Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / December 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ADA Organized Dentistry

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jan - 21 Dec 2004 00:36 GMT
Corruption wins again.

Mark nwho cares NOT about suffering epople, rather is all about EGO.

We are very pleased with the outcome of this matter. It represents one more
significant victory on behalf of organized dentistry," says Peter Sfikas, ADA
chief counsel.

===========

The legal position of the American Dental Association (ADA) on the safety of
mercury containing dental amalgam and the use of the material by dentists in
the United States was recently stated as follows:

"The ADA owes no legal duty of care to protect the public from allegedly
dangerous products used by dentists. The ADA did not manufacture, design,
supply or install the mercury-containing amalgams. The ADA does not control
those who do. The ADA's only alleged involvement in the product was to provide
information regarding its use. Dissemination of information relating to the
practice of dentistry does not create a duty of care to protect the public from
potential injury".
Joel M. Eichen - 21 Dec 2004 00:46 GMT
>Corruption wins again.
>
>Mark nwho cares NOT about suffering epople, rather is all about EGO.

Mark Tarka doesn't care?

I am surprised.

Joel

>We are very pleased with the outcome of this matter. It represents one more
>significant victory on behalf of organized dentistry," says Peter Sfikas, ADA
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>practice of dentistry does not create a duty of care to protect the public from
>potential injury".
Alexander Vasserman DDS - 21 Dec 2004 02:05 GMT
What else is new.
Why have an insurance code for something that they supposidly do not
support?

> Corruption wins again.
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> practice of dentistry does not create a duty of care to protect the public from
> potential injury".
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.