Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / January 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

The high cost of Implants. WOW

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
James E. - 04 Jan 2005 23:47 GMT
I am 75 years old and am running out of teeth. My dentist recommend 7
implants (3 right top, 3 left top and 1 left lower). He will then put
snap-on bridges on the upper implants.

He says that the oral surgeon charges $ 1,700 per implant (total 12,000),
and he (the dentist) charges $ 1,200 per implant, for the two bridges (3
implants each) and the crown (total 9,000)

A total of 2,900 per implant, or $ 20,000 for 7. Is this the going rate for
implants or is there a less expensive way of dealing with these high costs?

I live in San Diego, maybe prices here are higher than elsewhere, just like
houses? Time to move to Mexico?

Needless to say, I have no dental insurance.

Thanks for any input

Signature

James
-

Steven Bornfeld - 05 Jan 2005 00:00 GMT
> I am 75 years old and am running out of teeth. My dentist recommend 7
> implants (3 right top, 3 left top and 1 left lower). He will then put
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Thanks for any input

    This is not an unusual fee.  Generally, dental insurance wouldn't help
you with implant-retained prostheses anyway.
    If you are willing to wear removable appliances, excellent partials or
overdentures can be made for a fraction of what it costs for all fixed
bridges retained by implants.

Steve
Joel M. Eichen - 05 Jan 2005 00:04 GMT
>I am 75 years old and am running out of teeth. My dentist recommend 7
>implants (3 right top, 3 left top and 1 left lower). He will then put
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>I live in San Diego, maybe prices here are higher than elsewhere, just like
>houses? Time to move to Mexico?

YUP, but do not drink the water!

Joel

>Needless to say, I have no dental insurance.
>
>Thanks for any input
James E. - 05 Jan 2005 00:12 GMT
Hi Joel

What does "Yup" mean? Get the work done in beautiful Tijuana, Mexico?

Mexican dentists advertise for implants in our S.D. papers. Is it worth
exploring? Any drawbacks, aside from the water?

Signature

James
-

>
>>I am 75 years old and am running out of teeth. My dentist recommend 7
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>>
>>Thanks for any input
Joel M. Eichen - 05 Jan 2005 01:10 GMT
>Hi Joel
>
>What does "Yup" mean? Get the work done in beautiful Tijuana, Mexico?

Slang for "yes."

Another variation is "yuppers."

Joel

>Mexican dentists advertise for implants in our S.D. papers. Is it worth
>exploring? Any drawbacks, aside from the water?

Gee from what I hear, there are some good dentists down there. The
only problem is when there are problems ..... they you have to lie to
your Los Angeles dentist ..... ummmm, I just moved here from Arizona
.......

Joel
Gregory P. Cole, B.S., D.D.S. \(Flap\) - 05 Jan 2005 00:45 GMT
Why do you need implants on the top anyway?  Why not a conventional denture?

Signature

Gregory P. Cole, B.S., D.D.S. (Flap)
www.smilesforalifetime.com
Flaps Dental Blog
http://flapsblog.blogspot.com/
Liberae sunt nostrae cogitationes

>I am 75 years old and am running out of teeth. My dentist recommend 7
>implants (3 right top, 3 left top and 1 left lower). He will then put
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Thanks for any input
James E. - 05 Jan 2005 01:05 GMT
Good point.

Since my # 11 & 12 teeth just broke off at the gum line (they had previously
been cantilevered) they have to be extracted. That leaves me only with 5
good upper front teeth (not so good for chewing).

Is it possible to anchor an upper partial to 5 teeth (6,7,8,9,10)?

What is the best kind of partial denture that you might suggest? My dentist
likes "Flexite" dentures. They look rather flimsy to me and are just as
expensive as regular, solid dentures.

I sincerely appreciate your interest.

Signature

James
-
"Gregory P. Cole, B.S., D.D.S. (Flap)" <drgregorycole.dds@verizon.net> wrote

> Why do you need implants on the top anyway?  Why not a conventional
> denture?
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>>
>> Thanks for any input
Steven Bornfeld - 05 Jan 2005 03:03 GMT
> Good point.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> I sincerely appreciate your interest.

    Doing a partial upper denture with these remaining teeth is far from
ideal, but there are a few strategies depending on the prognosis for
these teeth.  Flexite is one way, but if the teeth are not in good shape
something like a Cu-sil will give better retention with reasonably low
stress on the remaining teeth.
    If the teeth are in decent to good shape I might recommend splinting
them together, and maybe place one implant fixture in the area of the
left canine, and put an attachment such as an ERA or an "O" ring in the
denture.  This would give a balance of esthetics, retention and would
replace all your missing teeth.  The expense for the Cu-sil would
probably be about $1500.  Splinting all the teeth, an implant and
semiprecision partial upper would probably be $7K-$9K--not cheap, but
certainly less than the $20K even after the lower implant.

Steve
Dr. Steve - 05 Jan 2005 03:08 GMT
>> Good point.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
>Steve

You could make a partial work in these cases if you are very careful
with metal design and occlusion.
..
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA

I am writing on a Tablet-PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my handwriting.
Steven Bornfeld - 05 Jan 2005 03:18 GMT
>>>Good point.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> You could make a partial work in these cases if you are very careful
> with metal design and occlusion.

    I've been forced to make do with worse situations than this, though
usually only on a temporary basis, and with lots of Fixodent.

Steve

> ..
> Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
> Troy, Michigan, USA
>
> I am writing on a Tablet-PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my handwriting.
Alexander Vasserman DDS - 05 Jan 2005 10:05 GMT
Get the implants it will be worth every penny in the end. Finance if
you have to
Joel M. Eichen - 05 Jan 2005 10:57 GMT
>Get the implants it will be worth every penny in the end. Finance if
>you have to

This is a problem when 1.5 million households file for bankruptcy.

How can one finance anything without a future income stream to pay it
off? The guy is 75 right?

Joel
Joel M. Eichen - 05 Jan 2005 10:56 GMT
>> You could make a partial work in these cases if you are very careful
>> with metal design and occlusion.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Steve

Where do you find "very careful" labs these days?

Joel
Steven Bornfeld - 05 Jan 2005 14:15 GMT
>>>You could make a partial work in these cases if you are very careful
>>>with metal design and occlusion.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Joel

    Well, Mancuso said that.  Watch out--he'll be by in a coupla minutes to
ask,
"What's a lab?"

Steve
Dr Steve - 05 Jan 2005 19:39 GMT
An RPD can work when the patient is cuspid to lateral.  I have made a few of
these.  Your metal design should support each remaining tooth.  I place a
cingulum rest on all 5 teeth which wraps interproximally as far as I can
possibly get the metal.  The rests should almost for guiding plates mesial
and distal.  You want distal guiding plates on the 2 terminal teeth.  Clasps
should be positioned so as not to tip the lateral when the tissues compress
under the saddle. Occlusal plane has to be flat.  No excursive
interferences. Horger Synchronized occlusion is a must.  Finally, NO
parafunction.  Oh, it helps if it opposes a lower RPD.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
>>>>You could make a partial work in these cases if you are very careful
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Steve
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS - 05 Jan 2005 21:37 GMT
> An RPD can work when the patient is cuspid to lateral.  I have made a few of
> these.  Your metal design should support each remaining tooth.  I place a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> interferences. Horger Synchronized occlusion is a must.  Finally, NO
> parafunction.  Oh, it helps if it opposes a lower RPD.

    Nice ideas.  Of course, the occlusion won't always allow this.

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Dr Steve - 05 Jan 2005 23:27 GMT
Then you give the patient a choice.
1)  change the occlusion
2)  make the RPD and acknowledge that it will fail in the next few years
taking teeth with it
3)  give up and try something different

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
>> An RPD can work when the patient is cuspid to lateral.  I have made a few
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Steve
Joel M. Eichen - 05 Jan 2005 21:47 GMT
Long saddle though, and a lateral incisor
has a bad contour for clasp design!

Joel

>An RPD can work when the patient is cuspid to lateral.  I have made a few of
>these.  Your metal design should support each remaining tooth.  I place a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>interferences. Horger Synchronized occlusion is a must.  Finally, NO
>parafunction.  Oh, it helps if it opposes a lower RPD.
Dr Steve - 05 Jan 2005 23:27 GMT
It has to be on the right patient.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

> Long saddle though, and a lateral incisor
> has a bad contour for clasp design!
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>>interferences. Horger Synchronized occlusion is a must.  Finally, NO
>>parafunction.  Oh, it helps if it opposes a lower RPD.
Joel M. Eichen - 05 Jan 2005 21:46 GMT
>> Where do you find "very careful" labs these days?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Steve

True. He does denture relines on slow days with his CEREC.
Dr Steve - 05 Jan 2005 23:27 GMT
Don't laugh.  We will be sitting here talking about scanning an edentulous
ridge with a camera (similar to the overlapping images made with the CEREC
camera), design on the monitor, then mill the denture out of a block of
acrylic.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
>>> Where do you find "very careful" labs these days?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> True. He does denture relines on slow days with his CEREC.
W_B - 05 Jan 2005 17:37 GMT
>> Good point.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
>Steve

A good plan but if that is over budget a standard partial
denture could be constructed. Open palate with posterior
palatal strap to decrease weight. Currently have an
80 yo male with 8, 9, 10 plus 6 and 11 as OD abutments,
no attachments. Patient functions very well with this config.

--

W_B

Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS - 05 Jan 2005 21:25 GMT
>>>Good point.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> Take out the G'RBAGE
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com

    Sure, but I hate using lateral incisors as terminal abutments, and
that's what you'd have to do with this patient--not that I haven't done it.

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Dr Steve - 05 Jan 2005 23:27 GMT
> Sure, but I hate using lateral incisors as terminal abutments, and that's
> what you'd have to do with this patient--not that I haven't done it.

You have to design the metal so that the axis of rotation (on the side of
the missing cuspid), pivots on two teeth rather than just the lateral.  You
cannot always do it.
W_B - 06 Jan 2005 16:13 GMT
>Currently have an
>> 80 yo male with 8, 9, 10 plus 6 and 11 as OD abutments,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
>> W_B

>    Sure, but I hate using lateral incisors as terminal abutments, and
>that's what you'd have to do with this patient--not that I haven't done it.
>
>Steve

Sometimes you have to work with what is present.
BTW this was not a new construction but the result
after some 'modifications'.
--

W_B

Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Joel M. Eichen - 05 Jan 2005 21:47 GMT
THIS IS SPAM!

Did anyone notice W_B's use of the word, "Budget?"

He has sold short his shares with Hertz and Avis.

(He also included a subtle advertisement
for the optometrist industry ...... (OD).

Joel

>>> Good point.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>80 yo male with 8, 9, 10 plus 6 and 11 as OD abutments,
>no attachments. Patient functions very well with this config.
Jorge Bonilla - 05 Jan 2005 03:08 GMT
You might like to check out removable partial dentures with attachments
that help retain it in place. I like the Equipoise C and L attachments
for cases similar to yours. The dentist would make a special crown with
a slot in it for two or three of you remaining teeth, and the partial
denture would have a "male" type attachment that goes into those slots.
In addition, it would have a spring loaded "L" that enters an undercut
in the crowns in teeth 6 and 10. This is just one of many alternatives.
There are many different attachments available to dentists. The
retention is excellent if well made and the price is much lower than
going with implants.
Dr. Bonilla
Dr. Steve - 05 Jan 2005 03:11 GMT
>You might like to check out removable partial dentures with attachments
>that help retain it in place. I like the Equipoise C and L attachments
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>going with implants.
>Dr. Bonilla

To be successful, you need to crown almost virgin teeth, have
fantastic occlusion and eliminate all parafunction.   Otherwise the
crowns snap off
..
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA

I am writing on a Tablet-PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my handwriting.
Jorge Bonilla - 05 Jan 2005 03:42 GMT
> To be successful, you need to crown almost virgin teeth, have
> fantastic occlusion and eliminate all parafunction.   Otherwise the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> I am writing on a Tablet-PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my handwriting.

That's why I like the Equipoise system. It avoids the Class 1 lever
that every other attachment produces (which causes crowns to snap off
just like in this patients cantilevered bridge). When the partial moves
towards the gum in the distal extension during mastication, the L
attachment disengages (like in a Class 2 lever). The slots can be made
on splinted crowns (which as you say would have to be made on virgin
teeth).
Dr. Bonilla
Dr Steve - 05 Jan 2005 19:41 GMT
I am NOT thinking about external attachments.  I am thinking of the kinds of
lateral stresses placed on the crowned tooth stump by the stronger fit of
the internal attachment.  Lateral stress are not able to dislodge the RPD,
and the force is transmitted to the area between the crown margin and the
crest of alveolar bone.  Eventually, S-NO-A-UP ! ! ! ! !

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
>> To be successful, you need to crown almost virgin teeth, have
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> teeth).
> Dr. Bonilla
Joel M. Eichen - 05 Jan 2005 10:55 GMT
>Good point.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Is it possible to anchor an upper partial to 5 teeth (6,7,8,9,10)?

Yes but it is tricky due to the flat contour of the distal aspect of
$10.

Joel

>What is the best kind of partial denture that you might suggest? My dentist
>likes "Flexite" dentures. They look rather flimsy to me and are just as
>expensive as regular, solid dentures.

I prefer in that circumstance, a cast metal plate with Valplast clasps
to avoid an ugly chromy looking clasp near the front.

Joel

>I sincerely appreciate your interest.
Joel M. Eichen - 05 Jan 2005 01:13 GMT
>Why do you need implants on the top anyway?  Why not a conventional denture?

I agree.

This sounds like a salespitch for the Mercedes,
when I can only afford the Chevy.

Joel
James E. - 05 Jan 2005 02:00 GMT
Another good suggestion

I could probably afford the 20 thou if I sell the dog, the wife and the
house. My major concern is that, after I spend all this money (that I
haven't got), the implants will corrupt after a few years.

I had that happen to me when I was a guinea pig in implantology in 1971. The
implants had to be removed after 3 years, probably because they were not
using titanium at that time.

In 2004, how often do people with implants run into trouble, necessitating
removal?
Signature

James
-

>
>>Why do you need implants on the top anyway?  Why not a conventional
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Joel
carabelli - 05 Jan 2005 02:04 GMT
> Another good suggestion
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> In 2004, how often do people with implants run into trouble, necessitating
> removal?

Blade implant?  Things have changed.

carabelli
Joel M. Eichen - 05 Jan 2005 10:57 GMT
>> Another good suggestion
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Blade implant?  Things have changed.

Len Linkow?

>carabelli
Steven Bornfeld - 05 Jan 2005 14:19 GMT
>>>Another good suggestion
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Len Linkow?

    There's a blast from the past.  A classmate of mine married Lennie
Linkow's daughter.  He got himself set up as an implant expert in the
early days, then divorced her.
    Lennie was a real character, that's for sure.

Steve

>>carabelli
Joel M. Eichen - 05 Jan 2005 21:47 GMT
>>>>Another good suggestion
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
>Steve

Still practicing, last time I checked!

Joel

>>>carabelli
Joel M. Eichen - 05 Jan 2005 10:57 GMT
>Another good suggestion
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>implants had to be removed after 3 years, probably because they were not
>using titanium at that time.

There are a nbumber of implant failures.

They are excellent but not perfect.

How much do you want for the dog?

>In 2004, how often do people with implants run into trouble, necessitating
>removal?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.