 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / December 2004More Improvements From Removal Of Amalgams
The semi-informed strangely believe the only reason amalgams should be replaced is because they are fugly. http://tinyurl.com/5ddzt Altern Ther Health Med. 2000 Jul;6(4):49-55. Related Articles, Links Results of dental amalgam removal and mercury detoxification using DMPS and neural therapy. Kidd RF. Sixty consecutive patients who had undergone replacement of dental amalgam fillings and a protocol of nutritional support and heavy metal detoxification using dimercapto-propanyl-sulfate and neural therapy were surveyed. A questionnaire was mailed to the patients and 42 responded, resulting in a response rate of 70%. The reasons for undergoing treatment were many, ranging from a patient's desire to avoid potential health problems in the future to treatment of serious current disease. Although medical diagnoses were made when possible before treatment, this survey studied only the patients' estimations of their most distressing symptoms and their evaluations of response to treatment. The most common complaints were problems with memory and/or concentration; muscle and/or joint pain; anxiety and insomnia; stomach, bowel, and bladder complaints; depression; food or chemical sensitivities; numbness or tingling; and eye symptoms, in descending order of frequency. The most distressing symptoms were headache and backache, fatigue, and memory and concentration problems. Headache and backache responded best to treatment, but all symptoms showed considerable improvement on average. Of the respondents, 78% reported that they were either satisfied or very satisfied with the results of treatment, and 9.5% reported that they were disappointed. PMID: 10895513 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] >Results of dental amalgam removal and mercury detoxification using DMPS These two were certainly key components in my recovery. Chuck http://www.mercurypoisoned.com/chuck_balzer.html > >Results of dental amalgam removal and mercury detoxification using DMPS > > These two were certainly key components in my recovery. > > Chuck > http://www.mercurypoisoned.com/chuck_balzer.html Not to re-hash old stuff, but as we discussed a while back, the steps that led to your recovery were broad and wide, and while the "key components" you mention could very well have been the key factors, there is no way you, I, or anyone can be certain. Not saying you are wrong, just that your case was inconclusive because so many things went on at the same time. http://tinyurl.com/5t7u7 T >Subject: Re: More Improvements From Removal Of Amalgams >From: "Tony Bad" spamspamspam@bakedbeans.spam [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >Not to re-hash old stuff, I knew it, once again it was the peas. Jan >Not to re-hash old stuff, but as we discussed a while back, the steps that >led >to your recovery were broad and wide, Understood. I believe that although fish was the main source of my poisoning, 22 old and many large amalgams, played a role in my poisoning. Add to that the exacerbation I had in symptomology after every amalgam removal - this is my definitive conclusion. Chuck > >Not to re-hash old stuff, but as we discussed a while back, the steps that > >led [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Chuck Chuck, I got the first effects in my 20's too and no fish, it takes about 5-10 years for the fillings they (some) place in your teens to come apart. Especially those copper/palladium ones, they are nasty as sh.t. I don't want to get into a big discussion here, but I think it's a huge mistake to think that all amalgams are the same. Did you ever check your dental records or question the dentist who placed them? I would not say this is typical. I see amalgams that are 20-50 years old every day that are not 'coming apart'. I get to monitor a few of the ones that I placed from 1979-1984 also. I've rarely needed to replace any. I mainly used Tytin®. Amalgams do fail. Usually it's related to recurrent decay (have I ever mentioned soft drinks?). Sometimes a crack forms in the tooth and part of the tooth breaks away from the filling. Overall, I have been very impressed with the durability of *most* dental work. There are a few dips that couldn't place a decent restoration if their life depended on it and there are a few materials that leave a lot to be desired. There are also a few patients who develop cavities about as fast as I can fix them (have I ever mentioned soft drinks?). JME, Fawks > it takes about 5-10 years for the fillings they (some) place in > your teens to come apart. > Did you ever check your dental >records or question the dentist who placed them? >Clinton I received almost all of them as a child, so I know that my Doc is retired and may even be deceased. Chuck >> Did you ever check your dental >>records or question the dentist who placed them? [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Chuck Did you notice any improvements in Break Dancing after removal? Joel This is what passes for research these days. If you feel this little abstract says anything important, those letters after your name must have come from a crackerjack box. T September 3rd, 2003 I forgot you said this shame on you Tony! I cite many solid refereences in my testimony, many that even the DDS's here have not disputed. Read our whole discussion below, those who wish to, and come to your own conclusion. Chuck >http://tinyurl.com/5t7u7 > This is what passes for research these days. If you feel this little abstract > says anything important, those letters after your name must have come from a [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Chuck > >http://tinyurl.com/5t7u7 I was young and foolish then...I believe I apologized for that comment, but if not, I do apologize now. We had a civil discussion after I started it rather uncivilly, and as I have written before, I respect your willingness to discuss these matters rationally. We may not agree, but I have no personal issues with you. Again, I apologize for that comment. T > Again, I apologize for that comment. > >T No problem Tony. I kind of meant it as a joke regarding our first "meeting". You have been very civil, even in stark disagreement. Chuck >> Again, I apologize for that comment. >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Chuck Tony is always a gentleman ...... > >> Again, I apologize for that comment. > >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Tony is always a gentleman ...... Oooooh...I am going to print and frame this! T >> Tony is always a gentleman ...... >> >Oooooh...I am going to print and frame this! > >T Yes, need to be pull that out as a reminder when the wife, girfriend, family member.... thinks otherwise ;-) Chuck > >> Tony is always a gentleman ...... > >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Chuck Well...if the wife finds out about the girlfriend, I don't think this will help! (;^P) T >Subject: Re: More Improvements From Removal Of Amalgams >From: "Tony Bad" spamspamspam@bakedbeans.spam [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > >T LOL. Joel hardly ever says it. Searched all groups Results 1 - 10 of 122 for joel eichen always a gentleman (0.13 seconds) >>> >> Again, I apologize for that comment. >>> >> >>> >>T Thanks Jan, we accept your apology. Joel >>>> >> Again, I apologize for that comment. >>>> >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Joel HERE http://tinyurl.com/303c >The semi-informed strangely believe the only reason amalgams should be replaced >is because they are fugly. > >http://tinyurl.com/5ddzt > >Altern Ther Health Med. 2000 Jul;6(4):49-55. Related Articles, Links ALTERN HEALTH THERAPY> Jan are those medical doctors? >Results of dental amalgam removal and mercury detoxification using DMPS and >neural therapy. [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > >PMID: 10895513 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.