Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / December 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

fluorosis (how much fluoride?)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Keri - 09 Dec 2004 04:10 GMT
Hello again,

Can someone tell me how many milligrams of fluoride per day a child
would need to ingest, to cause fluorosis in a child's permanent teeth?
I did some calculations and my 33 month old daughter has been
ingesting at least 2 mg each day from drinking water and fluoride
toothpaste that she swallowed every day.  I actually monitored her
water intake each day for a week, and she drinks at least 32 ounces
per day.  She has been getting at least 2 mg of fluoride per day for
over one year!  This figure does not even include food, or food that
includes our fluoridated drinking water.  Anyway, how much per day
will cause fluorosis?

Thanks for your time,
Keri

P.S.  We no longer use fluoride toothpaste since she swallows the
entire amount.  She cannot grasp the concept of spitting yet.  She
did, however, swallow it twice a day for a whole year if you remember
my prior post to you guys.
JWN DDS - 09 Dec 2004 05:46 GMT
I would not brush her teeth with toothpaste until she can spit.

jwn dds

> Hello again,
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> did, however, swallow it twice a day for a whole year if you remember
> my prior post to you guys.
Dr Steve - 09 Dec 2004 13:21 GMT
You can buy special baby toothpaste which does not contain fluoride and is
safe to swallow.  It is in tiny tubes on the blister-pack wall of the baby
supplies at the store.  Next to the baby oral-gel.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>I would not brush her teeth with toothpaste until she can spit.
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>> did, however, swallow it twice a day for a whole year if you remember
>> my prior post to you guys.
Sally - 09 Dec 2004 10:59 GMT
> Hello again,
>
> Can someone tell me how many milligrams of fluoride per day a child
> would need to ingest, to cause fluorosis in a child's permanent teeth?

To avoid dental fluorosis, the National Academy of Sciences advises the
following daily fluoride intake from all sources (food, air, water,
medicines,  supplements and dental products):· infants up to 6 months
old - less than 0.01 mg · babies from 7 - 12 months - less than 0.5
mg · children from 1 to 3 years old - less than 0.7 mg · children
from 4 to 8 years old - less than 1 mg

How Much Fluoride Did You Eat Today?

See:
http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/fluoridation/112620

Sally Stride
Fluoridation Feature Writer, Suite 101
http://www.suite101.com/welcome.cfm/fluoridation
Joel M. Eichen - 09 Dec 2004 13:46 GMT
>How Much Fluoride Did You Eat Today?

Very little but I ate huge amounts of FLOURide.
Keri - 09 Dec 2004 16:46 GMT
>To avoid dental fluorosis, the National Academy of Sciences advises the
>following daily fluoride intake from all sources (food, air, water,
>medicines,  supplements and dental products):· infants up to 6 months
>old - less than 0.01 mg · babies from 7 - 12 months - less than 0.5
>mg · children from 1 to 3 years old - less than 0.7 mg · children
>from 4 to 8 years old - less than 1 mg

Well there you go, she was getting more than twice too much (and
probably more).  God if I could only go back in time.  Now all the
kids are gonna laugh at her for having disgusting looking teeth.  She
was getting at least 2 mg FOR A YEAR.  Tears are currently streaming
down my face, thinking about how I will have ruined her self esteem.
An ugly smile can kill a child's self esteem.  Thanks for the info.

Keri
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS - 09 Dec 2004 17:04 GMT
>>To avoid dental fluorosis, the National Academy of Sciences advises the
>>following daily fluoride intake from all sources (food, air, water,
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Keri

    Please read this letter, from the NAS.  Please note that the 0.1 mg
figure is an ADEQUATE fluoride intake, as defined by the NAS, for
infants, not a maximum allowable dose.  The level at which SOME children
will suffer generally MILD fluorosis has been stated as 0.5 mg/kg of
body mass.  This means that a child about 20 lbs. has a small risk of
mild fluorosis an an ingestion level of about 5 mg/day.  Allowing for
some wiggle room, it appears to me that you are panicking for no reason:

http://www.fluoride-journal.com/99-32-3/323-187.htm

    Please note that Sally here is an anti-fluoride activist.  She
certainly has that right.  She does not have the right to misrepresent
the position of the NAS.
    The web has some wonderful information, but this illustrates how a
selective reading of information can be very misleading.

Best,
Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Keri - 09 Dec 2004 22:20 GMT
>    Please read this letter, from the NAS.  Please note that the 0.1 mg
>figure is an ADEQUATE fluoride intake, as defined by the NAS, for
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>http://www.fluoride-journal.com/99-32-3/323-187.htm

Thanks for the article.  It actually says it ".05" not ".5" mg/kg of
body mass.  My daughter currently weighs about 26 pounds, but we
started her on fluoride a year ago and she was 20 pounds.  SInce it is
.05 would that mean that a 20 pound child would get fluorosis at .50
mg per day?  Wow, then she was getting at least 4 times too much.

Please tell me if my math is wrong.  I won't lie, my math skills leave
alot to be desired!

Keri
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS - 09 Dec 2004 22:59 GMT
>>    Please read this letter, from the NAS.  Please note that the 0.1 mg
>>figure is an ADEQUATE fluoride intake, as defined by the NAS, for
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Keri

    No, my arithmetic is in error.  However, note that the opinion letter
from the NAS assessed minimal risk of fluorosis at this level.

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Keri - 09 Dec 2004 23:19 GMT
>    No, my arithmetic is in error.  However, note that the opinion letter
>from the NAS assessed minimal risk of fluorosis at this level.
>
>Steve

Okay, well since it is clear she was getting like 4 times too much,
if/when she does get these horrid teeth, is there anything that can be
done to improve the way they look?  I thought I read something once
that said bleaching would not work on fluorosis.

Thanks,
Keri

By the way, here's how I come up with how much fluoride she got.

She brushed and swallowed (full amount) of .15 % fluoride toothpaste
twice per day (a larged pea sized amount)

She drinks 32-40 ounces per day of 1 ppm fluoridated water

None of this even includes water we cooked with, or foods that contain
fluoride.

two pea sized amounts of toothpaste would be like .75 mg or more,
right?
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS - 09 Dec 2004 23:27 GMT
>>    No, my arithmetic is in error.  However, note that the opinion letter
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> two pea sized amounts of toothpaste would be like .75 mg or more,
> right?

    Now you've got me guessing, but I guess no.  I'd guess a pea-sized
amount is no more than maybe 50 mg, so on the order of .15% of 100 mg
would be no more than 150 ug, or .15 mg.

Someone have an analytical balance?

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Joel M. Eichen - 09 Dec 2004 23:39 GMT
>>    No, my arithmetic is in error.  However, note that the opinion letter
>>from the NAS assessed minimal risk of fluorosis at this level.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>if/when she does get these horrid teeth, is there anything that can be
>done to improve the way they look?

If you are close to Los Angeles several dentists will offer to do
porcelain veneers .....

> I thought I read something once
>that said bleaching would not work on fluorosis.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>two pea sized amounts of toothpaste would be like .75 mg or more,
>right?
Keri - 10 Dec 2004 03:13 GMT
Why the hell do they put it in the drinking water if it is dangerous
in forming teeth?  Even without the fluoride toothpaste, my daughter
is getting too much just from the drinking water at 1 ppm.  It really
pisses me off that this crap is added to the water.  I had no idea
just drinking the water could affect my kids future teeth.

Just needed to get that off my chest.
Keri
Joel M. Eichen - 10 Dec 2004 11:02 GMT
>Why the hell do they put it in the drinking water if it is dangerous
>in forming teeth?

That's a huge discussion mainly in political circles .....

The idea is that many people will not buy fluoride in toothpaste or in
vitamins ......

Joel

>  Even without the fluoride toothpaste, my daughter
>is getting too much just from the drinking water at 1 ppm.

Your municipal supply should be less than that. Ours is o.3 ppm .....

> It really
>pisses me off that this crap is added to the water.  I had no idea
>just drinking the water could affect my kids future teeth.
>
>Just needed to get that off my chest.
>Keri
Keri - 10 Dec 2004 19:54 GMT
>Your municipal supply should be less than that. Ours is o.3 ppm .....

Nope, I have the report.  It ranges from .85 ppm to 1 ppm.  I think
it's ridiculous, given people use water to mix formula and such.  JMO.

Keri
Matt - 11 Dec 2004 18:50 GMT
> The idea is that many people will not buy fluoride in toothpaste or in
> vitamins ......

Now that is funny.  It is hard to find non-fluoridated toothpastes.
Adenosine - 11 Dec 2004 18:52 GMT
>> The idea is that many people will not buy fluoride in toothpaste or in
>> vitamins ......
>
>Now that is funny.  It is hard to find non-fluoridated toothpastes.

Not where I live. Not only is there a good selection of
non-fluoridated toothpastes at any of the natural foods stores, there
is also at least one brand at every larger supermarket.

--
Adenosine
Semi-informed Dental Consumer ?
W_B - 10 Dec 2004 15:03 GMT
>Why the hell do they put it in the drinking water if it is dangerous
>in forming teeth?

Because at 1 part per million, it doesn't harm developing teeth.
It makes them stronger and more resistant to decay.

> Even without the fluoride toothpaste, my daughter
>is getting too much just from the drinking water at 1 ppm.

No.

>It really
>pisses me off that this crap is added to the water.

Don't buy into the anti-fluoridationists BS.

>I had no idea
>just drinking the water could affect my kids future teeth.

It will make them stronger, have a \/alium

>Just needed to get that off my chest.

Ten-foot cyber-pole.

>Keri

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
Joel M. Eichen - 10 Dec 2004 16:20 GMT
>>Why the hell do they put it in the drinking water if it is dangerous
>>in forming teeth?
>
>Because at 1 part per million, it doesn't harm developing teeth.
>It makes them stronger and more resistant to decay.

I would say the ingested fluoride plus the municipal water fluoride
should EQUAL one ppm.

Joel

>> Even without the fluoride toothpaste, my daughter
>>is getting too much just from the drinking water at 1 ppm.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>>Keri
W_B - 10 Dec 2004 16:25 GMT
>>Because at 1 part per million, it doesn't harm developing teeth.
>>It makes them stronger and more resistant to decay.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Joel

I say it takes a helluvalot more than 1ppm to cause fluorosis.
--

W_B

Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Joel M. Eichen - 10 Dec 2004 16:33 GMT
>>>Because at 1 part per million, it doesn't harm developing teeth.
>>>It makes them stronger and more resistant to decay.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>I say it takes a helluvalot more than 1ppm to cause fluorosis.

I would say 5 is the range and up to 10 or more!

This happens in various places in Texas with huge natural fluoride in
the drinking water .....

Stolen material follows .......

Recent studies indicate that the total intake of fluoride is as high
as 3 mg/day rather than the earlier figure of 1.5 mg/day, primarily
because of increases in the estimated levels of fluoride in food.
(1970) Balance data presented by Spencer also suggest a higher
retention by bone, nearly 2 mg/day rather than the 0.2 mg/day
indicated earlier. ... These findings are important . . . a retention
of 2 mg/day would mean that an average individual would experience
skeletal fluorosis after 40 yr, based on an accumulation of 10,000 ppm
fluoride in bone ash. [phase 3 Crippling Skeletal Fluorosis]

There was an observation in the Kingston-Newburgh study that was
considered spurious and has never been followed up. There was a 13.5%
incidence of cortical defects in bone in the fluoridated community but
only 7.5% in the nonfluoridated community. ... Caffey noted that the
age, sex, and anatomical distribution of these bone defects are
'strikingly' similar to that of osteogenic sarcoma.

The "moderate" dental fluorosis shown by Hodge and Smith (1965, p.
443) in a community with "about 2 ppm" would be objectionable to most,
if not all, parents, although there seems to be little consumer
research on the matter.

As noted above, the possibility of mutagenesis due to HF is
potentially important in cancer of the stomach. Ingested fluoride ion
can become HF in the stomach because the pH of HF is 3.18 and the pH
of the stomach without food is generally about 1. Although stomach
cancer rates show no consistent indication of a relationship to
fluoridation in the United States, the much higher stomach cancer
rates in Japan are related to intake patterns that are compatible with
a hypothesis that fluoride is the crucial factor involved....

Initial symptoms of toxicity are a result of the local action of
fluoride on the mucosa of the gastrointestinal tract. Vomiting,
abdominal pain, nausea, and diarrhea are followed by paresthesia,
hyperactive reflexes and tonic and clonic convulsions. No system of
the body can be considered exempt, and death is usually due to
respiratory paralysis or cardiac failure. Many of the signs and
symptoms of acute fluoride toxicity are a result of the
calcium-binding effects of fluoride (Goodman and Gilman, 1975; WHO,
1970).

Without statements about the power of the tests, the implication of
finding no-effect is construed to be that no effect exists ... further
study is indicated. (Discussion of safety studies)

Three reports confirm the belief that renal patients have a lower
margin of safety than the average person. ... One case of symptomatic
skeletal fluorosis (radiculomyelopathy) has been reported from an area
in Texas with natural fluoride at 2.3 -3.5 ppm in the water. (1965).
There have been two cases of suspected skeletal fluorosis (based on
X-ray evidence in the United States with fluoride at 2-3 ppm in the
drinking water (1972). The combination of renal impairment and very
high water intake was thought to account for these findings.
Peter Meiers - 10 Dec 2004 18:33 GMT
> I would say the ingested fluoride plus the municipal water fluoride
> should EQUAL one ppm.

I appreciate much what you say in some of your other related posts.

Yet, 1 ppm is not a dose but a concentration. It simply says one part
per million parts of something (water, for example). With 1 ppm fluoride
in water (1 mg per million mg = 1 mg per liter) you ingest one mg
fluoride if you drink just one liter. If you chose to drink two liters,
you already ingest two mg. To that add what you use to prepare your food
(wherein it becomes more concentrated on cooking). Plus what´s in
juices, in tea, mineral water, etc.

Colorado Springs, where the research on badly mottled teeth once began,
had just 2 to 2.5 ppm in the water (depending on the season, because the
minerals become more concentrated during summer months when rivers carry
less water).

Trendley Dean, the father of fluoridation, set 1 ppm as an arbitrary
threshold level, where -he said- about 10 per cent of the children will
develop mildest forms of mottled teeth. You will admit, that among
children 9 years of age you will get less fluorotic individuals than
with children 12 years of age (-> tooth development). So, if your ten
percent children with mottled teeth are in a group of children aged 9,
you will probably have a much higher percentage at age 12. With this in
mind look at Dean´s original data! You will be surprised to see how he
managed to have a low fluorosis incidence in some places.

Peter

Signature

-History of fluorine, fluoride and fluoridation-:
--- http://PMeiers.bei.t-online.de/index.htm ---
----------------------------------------------------

The Webby - 10 Dec 2004 19:17 GMT
Hi Peter,

I don't know how many people have taken time to visit your website.  But
I wanted to mention for a long time that it is a most interesting site
and informative in ways that I would not have encountered otherwise.  

Sabra
Peter Meiers - 10 Dec 2004 19:50 GMT
> I don't know how many people have taken time to visit your website.  But
> I wanted to mention for a long time that it is a most interesting site
> and informative in ways that I would not have encountered otherwise.

Thank you, Sabra, for the kind words. I don´t know, either, how many
people have taken time to visit my website and to read some of the
articles. Comments like yours show me that all my investments of time
and money to get the historic documents together are not in vain. Too
bad only, that after a normal 8-hours work day there´s not much time and
energy left to work on any website updates, which, therefore, can be
done only in rather long intervals.

Best,
Peter

Signature

-History of fluorine, fluoride and fluoridation-:
--- http://PMeiers.bei.t-online.de/index.htm ---
----------------------------------------------------

Keri - 10 Dec 2004 20:03 GMT
>I would say the ingested fluoride plus the municipal water fluoride
>should EQUAL one ppm.
>
>Joel

How do you figure?  Maybe it SHOULD but it doesn't.  She drinks
minimum 32 ounces of 1 ppm water (I measured for a week and I have our
water plant's report).  She swallowed 2 large pea sized amounts of
toothpaste every single day.  Then you have to think about the food
with natural fluoride plus the water we use to cook with.

32 ounces of water-  1 mg
2 times swallowed paste- .75 mg

Thats 1.75 mg just right there.  Some days she drinks closer to 40
ounces (we live in a hot climate).
Joel M. Eichen - 10 Dec 2004 20:35 GMT
>>I would say the ingested fluoride plus the municipal water fluoride
>>should EQUAL one ppm.
>>
>>Joel
>>
>How do you figure?

That's the problem! I drink Tropicana which is NOT from concentrate
while some dude down the street reconstitutes from frozen.

So keeping track is impossible.

Oh yes, I mean orange juice.

Everything else too.

Joel

> Maybe it SHOULD but it doesn't.  She drinks
>minimum 32 ounces of 1 ppm water (I measured for a week and I have our
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Thats 1.75 mg just right there.  Some days she drinks closer to 40
>ounces (we live in a hot climate).
Joel M. Eichen - 10 Dec 2004 20:36 GMT
>>I would say the ingested fluoride plus the municipal water fluoride
>>should EQUAL one ppm.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>Thats 1.75 mg just right there.  Some days she drinks closer to 40
>ounces (we live in a hot climate).

The limit is not one milligram. It may be twenty milligrams(per day)
spread over water, orange juice, beer (me not her), and of course
food. Food is 75 - 90% water!

Joel
Keri - 10 Dec 2004 20:40 GMT
>The limit is not one milligram. It may be twenty milligrams(per day)
>spread over water, orange juice, beer (me not her), and of course
>food. Food is 75 - 90% water!
>
>Joel

According to the ADA the upper intake limit is 1.3 mg for a 1-3 year
old.  Adequate intake amount is .7 mg.  So she was way above even the
upper intake limit.  The ADA claims you will start to see fluorosis
when you go above that figure.

Keri
The Webby - 10 Dec 2004 20:45 GMT
> >The limit is not one milligram. It may be twenty milligrams(per day)
> >spread over water, orange juice, beer (me not her), and of course
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Keri

Keri, have you visited the website of Peter Meiers?
Keri - 10 Dec 2004 20:50 GMT
>Keri, have you visited the website of Peter Meiers?

Nope, why?  Tell me how to get there and I'll check it out tonight
after my kiddos are asleep.
The Webby - 10 Dec 2004 21:04 GMT
> >Keri, have you visited the website of Peter Meiers?
>
> Nope, why?  Tell me how to get there and I'll check it out tonight
> after my kiddos are asleep.  

Okay.

The Webby wrote:

> > I don't know how many people have taken time to visit your website.  But
> > I wanted to mention for a long time that it is a most interesting site
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Best,
> Peter

So open your browser and put in the following URL:

http://PMeiers.bei.t-online.de/index.htm

You asked why?  After you have a chance to visit, let us know what you
think?

TW
Keri - 11 Dec 2004 02:58 GMT
>http://PMeiers.bei.t-online.de/index.htm
>
>You asked why?  After you have a chance to visit, let us know what you
>think?
>
>TW

I think it backs up my reason for being so concerned about my
daughter's developing teeth.

Keri
The Webby - 11 Dec 2004 03:58 GMT
> >http://PMeiers.bei.t-online.de/index.htm
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Keri

Keri, you may see it that way, but that is not why I suggested you read
the materials there.  I know that it's impossible for you to have read
much of anything published there by this time today.

On the other hand, you can go to the American Academy of Pediatrics and
read their position.  

Balance, my dear.  Everything in life is about balance.

TW
Keri - 11 Dec 2004 17:26 GMT
>On the other hand, you can go to the American Academy of Pediatrics and
>read their position.  
>
>Balance, my dear.  Everything in life is about balance.
>
>TW

I read the ADA and AAP stuff first.  Their stuff is what lead me to
the conclusion she will have fluorosis.  The link you gave me just
reinforced it.  No, I have not read all the stuff about cancer etc, I
will read that later when I have time.  I was only looking at
fluorosis.

Keri
Joel M. Eichen - 11 Dec 2004 17:36 GMT
>>On the other hand, you can go to the American Academy of Pediatrics and
>>read their position.  
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>will read that later when I have time.  I was only looking at
>fluorosis.

I posted at DT, but so far, plenty of reading but no replying .....

Now I am wondering .....

Joel

>Keri
The Webby - 11 Dec 2004 17:45 GMT
> >>On the other hand, you can go to the American Academy of Pediatrics and
> >>read their position.  
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> >Keri

We can and should wonder about all sorts of points the pendulum touches
as it swings far and wide ... but we must remember that one of the
points it always touches on that journey is the point determined as
dead-center.  

TW
The Webby - 11 Dec 2004 17:53 GMT
Observation.  Moderation.  

TW

In article
<nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam-AC9A14.09452011122004@orngca-news04.soca
l.rr.com>,

> > >>On the other hand, you can go to the American Academy of Pediatrics and
> > >>read their position.  
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> TW
Keri - 11 Dec 2004 18:30 GMT
>>>On the other hand, you can go to the American Academy of Pediatrics and
>>>read their position.  
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>>Keri

I have no idea what DT is.
Adenosine - 11 Dec 2004 18:41 GMT
>>>>On the other hand, you can go to the American Academy of Pediatrics and
>>>>read their position.  
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
>I have no idea what DT is.

DentalTown. It's an online community devoted to dentistry. It's for
professionals and businesses only, but it's not particularily
difficult to get a login without being a dentist or a provider of
dental goods.

--
Adenosine
Semi-informed Dental Consumer ?
Joel M. Eichen - 11 Dec 2004 19:58 GMT
>>>>Keri
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>difficult to get a login without being a dentist or a provider of
>dental goods.

What's that secret word ,,,,,,,, OCCIDENTAL?
The Webby - 11 Dec 2004 20:56 GMT
> >>>>Keri
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> What's that secret word ,,,,,,,, OCCIDENTAL?

I don't think so... but you're close!
Joel M. Eichen - 11 Dec 2004 21:57 GMT
>> >DentalTown. It's an online community devoted to dentistry. It's for
>> >professionals and businesses only, but it's not particularily
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>I don't think so... but you're close!

I lied because otherwise Jan Drew will tell Howard I am spilling the
beans!

Joel
The Webby - 11 Dec 2004 22:07 GMT
> >> >DentalTown. It's an online community devoted to dentistry. It's for
> >> >professionals and businesses only, but it's not particularily
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Joel

I knew you lied.
Joel M. Eichen - 11 Dec 2004 19:57 GMT
>>I posted at DT, but so far, plenty of reading but no replying .....
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>I have no idea what DT is.

You cannot get there from here ,,,,,, its for dental people .... but I
will report back what they say.

DentalTown (there are armed guards at the border).

Joel
The Webby - 11 Dec 2004 20:55 GMT
> You cannot get there from here ,,,,,, its for dental people .... but I
> will report back what they say.
>
> DentalTown (there are armed guards at the border).
>
> Joel

Is it the one that's three groups up, two across, and three over on the
diagonal???  I see armed guards over there, I think ..... yes, that's
what I see!  You're right.  You can't get there from here.
Keri - 12 Dec 2004 02:59 GMT
>>>I posted at DT, but so far, plenty of reading but no replying .....
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>Joel

As interested as I might be to see what they have to say, I would
never go to any site and pretend to be something I'm not (a dentist).
If you find out anything that I might be interested in, good or bad,
please email me at karasmom2004@yahoo.com

Thanks,
Keri
Joel M. Eichen - 12 Dec 2004 13:01 GMT
>>You cannot get there from here ,,,,,, its for dental people .... but I
>>will report back what they say.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>Thanks,
>Keri

Will do. Its two days and no one there has taken the bait ... although
around 100 have clicked and viewed the file.

(I do not know how many have READ thye file, but at least they
clicked).

Joel
Peter Meiers - 12 Dec 2004 16:18 GMT
> Will do. Its two days and no one there has taken the bait ... although
> around 100 have clicked and viewed the file.
>
> (I do not know how many have READ thye file, but at least they
> clicked).

Joel,

try asking the AAPHD listserv. They´ll probably give you some lesson
;-))

Peter

Signature

-History of fluorine, fluoride and fluoridation-:
--- http://PMeiers.bei.t-online.de/index.htm ---
----------------------------------------------------

StovePipe - 12 Dec 2004 07:57 GMT
> >>I posted at DT, but so far, plenty of reading but no replying .....
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Joel

the guards can be bribed with anything.... a cigarette, and elastic
band,  what ever... what a farce
SP

Signature

Not a real Addy, yet

Joel M. Eichen - 10 Dec 2004 23:47 GMT
>>The limit is not one milligram. It may be twenty milligrams(per day)
>>spread over water, orange juice, beer (me not her), and of course
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Keri

Really?

I stand corrected. THANKS.

Joel
Keri - 10 Dec 2004 19:58 GMT
>It will make them stronger, have a \/alium

Yes, I need one.  Can dentists prescribe them?  LOL.  I agree that at
1 ppm alone, it may not be a big deal.  But they probably would not
expect a toddler to drink a liter or more of water per day (like mine
does).  Then we have the whole swallowed toothpaste issue.  I am
currently using non fluoride toothpaste, which I should have done from
the beginning.  I am trying not to buy into the anti-fluoride crap,
but everything I read is mostly negative.  There is a fine line
between how much is healthy and how much will do harm.  I am finding
out that my daughters 2 mg or more per day was WAY too much.

Keri
Adenosine - 10 Dec 2004 20:07 GMT
>>It will make them stronger, have a \/alium
>>>
>Yes, I need one.  Can dentists prescribe them?  

Yes, when I had oral surgery when I was a kid, I was given a valium
before I came in, even tho I was going under for the procedure.

Didn't stop me from getting rather emotional before they knocked me
out however.

--
Adenosine
Semi-informed Dental Consumer ?
Joel M. Eichen - 10 Dec 2004 20:37 GMT
>>It will make them stronger, have a \/alium
>>>
>Yes, I need one.  Can dentists prescribe them?  LOL.

YUP, we give laughing gas too but only at parties.

> I agree that at
>1 ppm alone, it may not be a big deal.  But they probably would not
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>between how much is healthy and how much will do harm.  I am finding
>out that my daughters 2 mg or more per day was WAY too much.

No its not.

If you drink 8 glasses of water you are over 2 mg fluoride.

Joel

>Keri
Keri - 10 Dec 2004 20:55 GMT
O

>No its not.
>
>If you drink 8 glasses of water you are over 2 mg fluoride.
>
>Joel

Look, I have the utmost respect for you, even though I don't know you.
And I respect what you do and all that it took to get there.  BUT, why
would the ADA but a limit on fluoride ingestion if it caused no
problems?  They recommend .7 mg per day, upper intake allowable limit
1.3 mg for 1-3 year olds. so how on earth can you claim 2 mg would not
be too much?  Yes, 8 glasses of water would give me 2 mg, but I am an
adult.  Children should not be drinking that junk if it is harmful.  I
will admit, my kid drinks twice as much water as most kids.  I only
let her drink water and milk, currently (I know, mean mommy)!  ADA
says you get fluorosis when you go over their suggested limits.  They
are the "gods" of dentistry, right?

Keri
Joel M. Eichen - 10 Dec 2004 23:50 GMT
>O
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>would the ADA but a limit on fluoride ingestion if it caused no
>problems?

Jeez, I am wondering the same thing myself. That's impossibly low!

One liter of water (around a quart) contains one mg of fluoride.

Joel

> They recommend .7 mg per day, upper intake allowable limit

Wow! Three glasses of water ...... and no food either.

>1.3 mg for 1-3 year olds. so how on earth can you claim 2 mg would not
>be too much?  Yes, 8 glasses of water would give me 2 mg, but I am an
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>says you get fluorosis when you go over their suggested limits.  They
>are the "gods" of dentistry, right?

No Rod Kurthy is the God of dentistry .......

Joel

>Keri
Joel M. Eichen - 11 Dec 2004 00:05 GMT
OY VEY!!!!

Keri,

Please skip this part ...... YIKES.

You got too much to worry about already.

Joel

Does fluoride cause cancer?

It was a letter from a famous physician of Hannover, Dr. Hans Nieper
(a friend of Dr. Dean Burk), to the editor of a medical journal that
drew my attention to the problem late in 1981. In response to an
article on possible immuno-suppressive effects of tetracyclines, Dr.
Nieper suggested that fluorides used in water fluoridation might have
contributed to the observed occurrence of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma in
American and Canadian patients consulting him. They had been treated -
three months to three years before the diagnosis- with tetracyclines.
As no such association existed in his German patients with lymphoma or
myeloma, Dr. Nieper thought that an additional factor, typical for the
U.S.A. and Canada, might be synergistic with tetracycline leading to
cancer. Besides the possiblity of viruses and nitrites, he mentioned
fluoridation and referred to evidence of carcinogenic fluoride effects
presented at a court trial in Pittsburgh, Pa.  I called

>>O
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
>>Keri
Peter Meiers - 11 Dec 2004 08:28 GMT
> OY VEY!!!!
> ...
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> (a friend of Dr. Dean Burk), to the editor of a medical journal that
> drew my attention to the problem late in 1981. ...

That was the start. Here´s something more:

http://www.npwa.freeserve.co.uk/meiers_critique_of_york_review.html

Yikes ?!?

Signature

-History of fluorine, fluoride and fluoridation-:
--- http://PMeiers.bei.t-online.de/index.htm ---
----------------------------------------------------

Joel M. Eichen - 11 Dec 2004 13:03 GMT
Yo Peter!

I agree with you and thanks for alerting us to the possibility that
fluoride is doing something other than making teeth stronger.

ME? I just do not know ........

So I am counting on YOU!

Joel

>> OY VEY!!!!
>> ...
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Yikes ?!?
Keri - 11 Dec 2004 02:55 GMT
>Jeez, I am wondering the same thing myself. That's impossibly low!
>
>One liter of water (around a quart) contains one mg of fluoride.
>
>Joel

Look at the second table on this page

http://www.ada.org/public/topics/fluoride/facts/tables.asp

Don't forget I am talking about the intake for a child, not an adult.
Most kids don't drink a liter of water per day.  Mine does and more.

Keri
Joel M. Eichen - 11 Dec 2004 13:05 GMT
>>Jeez, I am wondering the same thing myself. That's impossibly low!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Keri

Thanks Keri,

You are a good researcher! This is stuff I never came across before
and believe me ,,, I am o nthe internet some!

THANKS.

PS- I am wondering about blood sugar. A pediatrician may want to check
into why the kid drinks so much water.

Joel
Keri - 11 Dec 2004 18:27 GMT
>Thanks Keri,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Joel

We live in a hot climate and she plays outside alot.  Also, I don't
let her drink juice so water is her only option.  Her blood sugar was
checked (for other reasons) and was fine.  Are you a dentist?
Joel M. Eichen - 11 Dec 2004 19:58 GMT
>>Thanks Keri,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>let her drink juice so water is her only option.  Her blood sugar was
>checked (for other reasons) and was fine.  Are you a dentist?

YUP.
Matt - 11 Dec 2004 19:16 GMT
> and believe me ,,, I am o nthe internet some!

But how much of that time is spent making inane posts to s.m.d?

It really took you a long time to notice the difference between giving
2mg to a 20-lb. individual and giving the same amount to an adult.  You
are a dental college graduate for god's sake.
Joel M. Eichen - 11 Dec 2004 19:59 GMT
>> and believe me ,,, I am o nthe internet some!
>
>But how much of that time is spent making inane posts to s.m.d?

95% of it, why do you ask?

Joel

>It really took you a long time to notice the difference between giving
>2mg to a 20-lb. individual and giving the same amount to an adult.  You
>are a dental college graduate for god's sake.
Joel M. Eichen - 11 Dec 2004 20:00 GMT
>> and believe me ,,, I am o nthe internet some!
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>2mg to a 20-lb. individual and giving the same amount to an adult.  You
>are a dental college graduate for god's sake.

To tell you the truth I never heard of the limit for fluoride to be
1mg or 2mg or 10mg.

That is why I posted at DentalTown. The other dentists do not seem to
have any knowledge of it either.

Joel
Keri - 12 Dec 2004 03:07 GMT
>To tell you the truth I never heard of the limit for fluoride to be
>1mg or 2mg or 10mg.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Joel

I do believe you, but I find that fasinating.  I wonder if it's
something they mainly teach to the hygienists since they are the one
spending the most time with your child and discussing cleaning your
child's teeth.....???  I would be interested in any info any dentist
has.  We won't be seeing a pediatric dentist until April of next year
(when our insurance kicks in).  What I find surprising is that link
that Dr Bornfeld (Steve?) posted where they said the limit was .05
mg/kg of body weight.  That would mean my 20 lb child would top out at
.5 mg right?  Jeez, I'd have to NEVER give her any water at that rate.
The article actually said you will see fluorosis above that figure.
Do any of you see children in your practice?  Do you see much
fluorosis?  I am particularly interested in areas with water
fluoridated at 1 ppm.

Keri
The Webby - 12 Dec 2004 03:31 GMT
> >To tell you the truth I never heard of the limit for fluoride to be
> >1mg or 2mg or 10mg.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Keri

Keri, look around at all the other children where you live.  Do they all
have the problem you fear for your children?  If so?  If not?  

TW
Keri - 12 Dec 2004 03:57 GMT
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 03:31:57 GMT, The Webby

>Keri, look around at all the other children where you live.  Do they all
>have the problem you fear for your children?  If so?  If not?  
>
>TW

I never paid attention but I will start looking now!  However, I do
think my daughter drinks more water than the average 2 year old.  Like
I said before, other parents probably also did not let their toddler
swallow fluoride toothpaste twice a day.  I really don't understand
why they fluoridate the water, when it is so easy to go over the ADA's
recommended intake level.  I guess they feel ugly teeth is better than
cavities.  It actually pisses me off.  I think it's ridiculous to
fluoridate the water at 1 ppm when fluoride is also coming from so
many other sources.  And the recommended intake for my kid according
to the ADA is .7 mg!  That is insane.  My child was getting about 4
times too much (that I KNOW of).  Sorry I am repeating the same thing
over and over, I am just angry.  I will get over it soon, I promise.

Keri
The Webby - 12 Dec 2004 04:08 GMT
 Sorry I am repeating the same thing
> over and over, I am just angry.  I will get over it soon, I promise.
>
> Keri

I certainly hope so because you might have something more pressing to
worry about when you least expect it with two children!

TW
Matt - 12 Dec 2004 07:22 GMT
> However, I do
> think my daughter drinks more water than the average 2 year old.  Like
> I said before, other parents probably also did not let their toddler
> swallow fluoride toothpaste twice a day.  

As I understand it, excessive fluoride intake causes thirst, so there is
supposed to be a snowball effect.
StovePipe - 12 Dec 2004 09:09 GMT
> I really don't understand
> why they fluoridate the water, when it is so easy to go over the ADA's
> recommended intake level.  I guess they feel ugly teeth is better than
> cavities.  It actually pisses me off.

Lady! Don't you think that if there was a serious flurosis problem in
your area you'd know about it already??? You'd have seen it in the kids
around you? Come on now... you are being paranoid about this thing and I
seriously think that it is time YOU got some help. Your kids are going
to be FINE, in all probability. YOU, however, are not, unless you can
learn to control yourself. You NEED HELP with this. Maybe not
permanently, but for a while. DON'T do anythig stupid, like try to limit
your little girl's water intake. Limit your own thoughts instead. Did I
mention I think you yourself need help? Talk to YOUR OWN physician, and
ask for a referral. Like I said before, you are harming your children
with this obsession. You are an adult; it is too late to change your
psychological make-up. Not so for your children. If you walked into my
office with this attitude, I would force you to do what I say for the
sake of your children, more than your own health.
DO IT NOW
SP
Signature

Not a real Addy, yet

Joel M. Eichen - 12 Dec 2004 13:14 GMT
>Lady! Don't you think that if there was a serious flurosis problem in
>your area you'd know about it already??? You'd have seen it in the kids
>around you?

But still ,,, enamel can be splotchier than we would like. The parents
are often unaware, but I do not like what I see ... that part is true.

Joel
StovePipe - 12 Dec 2004 15:00 GMT
> But still ,,, enamel can be splotchier than we would like. The parents
> are often unaware, but I do not like what I see ... that part is true.
>
> Joel

What is true is that this lady is having a cow over something that is a
small and correctible defect in teeth. Self flaggellation went out when
Jesus Christ was Lord and Master in Europe (that is: The Middle Ages).
This is 2004/2005, and this lady needs to get some balance into her head
or the SAAAAAME thing will happen again and again..... I am worried
about those kids with an attitude like that.
SP
Signature

Not a real Addy, yet

Joel M. Eichen - 12 Dec 2004 15:16 GMT
>> But still ,,, enamel can be splotchier than we would like. The parents
>> are often unaware, but I do not like what I see ... that part is true.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>small and correctible defect in teeth. Self flaggellation went out when
>Jesus Christ was Lord and Master in Europe (that is: The Middle Ages).

She did not mention if she is religious .....

It is a shame to see the splotchy enamel though ....

...and to tell you the truth I never heard about the 1mg or 2mg per
day ........ (ADA site) ......

The discussion itself should be resolved somehow ......

Joel

>This is 2004/2005, and this lady needs to get some balance into her head
>or the SAAAAAME thing will happen again and again..... I am worried
>about those kids with an attitude like that.
>SP
Keri - 12 Dec 2004 16:55 GMT
>What is true is that this lady is having a cow over something that is a
>small and correctible defect in teeth. Self flaggellation went out when
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>about those kids with an attitude like that.
>SP

Look, I will agree that I am worked up over something that already
occured, and I have no control over.  However, there is NOTHING wrong
about educating myself on this subject.  I have a 7 month old baby
girl, also, and I want to make sure her fluoride intake is adequate
but not too much.  Therefore, this subject interests me alot.  Should
I just continue to be ignorant on the subject and let it happen to my
2nd daughter's teeth, too?  My concern is that the ADA claims
fluorosis will result when you go over a ridiculously small amount of
fluoride per day.  In my community, the fluoride in the water is at
1ppm.  Both my kids will likely drink lots of water because I don't
like to give them juice (just sugar water, IMO).  Anyway, 2 year olds
cannot spit toothpaste, so why do the directions on the tube (Oral B
stages for kids, for example) say to use a pea sized amount for 2-6
years old?  2 year olds should not have fluoridated toothpaste.  If
you brush twice a day, they are ingesting about .75 mg.  If they drink
a liter of water per day (like my toddler), they are getting 1 mg.
Just right there you are over the ADA's recommended intake AND the
upper intake tolerable level (by ALOT).  This is my point, it should
not be in the water, when it's so easy to go over.  Maybe some
dentists LIKE it this way so they can make more money on correcting
fluorosis.  However, I have read numerous times that it is extrememly
difficult to correct damage from fluorosis.

I do not care if I seem neurotic.  This subject interests me and I
want to do whats best for my child's teeth.  The research I have been
doing while my children nap or are with my husband playing in no way
affects the wonderful relationship we have.  Give me a break.

Oh yeah, as far as there being a fluorosis crisis in my area, no I
have not heard of one.  However fluorosis is not always severe, and
most parents I have talked to recently are not using fluoridated
toothpaste for their kid and their children don't drink that much
water.  So most likely they will not have too much of a problem.

Keri
Joel M. Eichen - 12 Dec 2004 17:34 GMT
>>What is true is that this lady is having a cow over something that is a
>>small and correctible defect in teeth. Self flaggellation went out when
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>occured, and I have no control over.  However, there is NOTHING wrong
>about educating myself on this subject.

We agree.

The cow agrees too.

Joel

> I have a 7 month old baby
>girl, also, and I want to make sure her fluoride intake is adequate
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
>Keri
Joel M. Eichen - 12 Dec 2004 17:35 GMT
>Oh yeah, as far as there being a fluorosis crisis in my area, no I
>have not heard of one.

Go look at the front teeth of some of the seven and eight year olds
.....

Joel
Keri - 12 Dec 2004 17:46 GMT
>>Oh yeah, as far as there being a fluorosis crisis in my area, no I
>>have not heard of one.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Joel

I can do that, but how will I know how much water they drank as a
toddler, or if their parents let them use fluoridated toothpaste? Much
less swallow it.  There is no way to know, and even "I" am not crazy
enough to go around asking parents.  LOL!

Keri
Joel M. Eichen - 12 Dec 2004 17:57 GMT
>>>Oh yeah, as far as there being a fluorosis crisis in my area, no I
>>>have not heard of one.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>I can do that, but how will I know how much water they drank as a
>toddler, or if their parents let them use fluoridated toothpaste?

That's the problem with all fluoride studies ... for example I drink
Tropicana orange juice that is not reconstituted from concentrate,
while someone else may buy frozen and reconstitute it with
fluoirde-laden water ......

Joel

>Much
>less swallow it.  There is no way to know, and even "I" am not crazy
>enough to go around asking parents.  LOL!

Too bad. Stope Pipe would have liked to hear you say that!

>Keri
Peter Meiers - 12 Dec 2004 19:36 GMT
> I can do that, but how will I know how much water they drank as a
> toddler, or if their parents let them use fluoridated toothpaste? Much
> less swallow it.  There is no way to know, and even "I" am not crazy
> enough to go around asking parents.  LOL!

At least you would get an impression of how widespread the problem is or
may be in your area. Regardless of whether it´s caused by the water or
toothpaste, or whatever. Just regard it as an outcome of the sum of all
fluoride exposure, which is higher in areas with fluoridated water. One
child may get most fluoride by drinking 3 liters of water (what? eh?
well, somewhat exaggerated) and not swallow toothpaste, while another
drinks less water but prefers toothpaste or <whatever>.

Peter

Signature

-History of fluorine, fluoride and fluoridation-:
--- http://PMeiers.bei.t-online.de/index.htm ---
----------------------------------------------------

StovePipe - 12 Dec 2004 18:42 GMT
> Oh yeah, as far as there being a fluorosis crisis in my area, no I
> have not heard of one.  However fluorosis is not always severe, and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Keri

Then follow the good suggestion: go ask the neighbors how they handle it
and look closely at the front teeth of the 6 and 7 year olds. If you see
white spots, you may have a problem. If not, concentrate on other
things.
SP
Signature

Not a real Addy, yet

Keri - 13 Dec 2004 03:04 GMT
>What is true is that this lady is having a cow over something that is a
>small and correctible defect in teeth. Self flaggellation went out when
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>about those kids with an attitude like that.
>SP

Small?  The problem is small?  Look at these teeth, especially the
ones at the bottom.

http://www.fluoridealert.org/dental-fluorosis.htm
The Webby - 13 Dec 2004 03:25 GMT
> >What is true is that this lady is having a cow over something that is a
> >small and correctible defect in teeth. Self flaggellation went out when
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> http://www.fluoridealert.org/dental-fluorosis.htm

Looking at the photo credits, I saw Elke Babiuk who spent quite a bit of
time in this newsgroup.  That takes me back to '95 ... '96?  (I could
look it up.)  

I was going to collect the "ideas" for Keri from this thread, but the
more I think about it, I think Keri should do that.  What do you say,
Keri?

TW
Keri - 13 Dec 2004 03:42 GMT
>I was going to collect the "ideas" for Keri from this thread, but the
>more I think about it, I think Keri should do that.  What do you say,
>Keri?
>
>TW

Sure, no problem.
The Webby - 13 Dec 2004 03:55 GMT
> >I was going to collect the "ideas" for Keri from this thread, but the
> >more I think about it, I think Keri should do that.  What do you say,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Sure, no problem.

Great!  

TW
Joel M. Eichen - 13 Dec 2004 11:33 GMT
>Looking at the photo credits, I saw Elke Babiuk who spent quite a bit of
>time in this newsgroup.  That takes me back to '95 ... '96?  (I could
>look it up.)  

I was thinking that too ......

Gee, its a small vocal group that's everywhere .........
The Webby - 13 Dec 2004 16:08 GMT
> >Looking at the photo credits, I saw Elke Babiuk who spent quite a bit of
> >time in this newsgroup.  That takes me back to '95 ... '96?  (I could
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Gee, its a small vocal group that's everywhere .........

Interesting.
Peter Meiers - 13 Dec 2004 17:24 GMT
> >Looking at the photo credits, I saw Elke Babiuk who spent quite a bit of
> >time in this newsgroup.  That takes me back to '95 ... '96?  (I could
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Gee, its a small vocal group that's everywhere .........

A "small vocal group"? Since you learned this by heart, the "small vocal
group" grew quite a bit.

Signature

-History of fluorine, fluoride and fluoridation-:
--- http://PMeiers.bei.t-online.de/index.htm ---
----------------------------------------------------
- Fluor. Auf den Spuren eines Wundermittels - :
--http://PMeiers.bei.t-online.de/deutsch/index.htm--
----------------------------------------------------

Joel M. Eichen - 13 Dec 2004 18:49 GMT
>> >Looking at the photo credits, I saw Elke Babiuk who spent quite a bit of
>> >time in this newsgroup.  That takes me back to '95 ... '96?  (I could
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>A "small vocal group"? Since you learned this by heart, the "small vocal
>group" grew quite a bit.

YUP, Keri joined!
Peter Meiers - 13 Dec 2004 19:22 GMT
> >> >Looking at the photo credits, I saw Elke Babiuk who spent quite a bit of
> >> >time in this newsgroup.  That takes me back to '95 ... '96?  (I could
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> YUP, Keri joined!

We´ll see.

Signature

-History of fluorine, fluoride and fluoridation-:
--- http://PMeiers.bei.t-online.de/index.htm ---
----------------------------------------------------
- Fluor. Auf den Spuren eines Wundermittels - :
--http://PMeiers.bei.t-online.de/deutsch/index.htm--
----------------------------------------------------

Peter Meiers - 13 Dec 2004 17:21 GMT
> Looking at the photo credits, I saw Elke Babiuk who spent quite a bit of
> time in this newsgroup.  That takes me back to '95 ... '96?  (I could
> look it up.)

That may be right. It was my beginning too. And I remember well how you
entered the group with almost thousands of posts a day on one subject
... ;-))

Regards,
Peter

Signature

-History of fluorine, fluoride and fluoridation-:
--- http://PMeiers.bei.t-online.de/index.htm ---
----------------------------------------------------

The Webby - 13 Dec 2004 17:32 GMT
> > Looking at the photo credits, I saw Elke Babiuk who spent quite a bit of
> > time in this newsgroup.  That takes me back to '95 ... '96?  (I could
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Regards,
> Peter

The tough old days ... ;-)

And best regards to you, Peter.

Sabra
Joel M. Eichen - 13 Dec 2004 18:50 GMT
>> Looking at the photo credits, I saw Elke Babiuk who spent quite a bit of
>> time in this newsgroup.  That takes me back to '95 ... '96?  (I could
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>Regards,
>Peter

I am just wondering what with millions and billions of web pages, how
come I ALWAYS run into the same twenty or thirty people?

Joel
Peter Meiers - 13 Dec 2004 19:33 GMT
> >> Looking at the photo credits, I saw Elke Babiuk who spent quite a bit of
> >> time in this newsgroup.  That takes me back to '95 ... '96?  (I could
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I am just wondering what with millions and billions of web pages, how
> come I ALWAYS run into the same twenty or thirty people?

Take a look at the fluoridistas. Same thing. That´s why I am so
interested in the history of that BS.
The anti´s only don´t have that many followers yet, as they are not so
well organized.
But times change.

Signature

-History of fluorine, fluoride and fluoridation-:
--- http://PMeiers.bei.t-online.de/index.htm ---
----------------------------------------------------

The Webby - 13 Dec 2004 04:13 GMT
> >What is true is that this lady is having a cow over something that is a
> >small and correctible defect in teeth. Self flaggellation went out when
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> http://www.fluoridealert.org/dental-fluorosis.htm

For some reason, my reply post hasn't arrived in a timely manner.  If
this is a duplicate, I apologize.

I wrote:

Looking at the photo credits, I saw Elke Babiuk who spent quite a bit of
time in this newsgroup.  That takes me back to '95 ... '96?  (I could
look it up.)  

I was going to collect the "ideas" for Keri from this thread, but the
more I think about it, I think Keri should do that.  What do you say,
Keri?

TW
StovePipe - 13 Dec 2004 05:29 GMT
> Small?  The problem is small?  Look at these teeth, especially the
> ones at the bottom.
>
> http://www.fluoridealert.org/dental-fluorosis.htm

I am sure we're talking here about areas where the water is unusually
high in Fluoride content, and most/all the kids in the area are
afflicted. I don't think you'd find this in the city, really I don't.

If you were at risk for that type of difformity, the neighborhood kids
would be showing it, it wouldn't be an isolated case.
Keep yer chin up!      ;-)
SP
Signature

Not a real Addy, yet

Joel M. Eichen - 13 Dec 2004 11:34 GMT
>I am sure we're talking here about areas where the water is unusually
>high in Fluoride content, and most/all the kids in the area are
>afflicted. I don't think you'd find this in the city, really I don't.

Places like Texas, I believe .......
Keri - 13 Dec 2004 16:35 GMT
>>I am sure we're talking here about areas where the water is unusually
>>high in Fluoride content, and most/all the kids in the area are
>>afflicted. I don't think you'd find this in the city, really I don't.
>
>Places like Texas, I believe .......

I live in Texas.

Keri
Joel M. Eichen - 13 Dec 2004 16:37 GMT
>>>I am sure we're talking here about areas where the water is unusually
>>>high in Fluoride content, and most/all the kids in the area are
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Keri

Oh no!

Ooo-o-oo-o-o-o-o-o I said the wrong thing!

Joel
Keri - 13 Dec 2004 17:24 GMT
>>>Places like Texas, I believe .......
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Joel

Yep, but maybe you can see my concern a little better now.
Any responses on Dental Town?  What about that "god" you refer to?
Ron or Rod?

Keri
Joel M. Eichen - 13 Dec 2004 18:50 GMT
>>>>Places like Texas, I believe .......
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>Keri

NOTHING! And hundreds have viewed the page!

NUTTIN'

Joel
Peter Meiers - 13 Dec 2004 17:25 GMT
> >>I am sure we're talking here about areas where the water is unusually
> >>high in Fluoride content, and most/all the kids in the area are
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> >
> I live in Texas.

Where?