Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / November 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Holistic Dentist Debate.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
W_B - 28 Oct 2004 18:09 GMT
Holistic v. Wholeistic.

My first point is those who wish to be considered 'holistic'
mean they treat the whole being. This is obviously
misspelled. The correct term would be wholeistic.
Treating the whole.

The second point is that dentists are limited to treating
the stomato-gnathic system. I don't want any of my colleges
performing bypass surgery on my heart. That's what
cardio-vascular surgeons are for.

Therefore a 'wholistic' dentist would only be able to
treat problems with the entire stomato-gnathic system.

Thirdly there a dental specialists, never heard of
a 'wholistic' orthodontist, endodontist, periodontist, etc...
What does a 'wholeistic' podiatrist treat ? Feet and hands ?

OK team, off to the races.

--

W_B

Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Adenosine - 28 Oct 2004 18:35 GMT
>Holistic v. Wholeistic.
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>OK team, off to the races.

So, do you believe it would be proper for 'wholeist' dentists to treat
GERD? Or do you think it would be more proper for them to refer to a
specialist of gastroenterology?

Adenosine
W_B - 28 Oct 2004 20:32 GMT
>So, do you believe it would be proper for 'wholeist' dentists to treat
>GERD? Or do you think it would be more proper for them to refer to a
>specialist of gastroenterology?
>
>Adenosine

The treatment range of the general dentist, whether calling
s/he/it's self 'Whole-istic' or General Pratictioner stops at the
distal of the third molar (wisdom teeth) IMO.

OMFS range is much broader and wider commensurate
with their advanced training.
Still I don't think you will find any OMFS treating GERD.

That would be for an M.D. General Pracitioner or the
Gastroenterology specialist.
--

W_B

Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Dr Steve - 28 Oct 2004 21:38 GMT
agreed

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
>>So, do you believe it would be proper for 'wholeist' dentists to treat
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> Take out the G'RBAGE
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
StovePipe - 29 Oct 2004 03:39 GMT
> >So, do you believe it would be proper for 'wholeist' dentists to treat
> >GERD? Or do you think it would be more proper for them to refer to a
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> with their advanced training.
> Still I don't think you will find any OMFS treating GERD.

So.... a distal wedge should be performed by..... an
expanded-broader-wider distally trained dentist.....?... ;-)

Ray Berlotti had NOTHING to say about soft tissue, except that the Heal
OZONE can help reduce inflammation from coldsores, etc.
<Sigh....>
SP
Signature

Not a real Addy, yet

W_B - 29 Oct 2004 16:51 GMT
>> >So, do you believe it would be proper for 'wholeist' dentists to treat
>> >GERD? Or do you think it would be more proper for them to refer to a
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>So.... a distal wedge should be performed by..... an
>expanded-broader-wider distally trained dentist.....?... ;-)

Was talking restorative not surgery.

Routinely go up the ramus when flapping for impacted lower thirds
and past the tuberosity for uppers.
But you already knew that right ?

>Ray Berlotti had NOTHING to say about soft tissue, except that the Heal
>OZONE can help reduce inflammation from coldsores, etc.

Sounds like RB has a financial interest in the product.

><Sigh....>
>SP

--

W_B

Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
StovePipe - 30 Oct 2004 08:10 GMT
> >So.... a distal wedge should be performed by..... an
> >expanded-broader-wider distally trained dentist.....?... ;-)
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> and past the tuberosity for uppers.
> But you already knew that right ?

Yes, and I'm DOING it in those few times that I'm shopping in that area,
although I find it awkward to do...

Tally-Ho
SP
Signature

Not a real Addy, yet

Dr. Steve - 29 Oct 2004 22:14 GMT
>> >So, do you believe it would be proper for 'wholeist' dentists to treat
>> >GERD? Or do you think it would be more proper for them to refer to a
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
><Sigh....>
>SP

Anyone want to bet on how much $ RB  is poised to make on each sale of
a ozone machine?
..
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA

Writing on a tablet PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my poor handwriting.
Dr Steve - 28 Oct 2004 21:39 GMT
A dentist is licensed to write prescriptions for ANY medication.  But, they
could lose their license if they write prescriptions with the intent of
treating other than oral conditions.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
>>Holistic v. Wholeistic.
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Adenosine
Adenosine - 28 Oct 2004 21:48 GMT
>A dentist is licensed to write prescriptions for ANY medication.  But, they
>could lose their license if they write prescriptions with the intent of
>treating other than oral conditions.

Acid erosion of the teeth due to stomach acid coming back up isn't a
dental condition?

Adenosine
Dr Steve - 28 Oct 2004 22:25 GMT
We can treat the tooth erosion, but not the acid reflux.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
>>A dentist is licensed to write prescriptions for ANY medication.  But,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Adenosine
James Stein - 28 Oct 2004 22:37 GMT
> We can treat the tooth erosion, but not the acid reflux.

How does one treat the tooth erosion? I was under the impression that it was
somewhat irreversible.
W_B - 28 Oct 2004 23:03 GMT
>> We can treat the tooth erosion, but not the acid reflux.
>
>How does one treat the tooth erosion? I was under the impression that it was
>somewhat irreversible.

He means restoratively.
--

W_B

Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
W_B - 28 Oct 2004 23:02 GMT
>>A dentist is licensed to write prescriptions for ANY medication.  But, they
>>could lose their license if they write prescriptions with the intent of
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Adenosine

Actually it is not.
That is a stomach condition that affects the dentition.
The dentist is obligated to send the patient to the appropriate physician
to treat the underlying cause and then restore the teeth.

Scope of Practice.
This is usually defined in the State Dental Act.
--

W_B

Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
StovePipe - 29 Oct 2004 03:40 GMT
> >A dentist is licensed to write prescriptions for ANY medication.  But, they
> >could lose their license if they write prescriptions with the intent of
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Adenosine

I would say it is an oral manifestation of a systemic/psychologic
disorder and as such we treat the RESULTS of that disease in the mouth,
without treating the CAUSE of that disease.... but don't quote me... I'm
just a Kaannnaaadiiaaann jaw-breaker who should be slogging through the
RB notes some more...
<sigh>
SP
Signature

Not a real Addy, yet

W_B - 28 Oct 2004 22:58 GMT
>A dentist is licensed to write prescriptions for ANY medication.  But, they
>could lose their license if they write prescriptions with the intent of
>treating other than oral conditions.

Absolutely true.
Outside the normal scope of practice.

So we may infer that 'wholeistic dentists' may
recommend vitamins and juices, and other
non-regulated stuff like liver flushes.

However the so called 'wholeistic dentists'
would be practicing medicine without a license
if they wrote prescriptions outside the scope of
dental practice.
--

W_B

Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Dr Steve - 28 Oct 2004 21:42 GMT
One would think by the terminology, that they would treat the mouth only as
it effects the entire organism.  However, somehow, they seem to (at least as
I have encountered) evolve into practitioners who utilize un-orthodox
methods and materials to treat patients with.  The concept of the diluted
water medicines used by holistic physicians comes to mind here.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>
> Holistic v. Wholeistic.
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> Take out the G'RBAGE
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
W_B - 28 Oct 2004 22:58 GMT
>One would think by the terminology, that they would treat the mouth only as
>it effects the entire organism.  However, somehow, they seem to (at least as
>I have encountered) evolve into practitioners who utilize un-orthodox
>methods and materials to treat patients with.  The concept of the diluted
>water medicines used by holistic physicians comes to mind here.

Homeopathy ?

Ahh yes, pure bunkum.
Should be called Hopeopathy because
they hope it works.
--

W_B

Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
carabelli - 29 Oct 2004 00:43 GMT
> Holistic v. Wholeistic.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> The second point is that dentists are limited to treating
> the stomato-gnathic system. ..................

From my POV obviously we treat one part of the body, pick you anatomical
landmarks as you see fit.  Why in the hell did we take all those courses in
school (FYJ) this does not limit our education to just dental school - we
took a few other courses too (FYJA).

No health practicioner worth his/her two cents will try to zero in on one
part of the body and ignore the whole.  The obvious is (FYJ)  to know when
there are issues outside of the scope of dental practice and get an MD to
listen and address those concerns.  When some dimwit tells you that your
mesial-buccal canal of your upper right second molar is in the same meridian
as your mojo - and that is the cure, it's time to lay rubber in the parking
lot.

Dentists are acutely aware that the part can affect the whole and vice
versa.  It is when some dipwad claims to be able to treat the whole by
addressing the part that you can find yourself in the tarpits.  That is what
a *holistic*  (choose your health care provider) does - preying on those
without hope for financial gain.

There is no excuse in this day and age for any dentist not to be aware of
these issues.  The obvious is to know when to refer and when to treat.
Every dentist practicing today IMO should be, and probably is holistic.
Just not by the standards of the crystal huggers etc............

Did I mention FYJ?

carabelli
Jan - 29 Oct 2004 05:26 GMT
>From: "carabelli" huerter@att.net.not

>There is no excuse in this day and age for any dentist not to be aware of
>these issues.  

Correct, except they are aware, and still deny the damage mercury vapors do to
the WHOLE body.

They also deny the toxicity of mercury coming from amalgams to the WHOLE body.

They deny the studies.

They have no concern for the environment.

They have no interest in the mercury reduction act.

And,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

They CANNOT answer questions.

just where in *mid air* this material (highy  toxic, so called safe IN the
mouth) became suddenly hazardous again??

Mercury On The Mind

From: "Dr Steve" nospam@home.net
>Date: 10/15/2004 4:50 AM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <TIPbd.8090$5b1.7165@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com>
>
>I'll read the long posting IF you promise to discuss it with any of us.
>Otherwise, it just gets deleted.

You'll read *IF*???

Just HOW interested, are YOU???

WHY are you placing deals on YOUR descision to delete it? YOUR role of using
this mercury is YOUR choice. Do YOU feel comfortable with using this mercury???

Did you read the DEATHS from mercury vapors???

Do amalgams release mercury vapors??

Do YOU want to be responsible for installing this mercury inches from the
brain???

Do YOU want to be responsible for this steady stream of gaseous mercury
atoms???

Do You want to be responsible for Elemental mercury when released by a dental
amalgam is inhaled and (80
percent of it) absorbed by the lungs and retained in the body?????

> Currently the two most important sources of mercury exposure for
> Americans are dental amalgams and vaccinations.

Helloooooooooooooooooooooo.

>Mainstream medical journals, like Pediatrics and The New England
>> Journal of Medicine, only publish studies that claim thimerosal is
>> safe. And it turns out that these articles are written in large part
>> by researchers in the pay of vaccine makers,

YOU have WHAT to say about that???

>as the Coalition for Safe
>> Minds (Sensible Action For Ending Mercury-Induced Neurological
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> Neurodevelopment Disorders, and Heart Disease in the United States" by
>> Mark and David Geier, which documents a strong association between the
amounts of mercury injected in vaccines and autism.
Such articles can
>> only find acceptance in alternative (i.e., "politically incorrect")
>> journals like the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, where
>> this one was published.

Do discuss this, please!

>Brain cells grown in the laboratory develop the same three
>> pathologic findings when exposed to nanomolar (3.6 × 10-10 molar)
>> doses of mercury, an amount approximating that found in the brains of
people who have a lot of amalgam fillings.

> Dental amalgams are the main source of mercury in an adult's brain. An
>> average-sized amalgam filling contains 750,000 micrograms of mercury
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> through the nose travel up filaments of the olfactory nerve to the
>> hippocampus, which controls memory, and to other critical areas in the
brain. In another study, rats given the same concentration of mercury
>> that people inhale from their amalgams develop the pathologic markers
>> of Alzheimer's disease. People with Alzheimer's disease have mercury
>> levels in their brains that are 2 to 3 times higher than that seen in normal
people.

Discuss away!!!

>The mercury in flu vaccines also plays a role in this disease. One
>> investigator has found that people who received the flu vaccine each
>> year for 3 to 5 years had a ten-fold greater chance of developing
>> Alzheimer's disease than people who had zero, 1, or 2 shots.

Waiting for your response.

>> Another important factor with regard to mercury on the mind, which
>> officials at the CDC, FDA and the professors in the IOM do not
>> consider, is synergistic toxicity - mercury's enhanced effect when
>> other poisons are present. A small dose of mercury that kills 1 in 100
>> rats and a dose of aluminum that will kill 1 in 100 rats, when combined have
a striking effect: all the rats die. Doses of mercury
>> that have a 1 percent mortality will have a 100 percent mortality rate
>> if some aluminum is there. Vaccines contain aluminum.

Nice combination huh??

> Why do officials at the CDC, FDA, and leaders of the medical and
>> dental establishment discount or ignore all these important facts?

Uh hmmmmmmmmm.

WHY indeed??

> Some of them being in the pay of vaccine makers is one reason

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.

> Thespecter of litigation for having sanctioned thimerosal and amalgams
>> and, in the case of the FDA, not doing appropriate safety studies on
>> them is another.

AS *I* have been saying. You think, I am wrong? If so why?

>. But it is more complicated than that. The hypothesis
>> that mercury causes autism and Alzheimer s disease is a new
>> truth. And as Schopenhauer points out (see my article on him), each
>> new truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed.

AMEN!!! Along with the messegner who has the guts to post it. Do you agree???

> Second, it is violently opposed.

We see it HERE!!!!!

>And third, it is accepted as self-evident.
The mercury truth is now in the second stage.

<snip more about vaccines for now>

>> Today the medical establishment, led by the AAP, AAFP, AMA, CDC, and
>> IOM, has gone to the other extreme.

<snip>

>> Avoiding flu shots that contain thimerosal, and having dentists stop
>> implanting mercury amalgams in people's mouths would lower the
>> incidence of Alzheimer's disease. If you have amalgam fillings,
>> particularly if there is a family history of Alzheimer's disease, you
>> might consider having them removed. Be sure to have a dentist do it who
follows the protocol established by The International Academy of
>> Oral Medicine & Toxicology for safely removing them.

Discussion open.

<snip>

>> If your dentist parrots the American Dental Association stance on this
>> subject and says that "silver" - i.e., mercury - amalgams are
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> to for a number of years. When he chose to ignore it, I changed
>> dentists - to a mercury-free one and had him remove all my amalgam fillings.

Jan
Rich.@. - 29 Oct 2004 05:40 GMT
>They also deny the toxicity of mercury coming from amalgams to the WHOLE body.

>>>Rich said:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>>>>dam in my mouth for two hours at a time. It's called a burden lifted. It's
>>>>>spelled RELIEF.

>>>>Rich says:
>>>>But at the time that you felt better than you had in two years you did
>>>>not yet have all the amalgams removed yet.

Jan Drew lies:
>>>>Of course I did. The work was over the bill was paid, no more sitting in the
>>>>dentist chair.

http://www.google.com/groups?q=++%22I+hav+felt+better+today+that++%22+author:jdr
ew63929%40aol.com&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=19990618194417.11038.00000497%40ng-fm1
.aol.com&rnum=1


From: JDrew63929 (jdrew63929@aol.com)
Newsgroups: alt.health.dental-amalgam
Date: 1999/06/18

>I believe the mercury is the cause of my problems. I hav felt better
>today that
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Jan

OOPS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Looking forward to having the REST of the
mercury out??? The dental work was over?? Poor Jan. May God have mercy
on her soul.

When Jan is confronted about the fact that she still had amalgams when
she said she felt better than she had in two years Jan lies saying
that the dental work *was* over. The above proves in Jan's own words
that she lied. She has been confronted about this contradiction but
she refuses to admit the lie and instead creates diversions by falsely
accusing me of lying.

Watch as she either pretends that she is not reading this or starts a
new thread to attack me. Just watch. What will it be?? Nude hiking??
Did not answer Bubba's questions?? Nuked my posts?? Used her dying
parents to belittle her?? Or maybe Jan will come up with some new
diversion.

Aloha,

Rich
carabelli - 29 Oct 2004 16:11 GMT
"Jan" <jdrew63929@aol.com> wrote..........

> just where in *mid air* this material (highy  toxic, so called safe IN the
> mouth) became suddenly hazardous again??

Washington, D.C.
W_B - 29 Oct 2004 17:36 GMT
>"Jan" <jdrew63929@aol.com> wrote..........
>
>> just where in *mid air* this material (highy  toxic, so called safe IN the
>> mouth) became suddenly hazardous again??
>
>Washington, D.C.

Beat me to the punch.
--

W_B

Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Dr. Steve - 29 Oct 2004 22:01 GMT
>>"Jan" <jdrew63929@aol.com> wrote..........
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>
>Beat me to the punch.

I have no idea how you can stand to live in DC so close to those
politicians.
..
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA

Writing on a tablet PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my poor handwriting.
W_B - 30 Oct 2004 02:09 GMT
>>>"Jan" <jdrew63929@aol.com> wrote..........
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>..
>Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.

Better to keep a close eye on them.

You know that the only time America is safe is when Congress is out of
session.

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
Jan - 29 Oct 2004 23:16 GMT
>Subject: Re: Holistic Dentist Debate.
>From: "carabelli" redslaz3@att.net.not
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Washington, D.C.

Your blathering because you can't answer the question is noted
Dr. Steve - 31 Oct 2004 18:35 GMT
Jan' continuing refusal to answer a simple question, which does not
even compromise her stance on Hg in any way, is noted.

>>Subject: Re: Holistic Dentist Debate.
>>From: "carabelli" redslaz3@att.net.not
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Your blathering because you can't answer the question is noted

..
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA

Writing on a tablet PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my poor handwriting.
Dr Steve - 01 Nov 2004 15:10 GMT
Jan, I will happily discuss any issue you like once we finish the previous
discussion.  I will even settle for simply your clarification of the term
Holistic.  How about it?

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

> >From: "carabelli" huerter@att.net.not
>
>>There is no excuse in this day and age for any dentist not to be aware of
>>these issues.
Jan - 29 Oct 2004 05:09 GMT
>Subject: Holistic Dentist Debate.
>From: W_B no_one@nowhere.net
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>The second point is that dentists are limited to treating
>the stomato-gnathic system

"No tooth is worth damaging your immune system."  

The dental profession, through its leadership, has generally ignored or denied
the truth about the risks of using mercury and other metals in fillings.

The dental care profession that has managed to isolate itself from the rest of
medicine. This permits denial that the procedures and materials used in
dentistry usually result in chronic infections and toxicity that have
far-ranging, degenerative health consequences all over the body.

It's remarkable how advances in medicine are thought of as a major benefit of
modernity. Yet, considering what's going on with cancer, dentistry, AIDS, in
which politics, ego and perpetuating institutions are more important than
solutions, perhaps this time will be looked upon even less favorably than when
"leeching" was common. At least back then, it was lack of knowledge. Nowadays,
the errors are due to perversity; the knowledge exists but is disregarded to
perpetuate human power and dodge responsibility for error. Who is living in the
Dark Ages?

Dentistry has never been at the top of my list of things I would like to learn
about in this lifetime. In fact, for most of my life, dentistry has been on a
different list: "Things I would prefer not to know." But while ignorance is
bliss, ignorance can also be costly. The costs come in the form of declining
health and money spent for dental treatments that aren't in one's best
interest.

Tooth Truth provides some shocking and disturbing information about the current
practice of dentistry. By the end of the book, I could see why Dr. Frank
Jerome, D.D.S., states in his introduction, "This book is a warning to every
person that there is much danger every time they enter a dental office." The
dangers include almost every aspect of dentistry, from treatments recommended
to the materials used.

Dr. Jerome states, "It is common knowledge among dentists that over 95 percent
of all dental treatments are optional." It is important, therefore, that the
patient have the information to discern which of these treatments might be
beneficial and which might not. Tooth Truth is a book for the consumer, a
dental primer, providing an understanding of dental techniques and materials so
that informed decisions can be made when your dentist makes recommendations.

For most people, the normal course of action is to accept a dentist's
recommendations, have the treatment done, and then forget about it. In
contrast, Tooth Truth provides a broader perspective, letting us know the
consequences of a particular treatment ten years later so that we can decide
whether or not it is wise to have a particular treatment in the first place.

For example, if you know that crowning a tooth increases the probability of
needing a root canal later, then you might choose not to have a tooth crowned.
Dr. Jerome explains how damaging it is to remove all of a tooth's enamel in
order to crown a tooth. Furthermore, we learn that twenty percent of all
crowned teeth die. Once the tooth dies, most dentists will want to do a root
canal.

Rather than having a tooth crowned, Dr. Jerome suggests either a composite
filling or an onlay. An onlay is bonded to the top of the tooth and allows more
of the enamel to remain intact. An onlay is far less damaging to the tooth than
a crown, yet dentists are less likely to suggest this option. Dentists are
taught that they need to "do more crowns to increase practice profitability."

In fact, in quite a variety of areas, dentists do not seem to take into account
the toxicity of the treatment being recommended. An example of this is the
continued use of mercury in fillings. Dr. Jerome explores the use of mercury in
dentistry and discusses its toxicity. Mercury is poisonous to the body, and has
been proven to cause birth defects.

In addition to the health threats that mercury poses, the disposal of the
mercury-containing amalgam is a noticeable threat to our environment. The
mercury-containing amalgam filling is considered hazardous waste before it is
put in your mouth, and it is also considered hazardous waste if the filling is
ever removed from your mouth. (Yet, somehow it is considered safe while it is
in your mouth!) A newspaper reports that 25 percent of the mercury in the air
in Denmark comes from crematoriums. Mercury enters the sewers from dental
offices and contaminates the environment. Some dental offices in Europe are
required to use mercury separators on their sewer lines, but there is no such
requirement in the United States.

As it turns out, it is actually quite common to find toxic elements in dental
materials. Porcelain, for example, commonly has radioactive material added to
help give it luminescence. Nickel, which is carcinogenic, is commonly found in
braces and crowns.

In addition to toxic materials, dentists frequently recommend toxic procedures
as well. An example of this is the root canal. Since the philosophy of
dentistry is to "save every tooth," root canals are frequently recommended in
spite of the fact that root canals are a heavy burden on the immune system.
According to Dr. Jerome, the acute infection in the tooth may subside, but a
chronic infection continues and the bacteria continue to produce toxins.

In contrast to the "save every tooth" philosophy, Dr. Jerome's philosophy is
"no tooth is worth damaging your immune system." Dr. Jerome recommends having
the tooth pulled rather than leaving the dead tooth in your mouth. In addition,
he discusses the importance of properly cleaning the tooth socket after a tooth
is extracted.

Those who are familiar with Dr. Hulda Clark's books (The Cure for All Cancers,
The Cure for HIV and AIDS, etc.) will recognize this philosophy. In fact, it
was through Dr. Clark's books that I first learned about Dr. Jerome, as Dr.
Clark interviews Dr. Jerome in all of her books. Because of this connection
between Drs. Jerome and Clark, I assumed that Dr. Jerome's new edition of Tooth
Truth would have the same dental recommendations as Dr. Clark's latest book The
Cure for All Advanced Cancers [see The New Times, September 2000 issue for
review].

As it turns out, they have different recommendations in the area of fillings.
Dr. Clark recommends laboratory-processed composite inlays (cured according to
the procedure in The Cure for All Advanced Cancers so that no toxins can seep),
while Dr. Jerome uses the composite Visiofil. This is a major difference in
recommendations, and Dr. Clark devotees will want to take note of this
difference.

However, in spite of this difference, Tooth Truth contains a wealth of
information that can benefit everyone. Such technical distinctions and details
may seem like too much information for the average dental patient, but, given
the current practice of dentistry, it is no longer advisable that we blindly
follow a dentist's recommendations. For the preservation of our health, it is
essential that we become informed consumers in the area of dental care. Tooth
Truth provides the details of dentistry to help us make those informed
decisions.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.