Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / January 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

What is the typical cost of NTI

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rip - 23 Dec 2004 14:49 GMT
In So Cal I am finding a range of $350-650.
Some do it immediately in 1 visit, others send to lab, back in a week.
Joel M. Eichen - 23 Dec 2004 15:22 GMT
>In So Cal I am finding a range of $350-650.
>Some do it immediately in 1 visit, others send to lab, back in a week.

Thanks.

Joel
Rip - 23 Dec 2004 16:13 GMT
Is that typical for So Cal and rest of the country?

>>In So Cal I am finding a range of $350-650.
>>Some do it immediately in 1 visit, others send to lab, back in a week.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Joel
Alexander Vasserman DDS - 24 Dec 2004 00:59 GMT
> Is that typical for So Cal and rest of the country?
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> >
> >Joel

I've seen it go as high as $800.
The high end prices usually include all the adjustment appointments.
The Webby - 24 Dec 2004 01:15 GMT
> > Is that typical for So Cal and rest of the country?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I've seen it go as high as $800.
> The high end prices usually include all the adjustment appointments.

Huh?

TW
Alexander Vasserman DDS - 24 Dec 2004 07:20 GMT
Yes. I was talking with some doctors on dental town and that is what
one of them charged. And I believe he is in California. There was
another doctor also charging $800 but he was in CANADA so that' in
Canadian $$$.
I suppose it is possible that somebody was lying but the conversation
seemed sincere.
The Webby - 24 Dec 2004 16:41 GMT
> Yes. I was talking with some doctors on dental town and that is what
> one of them charged. And I believe he is in California. There was
> another doctor also charging $800 but he was in CANADA so that' in
> Canadian $$$.
> I suppose it is possible that somebody was lying but the conversation
> seemed sincere.

Well, I must say that I think that price is higher than I expected.  
But... supply and demand, I suppose.

TW
Rip - 24 Dec 2004 11:43 GMT
What's the lowest people have seen?
Rip - 24 Dec 2004 11:58 GMT
ooops. just found the previous posts. It appears the low figure is
around $200.

>What's the lowest people have seen?
Tim Dixon - 25 Dec 2004 14:50 GMT
> ooops. just found the previous posts. It appears the low figure is
> around $200.
>
>>What's the lowest people have seen?

The National Average for a chairside NTI is about 450$.
W_B - 27 Dec 2004 16:35 GMT
>> ooops. just found the previous posts. It appears the low figure is
>> around $200.
>>
>>>What's the lowest people have seen?
>
>The National Average for a chairside NTI is about 450$.

My fee is $250

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
Tim Dixon - 27 Dec 2004 18:20 GMT
>>> ooops. just found the previous posts. It appears the low figure is
>>> around $200.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> My fee is $250

Are you using Rose Niermans software for NTI billing?  You may want to check
it out. http://www.nti-tss.com/insurance.html
W_B - 28 Dec 2004 04:07 GMT
>>>> ooops. just found the previous posts. It appears the low figure is
>>>> around $200.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Are you using Rose Niermans software for NTI billing?  You may want to check
>it out. http://www.nti-tss.com/insurance.html 

Nope. Cash, check, or CC.

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
Alexander Vasserman DDS - 28 Dec 2004 05:03 GMT
ouch

she wants $2500.00 for the billing software full version.

> >>>> ooops. just found the previous posts. It appears the low figure is
> >>>> around $200.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
> Take out the G'RBAGE
Tim Dixon - 28 Dec 2004 14:36 GMT
Im not trying to sell her product but I have attended her lectures and her
software is absolutely amazing for NTI billing.  In fact I am thinking of
launching a billing service for NTI providers next year that don't want to
invest in the software and needed training for their staff and handle their
billing for them, which would likely be based on some unknown percentage.

If you have a high number of nti clients with medically diagnosed migraine
you should be billing to their medical rather than trying to bill dental.
Of course the NTI module also includes the dental billing as well and you
would be pleasantly surprised at how many ways an NTI can also be billed
under dental.

> she wants $2500.00 for the billing software full version.
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
>> Take out the G'RBAGE
The Webby - 28 Dec 2004 16:30 GMT
So the question I have is this:  for people who do not have "dental
insurance" or "medical insurance" -- how much will an NTI cost them if
they complain of the typical "TMD" symptoms?  (TMD not Migraine patient.)

TW

> Im not trying to sell her product but I have attended her lectures and her
> software is absolutely amazing for NTI billing.  In fact I am thinking of
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> >> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
> >> Take out the G'RBAGE
W_B - 28 Dec 2004 16:39 GMT
>So the question I have is this:  for people who do not have "dental
>insurance" or "medical insurance" -- how much will an NTI cost them if
>they complain of the typical "TMD" symptoms?  (TMD not Migraine patient.)
>
>TW

> >> >> My fee is $250

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
The Webby - 28 Dec 2004 16:52 GMT
> >So the question I have is this:  for people who do not have "dental
> >insurance" or "medical insurance" -- how much will an NTI cost them if
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
> Take out the G'RBAGE

Thanks for your reply.  

TW
Steven Fawks - 28 Dec 2004 17:33 GMT
I agree.  Shootin' fish in a barrel shouldn't cost much.
It's fun!

:-)
Fawks

>>>>>>My fee is $250
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
> Take out the G'RBAGE
W_B - 28 Dec 2004 17:51 GMT
Sometimes I do them for cost + 30

>I agree.  Shootin' fish in a barrel shouldn't cost much.
>It's fun!
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
>> Take out the G'RBAGE

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
Tim Dixon - 28 Dec 2004 16:49 GMT
> So the question I have is this:  for people who do not have "dental
> insurance" or "medical insurance" -- how much will an NTI cost them if
> they complain of the typical "TMD" symptoms?  (TMD not Migraine patient.)

Not being a dentist I can't say what they would charge individually, but I
can say that the price varies by geography for sure.
Dr Steve - 28 Dec 2004 18:49 GMT
$452 here in Troy

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

> So the question I have is this:  for people who do not have "dental
> insurance" or "medical insurance" -- how much will an NTI cost them if
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
>> >> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
>> >> Take out the G'RBAGE
The Webby - 28 Dec 2004 18:52 GMT
$452.00 US seems reasonable to me.  

TW

> $452 here in Troy
>
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
> >> >> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
> >> >> Take out the G'RBAGE
W_B - 28 Dec 2004 18:59 GMT
>$452 here in Troy

A reasonable fee.

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
Alexander Vasserman DDS - 29 Dec 2004 05:54 GMT
> Im not trying to sell her product but I have attended her lectures and her
> software is absolutely amazing for NTI billing.  In fact I am thinking of
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> would be pleasantly surprised at how many ways an NTI can also be billed
> under dental.

What I've experienced is that the Medical insurance wants the dental to
deny the claim before they will consider payment.
The Webby - 29 Dec 2004 06:14 GMT
> > Im not trying to sell her product but I have attended her lectures
> and her
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> What I've experienced is that the Medical insurance wants the dental to
> deny the claim before they will consider payment.

Hi AV,

How much do you charge for an NTI as treatment for "TMD"?
One of these days, I'd like to stop by your office in LA.  It would be
nice to greet one another.  Would that be something we could arrange
after the new year?

TW
Tim Dixon - 29 Dec 2004 14:15 GMT
>> Im not trying to sell her product but I have attended her lectures
> and her
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> What I've experienced is that the Medical insurance wants the dental to
> deny the claim before they will consider payment.

Is your experience from using the software to code your billing?  Just
curious.
Alexander Vasserman DDS - 30 Dec 2004 02:14 GMT
> > What I've experienced is that the Medical insurance wants the dental to
> > deny the claim before they will consider payment.
>
> Is your experience from using the software to code your billing?  Just
> curious.

My practice management software has the medical claim billing.
But we go over it carefully since I rarely bill medical insurance. What
happens is the medical insurance sends a letter asking for a denial of
payment from the dental before processing the claim. The medical will
pay for it but there is more paper work involved and it takes twice as
long to get a response.
Bill - 31 Dec 2004 02:55 GMT
"Im not trying to sell her product but I have attended her lectures and
her
software is absolutely amazing for NTI billing. In fact I am thinking
of
launching a billing service for NTI providers next year that don't want
to
invest in the software and needed training for their staff and handle
their
billing for them, which would likely be based on some unknown
percentage."

Sounds like a good idea and a good service!

However, it would be wise for any California dentist to check the
current laws on paying for a service on a percentage basis. It is
entirely legal for a dentist to pay a flat fee, or a variable fee based
on your time or effort. However, the "percentage" charge runs afoul of
the California dental laws' prohibition against "fee-splitting" by a
dentist. A dentist cannot pay a fee for a service based on a percentage
( a "split") of the fee charged to the patient.

I'm not sure if any recent revisions to the California law have changed
this provision. Just to be safe, it would be a good idea to charge a
flat fee per insurance submission, or a fee based upon your time and
effort (for those cases that take extra work). That would keep the
dentist out of any potential trouble.

It sounds like this proposed service could be of value to thousands of
dentists around the country. Is there any way to research whether it
has enough appeal to gain critical mass?

Best regards,
- dentaldoc
Tim Dixon - 31 Dec 2004 04:55 GMT
> "Im not trying to sell her product but I have attended her lectures and
> her
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> Best regards,
> - dentaldoc

Thank you for the valuable input and I wasn't entirely sure of the fee
schedule but I would obviously not want to be on the wrong side of the law
and will investigate fully what you have shared with me.  I  will certainly
keep you posted with any progress or news.

Again thanx for the input, it's greatly appreciated.

Tim
Joel M. Eichen - 31 Dec 2004 15:47 GMT
Hello Tim!

Could you pull out the main from the thread  and post it as a new
topic? You deserve some publicity here.

Joel

>> Sounds like a good idea and a good service!

>> - dentaldoc
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Tim
Joel M. Eichen - 31 Dec 2004 15:47 GMT
Hello Tim!

Could you pull out the main from the thread  and post it as a new
topic? You deserve some publicity here.

Joel

>> Sounds like a good idea and a good service!

>> - dentaldoc
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Tim

Hello Tim!

Could you pull out the main from the thread  and post it as a new
topic? You deserve some publicity here.

Joel

>> Sounds like a good idea and a good service!

>> - dentaldoc
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Tim
TD - 31 Dec 2004 15:58 GMT
> Hello Tim!
>
> Could you pull out the main from the thread  and post it as a new
> topic? You deserve some publicity here.
>
> Joel

While I am not trying to spam the group with commercial interests, I was
interested in hearing if others are using that software package.
Fortunately for me I have the NTI commander & chief backing me (it was his
idea I do it) but as long as you guys don't mind discussing the pro's &
con's Im willing to open a new thread.

Tim
Joel M. Eichen - 31 Dec 2004 18:34 GMT
>> Hello Tim!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Tim

I think that would be great.

INFORMATION is never spam, as long as there is INFORMATION.

I do not even mind any BUY MY PRODUCT information as long as it is 15%
of the message, not 95% of the message.

Joel
W_B - 01 Jan 2005 08:19 GMT
>INFORMATION is never spam,

You left out the word *real*

>as long as there is INFORMATION.

Most of what passes, in your judgment JME,
is what the rest of us call a "sales pitch".

>I do not even mind any BUY MY PRODUCT information as long as it is 15%
>of the message, not 95% of the message.

95% Sales Pitch, 15% Closing.
Your 'definition' does not comply with the majority.
Too much DT, I suspect.

>Joel

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
Joel M. Eichen - 01 Jan 2005 13:27 GMT
>>INFORMATION is never spam,
>
>You left out the word *real*

Where does the "REAL" get placed and who determines what is REAL?

Do you get the final say or do I?

Joel

>>as long as there is INFORMATION.
>
>Most of what passes, in your judgment JME,
>is what the rest of us call a "sales pitch".

That's fine. Now if you will just place the period inside the quotes
then we can agree.

>>I do not even mind any BUY MY PRODUCT information as long as it is 15%
>>of the message, not 95% of the message.
>
>95% Sales Pitch, 15% Closing.
>Your 'definition' does not comply with the majority.
>Too much DT, I suspect.

You are right there except DT is 90% sales pitch. AND a huge sales
pitch. It sure makes SMD look very professional. I will give you that.

I racked my brain for months and months trying to figure out what I
could sell them. I couldn't come up with anything.

Is it the lack of advertising that makes SMD great?>

It could be ....

Joel

>>Joel
Alexander Vasserman DDS - 31 Dec 2004 06:23 GMT
This fee splitting law is very confusing.
Does accepting visa mastercard and paying a percentage of that fee to
visa mastercard constitute fee splitting????
What about 3rd party financing such as DFP or care credit that take a
bigger chunk based on percentage?

There is no clear line and if things hit the fan you are at the
governments' mercy.

Ethicaly speaking it is not a concern but legally it is.

> "Im not trying to sell her product but I have attended her lectures and
> her
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> Best regards,
> - dentaldoc
Tim Dixon - 31 Dec 2004 13:28 GMT
You make a good point.  Thanx.

> This fee splitting law is very confusing.
> Does accepting visa mastercard and paying a percentage of that fee to
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>> Best regards,
>> - dentaldoc
Joel M. Eichen - 31 Dec 2004 15:44 GMT
>"Im not trying to sell her product but I have attended her lectures and
>her
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Sounds like a good idea and a good service!

Is there a website?

I am tuning in late.

Joel

>However, it would be wise for any California dentist to check the
>current laws on paying for a service on a percentage basis. It is
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>Best regards,
>- dentaldoc
TD - 31 Dec 2004 15:48 GMT
>>"Im not trying to sell her product but I have attended her lectures and
>>her
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Joel

Not yet there isn't but there will be I am certain.  So many things to do,
so little time.
Joel M. Eichen - 31 Dec 2004 18:30 GMT
>>>"Im not trying to sell her product but I have attended her lectures and
>>>her
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>Not yet there isn't but there will be I am certain.  So many things to do,
>so little time.

You are welcome to create a page at www.DentalCom.Net with text and
graphics, and then reference that page by using TINYURL so people can
visit without any rigamarole.

Deep Linking is okay.

Free access, free browsing, sign-on only to post.

Joel
TD - 31 Dec 2004 18:37 GMT
>>>>"Im not trying to sell her product but I have attended her lectures and
>>>>her
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Joel

Thanx Joel but I will likely register a domain and host the site on my own
equipment.
Joel M. Eichen - 31 Dec 2004 19:49 GMT
>>>>>"Im not trying to sell her product but I have attended her lectures and
>>>>>her
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>Thanx Joel but I will likely register a domain and host the site on my own
>equipment.

Got it. Wise move, most likely

Joel
Joel M. Eichen - 31 Dec 2004 19:48 GMT
>>>>"Im not trying to sell her product but I have attended her lectures and
>>>>her
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
>Free access, free browsing, sign-on only to post.

I forgot to mention, headlines are delivered to "UNWIRED" TREOs,
Blackberries, web-enabled cell phones, 802.11b Wi-Fi appliances, so
write a good headline.

Busy people only open the headlines that interest them.

This is a business Dental site, as opposed to the chat sites around so
much today.

Joel

>Joel
The Webby - 28 Dec 2004 17:01 GMT
> ouch
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> > wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
> > Take out the G'RBAGE

If a person presents with signs and symptoms of simple "TMD", why would
the dentist need a high priced billing program?  Is "TMD" a medically
acceptable diagnosis?  Hmmm....

TW
Tim Dixon - 28 Dec 2004 17:08 GMT
I don't know that they would, but if they are seeing the medically diagnosed
migraine patient and if that patient has medical insurance it makes good
sense to bill under medical.  The NTI Provider without that software can
still get the basic info directly from the nti website
http://www.nti-tss.com/insurance.html  Even so, if the patient has dental
insurance even the simple tmd treatment would likely have coverage if the
correct filing is done.  If a patient has dental why should they pay out of
pocket if there is coverage?

> If a person presents with signs and symptoms of simple "TMD", why would
> the dentist need a high priced billing program?  Is "TMD" a medically
> acceptable diagnosis?  Hmmm....
>
> TW
Tim Dixon - 28 Dec 2004 17:12 GMT
>I don't know that they would, but if they are seeing the medically
>diagnosed migraine patient and if that patient has medical insurance it
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>
>> TW

I don't think TMD is, but here is a basic guideline for dental billing.

Date
Dental Insurance Carrier

Re: John Doe

To Whom it may Concern:

Your insured ____________ sought treatment at our office on ______.

Mr./Ms. _________ reported concerns of tooth grinding and clenching, tooth
pain, head, neck and facial pain (including headache and medically-diagnosed
migraine), as well as joint pain and clicking.

Examination revealed:
   * Limited range of mandibular motion:
        ___ mm on opening
        ___ mm left side movement
        ___ mm right side movement
   * Moderate-severe pain on palpation of the muscles of mastication
   * Moderate-severe temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD, with
pain/clicking)
   * Pathological tooth wear.
   * Vertical bone loss patterns seen radiographically
   * Biting stress mobility and fremitis.
   * Abfractures of teeth at the gum line

Treatment, with CDT-3 codes, includes insertion of an FDA approved device,
the NTI-tss appliance submitted with [CDT-3 code, D7880 oral occlusal
orthotic] OR [CDT-3 code D9940 occlusal guard, by report].

Once the pain problem has resolved Mr./Ms. ____________ will have a complete
occlusal adjustment/selective grinding (CDT-3 Code D-9951) to establish a
stable, functional occlusion. This will eliminate the forces which are
causing the fractures, tooth wear and tooth-loosening. It will also make it
possible for ______ to chew properly.

This report provides you with information demonstrating the need for
treatment. All of the necessary patient information is provided herein for
expedient claims processing.

Sincerely,

[NTI-tss Provider]

******************************

Special thanks to Ronald L. Rosenthal, DDS, past co-director of the TMJ
clinic at UK,
for providing this sample dental insurance billing guideline for the TMD
patient.
The Webby - 28 Dec 2004 18:05 GMT
There was a time when I would not have been shy about sending up red
flags upon reading this boiler plate of a guideline.  I still see red
flags, but I figure... what's the point of such a "letter" except to
cover all the possible bases whether or not the findings exist?

Fremitis???  Fremitis where????

TW (with wrinkles between my brows)

> >I don't know that they would, but if they are seeing the medically
> >diagnosed migraine patient and if that patient has medical insurance it
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
> for providing this sample dental insurance billing guideline for the TMD
> patient.
Tim Dixon - 28 Dec 2004 18:08 GMT
> There was a time when I would not have been shy about sending up red
> flags upon reading this boiler plate of a guideline.  I still see red
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> TW (with wrinkles between my brows)

Yes I know you would have, and I think it is only meant as a guideline.
They have to start somewhere I suppose.
The Webby - 28 Dec 2004 18:43 GMT
> "The Webby" <nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam@san.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam-7E7AE9.10050628122004@orngca-news04.socal.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Yes I know you would have, and I think it is only meant as a guideline.
> They have to start somewhere I suppose.

It looks to me more like a means to justify asking too much in fees for
the treatment.  Do you realize how easy it is for a dentist to never
even perform an exam on the patient?

Fremitis?  Fremitus?  What is this all about?  ...everybody has
this?????  Come on.... I'm not selling out.

TW
Tim Dixon - 28 Dec 2004 18:48 GMT
>> "The Webby" <nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam@san.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam-7E7AE9.10050628122004@orngca-news04.socal.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> TW

I can imagine someone doing that.. but there is nothing to say anyone is./

I have no idea about the fremitus/fremitus ...
W_B - 28 Dec 2004 19:01 GMT
>Fremitis?  Fremitus?  What is this all about?  ...everybody has
>this?????  Come on.... I'm not selling out.
>
>TW

Have seen it spelled both ways.

Basically you can feel a tooth move when the
patient occludes.

Also known as 'traumatic occlusion" (for Dr. SM 'occluding')

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
The Webby - 28 Dec 2004 19:09 GMT
> >Fremitis?  Fremitus?  What is this all about?  ...everybody has
> >this?????  Come on.... I'm not selling out.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
> Take out the G'RBAGE

I see.  You learn something new everyday.  I have never come across the
term being used this way.  Hmm.
TW
W_B - 28 Dec 2004 19:31 GMT
>> >Fremitis?  Fremitus?  What is this all about?  ...everybody has
>> >this?????  Come on.... I'm not selling out.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>term being used this way.  Hmm.
>TW

I learned it from one of the *master* dentist/proffessors at DS.
Practitioners with 30 to 40 years of experience.

It is a very obscure topic.

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
The Webby - 28 Dec 2004 19:45 GMT
> >> >Fremitis?  Fremitus?  What is this all about?  ...everybody has
> >> >this?????  Come on.... I'm not selling out.
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
> Take out the G'RBAGE

In medicine it is not so obscure.  I had difficulty relating it to
dentistry.  Thanks for sharing something about it here in smd.  

TW
Joel M. Eichen - 28 Dec 2004 19:13 GMT
>>Fremitis?  Fremitus?  What is this all about?  ...everybody has
>>this?????  Come on.... I'm not selling out.
>>
>>TW
>
>Have seen it spelled both ways.

As long as you do not spell it fremituchas.

>Basically you can feel a tooth move when the
>patient occludes.
>
>Also known as 'traumatic occlusion" (for Dr. SM 'occluding')
Alexander Vasserman DDS - 29 Dec 2004 06:01 GMT
I think the point here is to get a response from the insurance company
so that the insurance puts out most of the bill for the device.
The Webby - 28 Dec 2004 17:57 GMT
> I don't know that they would, but if they are seeing the medically diagnosed
> migraine patient and if that patient has medical insurance it makes good
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> >
> > TW

They shouldn't pay out of pocket if there is coverage.  But if they
haven't met their deductible, they'll still be paying out of pocket.  
Most of the dentists in smd remind readers that "dental insurance" is
not insurance in the sense that medical insurance is "insurance".  I,
for one, don't have dental insurance, and I don't think I represent the
minority of the people in the USA.  

TW
Tim Dixon - 28 Dec 2004 18:06 GMT
>> I don't know that they would, but if they are seeing the medically
>> diagnosed
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> TW

Right.  I suspect that most people that find relief with an NTI regardless
of the reason they are using one, don't mind paying whatever they cost.
The Webby - 28 Dec 2004 18:36 GMT
> "The Webby" <nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam@san.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam-374343.09572928122004@orngca-news04.socal.
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> Right.  I suspect that most people that find relief with an NTI regardless
> of the reason they are using one, don't mind paying whatever they cost.

They won't complain about paying a reasonable fee for the service.  They
don't expect to be taken advantage of because they feel better as a
result of treatment.  

TW
Tim Dixon - 28 Dec 2004 18:41 GMT
>> "The Webby" <nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam@san.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam-374343.09572928122004@orngca-news04.socal.
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>
> TW

I think most NTI providers charge a resonable fee, compared to splints that
usually make a person worse off...
The Webby - 28 Dec 2004 18:50 GMT
> "The Webby" <nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam@san.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam-28B3D1.10360328122004@orngca-news04.socal.
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
> I think most NTI providers charge a resonable fee, compared to splints that
> usually make a person worse off...

But you have to think that there is plenty of room for over-prescribing
of this treatment.  How much does it take to convince a person that
he/she could benefit from an NTI ... because, afterall, it can't hurt to
try it....  

It's easy to prescribe treatments based upon the concept that it can't
hurt to give it a try.  Where have I heard that before?  I don't like
reading boiler plate letters such as the one that is on the web (the one
you provided.)

It's a rainy day ...

TW
Tim Dixon - 28 Dec 2004 18:57 GMT
>> "The Webby" <nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam@san.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam-28B3D1.10360328122004@orngca-news04.socal.
[quoted text clipped - 74 lines]
>
> TW

Well I am sure there is, and I also think it depends on what the NTI is
being used for.  Some guys/glas use them to protect teeth after a
restoration and probably charge next to nothing for it that they throw away
in a few weeks (or save for future work that might be done).  Other guys use
them as a diagnostic without using it as a therapy, yet others only treat
medically diagnosed migraine.  If someone is going to be misusing it for
gain without need then I am certain they are doing lots of other similar
things using their profession.
The Webby - 28 Dec 2004 19:04 GMT
> "The Webby" <nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam@san.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam-B3EA6E.10502828122004@orngca-news04.socal.
[quoted text clipped - 89 lines]
> gain without need then I am certain they are doing lots of other similar
> things using their profession.

You can't depend upon the fox to guard the henhouse without a supervisor
that isn't also a fox.

TW
W_B - 28 Dec 2004 19:32 GMT
>You can't depend upon the fox to guard the henhouse without a supervisor
>that isn't also a fox.
>
>TW

There is something profound in your statment.
I just don't know what it is. <hehe>

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
Steven Fawks - 28 Dec 2004 19:31 GMT
It's warm and sunny in mid Missouri.  I think that parafunctional
activities (clenching/bruxism) are right up there with decay and
periodontal disease for causing problems for millions of people.
Once you realize that the occluSION is much less important than the
occluDING, it all starts to make sense.

The percentage of patients that I see with either jaw pain, headaches,
abfractions, sensitive teeth, worn dentition, or fractured
teeth/restorations is very significant.

Which one of these would benefit from wearing an NTI?  I think almost
every one.  To me, it's almost like wearing a safety belt when you
get in the car.  Excellent protection from injury for very little risk
and (at least when I make them) low cost.

JMHO,
Fawks

> But you have to think that there is plenty of room for over-prescribing
> of this treatment.  How much does it take to convince a person that
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> TW
W_B - 28 Dec 2004 19:34 GMT
Agree 100% .
Eloquently stated.

Except for the Missouri part. <8^]]>

>It's warm and sunny in mid Missouri.  I think that parafunctional
>activities (clenching/bruxism) are right up there with decay and
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>JMHO,
>Fawks

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
The Webby - 28 Dec 2004 19:59 GMT
> Agree 100% .
> Eloquently stated.
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
> Take out the G'RBAGE

Where we see dentists providing poor quality dentistry, they are likely
to be the same ones who poorly construct their patient's NTIs. I
understand this.

All in all, I am hopeful with good reason, that fewer and fewer people
are ending up suffering because of "ground down occlusions and destroyed
teeth", "TMJ surgery", "unnecessary psychiatric care", "unnecessary
prescription drugs", less radiological studies, and less financial worry
because of the benefits associated with proper use of the NTI.

TW (a bit of the devil's advocate from time to time)
Steven Fawks - 28 Dec 2004 21:36 GMT
Had a fellow from England send me some nice pictures of his teeth and
an NTI that was made for him across the pond.  He asked me what I
thought of it considering that he was not having much relief from his
jaw pain and headaches.

It had been fitted with the thermoplastic buttons, left very bulky, had
a fairly large 'ramp' in the discluding element, looked like he could
probably get the DE on the lower cuspids, and the DE did not match well
with his 'jumbled' lower incisors.

Pretty tough to troubleshoot a disaster.  For starters, I'd make a new
one with SNAP acrylic on the lower teeth and keep the DE flat.

Fawks

> Where we see dentists providing poor quality dentistry, they are likely
> to be the same ones who poorly construct their patient's NTIs. I
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> TW (a bit of the devil's advocate from time to time)
The Webby - 28 Dec 2004 22:26 GMT
> Had a fellow from England send me some nice pictures of his teeth and
> an NTI that was made for him across the pond.  He asked me what I
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> >
> > TW (a bit of the devil's advocate from time to time)

Ah yes, you have replied to my concern.  Thanks Fawks.

TW
Rip - 04 Jan 2005 04:25 GMT
I'd agree with this. Anything over $300 seems unreasonable unless it's
paid by insurance or something.

>They won't complain about paying a reasonable fee for the service.  They
>don't expect to be taken advantage of because they feel better as a
>result of treatment.  
>
>TW
Steven Fawks - 04 Jan 2005 19:22 GMT
One ironic part of NTI treatment is that patients have often spent
many thousands of dollars (much of it through medical insurance and
on drugs) over many years without much relief.

A simple, non-invasive, effective treatment is offered for 1/4 the cost
of their last CAT scan and they think they are getting ripped off!

When I try and provide an NTI for it's true value, no one wants it.

Patients don't realize the value of the device.  It can help greatly
reduce headaches and TMJ pain.  It can greatly reduce wear on teeth,
(which can lead to needing lots of crowns).  It can help prevent
fractured teeth that lead to crowns/root canals/lost teeth.  It can help
prolong the life of dental restorations by preventing abnormal clenching
forces.

Come to think of it, a lot of dentists do not realize the value of an
NTI either (let alone physicians!).

That gives me two choices.  I can hold the secrets of the NTI for the
very few who understand the real value of the device or I can make them
by the bucketfull for a small profit and quit worrying about being
insulted that patients don't fully appreciate my knowledge.

I guess with having a small interest in the company, the second option
makes more sense.

:-)
Fawks

> I'd agree with this. Anything over $300 seems unreasonable unless it's
> paid by insurance or something.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>
>>TW
StovePipe - 05 Jan 2005 06:53 GMT
> That gives me two choices.  I can hold the secrets of the NTI for the
> very few who understand the real value of the device or I can make them
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> :-)
> Fawks

So, I assume you charge a fee based on the 15-20 minutes it takes you to
place an NTI? You mentioned that you can do one in the time it takes to
do a dental exam. If I were to do that, they would be cheaper than the
unit cost derived from ordering 10 devices at a time (the minimum Alpha
Dental will send, here in Kaaannnaada).

Also, I assume y'all do the NTI like DrS does: 2 minutes, then trim, hot
water, 20 seconds on the teeth, pump it a bit... and continue till hard.
If you can do that, great... I usually end up destroying my retention by
doing that... So I've taken to doing the initial 2 mins, trim, 20
seconds in mouth, then I let it harden in the mixing bowl with the hot
water...

Then, of course, I have to trim with the straight attachment on the slow
speed at the cervical and interproximal... try it back in... etc...
Finally, I adjust the DE on the model trimmer, and polish with SofLex
disks. This takes MUCH MORE TIME, but at least I get good retention. (In
fact, once, I even had to use the reverse mallet crown remover to take
one off after I thought it was finished hardening... :-( ...)

So, seeing as it takes me more than 15 mins, I must charge more. Sad, as
I have LOTS of elderly patients on whom I would dearly love to be able
to place them at reduced cost...

BTW... I didn't know that the NTI was a public company... What is their
stock name?

Also: I'm sure y'all know this, but there is now an NTI with a mini DE,
so little or no filing is necessary.

Thanks
SP

Signature

Not a real Addy, yet

Steven Fawks - 07 Jan 2005 23:19 GMT
I'm not saying that Dr. M's way won't work, but I make them based on the
original directions from Dr. Boyd.

2 minutes with SNAP
Pop out and place in warm tap water for 5 or 10 minutes while I do
something else.
Trim major adjustments on a lab wheel
Try in (it rarely goes to place, but sometimes any internal trimming
will leave you with a loose NTI and you have to mix more snap)
Trim internal with a sharp blade and keep trying it until desired
fit is achieved.
Check vertical and size of DE
Make final trimming with acrylic bur and polish.

One of my assistants can do most of this if I'm really busy.

Fawks

> Also, I assume y'all do the NTI like DrS does: 2 minutes, then trim, hot
> water, 20 seconds on the teeth, pump it a bit... and continue till hard.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Thanks
> SP
W_B - 08 Jan 2005 00:13 GMT
>I'm not saying that Dr. M's way won't work, but I make them based on the
>original directions from Dr. Boyd.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>Fawks

That's the way I do it to. No assistants though.

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
StovePipe - 08 Jan 2005 19:08 GMT
> I'm not saying that Dr. M's way won't work, but I make them based on the
> original directions from Dr. Boyd.
>
> 2 minutes with SNAP
> Pop out and place in warm tap water for 5 or 10 minutes while I do
> something else.
.... snip...

Thanks for this. My own modification of the Dr S method is to use the
standard long almost exclusively when I use it. This is reserved for
teeth that have contours that are non retentive (I have alot of those).

I take my time and make the SNAP like sand. Two minutes in the mouth,
sculpting the excesses around the sides before they close.

Pop it out, trim the obvious excesses with curved suture scissors (Dr
Boyd's video shows this) and put it in the mixing bowl with hot water
for 20 secs.

Pop it back in, but don't have the patient close on it again, or the
acrylic will be deformed.... 20-30 secs

Then, take it out, but only part way, and push it back in place. Wait
another 20-40 secs, and do it again, and again,.... for a good 10
minutes. Often, there is no more internal trimming to be done by this
method.

The downside is that you have to Be There the whole time. I recline the
chair, position myself standing at 12 o'clock, place my forearms on the
patients' shoulders, and we sit/stand like that with the patient having
the saliva pump as we go, until it is hardened.

I rarely have to adjust the internal retention if I do this for the full
ten minutes. I then reduce the DE on the model trimmer (with pleanty of
water) and polish with SofLex disks on the contra angle or the straight
handpiece. You probably know that standard latch-type burs will fit in
the straight handpiece and they work well.

Again, this works best (in my hands) with a standard long device.

Just my chicken scratchin's
SP
Signature

Not a real Addy, yet

The Webby - 28 Dec 2004 19:19 GMT
> > Is that typical for So Cal and rest of the country?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I've seen it go as high as $800.
> The high end prices usually include all the adjustment appointments.

Are you saying that this would be for a reconstruction case rather than
for simple TMD symptoms?

TW
Dr Steve - 28 Dec 2004 19:44 GMT
I never charge for adjusting an NTI.  Nor do I charge to repair anything the
patient can do to it while it is in their mouth.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
>> > Is that typical for So Cal and rest of the country?
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> TW
W_B - 28 Dec 2004 20:01 GMT
>I never charge for adjusting an NTI.  Nor do I charge to repair anything the
>patient can do to it while it is in their mouth.

I don't either.

Had a patient break one in half.
Been meaning to take pictures to post.

Made new one for free.

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
The Webby - 28 Dec 2004 20:26 GMT
> >I never charge for adjusting an NTI.  Nor do I charge to repair anything the
> >patient can do to it while it is in their mouth.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
> Take out the G'RBAGE

Broke it in half as the result of forces while wearing?  Or did it
fracture as the result of a handling accident while not being worn?

TW
W_B - 28 Dec 2004 20:37 GMT
>Broke it in half as the result of forces while wearing?  

Yep.

>Or did it
>fracture as the result of a handling accident while not being worn?

Nope.

>TW

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
The Webby - 28 Dec 2004 21:13 GMT
> >Broke it in half as the result of forces while wearing?  
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
> Take out the G'RBAGE

Wow!  That patient needs a new one!!! ... deservedly, I say.  ;-)
TW
Steven Fawks - 28 Dec 2004 22:27 GMT
I've seen that a few times over the years as well.  *Usually*
they have either worn a notch in the DE and didn't come in
as instructed to fill it in or they are tossing the NTI in their
mouth and seating it on the teeth by biting (I tell patients to
*alway* put it in place with their fingers!).

That doesn't account for the ones that the dogs eat.

:-)
Fawks

>>>Broke it in half as the result of forces while wearing?  
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Wow!  That patient needs a new one!!! ... deservedly, I say.  ;-)
> TW
Alexander Vasserman DDS - 29 Dec 2004 06:27 GMT
You know it's interesting when I make the NTI there is rarely any
further adjustments but this dentist I spoke to who charges $800 says
he does more adjustments at subsequent visits and this justifies the
higher cost of the device.

With respect to your question whether is for treatment of symptoms or
for diagnosis and deprogramming prior to full mouth reconstruction, If
anything the cost should either be the same or lower if you are doing
full mouth reconstruction. If you think about it that if someone is
paying you 35-60K for full mouth reconstruction what difference does
$200-$800 device really make in terms of cost? And most dentists that I
know charge a flat fee for the reconstruction and if there is an
overpayment in terms of what is actually done patient gets a
reimbursement. I have found that when doing so much dentistry in one's
mouth, the treatment plan would vary quite a bit from what ended up
being done. Unexpected things come up such as teeth that become so
sensitive or hyperactive that they now need RCT. Or you do attempt to
save one tooth and later find out it's better to extract and place an
implant.
This is one reason why I do not like giving itemized estimates because
the larger the treatment plan the larger the "error". But somehow I
always keep falling into that trap.It is always when the patient asks
for the figure so that they can plan their finances. On one hand I do
not want to overwhelm them and on the other I realize that the list
they are asking for will vary greatly. They only thing I can do is
stress the fact that the treatment can vary quite a bit and hope the
patient understands.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.