Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Are Implants my only Option?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Toothless - 03 Mar 2005 03:29 GMT
I am in my thirties and missing my 9 and 10 teeth from an accident 25 years
ago.  My second Maryland bridge gave way last spring and I have been wearing
a flipper since. My dentist, who I trust and am very happy with, sees
implants as my best option.  A visit to the Periodontiste assured me that I
am a candidate(healthy, non smoker...) but due to significant loss of bone
in the area I do need a fair amount of ridge augmentation.  I realize
implants are the way to go long term but being nervous about the
augmentation and total cost($11,000 or $9500 after insurance), I just want
to make sure I am making the right choice. This implant cost also includes
crowns to 8 and 11 teeth. I understand that the failure rate for implants is
very low but is one at increased risk if the location is in the upper front
and if augmentation is needed?

Since my 8 and 11 teeth need to be crowned anyway why not a fixed bridge?  A
second opinion gave me an estimate of $8200 or $5800 after insurance for a 4
unit bridge. This also included bone grafting and something called Tissue
Guided Regeneration. Can a 4 unit bridge in the front last for any length of
time?  The dentist would not give me a direct answer.

I would rather pay $400 after insurance every 6 or so years for a Maryland
Bridge and avoid all the hassle but my dentist will not do another.  Why are
Maryland Bridges no longer recommended?

I have been managing ok with my flipper for almost a year(except having to
remove it to eat) so are dentures worth considering?

Thanks for any suggestions and comments.

Toothless in NY

Remove NOSPAM to reply directly
Steven Bornfeld - 03 Mar 2005 03:43 GMT
> I am in my thirties and missing my 9 and 10 teeth from an accident 25 years
> ago.  My second Maryland bridge gave way last spring and I have been wearing
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Remove NOSPAM to reply directly

    Those are some hefty fees.  Is this some well-known Manhattan dentist
to the starzzz?
    Fixed bridge may be an option, but depending on only #8 and 11 is a bit
of a risk.  The periodontal risk may be acceptable, but a bridge like
this has a significant risk of falling off.  If #6 and 7 are beaten up
and you can rationalize crowns on these teeth, I would have fewer
reservations.
    The implant-supported prostheses will be easier to clean.  Also, in the
long run the periodontal risk is less with implants, and because the
crowns #9 and 10 will be self-supporting, damage to one tooth will not
doom the whole restoration.  OTOH, surgery is surgery, and $11K is lotsa
bling bling.

Steve

Signature

Cut the nonsense to reply

Joel M. Eichen - 03 Mar 2005 12:04 GMT
>I am in my thirties and missing my 9 and 10 teeth from an accident 25 years
>ago.  My second Maryland bridge gave way last spring and I have been wearing
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Since my 8 and 11 teeth need to be crowned anyway why not a fixed bridge?

YUP we agree. Why not?

Joel

>  A
>second opinion gave me an estimate of $8200 or $5800 after insurance for a 4
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>Remove NOSPAM to reply directly
Toothless - 03 Mar 2005 23:22 GMT
In response to the question "Why not" to the fixed bridge--I am concerned
about shelling out 6k every 8 years or
less for  new bridge. Who knows the bridge might not even last that long,
right?

> >I am in my thirties and missing my 9 and 10 teeth from an accident 25 years
> >ago.  My second Maryland bridge gave way last spring and I have been wearing
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> >
> >Remove NOSPAM to reply directly
Steven Bornfeld - 04 Mar 2005 03:16 GMT
> In response to the question "Why not" to the fixed bridge--I am concerned
> about shelling out 6k every 8 years or
> less for  new bridge. Who knows the bridge might not even last that long,
> right?

    Are surgeons now telling patients that bridges are temporary and
implants are forever?
    I think that given good oral hygiene and a well-designed bridge, it
should last far longer than that.  Given bad hygiene and poor design,
neither will last.

Steve

>>>I am in my thirties and missing my 9 and 10 teeth from an accident 25
>>
[quoted text clipped - 72 lines]
>>>
>>>Remove NOSPAM to reply directly

Signature

Cut the nonsense to reply

Joel M. Eichen - 04 Mar 2005 10:56 GMT
>> In response to the question "Why not" to the fixed bridge--I am concerned
>> about shelling out 6k every 8 years or
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Steve

Wait a minute ........ there a number of implant cases that FAIL due
to osseointegration and there are instances of implant breakage, just
as bridges occasionally fail as well.

Joel

>>>>I am in my thirties and missing my 9 and 10 teeth from an accident 25
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 72 lines]
>>>>
>>>>Remove NOSPAM to reply directly
Steven Bornfeld - 04 Mar 2005 13:51 GMT
> Wait a minute ........ there a number of implant cases that FAIL due
> to osseointegration and there are instances of implant breakage, just
> as bridges occasionally fail as well.
>
> Joel

    Saw a patient yesterday morning.  She had lost her upper left central
incisor.  A periodontist had placed an implant 3 times in the site, and
the fixture failed to integrate 3 times.  He was trying to convince her
to try again.

Steve
Joel M. Eichen - 04 Mar 2005 14:16 GMT
>> Wait a minute ........ there a number of implant cases that FAIL due
>> to osseointegration and there are instances of implant breakage, just
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Steve

It is an increasing problem ... the periodontists say one thing but I
am not so sure ... I intend on looking into PubMed or something about
it.

OSSEOINTEGRATION or failure to achieve same.

Joel
W_B - 05 Mar 2005 19:28 GMT
>>> Wait a minute ........ there a number of implant cases that FAIL due
>>> to osseointegration and there are instances of implant breakage, just
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>Joel

It has to do with epithelial migration into the boney surgical site
before OI can take place. Gore-Tex used to be the
barrier of choice.

Mine got infected and had to be removed
after one month, however the implant correctly integrated.
Had osseous graft at implant placement surgery.

The actual margin of the gingiva suffered a few mm in height
compared to the ideal, however the implant is rock solid and
my lip doesn't elevate that high when I sneer.

#8

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
Joel M. Eichen - 05 Mar 2005 19:59 GMT
>It has to do with epithelial migration into the boney surgical site
>before OI can take place. Gore-Tex used to be the
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>#8

That describes it, but what factors cause it to happen or prevent it
from happening?

In other words, proposals for increased success.

Joel
W_B - 07 Mar 2005 15:50 GMT
>>It has to do with epithelial migration into the boney surgical site
>>before OI can take place. Gore-Tex used to be the
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>Joel

You would have to ask someone who regularly places implants.
On this subject I am just the patient, ok, a well informed patient.
--

W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
NOYB - 07 Mar 2005 18:02 GMT
>>>It has to do with epithelial migration into the boney surgical site
>>>before OI can take place. Gore-Tex used to be the
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> You would have to ask someone who regularly places implants.
> On this subject I am just the patient, ok, a well informed patient.

The gum follows the bone.

Here's what I know about papilla:
The papilla will fill the embrasure space as long as the height from the
crest of the bone to the most apical contact point of the crown and adjacent
tooth is between 2 and 5mm.  If the distance is 6mm, you only have a 60%
chance of the papilla filling the space.  If the distance is 7mm, then count
on not having a papilla.

One way to keep the gingiva from migrating apically on the straight facial
is to undercountour the facial margin of the temporary crown (make it
slightly concave).  On anterior teeth, I  place a temp crown for 2-3 months
to sculpt the tissue prior to final impressions for the porcelain implant
crown. Make sure that the temp crown puts slight pressure on the tissue
mesial and distal (the tissue should blanche slightly) in order to form the
papilla.  Make sure to make the straight facial slightly concave.  If the
gingiva migrates too far coronolly while the patient is in the temp, then
bulk out the facial margin a little.
Joel M. Eichen - 07 Mar 2005 18:38 GMT
>>In other words, proposals for increased success.
>>
>>Joel
>>
>You would have to ask someone who regularly places implants.
>On this subject I am just the patient, ok, a well informed patient.

Well, its becoming an increasing problem around here anyway. Some say
its due to the implant knock-offs that many are using but I am trying
to dope it out ......

Joel

>--
Steven Fawks - 04 Mar 2005 20:40 GMT
New patient exam 15 years ago where a guy had a mesio-lingual bony
defect on his upper right central.  He had been treated surgically by a
periodontist 3 times without improvement (deep class II bite and
clenching might have been a factor <G>).

One extraction and a bridge between the lateral and the other central,
and all is well to this day.

Fawks

>     Saw a patient yesterday morning.  She had lost her upper left
> central incisor.  A periodontist had placed an implant 3 times in the
> site, and the fixture failed to integrate 3 times.  He was trying to
> convince her to try again.
>
> Steve
Steven Bornfeld - 04 Mar 2005 20:47 GMT
> New patient exam 15 years ago where a guy had a mesio-lingual bony
> defect on his upper right central.  He had been treated surgically by a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Fawks

    See--and the textbooks don't like using laterals as terminal abutments.
    Good to know not all laterals read the textbooks!

Steve

>>     Saw a patient yesterday morning.  She had lost her upper left
>> central incisor.  A periodontist had placed an implant 3 times in the
>> site, and the fixture failed to integrate 3 times.  He was trying to
>> convince her to try again.
>>
>> Steve

Signature

Cut the nonsense to reply

Steven Fawks - 04 Mar 2005 22:42 GMT
Indeed!  However, this lateral was larger than most.

I didn't like the idea of also prepping the cuspid.  I didn't like the
idea of extracting the lateral and making a four unit bridge.
The patient wasn't too wild about having a bone graft before an
implant.

If it looks this good after 15 years, I think it's likely to
go another 10 or so.

<G>
Fawks

>> New patient exam 15 years ago where a guy had a mesio-lingual bony
>> defect on his upper right central.  He had been treated surgically by
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>>>
>>> Steve
W_B - 05 Mar 2005 19:19 GMT
>> Wait a minute ........ there a number of implant cases that FAIL due
>> to osseointegration and there are instances of implant breakage, just
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Steve

Had a similar case but it was 9 and 10
significant bony defect (6-8+mm)
hepC pt. Three grafts failed.
Implants not an option.

Solution:

8 X X 11,12 FPD with 'pink' porcelain to fill defect.
Good esthetics. Has been in service over 10 yrs now.
Pt is very happy.

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
Dr Steve - 07 Mar 2005 20:15 GMT
I think bridge longevity is more related to the presence or absence of
parafunction.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
>> In response to the question "Why not" to the fixed bridge--I am concerned
[quoted text clipped - 91 lines]
>>>>
>>>>Remove NOSPAM to reply directly
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 07 Mar 2005 20:35 GMT
> I think bridge longevity is more related to the presence or absence of
> parafunction.

    Sure.  I don't think implants would do well with parafunction either.

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Dr Steve - 07 Mar 2005 21:13 GMT
I agree

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
>> I think bridge longevity is more related to the presence or absence of
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Steve
Joel M. Eichen - 08 Mar 2005 00:17 GMT
>I think bridge longevity is more related to the presence or absence of
>parafunction.

I got to add that word to my vocabulary ... I keep forgetting to
.......
Steven Fawks - 08 Mar 2005 14:30 GMT
I might ask what you think was the reason that certain patients fracture
teeth and restorations at an alarmingly high rate, and someone else can
have an MODBL amalgam that last 30 years?  Why do some paitents lose
porcelain from crowns that you yourself had made with a quality lab?
Why do some patients even develop holes in gold crowns?  Why do some
patients flatten teeth, and have incisors that are 2/3 their original
length by the age of 50?

Do you think that is 'normal function'?

Maybe your patient base was so affluent and relaxed that this didn't
happen?

I see it every single day.

Fawks

>>I think bridge longevity is more related to the presence or absence of
>>parafunction.
>
> I got to add that word to my vocabulary ... I keep forgetting to
> .......
NOYB - 08 Mar 2005 16:00 GMT
> I might ask what you think was the reason that certain patients fracture
> teeth and restorations at an alarmingly high rate, and someone else can
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Maybe your patient base was so affluent

Affluent patients have the most wear.  I think it's because they're
constantly worrying about losing all of their money.  The poor ones don't
have that problem.
W_B - 08 Mar 2005 22:17 GMT
>> Do you think that is 'normal function'?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>constantly worrying about losing all of their money.  The poor ones don't
>have that problem.

Parafunction knows no economic boundaries.

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
NOYB - 08 Mar 2005 22:31 GMT
>>> Do you think that is 'normal function'?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Parafunction knows no economic boundaries.

Poor people worry about losing their money?
Joel M. Eichen - 08 Mar 2005 22:44 GMT
>>>> Do you think that is 'normal function'?
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Poor people worry about losing their money?

Implants, explants, and eggplants ......
Joel M. Eichen - 08 Mar 2005 22:43 GMT
>>> Do you think that is 'normal function'?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Parafunction knows no economic boundaries.

I heard the Iraqi War was a result of parafunction .......
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.