http://www.icnr.securesites.com/hhnewsl.html#ARTICLEONE
US Government Document Admits That Mercury Vapors From Silver Fillings Exceeds
The Minimum Risk Levels Established By The US Department of Health & Human
Services!
The last issue of Health & Happiness Newsletterprovided the backround on the
controversial isssue of mercury fillings. As always controversies exist when
those who are in opposition are ignorant of the facts.
***The facts are now clear. Buried in the 351 page document Toxicological
Profile For Mercury (Update) May 1994 published by the US Department of Health
& Human Services the scientific truth has finally been divulged.***
On page 125 of this document it states: "A report from the Committee to
Coordinate Environmental Health and Related Programs (CCEHRP) of the Department
of Health and Human Services determined that 'measurement of mercury in blood
among subjects with and without amalgam restorations... and subjects before and
after amalgams were removed... provided the best estimates of daily intake from
amalgam dental restorations. These values are in the range of 1-5 ug/day (Dept.
of Human Health & Services 1993, page III-29). The chronic inhalation Minimal
Risk Level is 0.014 ug/m3....The proposed acute Minimal Risk Level is 0.02
ug/m3. Thus, both MRL's are below estimated levels from dental amalgams.'"
According to the World Health Organization the general sources of mercury in
the body are: Breathed Air (.040 micrograms), Fish (2.34 micrograms), Non-fish
food (.25 micrograms), Drinking-water .0035 micrograms), mercury vapor from
dental amalgams (3 to 17 micrograms).
*****The mercury vapor from dental amalgam
alone is a bigger source than all the other sources together.*******
In the book, Mercury Poisoning from Dental Amalgam - a Hazard to Human Brain by
Patrick Stortebecker, M.D., Ph.D., is research by A Gura Knappwost et al
(p.132) which states that when mixed metals are present in the mouth, like gold
crowns and amalgam fillings, a release of mercury occurs that is 10 times
higher when compared to amalgam fillings alone.
Several laboratories have established that mercury vapor is continuously
released from amalgam tooth fillings, and that the rate of release is increased
immediately after chewing (7 to 9 micrograms) and tooth brushing (10
micrograms). Continuous chewing for 10 to 30 minutes results in a sustained
elevation of the oral mercury level which can run as high as 100 micrograms or
more. Eventually these levels decline to a baseline level 90 minutes after
cessation of chewing (Vimy and Lorschreider: "Serial measurements of intra-oral
air mercury: Estimation of daily dose from dental amalgam."J. Dent. Res 64,
1072-1075, 1985).
A microbial conversion of metallic or non-organic mercury into organic
mercurial compounds has been well known since the 1950's. Most strains of
Staphylococci, Streptococci, yeasts and Escherichia Coli (present in human
intestines) are able to convert metallic mercury into methyl mercury. Methyl
mercury is said to be 100 times more poisonous than elemental mercury. (Ely,
T.,"Methyl Mercury Poisoning in Fish and Human Beings," Modern Medicine, Nov.
16, 1970, pp. 135-141.)
Alexander Vasserman DDS - 18 Dec 2004 08:48 GMT
So if I want to have mercury breath how many silver fillings would I
need?
> http://www.icnr.securesites.com/hhnewsl.html#ARTICLEONE
>
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
> T.,"Methyl Mercury Poisoning in Fish and Human Beings," Modern Medicine, Nov.
> 16, 1970, pp. 135-141.)
clintonz@prodigy.net - 18 Dec 2004 08:58 GMT
The fatal flaw in your reasoning is to assume that all amalgams are
identical
and that methyl mercury conversion cannot occur near or at the filling
surface
regardless of what happens on average.
As you know Hg vapor is tasteless which has worked to the great
advantage
of organized dentistry.
W_B - 18 Dec 2004 09:26 GMT
>The fatal flaw in your reasoning is....
That CA, has no reasoning at all.
What does one expect from cyanoacrylate ?
Sticks even to an untennable position, at least
until run in the dishwasher on 'heavydirty'.
>As you know...
CubicAirconia is tasteless, which has worked to the great
>advantage
>of organized disinformationists
CzA has the ''vapors" once again, and fails miserably at
the task of solo wankin'.
CubicZapple attacked W_B personally .
Wait for the inevitable DenialOfSaidit.
This is no surprise, the tactics of the heathen are
well known to the salt of the earth.
Keep beating your head against that brick wall
CubicAirhead, it will feel so much better when
you stop.
--
W_B
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
clintonz@prodigy.net - 18 Dec 2004 09:42 GMT
luckily for you Jan isn't posting right about now. Take my advice and
take an
eight hour break before you give us anti-amites any more ammunition.
Dr. Steve - 18 Dec 2004 20:41 GMT
>luckily for you Jan isn't posting right about now. Take my advice and
>take an
>eight hour break before you give us anti-amites any more ammunition.
Go to file/change identity and click on Jaz Drxx
..
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
Writing on a tablet PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my poor handwriting.
clintonz@prodigy.net - 18 Dec 2004 21:02 GMT
Boy your really an obnoxious little **** aren't you. Even after I went
out of
my way to be polite to WB while he was drunk half the night. why don't
you put your
money where you big obnoxious mouth is.
W_B - 19 Dec 2004 18:35 GMT
>Boy your really an obnoxious little **** aren't you. Even after I went
>out of
>my way to be polite to WB while he was drunk half the night. why don't
>you put your
>money where you big obnoxious mouth is.
As usual, when CZ runs out of argument, he resorts to the ad hominem.
CZ polite ?
I think not.
--
W_B
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
Jan - 19 Dec 2004 19:12 GMT
>Subject: Re: CubicAirconia Tries, tries, again... Was: Vapors
>From: W_B no_one@nowhere.net
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>As usual, when CZ runs out of argument, he resorts to the ad hominem.
Touche.
Jan