Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / November 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Finger Points to Fillings in UK Dentistry Crisis

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Keith P Walsh - 20 Nov 2004 22:15 GMT
Most people automatically assume that the current crisis in National
Health Service (NHS) dentistry in the UK is simply due to a lack of
adequate government funding.

However, I think that the problem is more complex than this, and that
the question of funding may in fact be of only secondary importance.

I believe that Dr Lester Ellman, chair of the British Dental
Associations's general dental practice committee, puts his finger on
the real problem when he says:

"It's not to do with the money in terms of their take-home pay, but in
order to be able to spend more time with their patients and to do
things the NHS cannot do but the public wants."

(taken from, "Crisis to get worse, warns union", Manchester News,
Monday, 9th August 2004, see:

http://www.manchesteronline.co.uk/news/s/126/126624_crisis_to_get_worse_warns_un
ion.html


)

Dr Ellman highlights a particular problem which is that certain kinds
of dental treatments now being demanded by greater numbers of patients
are not available under the auspices of the National Health Service.

For example, it appears that more and more dental patients are
choosing not to have metal amalgam fillings placed in their teeth,
whilst the National Health Service continues to insist that the ONLY
filling material that dentists are allowed to use when placing
fillings in posterior teeth is metal amalgam.

Therefore the real truth might be that, since more and more people are
both able and willing to pay for private treatment in order that their
preference for non-metallic fillings is met, then more and more
dentists are able to fulfill their earnings requirements without
having to resort to the restrictive practices prescribed by the
authority of the National Health Service.

And an indication of the degree of influence which this particular
example is having on the present crisis in NHS dentistry might be
gained if a sufficiently curious investigative journalist were to pick
up a telephone and call a few "private" dentists to ask what are the
respective percentages of metallic and non-metallic fillings that they
place in their patients' posterior teeth. (Remember that the
corresponding figures for "National Health dentists" are 100% and 0%.)

Does anyone know if anyone has ever done this?

And, if so, what were the results?

Should NHS dental patients in the UK have the right to choose what
material is used for filling cavities in their teeth?

Keith P Walsh  

PS, would any prospective American commentators please note that the
National Health Service in the UK is not the equivalent of "welfare"
medical provision in the USA.

And is there any fundamental reason why non-metallic fillings should
be more expensive to place than metallic ones?
StovePipe - 21 Nov 2004 02:52 GMT
> PS, would any prospective American commentators please note that the
> National Health Service in the UK is not the equivalent of "welfare"
> medical provision in the USA.

... 'old on there, Mate... I would argue that in fact it truly *is* the
equivalent of the welfare system there or the RAMQ system here. It is
all about cost of treatment vs remuneration. If it costs twelve dolars
to treat and one is paid twenty dollars by the gov't, there is no
proffit, you're only spinning your wheels.

> And is there any fundamental reason why non-metallic fillings should
> be more expensive to place than metallic ones?

At least  five: Preparation of the operative site ( no contaminations
permitted; bleeding control ); time to do each of the steps, of which
there more, time to place a contact so food doesn't accumulate between
the teeth; time to finish and polish the restoration; and the cost of
these materials compared to Am.

My bug with you all is the same: you are all theroeticians. This is why
you place more emphasis on the composants of the Am instead of taking a
pragmatic approach: what this restoration can do that the white stuff
cannot, for the price paid by the gov't or the patient, or as dictated
by a less than ideal restorative situation.

Get out of your statistics and into a real mouth and see what is and is
not possible.

Another analogy: We must abolish all petrol using vehicles now if we
want a sane planet. Just try to put that one into practice... The
theoretical arguement is valid. The practical application is impossible
as of now.
Cheers
SP
Signature

Not a real Addy, yet

Keith P Walsh - 21 Nov 2004 19:02 GMT
>> PS, would any prospective American commentators please note that the
>> National Health Service in the UK is not the equivalent of "welfare"
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>Get out of your statistics and into a real mouth and see what is and is
>not possible.

I am in fact looking for practical solutions which might help to
alleviate what is seen as a crisis situation in UK dentistry.

My perception is that more and more patients are willing to pay the
extra (most of them have already paid their contributions to the
National Health Service out of their hard earned wages) in order to
ensure that their preference for non-metallic fillings is met.

Without any reliable figures I am happy to concede that any effect
that this factor might be having in contributing to the crisis remains
only theoretical.

That's why I have suggested that those who are concerned about this
crisis might actually bother to ask those dentists in the UK who no
longer treat patients under the auspices of the NHS exactly what
percentages of their patients prefer to have non-metallic fillings
placed in their teeth.

(I feel sure that organisations such as the NHS and British Dental
Association should have these figures, but if they have then it
appears that they have not been made generally available. Perhaps
these figures would represent a potential embarrassment for NHS policy
which continues to insist that metal amalgam is the ONLY material that
may be used for filling cavities in the posterior teeth of NHS
patients.)

Although more and more dentists are openly declaring their practices
to be "mercury free", these still remain in the minority. However,
whilst not specifically declaring that they will not place amalgam
fillings in teeth, many many dentists in the UK are refusing to offer
treatment for the NHS, and are thereby able to avoid any compulsion to
use amalgam.

Again, I think it might be instructive to find out accurate figures
which will allow a direct comparison to be made between the
percentages of metallic and non-metallic fillings placed in the
posterior teeth of "private" as opposed  to "NHS" patients. (Remember
that the figures for NHS patients are 100% and 0% respectively.)

Keith P Walsh
W_B - 21 Nov 2004 20:54 GMT
>>Get out of your statistics and into a real mouth and see what is and is
>>not possible.
>
>I am in fact looking for practical solutions which might help to
>alleviate what is seen as a crisis situation in UK dentistry.

What about 350 mV ?

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
CWatters - 21 Nov 2004 22:45 GMT
I had a UK NHS dentist for several years before moving to Belgium. The
difference is amazing...

My UK dentist had two chairs in adjoining rooms in a small semi detached ex
council house. The waiting room would frequently have 6 people in it when
you arrive and you might have to wait an hour if the dentist is running
late. He would normally work on two people at once and always did so while
waiting the 5 mins for your anaesthetic to take effect. The instant he had
finished with you (and while you were still horizontal in the chair) he was
off backing through the door to avoid contaminating the new gloves his
assistant had quickly changed. She would then come back and sort you out
while the dentist was drilling the next guy. The assistant wrote your
appointment in a diary like book and you had to pay by cash or cheque.
Shortly after giving me root canal I gained a cyst on that tooth.

Here in Belgium we have to pay 1/3rd of the costs (the other 2/3rds we get
back from the Mutuality) so it's not quite the same cost structure as the UK
NHS. Overall we pay slightly higher taxes here but there's not much in it.
The dentist has an office attached to the side of a huge 5 bedroom detached
house of almost unbelievable quality (stone detailing, solid oak period
windows and doors etc). I've never seen anyone else waiting in the waiting
room and normally I never have to wait more than a few seconds before the
dentist is ready for me. An appointment for a filling is allocated about
three times as long as the UK. The dentist has time to chat and it feels
like he works slowly with more precision. Appointments are stored on
computer which is linked to other in the building by wireless LAN.  You can
pay by credit card or by Bank Contact (eg like Switch in the UK).

The difference is so great that when we move back to the UK I may still come
back here to see the dentist!
Joel M. Eichen - 21 Nov 2004 23:18 GMT
>I had a UK NHS dentist for several years before moving to Belgium. The
>difference is amazing...

Interesting already ......

>My UK dentist had two chairs in adjoining rooms in a small semi detached ex
>council house. The waiting room would frequently have 6 people in it when
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>off backing through the door to avoid contaminating the new gloves his
>assistant had quickly changed. She would then come back and sort you out

What means "sort you out?" Is that like "Rogering" by any chance?

We Americans are weak on English patois.

>while the dentist was drilling the next guy. The assistant wrote your
>appointment in a diary like book and you had to pay by cash or cheque.
>Shortly after giving me root canal I gained a cyst on that tooth.
>
>Here in Belgium we have to pay 1/3rd of the costs (the other 2/3rds we get
>back from the Mutuality)

Here we call it the paramutual ...... where the ponies run.

>so it's not quite the same cost structure as the UK
>NHS. Overall we pay slightly higher taxes here but there's not much in it.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>dentist is ready for me. An appointment for a filling is allocated about
>three times as long as the UK.

Different dentist ......

>The dentist has time to chat and it feels
>like he works slowly with more precision. Appointments are stored on
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>The difference is so great that when we move back to the UK I may still come
>back here to see the dentist!

GREAT. Please explain "sort you out." Your wife may be listening in.

Joel
CWatters - 22 Nov 2004 07:29 GMT
> What means "sort you out?" Is that like "Rogering" by any chance?

No such luck. Although removal of a sucking device was involved.
W_B - 22 Nov 2004 04:47 GMT
>He would normally work on two people at once and always did so while
>waiting the 5 mins for your anaesthetic to take effect. The instant he had
>finished with you (and while you were still horizontal in the chair) he was
>off backing through the door to avoid contaminating the new gloves his
>assistant had quickly changed.

Good dental surgeons glove themselves.
Brain surgery is different.

5 minutes is normal onset time for mandibular local anesthesia
with lidocaine. Shorter for aristocaine, and longer for bupivicaine.

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
CWatters - 22 Nov 2004 07:31 GMT
> Good dental surgeons glove themselves.

Perhaps he did - I was still looking at the ceiling at the time.
Jan - 22 Nov 2004 23:36 GMT
>Subject: Re: Finger Points to Fillings in UK Dentistry Crisis
>From: W_B no_one@nowhere.net
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>Good dental surgeons glove themselves.
>Brain surgery is different.

Irrelevant/Diversion.

You ALL need to read Tooth Truth which addresses the problem
Lets Connect - 22 Nov 2004 13:21 GMT
Have you considered the possibility that your sample may not be
representative, therefore making generalization to the respective
populations of dentists impossible? If and when you move back to the
UK, you may want to consider a mixed NHS/private practice (if you
can't afford to go private).

> I had a UK NHS dentist for several years before moving to Belgium. The
> difference is amazing...
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> The difference is so great that when we move back to the UK I may still come
> back here to see the dentist!
Joel M. Eichen - 22 Nov 2004 13:47 GMT
>Have you considered the possibility that your sample may not be
>representative, therefore making generalization to the respective
>populations of dentists impossible? If and when you move back to the
>UK, you may want to consider a mixed NHS/private practice (if you
>can't afford to go private).

Exactly. Each dentist could be the outlier in his / her respective
country.

Except if Jan Drew is analyzing it., Then BOTH DENTISTS are the
out-LY-y-y-y-y-yers.

Joel

>> I had a UK NHS dentist for several years before moving to Belgium. The
>> difference is amazing...
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>> The difference is so great that when we move back to the UK I may still come
>> back here to see the dentist!
CWatters - 23 Nov 2004 07:45 GMT
> Have you considered the possibility that your sample may not be
> representative, therefore making generalization to the respective
> populations of dentists impossible?

Oh yes quite possible.

However - When choosing the dentist in the UK we took recommendations from
friends and co-workers and visited 4 or 5 dentists in person. This one
appeared to be the best we could find. From what I hear now we may no longer
have the luxury of choice.

In Belgium we went to the nearest one first and saw no need to visit others.
Lets Connect - 24 Nov 2004 02:32 GMT
Just go private. Cheaper than flying to Belgium =)

> > Have you considered the possibility that your sample may not be
> > representative, therefore making generalization to the respective
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> In Belgium we went to the nearest one first and saw no need to visit others.
Clinton C Zimmerman - 22 Nov 2004 16:08 GMT
> I had a UK NHS dentist for several years before moving to Belgium. The
> difference is amazing...
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> you arrive and you might have to wait an hour if the dentist is running
> late.

That seems to be common practice in the US. In fact I can't think of
a single time for a doctor or dentist appointment when there were not other
people in the waiting room and I didn't have to wait at least 10 minutes. that
is true whether or not the waiting room served more than one doctor/dentist.

> He would normally work on two people at once and always did so while
> waiting the 5 mins for your anaesthetic to take effect.

I wonder if that is really a good idea. How can a dentist work on
two people at once and do good work. Would a surgeon operate on two
people at once? Also may encourage using Am scrap
from one case in the mouth of someone else if that can happen.
W_B - 22 Nov 2004 16:15 GMT
>Also may encourage using Am scrap
>from one case in the mouth of someone else if that can happen.

BS it sets to fast.
--

W_B

Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Steven Fawks - 22 Nov 2004 17:55 GMT
Being out in a semi-rural area without a surplus of dentists, I
frequently am overworked.  Dealing with emergency pain patients crowds
the schedule and I am often behind.  If someone is in a hurry, or I am
running *way* late, we will call patients to reschedule appts., and
offer that to anyone currently waiting to be seated.

Out here, it isn't just seeing how many patients I can cram into one
day's work.

I do use three operatories.  This reduces the wait by cycling rooms as
they are cleaned, and almost all procedures have 'dead time' that I
could be doing other treatment in one of the other rooms.  If I had 1 or
2 rooms and only had one patient seated at a time, my fees would go up
considerably.

That doesn't mean that I rush through treatment and do sloppy work.

I'm not giving 20 second injections, cutting 3 minute crown preps,
eliminating steps in technique, taking shortcuts with
sterilization/disinfection, having assistants perform illegal services
(or something they aren't trained to do), etc.  Quality treatment comes
first.

I try and stay on schedule as much as possible, but hunting for an MB-2,
removing a fractured root tip, or starting an emergency endo all take
time.  If someone needs to be in and out by the clock, we can usually
handle that by scheduling them first thing in the morning, or right
after lunch.

This morning, I only had to deal with one emergency, all treatment went
exactly as predicted, and I had a couple of cancellations so everything
has clicked along perfectly.

JMO,
Fawks

> That seems to be common practice in the US. In fact I can't think of
> a single time for a doctor or dentist appointment when there were not other
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> people at once? Also may encourage using Am scrap
> from one case in the mouth of someone else if that can happen.
StovePipe - 23 Nov 2004 04:46 GMT
> I do use three operatories.  This reduces the wait by cycling rooms as
> they are cleaned, and almost all procedures have 'dead time' that I
> could be doing other treatment in one of the other rooms.  If I had 1 or
> 2 rooms and only had one patient seated at a time, my fees would go up
> considerably.

... Hope you're not shlepping the WaterLase from room to room... If so,
whatch out... the mirror alignment may go out and you'll need a service
call.
SP
Signature

Not a real Addy, yet

Clinton C Zimmerman - 23 Nov 2004 13:57 GMT
> Being out in a semi-rural area without a surplus of dentists, I
> frequently am overworked.  Dealing with emergency pain patients crowds
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> That doesn't mean that I rush through treatment and do sloppy work.

However , Dentist are people too and they get sick, have bad days etc.
Consider someone who has chronic fatigue syndrome, early onset
parkisons
etc. Running 3 rooms is a lot of pressure and before you know it,
things
could happen that endanger the patient. The denitst may be the last to
know or admit that they can't handle the work efficently. Additionally
some dentists are
obviously much more skilled and quicker to begin with so they can
probably
handle more than one room at a time. I wouldn't be concerned if Dental
procedures, and material handling, such as Am where error proof or if
the worst consequence of bad work was a restoration that looks funny,
but
what I suspect is that poor work combind with the inherent danger in
these
procedure and materials can have bad consequences.

> I'm not giving 20 second injections, cutting 3 minute crown preps,
> eliminating steps in technique, taking shortcuts with
> sterilization/disinfection, having assistants perform illegal services
> (or something they aren't trained to do), etc.  Quality treatment comes
> first.

I wonder how often assistants do perform jobs they shouldn't?

Obviously,I realize that having multiple operatories cuts down on
costs, however
I don't think patients think of it that way. In other words, if
patients
realized that the dentist would be given more time to do quality work
without being rushed and they would substantially have less time in
the waiting room if they paid more, I think they would pay it.

On the other hand, many
people are going to be practicing when they shouldn't or do bad
quality
work no matter what. How can the patient assess this? Demand a
dentists
health and work history as well as machine/equipment maintenance
records? Ask to see examples of previous work, and have their fillings
and x-rays reviewed by another dentist for restoration quality? In the
real world that is not going to happen, so most people figure if the
dentist is liscensed with
a decent reputation why pay more?
Joel M. Eichen - 23 Nov 2004 14:24 GMT
>However , Dentist are people too

Dentistssssssssss who NEED dentistsssssssssss are the HAPPIEST
dentistssssssssss in the world ...........

Streisand classic.
Dr. Steve - 24 Nov 2004 02:08 GMT
>> I had a UK NHS dentist for several years before moving to Belgium. The
>> difference is amazing...
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>people at once? Also may encourage using Am scrap
>from one case in the mouth of someone else if that can happen.

Wacko
..
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA

Writing on a tablet PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my poor handwriting.
Clinton C Zimmerman - 24 Nov 2004 15:37 GMT
> >two people at once and do good work. Would a surgeon operate on two
> >people at once? Also may encourage using Am scrap
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
> Troy, Michigan, USA

Hey peabrained twit who still doesn't comprehend that Hg from
amalgam is the largest source.

If you'd read the posts more carefully in the past weeks, you'd know
that the issues I brought up are relevant and not exactly
hypotheticals
pulled out of nowhere. But I guess you can't read scientifc literature
or newsgroups with comprehension. How the heck did you make it through
school?

> Writing on a tablet PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my poor handwriting.
Joel M. Eichen - 24 Nov 2004 16:14 GMT
>Hey peabrained twit who still doesn't comprehend that Hg from
>amalgam is the largest source.

Jan says, "It is always wrong to belittle ...."
carabelli - 24 Nov 2004 16:35 GMT
>> >two people at once and do good work. Would a surgeon operate on two
>> >people at once? Also may encourage using Am scrap
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Hey peabrained twit ............

pretty lame but what do you expect from someone that can trip over a
cordless phone.

carabelli.
Clinton C Zimmerman - 24 Nov 2004 22:15 GMT
> >> >two people at once and do good work. Would a surgeon operate on two
> >> >people at once? Also may encourage using Am scrap
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> carabelli.

Not so funny. If I want a good insult I can always go to an alt.politics
list with a contentous debate. They come up with some good ones.
Adenosine - 24 Nov 2004 22:18 GMT
>> >> >two people at once and do good work. Would a surgeon operate on two
>> >> >people at once? Also may encourage using Am scrap
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>Not so funny. If I want a good insult I can always go to an alt.politics
>list with a contentous debate. They come up with some good ones.

I already gave you a good insult, and all you did was whine about how
you couldn't find the full headers on google groups.

--
Adenosine
Semi-informed Dental Consumer ?
W_B - 24 Nov 2004 22:52 GMT
>>> pretty lame but what do you expect from someone that can trip over a
>>> cordless phone.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>--
>Adenosine

CubicZirconia couldn't ...   <fill in the blank>
if s/he/it's... <fill in the blank>...

What was that silly little book series that was popular
in the early 70's

verb/noun/adjective ???

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
Adenosine - 24 Nov 2004 22:54 GMT
>>>> pretty lame but what do you expect from someone that can trip over a
>>>> cordless phone.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>verb/noun/adjective ???

Are you thinking Mad Libs?

Early 70s my a.s, I was playing those when I was a kid in the late
80s/early 90s.

--
Adenosine
Semi-informed Dental Consumer ?
W_B - 25 Nov 2004 00:03 GMT
>>>>> pretty lame but what do you expect from someone that can trip over a
>>>>> cordless phone.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>Early 70s my a.s, I was playing those when I was a kid in the late
>80s/early 90s.

Yeah, Mad Libs, that's the ticket.

Twas the early to mid 70's for me kiddo.
Graduated from dental school in the mid 80's.
Some would consider me a kid, but ...

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
Jan - 25 Nov 2004 05:00 GMT
>From: Adenosine

>I already gave you a good insult,

Despeciable talking of one's dead mother.
W_B - 24 Nov 2004 22:49 GMT
>> pretty lame but what do you expect from someone that can trip over a
>> cordless phone.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Not so funny. If I want a good insult I can always go to an alt.politics
>list with a contentous debate. They come up with some good ones.

Then what are you doing here CubicZirconia ?

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
carabelli - 24 Nov 2004 22:55 GMT
>>> pretty lame but what do you expect from someone that can trip over a
>>> cordless phone.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> --
> W_B

I've seen people like him before, but I had to buy a ticket to get in.

carabelli
W_B - 25 Nov 2004 00:04 GMT
>>>Not so funny. If I want a good insult I can always go to an alt.politics
>>>list with a contentous debate. They come up with some good ones.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>carabelli

Know what you mean.
After the first time, didn't buy a second ticket.

This way to the Egress -->

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
John Chewter - 25 Nov 2004 01:15 GMT
"carabelli" <huerter@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:nj8pd.55701>>>>
pretty lame but what do you expect from someone that can trip over a
>>>> cordless phone.
>>>>
>>>> carabelli.
>>>
>>>Not so funny. If I want a good insult I can always go to an alt.politics
W_B - 24 Nov 2004 18:00 GMT
>> Wacko
>> ..
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Hey peabrained twit who still doesn't comprehend that Hg from
>amalgam is the largest source.

Nope.

Coal burning electrical generation plants, forest fires, and fish consumption.

Check epa.gov
--

W_B

Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Keith P Walsh - 21 Nov 2004 23:03 GMT
>What about 350 mV ?

Well, if you want to know the degree to which the electrical
potentials generated by metal amalgam dental fillings are able to
dissipate electrical energy through the nerves in people's heads then
you have to carry out experimental studies to measure it.

And if you want to know the degree to which "private" dentists in the
UK place amalgam fillings in their patients' teeth then you have to
ask them.

The principle is the same.

If you don't bother to find out then you don't know.

You simply remain ignorant.

Keith P Walsh
carabelli - 21 Nov 2004 23:08 GMT
>>What about 350 mV ?
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> UK place amalgam fillings in their patients' teeth then you have to
> ask them.

So Keith, when you get a phone are you going to call some dentists and ask?

carabelli
Joel M. Eichen - 21 Nov 2004 23:22 GMT
>>>What about 350 mV ?

Weird event happened.

I am reading an excellent Scientific American book about "The Cell."

What are they talking about? 350 mV.

I almost fell off my chair!

Keith is kinda right!

Joel

>> Well, if you want to know the degree to which the electrical
>> potentials generated by metal amalgam dental fillings are able to
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>carabelli
Keith P Walsh - 22 Nov 2004 06:26 GMT
>Weird event happened.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Keith is kinda right!

And as far as I am aware the resting potential of a human neurological
synapse is still only 70mV.

I suspect I'm kinda right about that too!

Do you think that NHS dental patients in the UK should have any right
to choose what material is used for filling cavities in their teeth?

Keith P Walsh
StovePipe - 22 Nov 2004 15:57 GMT
> And as far as I am aware the resting potential of a human neurological
> synapse is still only 70mV.

Yes, that's correct, inside of the organelle is negative wrt the
outside.

> Do you think that NHS dental patients in the UK should have any right
> to choose what material is used for filling cavities in their teeth?

That's for your public to decide: Are YOU willing to up your taxes to
cover the added expenses of placing composite materials in NHS patients'
cavities?  I think it would come down to that. You might want to suggest
this question to one of your phone-in type talkshows and see what people
say.

> Keith P Walsh
Cheers
SP

Signature

Not a real Addy, yet

Steven Fawks - 22 Nov 2004 17:12 GMT
Yep, there you go.  Find our what percentage of taxpayers see that as a
worthwhile benefit and act accordingly.  I'd bet that the numbers might
surprise you (Keith) once the money aspect is addressed.

I doubt that most citizens really think composites are worth a tax hike.

I'm grateful that I don't have to deal with such a system.

Fawks

>>Do you think that NHS dental patients in the UK should have any right
>>to choose what material is used for filling cavities in their teeth?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Cheers
> SP
Jan - 22 Nov 2004 23:54 GMT
>>>Do you think that NHS dental patients in the UK should have any right
>>>to choose what material is used for filling cavities in their teeth?
>>
>> That's for your public to decide:

That's for the PATIENT to decide.

The first step is to INFORM then that amalgams are 50% mercury, one of the most
TOXIC materials known to man.

Then INFORM them of the scientific proof of amalgam DANGERS.

Money is of NO value if you don't have your health.

Ban amalgams, the cost of composites will come down.

SP makes fun of serious illness.

Jan

A truth’s initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie
was believed…When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the
masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its
speaker, a raving lunatic.   -Dresden James
Keith P Walsh - 22 Nov 2004 20:59 GMT
>> And as far as I am aware the resting potential of a human neurological
>> synapse is still only 70mV.
>>
>Yes, that's correct, inside of the organelle is negative wrt the
>outside.

Dear Stovepipe,

Thank you for your continued correspondence.

It has been demonstrated experimentally that metal amalgam dental
fillings generate electrical potentials with magnitudes of up to
350mV.

You can read all about it at:

http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/dutch.htm

Do you think that it should be possible to determine experimentally
whether or not these potentials are able to dissipate electrical
energy through the nerves in people's heads?

Keith P Walsh
StovePipe - 23 Nov 2004 04:02 GMT
> Do you think that it should be possible to determine experimentally
> whether or not these potentials are able to dissipate electrical
> energy through the nerves in people's heads?
>
> Keith P Walsh

I see no way to do this, and I would think that any metal restoration
would produce a galvanic battery effect such as you describe, but again,
the significance of such potentials is dubious, IMO. If they were truly
nocif, I think we'd have seen demonstrable cause/effect pathology by
now.
Cheers
SP
Signature

Not a real Addy, yet

Keith P Walsh - 23 Nov 2004 06:37 GMT
>> Do you think that it should be possible to determine experimentally
>> whether or not these potentials are able to dissipate electrical
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>Cheers
>SP

The following is taken from the University of Illinois' "Physics Van"
website.

"Very sensitive measuring devices which can pick up tiny magnetic
fields can detect neural activity without needing to poke electrodes
directly into neurons, .. "

See:

http://van.hep.uiuc.edu/van/qa/section/Everything_Else/Humans_and_Animals/200208
12111737.htm


I think that it should be possible to measure the neural activity in
nerves close to the teeth of individuals with and without amalgam
fillings and compare the results.

Don't you agree?

Keith P Walsh

PS, Further enquiries concerning the electrical behavior of dental
amalgams can be found at:

http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/intro.htm

And by the way, the "Physics Van" website is for kids.

Perhaps you missed it.
StovePipe - 26 Nov 2004 00:57 GMT
> I think that it should be possible to measure the neural activity in
> nerves close to the teeth of individuals with and without amalgam
> fillings and compare the results.
>
> Don't you agree?

Where I'd disagree is more on what would be the real significance of
these potentials. If the nerves really did not tolerate Am based on
increased neural activity, we should see sensitive teeth that stay that
way. We don't unless the tooth is sick.
> Keith P Walsh
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Perhaps you missed it.

Thanks loads for the link. I don't believe the pipettes know about this
at all. I haven't had time to look but I will. Thanks again, adn ssorry
for the delay.... armageddon almost came to the clinic this week.
Cheers
SP
Signature

Not a real Addy, yet

Keith P Walsh - 26 Nov 2004 05:58 GMT
>> I think that it should be possible to measure the neural activity in
>> nerves close to the teeth of individuals with and without amalgam
>> fillings and compare the results.

>If the nerves really did not tolerate Am based on
>increased neural activity, we should see sensitive teeth that stay that
>way.

Is this assumption based on the findings of any experimental
investigation?

Or are you just guessing?

Would it be possible to determine whether or not the patient suffers
any neurological influence which is not perceived as "pain"?

Keith P Walsh
StovePipe - 27 Nov 2004 02:31 GMT
> >If the nerves really did not tolerate Am based on
> >increased neural activity, we should see sensitive teeth that stay that
> >way.
>
> Is this assumption based on the findings of any experimental
> investigation?

No... it's just emperically derived from my observations of 'normal'
Kebec people who have had Mercury Fillings since they were young.
> Or are you just guessing?

I'd say it's a bit more than a guess. One should not read too much into
measures that can be taken of miniscule biological events until one can
show that such measures reflect a true influence on the organism. I have
seen too many old Ams that are still in fine condition in the mouths of
people from all walks of life; successful, unsuccessful, healthy,
sickly, etc... to say that the presence or abscence of Ams in their
mouths can have a real influence on their health and lives. The lack of
dental care has far more influence than does the type of filling.

I have seen teeth filled with inappropriate material (like Jello) that
were also doing just fine. (I replaced the Jello and corn and broccoli,
etc with a real filling, of course... and those people went on to the
rest of their lives without incident)

Don't misunderstand: if I could eliminate Am fillings from my
armamentarium, I would. Unfortunately, we are not all Steve Fawks,
that's the bottom line.

> Would it be possible to determine whether or not the patient suffers
> any neurological influence which is not perceived as "pain"?
>
> Keith P Walsh
Think you'd need a neuro to tell you this. Or an ENT specialist. They
wouldn't have any axe to grind one way or the other. I grind the axe of
pragmatism. It is quite sharp, at the moment, I believe.

Cheers
SP
Signature

Not a real Addy, yet

W_B - 23 Nov 2004 15:34 GMT
>> Keith P Walsh
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Cheers
>SP

Is this your first encounter with the infamous KPW " the 350 mV Parrot " ?

--

W_B

Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
carabelli - 23 Nov 2004 15:36 GMT
> >> Keith P Walsh
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Is this your first encounter with the infamous KPW " the 350 mV Parrot " ?

I'll see your 350 and raise you 500

carabelli
Keith P Walsh - 24 Nov 2004 06:15 GMT
>> Is this your first encounter with the infamous KPW " the 350 mV Parrot " ?

I sensed myself that "StovePipe" might be a newcomer to this debate.

I'll bring him up to speed:

- It has been demonstrated experimentally that metal amalgam dental
fillings generate electrical potentials with magnitudes of up to
350mV. (*)

- I am trying to find out whether or not these electrical potentials
are able to dissipate electrical energy through the nerves in people's
heads?

- Carabelli and the guys can't help (they're too arrogant to admit it,
but the truth is they don't know).

Meanwhile the UK's National Health Service continues to insist that
the ONLY filling material that dentists are allowed to use when
placing fillings in posterior teeth is metal amalgam.

Keith P Walsh

(*) see:

http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/dutch.htm
Jan - 24 Nov 2004 02:55 GMT
>Subject: Re: Finger Points to Fillings in UK Dentistry Crisis
>From: W_B no_one@nowhere.net
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>W_B

http://van.hep.uiuc.edu/van/qa/section/Everything_Else/Humans_and_Animals/
20020812111737.htm

http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/intro.htm

http://www.jageblad.se/research/

==
http://www.drdooley.com/id6.html

The second fundamental flaw is that there are five dissimilar metals in the
amalgam. Galvanic action between these metals in inevitable (the dissimilar
metals form a battery). Galvanism produces electricity that flows through the
body. The electric currents produced by the amalgam typically are between 0.1
and 10 microamps, compared to the body's natural electric current of 3
microamps.
Dr Steve - 24 Nov 2004 12:56 GMT
Galvanic effect only occurs in an acidic environment and there MUST be a gap
or a permeable insulator (like paper) between the different metals.  In
addition, there must be a lot of free electrons in one metal, and less free
electrons (compared to equilibrium) in the other metal.  Oxidization helps
free up electrons, but only until equilibrium is reached.  Keeping the
metals in contact eliminates any electrical potential, as the electrons have
gone back and forth and equalized.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
>> Do you think that it should be possible to determine experimentally
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Cheers
> SP
Keith P Walsh - 24 Nov 2004 19:51 GMT
> Galvanic effect only occurs in an acidic environment and there MUST be a gap
> or a permeable insulator (like paper) between the different metals.  In
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> metals in contact eliminates any electrical potential, as the electrons have
> gone back and forth and equalized.

I always find it intriguing that dentists can appear to be so
knowledgeable of the elecrolytic behavior of the inhomogeneous mixtures
of dissimilar metals commonly used in restorative dentistry whilst, at
the same time, being completely ignorant of their other electrical
behaviors.

For example, thermoelectric effects in such a material produce
electrical potentials without the need for any acidic environment or
electrolytic agents at all. The size of the thermoelectric potential
generated by an inhomogeneous mixture of dissimilar metals is determined
by the property of the material known as its seebeck coefficient. And
yet it appears that there isn't anyone anywhere in the world who knows
what the seebeck coefficient (measured in volts per kelvin) of a typical
dental amalgam is.

Furthermore, electrical potentials (and currents) are induced in
conductive materials by their interaction with electromagnetic fields.
This behavior is defined for any particular material by its electrical
and electromagnetic properties. And yet it appears that there isn't
anyone anywhere in the world who knows what the electrical conductivity
(measured in siemens per metre) of a typical dental amalgam is. And it
also appears that there isn't anyone anywhere in the world who knows
what the permeability (measured in henry per metre) of a typical dental
amalgam is. And it also appears that there isn't anyone anywhere in the
world who knows what the permittivity (measured in farads per metre) of
a typical dental amalgam is.

Amalgam fillings are placed in children's teeth.

There is no justification for this ignorance.

The following abstract indicates that experimental studies show that the
electrical potentials generated by amalgam fillings are not necessarily
"eliminated" as readily as you suggest.

"The regeneration of the electromotor force E of the electric piles
formed by two amalgam fillings was measured as a function of time t
after the moment of interruption of the short  contact of their poles.
The measurements were carried out in 30 patients at a mean age of 27.0
+/- 08 years. Automatic recording of the equation E = f (t) demonstrated
that in the first phase of from several to about a score of seconds the
E value rose rapidly, while in the second phase lasting from several
scores to over a thousand seconds the E value approached asymptotically
its initial value Eo."

(from:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2
103035&dopt=Abstract


)

On the contrary, it appears that these electrical potentials might
quickly re-establish themselves after a temporary discharge.

And other studies have shown that the electrical potentials generated by
amalgam fillings measure up to 350 millivolts in magnitude.

(see:

http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/dutch.htm

)

I believe that further experimental studies should therefore have been
carried out in order to determine whether or not these potentials are
able to dissipate electrical energy through the nerves in people's
heads.

Do you not agree?

Keith P Walsh

PS, an elementary description of the thermoelectric effect can be found
at:

http://book.boot.users.btopenworld.com/thermo2.htm

- along with other scientific information regarding the electrical
properties of dental amalgams.

 
W_B - 24 Nov 2004 22:36 GMT
>And other studies have shown that the electrical potentials generated by
>amalgam fillings measure up to 350 millivolts in magnitude.

We sure have missed your 350mV message lately...

    not.

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
Jan - 25 Nov 2004 04:52 GMT
>Subject: Re: Finger Points to Fillings in UK Dentistry Crisis
>From: "Dr Steve" nospam@home.net
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>metals in contact eliminates any electrical potential, as the electrons have
>gone back and forth and equalized

http://home.iprimus.com.au/asomat/caulk/Dispersalloy-DFU.htm

From the manufactures:

Suggestions for best results with Dispersalloy®

Manufacturer's variation in amalgamators and differences in local electrical
current may necessitate adjusting trituration time

http://tinyurl.com/6o5yz

: Eur J Oral Sci. 1996 Jun;104(3):300-8. Related Articles, Links  

Galvanic corrosion and cytotoxic effects of amalgam and gallium alloys coupled
to titanium.

Bumgardner JD, Johansson BI.

Department of Dental Materials Science, Umea University, Sweden.
jbumgard@abe.msstate.edu

The aim of this study was to examine and compare the galvanic corrosion of a
conventional, a dispersed high-copper, and a palladium-enriched spherical
high-copper amalgam and a gallium alloy coupled to titanium in saline and cell
culture solutions, and to evaluate the effects of the couples on cultured
cells. The potentials and charge transfers between amalgams and titanium were
measured by electrochemical corrosion methods. Cytotoxicity of the couples, as
indicated by the uptake of neutral red vital stain, was determined in 24-h
direct contact human gingival fibroblast cell cultures. Results of this study
indicated that before connecting the high-copper amalgams to titanium, the
amalgams exhibited more positive potentials which resulted in initial negative
charge transfers, i.e. corrosion of titanium. However, this initial corrosion
appeared to cause titanium to passivate, and a shift in galvanic currents to
positive charge transfers, i.e. corrosion of the amalgam samples. Lower
galvanic currents were measured for the amalgam-titanium couples as compared to
the gallium alloy-titanium couple. Coupling the conventional or the
palladium-enriched high-copper amalgams to titanium did not significantly
affect the uptake of neutral red as compared to cells not exposed to any test
alloy. However, significant cytotoxic effects were observed when the
dispersed-type high-copper amalgam and the gallium alloy were coupled to
titanium. Even though the corrosion currents measured for these couples were
less than gold alloys coupled to amalgam, these results suggest there is the
potential for released galvanic corrosion products to become cytotoxic. These
data warrant further investigations into the effects of coupling amalgam and
gallium alloys to titanium in the oral environment.

PMID: 8831065 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

following information is about signs and symptoms of mercurypoisoning related
to amalgam fillings: the amount of mercury to which one isexposed is a function
of the age, number and size of filling.It makes adifference if there are two
different types of metals in the mouth, producing aflow of electric current(the
electro galvanic effect. The flow of electric currenthastens degradation of the
metals and releases a increased quanity of mercury
Dr Steve - 24 Nov 2004 12:57 GMT
Oh BTW, Admiral StovePipe,

Keith is a kook and best if ignored.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
>> Do you think that it should be possible to determine experimentally
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Cheers
> SP
Jan - 25 Nov 2004 04:53 GMT
>Subject: Re: Finger Points to Fillings in UK Dentistry Crisis
>From: "Dr Steve" nospam@home.net
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Keith is a kook and best if ignored

Translation:

Keith presentd truth that wil hurt the EGO.
carabelli - 25 Nov 2004 05:22 GMT
> >Subject: Re: Finger Points to Fillings in UK Dentistry Crisis
>>From: "Dr Steve" nospam@home.net
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Keith presentd truth that wil hurt the EGO.

Translation - when I post as Chuck I use my fingers to type instead of my
beak.

carabelli
W_B - 25 Nov 2004 06:16 GMT
>> Keith presentd truth that wil hurt the EGO.
>
>Translation - when I post as Chuck I use my fingers to type instead of my
>beak.
>
>carabelli

And all that time I though that they were using someone
elses' ...

Too horrible to contemplate....

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
Joel M. Eichen - 22 Nov 2004 23:10 GMT
>> And as far as I am aware the resting potential of a human neurological
>> synapse is still only 70mV.
>>
>Yes, that's correct, inside of the organelle is negative wrt the
>outside.

350 mV minus 70 mV leaves 280 mV.

I got the wrong number!

>> Do you think that NHS dental patients in the UK should have any right
>> to choose what material is used for filling cavities in their teeth?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>Cheers
>SP
Jan - 22 Nov 2004 23:45 GMT
>Subject: Re: Finger Points to Fillings in UK Dentistry Crisis
>From: Keith P Walsh keith.p.walsh@btinternet.com
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
>Keith P Walsh

Yep.

However as long as the lies are told, the general public has no idea what is in
amalgams, and that's the way dentistry wants to keep it.

Some states are ENFORCING the risks be displayed in the waiting room of
dentists offices.

.Lies Deceit and EGO is causing much suffering, and some don't give a hang.

One day they will answer for these sins.

Jan

A truth’s initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie
was believed…When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the
masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its
speaker, a raving lunatic.   -Dresden James
Dr. Steve - 24 Nov 2004 02:15 GMT
>Do you think that NHS dental patients in the UK should have any right
>to choose what material is used for filling cavities in their teeth?
>
>Keith P Walsh

Not if they are not paying for it.

How much extra tax is  Keith willing to pay out of his own pocket so
people in the UK can choose filling materials?
..
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA

Writing on a tablet PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my poor handwriting.
Keith P Walsh - 24 Nov 2004 06:00 GMT
>>Do you think that NHS dental patients in the UK should have any right
>>to choose what material is used for filling cavities in their teeth?
>>
>>Keith P Walsh
>
>Not if they are not paying for it.

But they are paying for it, you ignoramus.

The majority of working and salaried people in the UK have their
National Health Insurance contributions deducted from their
hard-earned wages at source.

When are you Americans going to understand that the UK's National
Health Service is NOT WELFARE.

Keith P Walsh
Steven Fawks - 24 Nov 2004 14:35 GMT
They are paying taxes for a given level of dental care.  This level of
care covers the cheapest materials.  Posterior composties *are not*
being covered because it would be more expensive.

Therefore the citizens *are not* paying for it at this time.  Taxes
would have to increase to cover this service.  Once the taxes were
raised *then* they would be paying for it.  Not now.

Reading comprehension skills are needed before you hurl insults.

Fawks

>>Not if they are not paying for it.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Keith P Walsh
W_B - 24 Nov 2004 17:34 GMT
>When are you Americans going to understand that the UK's National
>Health Service is NOT WELFARE.
>
>Keith P Walsh

Never, because it is welfare.
The fees barely cover the dentists' costs.
The whole system is poised for a disasterous collapse.
--

W_B

Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Joel M. Eichen - 24 Nov 2004 17:46 GMT
>>When are you Americans going to understand that the UK's National
>>Health Service is NOT WELFARE.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>The fees barely cover the dentists' costs.
>The whole system is poised for a disasterous collapse.

WELL, even if its WELFARE, its the dentist who is extending the
consideration, not the government.

LOW FEES means we are donating our time and energy and materials ....
for some reason.

And there is usally a limit to that!

Joel
W_B - 22 Nov 2004 04:53 GMT
>>>What about 350 mV ?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>carabelli

He musta been temporarily banned from the local library.
Too much spare Voltage. Them multiple 350 mV's shootin'
outta his toes stunk the place up.

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
W_B - 22 Nov 2004 04:50 GMT
>>What about 350 mV ?
>
>Well, if you want to know the degree to which the electrical
>potentials generated by metal amalgam dental fillings are able to
>dissipate electrical energy through the nerves in people's heads then
>you have to carry out experimental studies to measure it.

Why have you not funded these experiments that you have
already defined ?

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
G Xpetros - 23 Nov 2004 19:58 GMT
> Should NHS dental patients in the UK have the right to choose what
> material is used for filling cavities in their teeth?

No. The NHS is there to provide treatment to secure oral health. If a
patient wants to select a posterior composite over amalgam because it
looks better, then that's cosmetic treatment and it shouldn't come off
other people's tax.
To view it in a different light, a posterior composite is a very
delicate procedure. It requires skill, TIME (very important) and
expensive materials (new bonding agents, flowables, good matrix bands,
rubber dam preferaably etc). If the NHS came out tomorrow with a fixed
price for a posterior composite, it would still be an incredibly low
crappy NHS price - don't forget we're talking about the same system
who pays for a filling less than a pizza and for a RCT less than a
videogame. This means that Mr and Mrs Patient would decline amalgam
fillings (of course anyone would go for the white fillings given the
choice), but the dentists would still have to rush them in order to do
a living. This would inevitably result in 1) thousands if not tens of
thousands of people suffering from postfilling sensitivity and perhaps
much more serious problems, 2) the access problem worsened because
more people would demand more time-consuming procedures and 3) many
dentists going bust because they were counting on the private fees
from the composites to balance the outrageously low NHS fees, which
will also worsen the access problem.
Also, another thing I would like to point out is that there are no NHS
dental patients and no NHS dentists. There are just patients and
dentists; if one or the other chooses to go the NHS way it's his
choice, but it's not an obligatory choice.

George
W_B - 23 Nov 2004 20:19 GMT
> There are just patients and
>dentists; if one or the other chooses to go the NHS way it's his
>choice, but it's not an obligatory choice.
>
>George

Then again there are patients and there are Patient$

Same goes for Denti$t$
--

W_B

Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.