>California Judge Approves Landmark Warning on Mercury Use in Dentistry.
>
>(San Francisco, CA) - For the first time anywhere, dentists will be
>required to post a warning about the dangers of mercury in their dental
>fillings. A California Superior court judge finalized the language for
>the warning to be posted in dentists' offices here today.
>
>The warning will read as follows:
>
>Notice to Patients, Proposition 65:
>
>Warning on dental amalgams, used in many dental fillings, causes exposure
>to mercury, a chemical known to the state of California to cause birth
>defects or other reproductive harm.
>
>Root canal treatments and restorations including fillings, crowns and
>bridges, use chemicals known to the state of California to cause cancer.
>
>The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has studied the situation and
>approved for use all dental restorative materials.
>
>Consult your dentist to determine which materials are appropriate for your
>treatment.
>
>The exact language of the warning was argued and then finalized before
>Superior Court Judge James A. Robertson II between the California Dental
>Association, the largest constituent organization of the American Dental
>Association and Attorney Shawn Khorrami (Cor-ahm-mee). The agreement
>requires its member dentists to warn patients about the toxic dangers of
>mercury dental fillings and root canals. The agreement also allows non-CDA
>dentists to opt in to the agreement and post the warning.
>
>The warning is the result of a lawsuit filed by The Law Offices of Shawn
>Khorrami on behalf of As You Sow, a not-for-profit foundation dedicated to
>advocacy and activism in the public interest.
>
>"This is the first admission by organized dentistry that amalgams pose a
>potential health risk," says Shawn Khorrami, lead attorney. "The only
>problem is that it's about 100 years too late."
>
>This California consent judgment follows on the heels of recent lawsuits
>filed in Georgia, Texas, Ohio and Los Angeles, California charging that
>mercury fillings placed in a woman's mouth contributed to the autism of
>her child, as well as lawsuits in Maryland, California, and New York
>charging the American Dental Association with misrepresenting amalgam
>dental fillings as "silver." The lawsuits basically allege that such
>fillings actually contain approximately 50% mercury by weight. They cause
>continuous, daily exposure to mercury and, thereby pose substantial health
>risks to certain users. Mercury, a highly toxic substance, is the most
>widely used substance in dental fillings today.
>
>The use of mercury-based thimerosal in vaccines also has been the source
>of the recent controversy in the Homeland Security legislation.
>
>Khorrami filed the lawsuit against Roger Fieldman D.D.S., Inc., the
>Citadel Dental Group, Inc. dental offices, dental laboratories and
>private dental schools and training programs with more than nine
>employees. The suit won the enforcement of Proposition 65, Safe Drinking
>Water and Toxics Enforcement Act [Health & Safety Code § 25249.6].
>
>Proposition 65 requires that a clear and reasonable warning be provided to
>persons prior to their exposure to a chemical known to cause cancer or
>reproductive harm. This statute lists mercury, contained in dental
>amalgam, as a substance that can cause reproductive toxicity. The lawsuit
>was based on the absence of warnings to patients treated with amalgam
>restorative materials in dental offices.
>
>The judgment on Proposition 65 mandates that all dental offices with more
>than nine employees provide warnings on the dangers of Mercury dental
>fillings to patients. Those in non-compliance could incur a fine of up to
>$2,500 per day.
>
>Press may contact: Jackie Gladfelter at 650-218-1856 or D. Infusino at
>415-225-7970; call Attorney Shawn Khorrami at 818-947-5111.
>
>###
jdrew63929@aol.com (Jan) wrote in message >
> Toxicity from Root Canals
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> abscessed. The root canal is the left portion of the tooth which houses the
> vital organs such as the nerve and blood vessels.
The tooth is an organ it does not have organs in it.
The dentist endeavors to
> clean
key word here. clean with bleach which kills all bacteria.
and sterilize this canal and fill it with a sterile, non toxic inert
> material. This usually renders this tooth serviceable and non painful; however,
> the entire inner hard core of the tooth is made of dentin which has several
> million dentinal tubules.
So do healthy teeth.
These tubules allow the circulation of lymphatic type
> fluid to circulate from the vital organs
There are no organs inside a root canal tooth. The whole tooth is an
organ. and in a root canal situation all the nerve tissue and blood
vessels have been removed machanicaly and chemically with EDTA and
Bleach which kill everything.
Also in the course of filing and shaping the inside of thye canal
dentinal tubules get pluged and are now sealed with resin(composite
tooth colour filling) type sealers.
of the root canal to the outside of
> the tooth. This is a viable circulatory phenomenon which has a purpose. It
> services the periodontal ligament as well as the sensory aspect of the nerve
> and blood centers in the root canal.
Again the blood vessels and nerves plus bacteria which intered the
tooth through your blood stream were already removed by toxic bleach.
If the body chemistry is healthy, the flow
> of lymphatic fluid is from the root canal to the outside of the tooth. This
> creates an irrigation for the tooth and usually prevents the accumulation of
> plaque to form.
So if what you say is true than fillings and caps or crowns are bad
for this natural flow because there is less surface area for this flow
of lymphatic tissue and the bacteria flowing in our blood steam can
not get out of our body.
Also if we extract the tooth or all our teeth the lymph can not exit
because we have no dentinal tubules for exchange. End result our
bodies will get toxic and we will die.
When the body chemistry is not healthy, then the circulation is
> from the outside of the tooth to the inner root canal.
The inside has been plugged up with gutta percha and resin sealer.
stuff can't inter your body through the tooth.
On the other hand if you do not eat toxic foods you will not have that
problem.
remember whatever does not get inside your tooth will take the path of
least resistance and go through your GI tract.
This allows for no
> irrigation, but rather an accumulation of plaque to form.
fisrt of all plaque is too big to inter the tooth from the outside.
second this tooth is going to have a crown which will limit surface
area for plaque to enter the body.
Lastly plaque accumulates around teeth and periodontal pockets as
well.
There are many more
> reasons for maintaining the integrity of the circulation in the dentinal
> tubules. Root canal therapy completely destroys this integrity,
So does extraction which is your other option
and what
> happens to the non-circulating fluid in these tubules? This fluid as it ages
> becomes stagnant and becomes a toxic substance.
So does plaque around your teeth. And if you pull the teeth the toxins
can not get out and become stagnant inside your body.
This porous structure now
> becomes a septic mass emanating poisons into the body. Is this what you want?
Yes is it???
And mind you, there is no scientific research for this toxic theory.
That someones toxisity levels went up after a root canal.
> Mercury amalgams are said to be the caskets of the body. Root canals are said
> to be the cadavers of the body.
Eventually all bodies become cadavers.
> I do not recommend root canals for anyone.
Who are you to recommend anything to anyone????????
Each individual has a right to their
> decisions. Many people simply do not wish to lose a member of their body.
Like their appendix, or their hair.
I
> respect this, and I always discuss the consequences.
I hope you discuss the consequences of loosing teeth, and inability to
fully digest food due to lack of adequate breakdown. And also your
thoery of the lymph not being able to get out of the body because the
teeth are missing.
> The next area of discussion is whether the root canal filling actually
> sterilizes the apical end of the tooth. There are so many lateral canals at the
> root end of the tooth where bacteria can harbor that it is unlikely that a
> complete aseptic condition exists.
1% of the time it doesn't that is why root canals fail. but if
retreatment is successful then there is no worry for asepsis.
This, however, is a debateable subject.
Only with idiots like Jan Drew.
> Again, the complete acceptance of root canal therapy as a viable substitution
> for extraction is completely and whole heartedly supported by organized
> dentistry. You are in violation of the code of ethics if you speak out against
> root canal therapy. Speak all you want just don't impose unproven theories on the layman and as a result scare them to lose their teeth and end up with other health problems. That my dear is what is unethical.
When I was a practicing dentist, I always let the patient
> make that decision after explaining all pros and cons.
And could it be that you are not practicing because you were kicked
out for being a quack???
> FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
> >
> >California Judge Approves Landmark Warning on Mercury Use in Dentistry.
I wonder if this judge was Jan Drew's patient???
> >(San Francisco, CA) - For the first time anywhere, dentists will be
> >required to post a warning about the dangers of mercury in their dental
[quoted text clipped - 72 lines]
>
> Jan
Jan - 29 Oct 2004 23:38 GMT
>Subject: Re: Root Canals, Why Holistic Dentists Don't Do Them
>From: purple543210@yahoo.ca (Alexander Vasserman DDS., BS.)
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>jdrew63929@aol.com (Jan) wrote in message >
>> Toxicity from Root Canals
What I posted is below.
<snip>
> I do not recommend root canals for anyone.
>Who are you to recommend anything to anyone????????
I'm not.
Which URL did you snip this from?
<snip>
>Only with idiots like Jan Drew.
Insults are the norm here, if you were honest, you wouldn't have snipped.
<snip>
> FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
>> >
>> >California Judge Approves Landmark Warning on Mercury Use in Dentistry.
>
>I wonder if this judge was Jan Drew's patient???
I wonder if you have lost it?
===========
http://www.toothwisdom.net/r.root_canals.html
http://www.zip.com.au/~rgammal/RCTframeset.htm
http://www.ericdavisdental.com/root_canals.htm
http://www.whale.to/d/root2.html
http://www.drshankland.com/rootcanal.html
http://webpages.charter.net/kyarbrough/rootcanals.htm
http://www.dentistry-toothtruth.com/faq.htm#treatment
http://www.cfsn.com/maz/
http://cnorman.best.vwh.net/blazing/dental.html
http://rheumatic.org/teeth.htm
http://www.zip.com.au/~rgammal/root_therapies.htm
http://zap.intergate.ca/root.html
http://www.toothwisdom.net/
http://www.dentistryholistic.com/education.html
http://www.hugnet.com/Root_Canals.html
http://www.karlloren.com/ultrasound/p25.htm
http://www.hallvtox.dircon.co.uk/hallvt.html
Root Canals. A tooth has miles of tiny canals running through the root. A dead
or root filled tooth will have bacteria in these canals. There is no way of
removing the bacteria once they are in there.
http://www.toothwisdom.net/
Toxicity from Root Canals
The next subject to be discussed are root canals and their possible source of
toxicity. Approximately twenty five million Americans undergo root canal
therapy every year in an effort to prevent the loss of teeth that have
abscessed. The root canal is the left portion of the tooth which houses the
vital organs such as the nerve and blood vessels. The dentist endeavors to
clean and sterilize this canal and fill it with a sterile, non toxic inert
material. This usually renders this tooth serviceable and non painful; however,
the entire inner hard core of the tooth is made of dentin which has several
million dentinal tubules. These tubules allow the circulation of lymphatic type
fluid to circulate from the vital organs of the root canal to the outside of
the tooth. This is a viable circulatory phenomenon which has a purpose. It
services the periodontal ligament as well as the sensory aspect of the nerve
and blood centers in the root canal. If the body chemistry is healthy, the flow
of lymphatic fluid is from the root canal to the outside of the tooth. This
creates an irrigation for the tooth and usually prevents the accumulation of
plaque to form. When the body chemistry is not healthy, then the circulation is
from the outside of the tooth to the inner root canal. This allows for no
irrigation, but rather an accumulation of plaque to form. There are many more
reasons for maintaining the integrity of the circulation in the dentinal
tubules. Root canal therapy completely destroys this integrity, and what
happens to the non-circulating fluid in these tubules? This fluid as it ages
becomes stagnant and becomes a toxic substance. This porous structure now
becomes a septic mass emanating poisons into the body. Is this what you want?
Mercury amalgams are said to be the caskets of the body. Root canals are said
to be the cadavers of the body.
I do not recommend root canals for anyone. Each individual has a right to their
decisions. Many people simply do not wish to lose a member of their body. I
respect this, and I always discuss the consequences.
The next area of discussion is whether the root canal filling actually
sterilizes the apical end of the tooth. There are so many lateral canals at the
root end of the tooth where bacteria can harbor that it is unlikely that a
complete aseptic condition exists. This, however, is a debateable subject.
Again, the complete acceptance of root canal therapy as a viable substitution
for extraction is completely and whole heartedly supported by organized
dentistry. You are in violation of the code of ethics if you speak out against
root canal therapy. When I was a practicing dentist, I always let the patient
make that decision after explaining all pros and cons.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
>California Judge Approves Landmark Warning on Mercury Use in Dentistry.
>
[quoted text clipped - 72 lines]
>
>###
Jan
Rich.@. - 29 Oct 2004 23:40 GMT
>>Only with idiots like Jan Drew.
>
>Insults are the norm here,
Indeed and they often come from hypocrite Jan Drew:
>>It is also wrong to tell lies and belittle.
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>>
>>Jan
Alexander Vasserman DDS., BS. - 30 Oct 2004 05:13 GMT
> >Subject: Re: Root Canals, Why Holistic Dentists Don't Do Them
> >From: purple543210@yahoo.ca (Alexander Vasserman DDS., BS.)
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Which URL did you snip this from?
Your earlier post. "I do not recommend them to anyone"
read it.
> <snip>
>
[quoted text clipped - 176 lines]
>
> Jan
Jan - 30 Oct 2004 06:21 GMT
>Subject: Re: Root Canals, Why Holistic Dentists Don't Do Them
>From: purple543210@yahoo.ca (Alexander Vasserman DDS., BS.)
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>Your earlier post. "I do not recommend them to anyone"
>read it.
I did. Neither did I do any recommending.
> <snip>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
>> <snip>
>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
>> >> >
>> >> >California Judge Approves Landmark Warning on Mercury Use in Dentistry.
>> >
>> >I wonder if this judge was Jan Drew's patient???
>> I wonder if you have lost it?
>> ===========
>>
>> http://www.toothwisdom.net/r.root_canals.html
>http://www.zip.com.au/~rgammal/RCTframeset.htm
>>
[quoted text clipped - 174 lines]
>>
>> Jan
Alexander Vasserman DDS., BS. - 30 Oct 2004 05:15 GMT
> > I do not recommend root canals for anyone.
> >Who are you to recommend anything to anyone????????
>
> I'm not.
>
> Which URL did you snip this from?
Your above post.
here is the entire comment.
"I do not recommend root canals for anyone. Each individual has a right to their
> decisions. Many people simply do not wish to lose a member of their body. I
> respect this, and I always discuss the consequences."
W_B - 30 Oct 2004 06:37 GMT
Alex, just a kind word from a fellow practitioner.
Don't waste your time beating your head against
the brick wall that is jD/.
But if you are having fun aggravating...
Well, that's your call.
--
W_B
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE