Some quotes I mischievously cherry picked from an anti mercury site which is
helpful enough not to give references or bibliography.....
http://www.coastalpost.com/98/5/6.htm
Don't drink the thermometer
The best scientists in Europe, Canada and the United States have each
studied this and found no relation between health problems and mercury
fillings except in sensitive people
The American Dental Association, which also requires toxic fluoride to be
added to toothpaste to gain it's seal of approval, approves of amalgam
fillings.
Fluoride has one known health benefit: at low levels in children's diets or
water while their permanent teeth are forming, it prevents cavities. Without
cavities, there's no mercury fillings in your mouth.
Fluoride is blamed for everything from attention deficit disorder to
nymphomania in teens. Mercury gets rapped for asthma to high blood pressure.
Fillings, of course, are better than losing your teeth or getting a root
canal and crown.
The ADA does not approve of dentists making health claims for removing
mercury fillings and has prosecuted dentists who have done so.
Hundreds of case studies of various illnesses being cured or symptomatically
alleviated by filling replacement have been documented by these dentists and
doctors who work with them. Of course, they have a vested interest in
promoting their work, but their patients do feel better and sometimes have
remarkable cures for difficult diseases.
Placebo effect can explain some of the benefits, and it's possible that most
people suffer no ill effects from mercury in their mouth..........
Our smiles reveal our fangs-see, no large weapons, I'm friendly -
(ROTFLMAO!!!!! JC ask a wolf?)
Putting poisonous metals in our mouths cannot be healthy, even if the
studies are inconclusive.
------------------------------------------------------
That last one takes the biscuit! 'cannot be healthy' but the studies are
'inconclusive?' that is non Logic!
Fuze lit..... retiring to a safe distance........
Happy Oyster - 02 Nov 2004 12:09 GMT
>Some quotes I mischievously cherry picked from an anti mercury site which is
>helpful enough not to give references or bibliography.....
Dear Mr. Chewter,
if you want to have a better source and quote from my site
http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_p0.htm
you may of course mention the source. I try to make the texts as
scientifically bulletproof as possible. Help to find and correct
errors is invited.
Thank you,
Aribert Deckers

Signature
Die ARD als Werkzeug für Produktreklame
http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_ard1.htm
Hmm other Tuna research says its only 10% up on pickled Victorian Tuna :s
> Regarding Mercury Tuna Published figures on
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> If not where is it from? Curious.