Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Interesting story about lawsuit and amalgam

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Joel M. Eichen - 10 Mar 2005 14:01 GMT
Well two lawsuits. Two stories.

First Jan should realize that courts are not set up to adjudicate
amalgam issues just as courts are not set up to adjudicate how many
pounds of mercury can be put inside one single mercury filling.

Jan and the other dude just do not know that courts and judges are
concluders of law, and are not King-Solomon-type guys sitting up there
deciding what is "RIGHT" and what is "JUST."

Because if they did, the judges would rule that Jan Drew is JUST full
of NOT-RIGHT nonsense!

Joel

**

Judge gives homework lawsuit a big fat 'F'

How much, when work is due left up to school boardUpdated: 4:38 p.m.

ET March 9, 2005MILWAUKEE - A judge threw out a high school student’s
lawsuit against mandatory summer homework, saying he and his father
should have done a little more studying themselves before bringing the
case.

Students in the Whitnall High School math course — honors pre-calculus
— were supposed to do three assignments by certain dates over the
summer. Peer Larson, 17, and his father, Bruce, had filed suit in
Circuit Court, arguing that homework should not be required after the
180-day academic year is over.

The Larsons argued it was difficult for the boy to do the assignments
because he had a summer job as a camp counselor. They also said
students should be able to enjoy their summers free of homework.

But it’s up to school boards to decide such things, Judge Richard J.
Sankovitz ruled Tuesday.

“Had the Larsons done a bit more homework,” he wrote, they would had
learned that “the people of our state granted to the Legislature ...
the power to establish school boards.”

Bruce Larson said he had not immediately decided whether to appeal. He
said the judge ignored a key issue — whether it was reasonable for a
school to spring “three lengthy assignments” on students just before
summer vacation began.
carabelli - 10 Mar 2005 14:21 GMT
"Joel M. Eichen" <joeleichen@yahoo.com> ............

> Because if they did, the judges would rule that Jan Drew is JUST full
> of NOT-RIGHT nonsense!
>
> Joel

or possibly, non compos mentis

carabelli
Dr Steve - 10 Mar 2005 14:23 GMT
> or possibly, non compos mentis

The temptation would be to say something about compost mental, but I am
afraid that might sound insulting.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.