I would think that maybe our newsgroup has a few people who would be
willing to develop (together) a letter that would be of a quality
appropriate to be sent to the Editors of newspapers across the county.
I don't think that the general public gives fluoride much of a thought
after their children are grown, or for those without children, they may
not have any idea that fluoride is a public issue at all.
Most Americans are probably aware that fluoride is in toothpastes. Most
of the advertising $$$ seems to focus on "the whitening" properties of
toothpaste because of the desire to promote the "need" for cosmetic
dentistry.
So I ask, smd, can we devise a letter that can be distributed by any/all
of us to our local newspapers bringing attention to the need for a
better *standard* for public information regarding fluoride and it's
issues.
It is a **reasonable** question to ask, "Should I limit the amount of
water my child drinks because the water is fluoridate?" And of course,
for the question to be reasonable, there needs to be a valid reason for
the question. We have some information that can put this together. It
is not reasonable to ask that question without providing the reason
behind its significance.
Reasonable vs. unreasonable.
TW
Sdores - 20 Dec 2004 18:48 GMT
Just a suggestion, but instead of letters to newspapers I would recommend a
letter formatted to use easily by the lay person like I am to send to
representatives about getting this information to the people. It was done
by the Crohn's Colitis Foundation of American for the IBD ACT. It took a
long time to get the proper attentions but the bill finally got signed by
the president this month. UM MOM Susan
>I would think that maybe our newsgroup has a few people who would be
> willing to develop (together) a letter that would be of a quality
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> TW
The Webby - 20 Dec 2004 19:03 GMT
> Just a suggestion, but instead of letters to newspapers I would recommend a
> letter formatted to use easily by the lay person like I am to send to
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> >
> > TW
From "The Fluoride Debate"
http://www.fluoridedebate.com/conclusion.html
Professor Albert Schatz, Ph.D., Microbiology, discoverer of the
antibiotic streptomycin, was of the same opinion. His statement was:
"fluoridation ... it is the greatest fraud that has ever been
perpetrated and it has been perpetrated on more people than any other
fraud has."
________________________________________
Prof. Schatz was one of the first readers of "The TMJ Iatroepidemic" and
supported the message it delivered.
Susan, I think we need to establish what our question is before we
necessarily decide where the audience for the question might best be
found.
I appreciate your idea.
TW
Sdores - 20 Dec 2004 21:05 GMT
Well the first question that came to me when this topic got going is "Why is
fluoride added to so many things allowing people to have more than the
recommended doses?" I didn't know and I suspect most don't realize how
much fluoride they and their children are consuming to make an educated
decision. UM MOM Susan
> Susan, I think we need to establish what our question is before we
> necessarily decide where the audience for the question might best be
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> TW
The Webby - 20 Dec 2004 21:17 GMT
> Well the first question that came to me when this topic got going is "Why is
> fluoride added to so many things allowing people to have more than the
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> >
> > TW
There is so much to read and learn about on this subject. If you
haven't visited Peter Meiers' website, I encourage you to do so. He
makes very good points in asking who will be listening?
http://PMeiers.bei.t-online.de/index.htm
TW
Sdores - 20 Dec 2004 21:37 GMT
I do have it bookmarked but haven't really gotten a chance to really read it
which I intend to do. I am interested in the connection of fluoride to bones
which was a surprise to hear about. So I am just 'listening' to what you
all are saying about this to see if there is something I should change with
having medical problems of my own. Thank you for the interesting
discussions that have been going on. A lot of what is said is over my head
but I am finding this discussion quite an interesting read. Having problems
going to websites until I get my virus protection updated, hubby's been
busy. I should have this taken care of by the weekend though which will
make me more comfortable about going to some of the sites being shown.
Thanks again, and I will be checking this site out more thoroughly. I'll
let you know what I think, if anything, when I do. UM MOM Susan
>> Well the first question that came to me when this topic got going is "Why
>> is
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> TW
Joel M. Eichen - 20 Dec 2004 21:53 GMT
>Well the first question that came to me when this topic got going is "Why is
>fluoride added to so many things allowing people to have more than the
>recommended doses?" I didn't know and I suspect most don't realize how
>much fluoride they and their children are consuming to make an educated
>decision. UM MOM Susan
Yes astute comment. THANKS.
Joel
>> Susan, I think we need to establish what our question is before we
>> necessarily decide where the audience for the question might best be
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
>> TW
Peter Meiers - 20 Dec 2004 19:19 GMT
Hello Sabra,
> I would think that maybe our newsgroup has a few people who would be
> willing to develop (together) a letter that would be of a quality
> appropriate to be sent to the Editors of newspapers across the county.
I much appreciate your efforts. We have seen in the last years so many
discussions on fluoride at smd. This time I was surprised, however, how
peaceful the discussion went on. After the first posts by Keri I had the
strange feeling (not more than that though) that it might be some setup;
and I was very reluctant, therefore, to get involved. I realize that
many of the regulars here did not participate either. For whatever
reason.
Your plan to develop a letter to be sent to the editors of newspapers
across the country sounds interesting. But I bet it will have little
success in the end, even if some people here become involved. The public
depends on what they chose to be their experts. These "experts" in the
right positions (Public Health people) have their say and know how to
spread their wisdom and how to suppress others. They can do so with the
full backing of their government, as fluoride is an economic and
strategic issue as well.
It´s not only about caries, though this is what counts at smd.
If the interest of governments were indeed directed at caries
prevention, how can those same governments sign international sugar
treaties in more or less regular intervals to increase sugar sales?
Sugar is also an economic issue. Much money is involved here. Fluoride
serves also to detract attention from this topic. Have you ever followed
where the Sugar Bureau (the international head of the sugar business)
has its money?
The journalists? They have no clue. And most of them are either not
interested in fluoride as long as they cannot see the thriller behind
it, or they get admonished/fired by their boss if they dare to be too
critic.
I was after fluoride for so many years now and I can see no end to the
issue. The dentists and physicians I met, who finaly started to publicly
oppose fluoridation schemes, all got silenced. Practice interests were
at stake.
Who else would listen?
Best,
Peter
(an unreasonable one)

Signature
-History of fluorine, fluoride and fluoridation-:
--- http://PMeiers.bei.t-online.de/index.htm ---
----------------------------------------------------
carabelli - 20 Dec 2004 19:30 GMT
> Hello Sabra,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> peaceful the discussion went on. After the first posts by Keri I had the
> strange feeling (not more than that though) that it might be some setup;
I suspected when she couldn't keep the story straight on her kids ages etc.
But when she said she had a breast reduction surgery?? - that would never
happen in Texas.
carabelli
Joel M. Eichen - 20 Dec 2004 19:40 GMT
>> Hello Sabra,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>carabelli
I know ... you want proof.
Peter Meiers - 20 Dec 2004 19:45 GMT
> >I suspected when she couldn't keep the story straight on her kids ages etc.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> I know ... you want proof.
Ooops, Joel, have you been at W_B´s party lately?
Peter

Signature
-History of fluorine, fluoride and fluoridation-:
--- http://PMeiers.bei.t-online.de/index.htm ---
----------------------------------------------------
- Fluor. Auf den Spuren eines Wundermittels - :
--http://PMeiers.bei.t-online.de/deutsch/index.htm--
----------------------------------------------------
Joel M. Eichen - 20 Dec 2004 19:47 GMT
>> I know ... you want proof.
>
>Ooops, Joel, have you been at W_B´s party lately?
Good one that's HIGH proof.
The Webby - 20 Dec 2004 19:52 GMT
> Hello Sabra,
>
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> Peter
> (an unreasonable one)
Hello Peter,
As you know, I value your opinion as a reasonable person. In answer to
your final question, "Who else would listen?", and signed by 'an
unreasonable one', I too think no one will listen to 'unreasonable
people'. Still, I think it is important to encourage people not to
become apathetic about issues merely because they think or even if they
have good reason to know that no one will listen even if they do speak
up.
Thank you for your contributions to the knowledge base. People can take
it or leave it... these are choices people can make on their own.
Sincerely,
Sabra
Joel M. Eichen - 21 Dec 2004 02:14 GMT
>I would think that maybe our newsgroup has a few people who would be
>willing to develop (together) a letter that would be of a quality
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>toothpaste because of the desire to promote the "need" for cosmetic
>dentistry.
************************************************
I am working on a paper and am trying to obtain information regarding
fluoride levels in water. Specifically I am trying to determine the
range and distribution of fluoride concentrations.
Would it be possible to obtain data from you that would assist me in
preparing my paper? Thank you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fluoride levels in water vary from (essentially) zero to upwards of 7
parts per million (mg / L) fluoride. The U.S. Public health service
recommends that fluoride levels in community water supplies range from
0.7 to 1.2 parts per million. The best source for the type of
information you are seeking is the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
I highly recommend the following resources:
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/oh/flfact.htm
The American Dental Association
http://www.ada.org/consumer/fluoride/fl-menu.html
The California Dental Association
http://www.cda.org/public/pubhsrvc.html
Jay D. Shulman, DMD, MSPH
Associate Professor
Department of Public Health Sciences
************************************************
>So I ask, smd, can we devise a letter that can be distributed by any/all
>of us to our local newspapers bringing attention to the need for a
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>TW