Poor Jan Drew. She is foaming at the mouth because she cannot stop me
from exposing her bullshit claim of mercury poisoning. Jan is upset
because her own words prove that she is a liar. Her own words prove
that she never had mercury poisoning.

Jan Drew cannot explain how she felt better than she had in two years
within hours of having eight of twelve amalgams removed when before
their removal she was bedridden and dying of mercury poisoning from
amalgams. She cannot answer the question.

Jan Drew cannot explain how, a week after she had eight of twelve
amalgams removed when her mercury level was the highest in her life,
she was able to go out line dancing with no more foot pain. Jan Drew
cannot explain how she claimed that the reason that she knew it was
the mercury is because she did not *begin* to regain her health until
*after* her mercury level dropped. She cannot answer the question.

Jan Drew knows that she lied. All she can do is to divert attention
away from her own lies by making gratuitous attacks against me. Jan
cannot discuss her claim of mercury poisoning. So she starts new posts
that have nothing to do with dentistry, only to divert attention by
bearing false witness. Sad that.

For those who have not read Jan Drew lies I offer the following:

A lie. And Jan Drew knows it is a lie. Here is the PROOF in Jan's OWN
WORDS:

And now the admission that this improvement was due to relief:

 Here are her exact words:

All the work was done??? A lie. The work was not completed until
weeks
later. Jan Drew even posted that her dental work was not done until
July 11, 1999.

And now for more lies. Jan Drew told two egregious lies that were
told
solely to deceive people into thinking that she really had mercury
poisoning.

The first is on June 26 ,1999 just a week after she had eight
amalgams
removed. She claimed that ALL her feet pain went away and she was
able
to go out line dancing because she was no longer getting a daily dose
of mercury. This is a complete lie and Jan knew it. On June 26, 1999
Jan still had more amalgams to be removed and they would not be
removed until July 11, 1999 by Jan's own admission. You see Jan has
difficulty keeping her lies straight.

The second lie is when she posted to sci.med.dentisty that the reason
she knows that it was the mercury in her mouth that caused her health
problems was because she did not *begin* to regain her health until
*after* the mercury level dropped. Not only is this a complete lie
and Jan knows it but the complete opposite is true.

But let us have Jan Drew tell us in her own words:

 http://tinyurl.com/674oy

Nothing psychosomatic about it?!!?!?!?!?!?!? It was completely
psychosomatic. Jan Drew's mercury level at the time she made this
statement was the highest in her life since she had eight amalgams
removed over a two day period only a week before.

Jan Drew began to regain her health when her mercury level was the
highest in her entire life. That is right. When Jan Drew reported
dramatic improvement in her health (ie better than she felt in two
years, and being able to line dance due to all the pain gone) her
mercury level had not dropped and was likely the highest in her life
because this improvement occurred from hours to a week after her
amalgams were removed.

And now the proof that Jan KNEW that her mercury level rose when her
amalgams were removed:

Here is Jan accusing me of lying:

Jan says that she NEVER said she had eight amalgams. Above she says
that removing 8 amalgams made a difference.

Oh wait a minute. Jan said she had 8 amalgams, not eight amalgams.
Years is not two years. Lord have mercy.

The reason that alternative dentists recommend slow removal of
amalgams (some as posted by Jan Drew suggest removing no more than
one
amalgam every three months) is because the removal of the amalgams
results in vaporization of mercury which even with perfect protocol
will result in absorption into the body of large amounts of mercury.

So on June 18 and 19, 1999 Jan had eight amalgams removed. On June
19,
1999 Jan said she felt better than she had in two years.

On June 26, 1999 Jan said that she was able to go out line dancing

for a short time because it was likely a placebo effect due to her
RELIEF that the mercury was coming out of her mouth. Just like she
felt better than she did in two years due to relief (by her OWN
admission) she was able to go out line dancing a week later when the
absorption of mercury into her tissues from blood likely resulted in
the highest level in her life.

But Jan said that she knows it was the metal in her mouth because she
did not BEGIN to regain her health until AFTER her mercury level
dropped. A complete lie and the pathologic liar Jan Drew knows it.
This is why she kill filed me. This is why she lies about me being a
liar and a stalker. Jan Drew knows that I exposed her lies and she
refuses to admit it. She is a despicable human being whose sole
purpose in life is to shill for alternative dentists and to
perpetuate the lie that she had mercury poisoning from amalgams. She
did not and the proof is in her own words.

Jan Drew will not respond to any of the points in this post. Instead
she will pretend she is not reading them and then personally attack
me in order to discredit me. Or she will continue her stalking of me
by posting what she thinks is my name, address and phone number. And
she will accuse me of EXACTLY what she is guilty: STALKING. Just
watch.

Aloha,

Rich