Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / November 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

flouride level and tooth decay question

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Akbar - 09 Nov 2004 19:35 GMT
natural fluoride level of 0.6 ppm.if the fluoride level is raised by 0.4
ppm,tooth decay among grade grade school children is expected to decrease by
approximately what percent after seven years

could someone please help how to calculate this
Peter Meiers - 09 Nov 2004 19:42 GMT

> natural fluoride level of 0.6 ppm.if the fluoride level is raised by 0.4
> ppm,tooth decay among grade grade school children is expected to decrease by
> approximately what percent after seven years
>
> could someone please help how to calculate this

Sure:

0.6 + 0.4 - 1

Signature

-History of fluorine, fluoride and fluoridation-:
--- http://PMeiers.bei.t-online.de/index.htm ---
----------------------------------------------------

Akbar - 09 Nov 2004 21:59 GMT
thanks for replying back could u please provide detail on the answer as all
i see is u just added both nuber but how would u calculate the percentage

>> natural fluoride level of 0.6 ppm.if the fluoride level is raised by 0.4
>> ppm,tooth decay among grade grade school children is expected to decrease
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> 0.6 + 0.4 - 1
Steven Bornfeld - 10 Nov 2004 00:42 GMT
> thanks for replying back could u please provide detail on the answer as all
> i see is u just added both nuber but how would u calculate the percentage

    I doubt very much you are going to find usable data.  First of all,
0.6-1.0 ppm is generally considered the range for effective water
fluoridation.  We would never for example recommend enteral fluoride
supplementation for a patient in a water supply in that range.
Furthermore, there is so much fluoride in the food supply, toothpaste
etc. that in most parts of the world it would be difficult in vivo to
determine the average increase in actual dose.
    In any case, the bulk of recent research tends to indicate that the
primary mode of caries inhibition is topical exposure.  I think it would
be difficult to impossible to demonstrate a benefit for an incremental
increase in fluoride concentration within the generally accepted
therapeutic concentration.

Steve

>>>natural fluoride level of 0.6 ppm.if the fluoride level is raised by 0.4
>>>ppm,tooth decay among grade grade school children is expected to decrease
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>
>>0.6 + 0.4 - 1
Peter Meiers - 10 Nov 2004 05:41 GMT
Steve,

a great reply over which I can agree for the greatest part, except a few
points:

> > thanks for replying back could u please provide detail on the answer as all
> > i see is u just added both nuber but how would u calculate the percentage

With ZERO as a result it doesn´t matter whether it means number of
children, teeth or percentage.

>         I doubt very much you are going to find usable data.  First of all,
> 0.6-1.0 ppm is generally considered the range for effective water
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> etc. that in most parts of the world it would be difficult in vivo to
> determine the average increase in actual dose.

It is already next to impossible to determine the average (nor
individual) actual dose without an "increase".

>         In any case, the bulk of recent research tends to indicate that the
> primary mode of caries inhibition is topical exposure.  I think it would
> be difficult to impossible to demonstrate a benefit for an incremental
> increase in fluoride concentration within the generally accepted
> therapeutic concentration.

It also was "difficult" back in Dean´s times without the so-called
"halo" effect. There was no demonstrated benefit if you look carefully
at Dean´s statistics.

Regards,
Peter

Signature

-History of fluorine, fluoride and fluoridation-:
--- http://PMeiers.bei.t-online.de/index.htm ---
----------------------------------------------------

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS - 10 Nov 2004 14:24 GMT
> Steve,
>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> Regards,
> Peter

    The OP's original query sounded a little bit like a homework assignment
to me.

Steve

Signature

Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Akbar - 11 Nov 2004 01:04 GMT
actually that  was the question asked in exam

> Steve,
>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> Regards,
> Peter
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.