked my stock broker what
he thinks about investing in real estate and frankly he does not like
the idea at all.

Joel
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 15 Mar 2005 00:23 GMT
> I have been to two periodontists and a prosthodondont who all agree to
> remove all the uppers - which to me seems hasty.   I don't know if one
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
>
> My head is just swimming with conflicting opinions about what to do.

    I'm missing what the conflicting opinions are, except that the dentists
agree you need to have all your upper teeth extracted, and you don't
want to do it.
    You have a sub-optimal situation, but not an uncommon one.  I've had
patients twist my arm to save teeth in a situation such as yours.  I
even sometimes will agree to it IF they fully understand that saving the
teeth is likely to be a stopgap measure, and it is very likely despite
any treatment the remaining upper teeth will be lost, probably in the
not-too distant future.
    Of course, you are extremely likely to find a dentist to do what you
wish, take your money, and you may luck out.  Greater chance though that
if you are not fully informed of the risk, that dentist will have your
money, and you will be unhappy.
    If you think the dentists are making a clinical decision on other than
clinical grounds, by all means get another opinion.  But I'd avoid a
dentist who tries to make you happy by telling you what you want to hear.

Steve

> I'm sure I can find a dentist to make me a four or five tooth bridge if
> I look hard enough - but I keep hearing those periodontists and that
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> denture about six months after the upper gum heals - using a regular
> bridge in the mean times.  UGH!  I don't want any of these things.

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Dr Steve - 15 Mar 2005 00:38 GMT
I would have no problem keeping the teeth and restoring them if the patient
signed a form saying there would be ZERO guarantee after walking out the
door and that the patient understood that the procedure was the patient's
preferred treatment not mine.  Fees would either be full fees or slightly
higher as it is harder to restore mobile teeth with poor periodontal health.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
>> I have been to two periodontists and a prosthodondont who all agree to
[quoted text clipped - 75 lines]
>> denture about six months after the upper gum heals - using a regular
>> bridge in the mean times.  UGH!  I don't want any of these things.
Jonesy - 15 Mar 2005 05:39 GMT
Yes, I understand about signing a form saying there would be ZERO
guarantee....another thought is to maybe skip pocelain for resin or
some other cheaper material.
Jonesy - 22 Mar 2005 05:02 GMT
I'm sorry - I gave you the wrong url it's    http://tinypic.com/29zgxj

The exrays were taken with the bridge 8 through 3 removed fora better
look (since it was loose and needed recementing) There are four
remaining teeth - 3,3,6 and 8.  It looks like it must be number 8 since
it's beside a crown that must be nine..  What do the dds's mean when
they say it (tooth with white arrow) is cause for the bridge to not
last long - that that tooth is not supportive?  Why is it unsupportive?
Joel M. Eichen - 22 Mar 2005 12:30 GMT
>I'm sorry - I gave you the wrong url it's    http://tinypic.com/29zgxj

I couldn't find the CANINES.

Joel

>The exrays were taken with the bridge 8 through 3 removed fora better
>look (since it was loose and needed recementing) There are four
>remaining teeth - 3,3,6 and 8.  It looks like it must be number 8 since
>it's beside a crown that must be nine..  What do the dds's mean when
>they say it (tooth with white arrow) is cause for the bridge to not
>last long - that that tooth is not supportive?  Why is it unsupportive?
W_B - 22 Mar 2005 17:59 GMT
>I'm sorry - I gave you the wrong url it's    http://tinypic.com/29zgxj
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>they say it (tooth with white arrow) is cause for the bridge to not
>last long - that that tooth is not supportive?  Why is it unsupportive?

#8 not much tooth left and not much bone support.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Jonesy - 24 Mar 2005 02:42 GMT
>>#8 not much tooth left and not much bone support. <<<<<

Thanks W_B - guess I needed to hear that reiterated (dern!)
W_B - 24 Mar 2005 16:41 GMT
>>>#8 not much tooth left and not much bone support. <<<<<
>
>Thanks W_B - guess I needed to hear that reiterated (dern!)

Welcomed.

I suppose you could extend the bridge (new construction)
to #9 with at least one maybe two stress breaker attatchments.

This would buy some time, yet is not cheap.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Jonesy - 26 Mar 2005 09:04 GMT
I had asked about 3 to 9 instead of 3 to 11 but was told  that with ten
gone it would need the others for strength....

What are stress breakers?
Joel M. Eichen - 15 Mar 2005 00:57 GMT
>I'm missing what the conflicting opinions are, except that the dentists
>agree you need to have all your upper teeth extracted, and you don't
>want to do it.

ummmm. YES!
Jonesy - 15 Mar 2005 06:20 GMT
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 23:23:17 GMT, Mark & Steven Bornfeld

<bornfeldm...@dentaltwins.com> wrote:
>I'm missing what the conflicting opinions are, except that the dentists
>agree you need to have all your upper teeth extracted, and you don't
>want to do it.

Joes M. Eichem reply: ummmm. YES!

My reply:
Yes, there's that, too.  It's a hard decision to make - one I can't
face.  It's a decision I will never be ready to make unless in great
pain or to avoid open spaces, or a fatal condition. By consulting an
endodontist and have him work through the tooth, or by extracting #12
and having a four tooth bridge made (signing contract about no
guarantees) I am avoiding the peroidontist warnings here that I'm just
postponing the inevidable. So talking about it here is helpful.

Here my pet peeves or fears about having my upper teeth extracted:
#1 - I don't want my palate covered.
#2 Transplants can be annoying and painful.
#3 my gums are not straight from bridges being removed and remade over
the years...one side of my gums is much higher than the other. Will
dentures be adjusted in the fake gum area or the crown length (I don't
care which one) so that I wind up with a straight level line on the
bottom edge of my teeth when I oven my mouth?  So often I see dentures
that are slanty and I hate their look. I always wonder why the patient
didn't complain?

The periodontists, along with a consulting prosthodontist want to pull
out all the teeth at once and perform bone augmentation and have me get
a regular bridge while it's healing and see how it feels.  If I can't
live with it, then I would go for a palatless denture which I
understand can only be make if attached to transplants - 6 or 8,
depending ( there are only 12 teeth).

I do however have a neighbor who is a singer and who had a palatless
denture made up about 20 years ago. (no transplants) She swears by it
and speaks normally, but I don't know where I could find a dentist who
would make up that kind of denture today.  I would need bone
augmentation for implants and/or to help keep shrinkage down for
regular denture.  You said many bone augmentations are unnecessary..
I seem to have some bone loss that the DDS feels might not support a
transplant and that augmentation in necessary areas should solve the
problem.  If it works it is also helpful for regular dentures.

But here's another fact:  I have an over bite in my front 6 teeth.  If
that part of the gum shrinks toward the rear, wouldn't that help lose
the over bite? But, would I be trading and over bite for those awful
wrinkles in the upper lip that some people get?  Are those wrinkles
from shrinking gums? I don't know why else they would appear since they
don't seem to be in my family genes.  My parents used to say I
inherited my mother's "soft" teeth - whatever that means.  I was in a
series of sporting accidents when younger that caused me to lose teeth
or develop loose teeth. I am over 60 and still do risky sports.

Do you know of any famous attractive people with dentures?  It might
help me if I knew about them..  Thanks.  
Jonesy
Joel M. Eichen - 15 Mar 2005 13:03 GMT
>My reply:
>Yes, there's that, too.  It's a hard decision to make - one I can't
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>guarantees) I am avoiding the peroidontist warnings here that I'm just
>postponing the inevidable. So talking about it here is helpful.

Exactly. There is a difference between accepting an inevitable
conclusion where you have explored every alternative, and accepting a
CHOICE position.

The CHOOSERS become disgruntled denture patients. I hear about it all
the time, but fortunately, not from my patients!

>Here my pet peeves or fears about having my upper teeth extracted:
>#1 - I don't want my palate covered.

This part is not as annoying as one might think. The alternative
requires implants. I have made thousands of upper dentures and there
would be fewer than one percent who have this problem.

>#2 Transplants can be annoying and painful.
>#3 my gums are not straight from bridges being removed and remade over
>the years...one side of my gums is much higher than the other. Will
>dentures be adjusted in the fake gum area or the crown length (I don't
>care which one) so that I wind up with a straight level line on the
>bottom edge of my teeth when I oven my mouth?  

YUP, the occlusal plane (plane of the teeth) will be level.

>So often I see dentures
>that are slanty and I hate their look. I always wonder why the patient
>didn't complain?

Inebriated dentists ....... ??? No, kidding.

>The periodontists, along with a consulting prosthodontist want to pull
>out all the teeth at once and perform bone augmentation and have me get
>a regular bridge while it's healing and see how it feels.

Surprisingly an immediate denture is better accepted than the denture
made after the gums heal.

This is surprising but true.

> If I can't
>live with it, then I would go for a palatless denture which I
>understand can only be make if attached to transplants - 6 or 8,
>depending ( there are only 12 teeth).

$$$ Quanto Costa ?????

>I do however have a neighbor who is a singer and who had a palatless
>denture made up about 20 years ago. (no transplants) She swears by it
>and speaks normally, but I don't know where I could find a dentist who
>would make up that kind of denture today.

Every mouth is different so do not count on this at all.

> I would need bone
>augmentation for implants and/or to help keep shrinkage down for
>regular denture.

Bah humbug.

> You said many bone augmentations are unnecessary..
>I seem to have some bone loss that the DDS feels might not support a
>transplant and that augmentation in necessary areas should solve the
>problem.  If it works it is also helpful for regular dentures.

OKAY wait a minute, if we are talking implants some sites require bone
augmentation or sinus lift if the implant is to be be placed too close
to a low-hanging sinus area.

>But here's another fact:  I have an over bite in my front 6 teeth.  If
>that part of the gum shrinks toward the rear, wouldn't that help lose
>the over bite? But, would I be trading and over bite for those awful
>wrinkles in the upper lip that some people get?  Are those wrinkles
>from shrinking gums?

YES, and the fact that without teeth, the support for the face
changes. I can spot dentures from 20-30 feet away, generally, by
looking at the canine region or corners of the mouth.

>I don't know why else they would appear since they
>don't seem to be in my family genes.  My parents used to say I
>inherited my mother's "soft" teeth - whatever that means.

It was before fluoride and the sugar got inside the teeth. Other
people may have more "sealed-up" teeth or more resistant teeth. If you
come from Texas and your teeth are slightly brown, then natural
fluoridation, fluoride from the mountains seeping into the drinking
water may put the local dentists out of business.

This is how the effect of fluoride was discovered.

>  I was in a
>series of sporting accidents when younger that caused me to lose teeth
>or develop loose teeth. I am over 60 and still do risky sports.

Good for you. I do Extreme Channel Surfing ....... that's risky with
what's on TV today!

>Do you know of any famous attractive people with dentures?  It might
>help me if I knew about them..  Thanks.  

Yes, many many.

Joel

>Jonesy
W_B - 15 Mar 2005 16:51 GMT
>>Do you know of any famous attractive people with dentures?  It might
>>help me if I knew about them..  Thanks.  
>
>Yes, many many.
>
>Joel

Clark Gable comes to mind.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Joel M. Eichen - 15 Mar 2005 18:03 GMT
>>>Do you know of any famous attractive people with dentures?  It might
>>>help me if I knew about them..  Thanks.  
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Clark Gable comes to mind.

REALLY?
W_B - 15 Mar 2005 22:12 GMT
>>>>Do you know of any famous attractive people with dentures?  It might
>>>>help me if I knew about them..  Thanks.  
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>REALLY?

It's what I've heard.

The odor is supposedly legendary.
Actresses didn't want to kiss him.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Jonesy - 16 Mar 2005 23:24 GMT
I could tell he was wearing dentures.
Jonesy - 16 Mar 2005 23:23 GMT
>Do you know of any famous attractive people with dentures?  It might
>help me if I knew about them..  Thanks.

>Yes, many many.
>Joel

Really, Joel?  Who are they?  It would help to have "role models" -----
Jonesy
Joel M. Eichen - 16 Mar 2005 23:41 GMT
>>Do you know of any famous attractive people with dentures?  It might
>>help me if I knew about them..  Thanks.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Really, Joel?  Who are they?  It would help to have "role models" -----
> Jonesy

Merlina Mercury

The Italian Actress ......
Jonesy - 17 Mar 2005 22:18 GMT
Funny you should say that,  she was my Mom's favorite actress.
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 17 Mar 2005 22:31 GMT
>>>Do you know of any famous attractive people with dentures?  It might
>>>help me if I knew about them..  Thanks.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> The Italian Actress ......

    Well, I believe her son, Freddy Mercury, was actually of Turkish
background.  Melina Mercouri however, was Greek.

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Jonesy - 17 Mar 2005 22:49 GMT
Oh, I was thinking of Melina Mercouri - the Greek actress.
Joel M. Eichen - 17 Mar 2005 23:05 GMT
>Oh, I was thinking of Melina Mercouri - the Greek actress.

YUP that's who I was trying to say .......... Mercury in
sci.med.dentistry parlance.
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 17 Mar 2005 23:35 GMT
> Oh, I was thinking of Melina Mercouri - the Greek actress.

So was I. ;-)

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Joel M. Eichen - 17 Mar 2005 23:50 GMT
>> Oh, I was thinking of Melina Mercouri - the Greek actress.
>
>So was I. ;-)

We spell it Mercury here though.

>Steve
Joel M. Eichen - 17 Mar 2005 23:51 GMT
Speaking of Mercury, they just announced on the news ........ 48
million pounds of mercury from coal burning power generation plants!

48 million ......... that's bigger than 17 micrograms right?

Joel

>> Oh, I was thinking of Melina Mercouri - the Greek actress.
>
>So was I. ;-)
>
>Steve
StovePipe - 19 Mar 2005 20:43 GMT
>       Well, I believe her son, Freddy Mercury, was actually of Turkish
> background.  Melina Mercouri however, was Greek.
>
> Steve

D'you remember those GLASSES??????

Not even I, who looks like Frankenstein's Monster on a bad hair day,
would dream of wearin' those in public places without a bullet proof
vest...

If YOU have unexplained eye problems and the organized opthalmologists
are giviny you the snow jop....

.  .  ..   .  ..  .. .. .  .  .   .     .        ...      .      .

OK, I'll not drag you through that again...
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

Steven Bornfeld - 19 Mar 2005 21:46 GMT
>>      Well, I believe her son, Freddy Mercury, was actually of Turkish
>>background.  Melina Mercouri however, was Greek.
>>
>>Steve
>
> D'you remember those GLASSES??????

    Melina Mercouri's?  No.  I remember her walk in the opening scene of
"Never On Sunday" though.

Steve

> Not even I, who looks like Frankenstein's Monster on a bad hair day,
> would dream of wearin' those in public places without a bullet proof
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> OK, I'll not drag you through that again...
> SP

Signature

Cut the nonsense to reply

Joel M. Eichen - 19 Mar 2005 22:46 GMT
>    Melina Mercouri's?  No.  I remember her walk in the opening scene of
>"Never On Sunday" though.
>
>Steve

I am humming a few bars as we speak!
StovePipe - 19 Mar 2005 20:43 GMT
> Merlina Mercury
>
> The Italian Actress ......à

<clown>

.... If you have unexplained teeth problems,,,, and your acting career
is not going places....

CHECK THE LAST NAME!!!!

Don't go to a regular, organized movie producer, go to an alt. movie
producer,,, one that knows how to fix your LAST NAME in a real shyster
environment with lots of smoke and magic, while removing copious amounts
of greenbacks from your back pocket....

Here, only SWNMNBM is a gentleman... all the others are organized LAST
NAME changers...

I went to an alt movie producer: one who knew how to treat me and sweet
talk me into things with cloudy science behind them...

IT CHANGED MY LAST NAME!!!!!

Beware the lying movie producers on this NG; they'd just as soon change
your fillings as look at ya...

</clown>

Note to Jonsey: this is a bit of an inside joke, albeit a lousy one...
guess I'm gonna catch hell for it...

Re: dentures or keeping your teeth: If you're near a University with a
Dental Program, especially a graduate progream, you might get some good
alternatives w/o paying top dollar for them. This is one reason that
those programs exist: to push back the envelope of the accepted by
trying treatments that are not yet mainstream.

If/when you do decide to get dentures: DON'T get a piano key board
installed, or a set of perfectly straight teeth. IIRC, you're in your
sixties, and if you look around you, you'll probably see (as I do) that
most of those in your generation have teeth that are imperfect (read:
natural). Those who have teeth that are perfectly aligned are quite
often denture wearers. I can bet dollars to LAST NAMES that the denture
wearing actors (both male and female) have had those front teeth moved
around and characterized so that they are imperfect (read: natural
looking). Re: covering the palate: you can get a palate made of metal,
which is a lot thinner that full plastic, and so is kinder to the
tissues and the tongue.
HTH
Cheers!
SP
Signature

Finally: take out the TRASHH

Joel M. Eichen - 19 Mar 2005 22:47 GMT
>> Merlina Mercury
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>CHECK THE LAST NAME!!!!

Changed to       M E R C U R Y       in honor of Jan Drew .......

>Don't go to a regular, organized movie producer, go to an alt. movie
>producer,,, one that knows how to fix your LAST NAME in a real shyster
>environment with lots of smoke and magic, while removing copious amounts
>of greenbacks from your back pocket....

Good one!

>Here, only SWNMNBM is a gentleman... all the others are organized LAST
>NAME changers...
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>Cheers!
>SP
Jonesy - 20 Mar 2005 02:12 GMT
Yes, I know whatca mean.  I will want as natural looking as possible -
Jonesy - 17 Mar 2005 22:37 GMT
>>>>>Exactly. There is a difference between accepting an inevitable
conclusion where you have explored every alternative, and accepting a
CHOICE position.

The CHOOSERS become disgruntled denture patients. I hear about it all
the time, but fortunately, not from my patients! <<<<<<<<<<<,

Well, I certainly don't wnat to be a disgruntled anything! --  but I
don't understand.  By CHOICE position do you mean patients who elect to
have their teeth removed rather than spend time researching ways to
keep them, whether or not they were given a poor prognosis?
Joel M. Eichen - 17 Mar 2005 22:52 GMT
>>>>>>Exactly. There is a difference between accepting an inevitable
>conclusion where you have explored every alternative, and accepting a
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>have their teeth removed rather than spend time researching ways to
>keep them, whether or not they were given a poor prognosis?

I believe the main reason is cost. Then again, removing teeth is quick
and painless compared to preparing teeth for crowns etc.

I made some dentures that were fairly decent and one patient told his
buddies to stop fixing their teeth as the dentures are better than the
reaol teeth.

After I heard that through the grapevine, I called the guy and set him
straight. He was unfortunately or fortunately ..... lucky!

Joel
W_B - 15 Mar 2005 16:38 GMT
>Do you know of any famous attractive people with dentures?  It might
>help me if I knew about them..  Thanks.  
>Jonesy

Florence Henderson does denture commercials but I don't
know if she wears one. If so it looks pretty good, if not
that leads to many questions about why she does these
commercial$.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Jonesy - 16 Mar 2005 23:28 GMT
I recall there being some truth in advertising law passed a while back
where actors advertising denture adhesives had to be actural wearers of
dentures -- I think it was Betty White who more recently advertised
"Depends" and that really made me wonder...why advertise such a thing?
Jonesy - 16 Mar 2005 23:59 GMT
I removed a message I left earlier since learning Flo Henderson does
not wear dentures - according to these reports.

http://www.flohome.com/floanswers01.html   flo henderson denies she
wears dentures...  a few questions down on page.

http://www.ftppro.com/librarycgi/library_cf.php?sName=Florence_Henderson
Joel M. Eichen - 17 Mar 2005 00:14 GMT
>I removed a message I left earlier since learning Flo Henderson does
>not wear dentures - according to these reports.

Some actresses and actors do not wear Fixodent but use it in their
slippers to prevent slippage.

>http://www.flohome.com/floanswers01.html   flo henderson denies she
>wears dentures...  a few questions down on page.
>
>http://www.ftppro.com/librarycgi/library_cf.php?sName=Florence_Henderson
Dr Steve - 17 Mar 2005 12:57 GMT
Sit down and watch TV with a dentist one day.  We can point to the screen
and tell you which ones (in most cases) are real or not.  The mould 22E gets
used too much in Hollywood.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>I removed a message I left earlier since learning Flo Henderson does
> not wear dentures - according to these reports.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> http://www.ftppro.com/librarycgi/library_cf.php?sName=Florence_Henderson
W_B - 17 Mar 2005 17:59 GMT
>Sit down and watch TV with a dentist one day.  We can point to the screen
>and tell you which ones (in most cases) are real or not.  The mould 22E gets
>used too much in Hollywood.

I really prefer 32 E
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Joel M. Eichen - 17 Mar 2005 18:16 GMT
>>Sit down and watch TV with a dentist one day.  We can point to the screen
>>and tell you which ones (in most cases) are real or not.  The mould 22E gets
>>used too much in Hollywood.
>
>I really prefer 32 E

350 mV?
W_B - 17 Mar 2005 18:24 GMT
>>>Sit down and watch TV with a dentist one day.  We can point to the screen
>>>and tell you which ones (in most cases) are real or not.  The mould 22E gets
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>350 mV?

342.82 mV
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Jonesy - 17 Mar 2005 22:55 GMT
Have you an examples of 32E or  350V?  Can one choose the shape of
their teeth the way one chooses a hair style from a photo?
Joel M. Eichen - 17 Mar 2005 23:05 GMT
>Have you an examples of 32E or  350V?  Can one choose the shape of
>their teeth the way one chooses a hair style from a photo?

the 350 is 350 mV and its the one Keith loves .......
W_B - 18 Mar 2005 00:17 GMT
>Have you an examples of 32E or  350V?  Can one choose the shape of
>their teeth the way one chooses a hair style from a photo?

Yes but tooth shape generally follows the inverse of facial shape.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Joel M. Eichen - 18 Mar 2005 13:38 GMT
>>Have you an examples of 32E or  350V?  Can one choose the shape of
>>their teeth the way one chooses a hair style from a photo?
>
>Yes but tooth shape generally follows the inverse of facial shape.

True, many patients get the thin teeth ........
Jonesy - 20 Mar 2005 23:39 GMT
Can you please tell me the number of the tooth (from the exray) which
is also said to be in trouble...I can not tell which one it is.  Thanks

http://tinypic.com/view.html?p­ic=29zgxj
Joel M. Eichen - 21 Mar 2005 01:23 GMT
>Can you please tell me the number of the tooth (from the exray) which
>is also said to be in trouble...I can not tell which one it is.  Thanks
>
>http://tinypic.com/view.html?p­ic=29zgxj

It is definitely not the CANINE tooth!
Jonesy - 22 Mar 2005 04:57 GMT
OH, I'm sorry - I gave you the wrong url it's
http://tinypic.com/29zgxj

The one in question with the "trouble" is from bridge 3 through 8 - the
bridge came loose and the exrays were taken with the bridge removed to
get a better look.  There are four posts...   3,4,6(canine) and 8.  It
looks like it could be 8.. since next to an actual crown which I assume
to be 9.  What kind of  "trouble" can I suppose the dentist meant? That
was never made clear to me except that it was irreversible....
Jonesy - 24 Mar 2005 03:14 GMT
No, I am aftraid it must be  number 8 - from bridge 3 - 8 ....so say
W_B, and at least two other DDS's.
:(

The bridge is off for the full mouth exrays on top of the page >
http://tinypic.com/29zgxj   which explains why you see just the four
posts... 3,4,6 and 8 -  6 would be the bicuspard...
:(
Someone actually proposed removing 8 and making a NINE-TOOTH-BRIDGE
from 3 - 9 (Doesn't seem like a wise idea to me regarding longevity and
a some what extravagant, time consuming, painful way to hold off
dentures a little while longer - Other than that, the alternative is to
to the dentures, impanted or otherwise - but at least do bone
augmentation at time of tooth removal where implants would be needed,
if I decide to go that way which I probably will.   I can get a temp
bridge while gums heal the six months or so that the bone augmentation
healing requires.  Does this sound about right to you?.

Long story, but the first set of dentures for temp or otherwise would
be free!

I am really miserable about the prospect of having a plastic plate on
my upper patate since it causes bad breath, feels awful and interfers
with taste buds.  Not that I'm a wine taster by profession, but still.
Woe is me.....

My teeth are like my children to me and I'm already mourning their loss
to be.  I wonder is there Is there a self-help book for people who
dread dentures?

I would buy it.  (good idea for a dentist-writer)
W_B - 24 Mar 2005 16:54 GMT
>Someone actually proposed removing 8 and making a NINE-TOOTH-BRIDGE
>from 3 - 9 (Doesn't seem like a wise idea to me regarding longevity and
>a some what extravagant, time consuming, painful way to hold off
>dentures a little while longer - Other than that, the alternative is to
>to the dentures, impanted or otherwise

Thought about that too.

You may consider an over-denture rather than an implant
supported FPD.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Jonesy - 26 Mar 2005 09:11 GMT
I meant to say they proposed a nine tooth bridge from 3 to 11  (not 3
through 9)
Jonesy - 26 Mar 2005 09:07 GMT
I meant to say they proposed a nine tooth bridge from 3 to 11  (not 3
through 9)
W_B - 21 Mar 2005 22:26 GMT
>Can you please tell me the number of the tooth (from the exray) which
>is also said to be in trouble...I can not tell which one it is.  Thanks
>
>http://tinypic.com/view.html?p­ic=29zgxj

Looks like # 8 to me.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 15 Mar 2005 18:26 GMT
    Now we're getting somewhere.

(snip)

> Here my pet peeves or fears about having my upper teeth extracted:
> #1 - I don't want my palate covered.

    This is a reasonable fear.  Some people cannot tolerate a full palate.
 However, many folks who fear they won't tolerate a full palate in fact
do; others have trouble at first, but actually wind up doing well in time.

> #2 Transplants can be annoying and painful.

    Implants involve surgery, and there is pain involved in surgery.  But
the pain is short-lived, and generally the potential for annoyance in
the implants long term is no more (and frequently less) than for natural
teeth.

> #3 my gums are not straight from bridges being removed and remade over
> the years...one side of my gums is much higher than the other. Will
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> that are slanty and I hate their look. I always wonder why the patient
> didn't complain?

    Good question.  My guess is that these may well have been immediate
dentures.  When immediate dentures are made, the impressions of the jaws
are made before all the teeth are extracted.  The teeth are broken off
the model and the denture fabricated on the altered model.  There is no
way to try in the denture before processing (because the natural teeth
are in the way) so sometimes the tooth arrangement is off.  The other
possibility of course is that the dentures were just poorly made.  I
would say though that usually even if several teeth are still present
before the denture is made, this is USUALLY not a major problem.
    As far as your gum is concerned, the denture is fabricated to basically
replace bone, gum and dental tissues in general shape, so the lips and
cheeks are properly supported.  The tissues under the denture should be
firm and not flabby.  If they are flabby sometimes it is necessary to
re-shape the tissue surgically.

> The periodontists, along with a consulting prosthodontist want to pull
> out all the teeth at once and perform bone augmentation and have me get
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> transplant and that augmentation in necessary areas should solve the
> problem.  If it works it is also helpful for regular dentures.

    The reason for the full palate is for stability and retention (suction)
of the denture.  If the palate is removed, you will generally have to
augment the suction some other way--adhesives or implants.  Having said
that there is a wide range of adaptabilities in patients to dentures,
and what may work well in one patient may be a disaster in another.  The
rub is that you can't try the denture and then go back to teeth.  You
can of course go to implants, if ya got the bling bling.

> But here's another fact:  I have an over bite in my front 6 teeth.  If
> that part of the gum shrinks toward the rear, wouldn't that help lose
> the over bite? But, would I be trading and over bite for those awful
> wrinkles in the upper lip that some people get?

    As I said, the plastic of the denture flanges should be made to give
adequate support of the lips and cheeks.  In fact the bone of the jaws
does resorb more or less quickly, and in fact it does in the manner you
imply: the outside of the upper ridge tends to resorb more, and the
INSIDE of the lower jaw tends to resorb more.  Over time, this means
that the lower jaw winds up being wider than the upper jaw--exactly the
opposite of what is normally seen in a mouth with a full set of teeth.
This presents problems for tooth placement, but there is no reason to
get into that at this point.

  Are those wrinkles
> from shrinking gums? I don't know why else they would appear since they
> don't seem to be in my family genes.  My parents used to say I
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Do you know of any famous attractive people with dentures?  It might
> help me if I knew about them..  Thanks.

    I agree.  It would be a public service--but most denture wearers
generally don't like to publicise it.  I'm sure there are some.
    I did once see Zero Mostel do something very gross with his upper
denture on TV, but he was hardly a beauty. ;-)

Steve

> Jonesy

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Jonesy - 17 Mar 2005 23:16 GMT
>>>>>Good question.  My guess is that these may well have been
immediate
dentures.  When immediate dentures are made, the impressions of the
jaws
are made before all the teeth are extracted.  The teeth are broken off
the model and the denture fabricated on the altered model.  There is no

way to try in the denture before processing (because the natural teeth
are in the way) so sometimes the tooth arrangement is off. <<<

Can it be adjusted back at the lab?  Either by lengthing the teeth
quite a bit on one side or by remolding the plastic?
I am pretty certain the dentist will make immediate dentures --- and I
will get a bridge back that is not level... and I will wind up
(disgruntled?) -- unless something is done first to perhaps level the
gums -- or after the gums have healed and -I might consider having
another made by a cosmetic dentist as the only alternative to having a
slanty smile where one side in a half inch (not kidding) higher than
the other.  Woe is me..........................................

>>>> As far as your gum is concerned, the denture is fabricated to
basically
replace bone, gum and dental tissues in general shape, so the lips and
cheeks are properly supported.  The tissues under the denture should be

firm and not flabby.  If they are flabby sometimes it is necessary to
re-shape the tissue surgically.<<<<<

So Tell me: How soon after having teeth removed can a patient have a
mold made of the gums????  Right after or a month later or what??  I
could walk around with an allergy mask (I would, too) for a few weeks
if it would do anything toward assuring me against slanty smile
syndrome in the future.
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 17 Mar 2005 23:42 GMT
>