Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / October 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

More Excuses, NO Answers, NO discussion

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jan - 26 Oct 2004 22:15 GMT
Wearing thin

Sr Steve's posts for today 4:10 P.M.

LOL ! ! ! !

What discussion?

HUH?

What planet did this come from?

Did you wish to discuss this article in detail?

So, how would you summarize the differences between holistic dentists and
traditional dentist if Hg and RCT did not exist?

Hey,, that would be cool!

New Rock-Band ? ? ? ?

But, what does Jan see as the difference between Holistic and traditional
dentistry (excluding Hg and RCT)??????????????

For the "hundredth time" excluding Hg and RCT, are there any differences in
your point of view?

Why do you refuse to discuss?

Okay,,,,,,,,,,,, everyone slide into the time machine for a trip back to
1918 and all the science that was known at that time.

Hi Jan,

I am trying to catch up from the weekend.  Did you get a chance to clear up
my confusion over the Holistic dentist issue yet?  I am reading oldest to
newest and have only gotten this far (I do occasionally cheat and read the
very newest post).  <grin>

Let;s see if I can follow you.  I will do my best.  Please, please help me
out if I misunderstood your intent.  Kindly scroll down.

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................
"Jan" <jdrew63929@aol.com> wrote in message >

>>Subject: Re: Discussion
>>From: "Dr Steve" nospam@home.net
>>Date: 10/11/2004 3:37 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>Message-id: <QOEad.16258$Qv5.3253@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com>
>>
>>Might we have a straight answer just this one time.
>
> I always give a straight answer, so the just one time is a lie.
>
>>Is the only difference (in your interpretation) the use of Hg or non use
>>of
>>Hg?
>
> NO. Just as I stated.
>
>> The holistic dentist I know is much more different from me than that.
>
> Oh? Care to share the difference?
>
> Well???
John Chewter - 26 Oct 2004 23:11 GMT
Is this your idea of a discussion Jan?

What are your SERIOUS answers - assuming you have any - which we all now
doubt?

>>So, how would you summarize the differences between holistic dentists and
>>traditional dentist if Hg and RCT did not exist?

>Hey,, that would be cool!

>New Rock-Band ? ? ? ?

>But, what does Jan see as the difference between Holistic and traditional
dentistry (excluding Hg and RCT)??????????????
Jan - 27 Oct 2004 01:40 GMT
>Subject: Re: More Excuses, NO Answers, NO discussion
>From: "John Chewter" john@LESS_SPAMchewter.f9.co.uk
>Date: 10/26/2004 5:11 PM Central Standard Time
>Message-id: <clmi2c$lo6$1@hercules.btinternet.com>
>
>Is this your idea

>Wearing thin
>
[quoted text clipped - 71 lines]
>>
>> Well???
Dr Steve - 27 Oct 2004 00:16 GMT
Hi Jan,

I hope Indiana did not have the heavy fog we did this morning.  I came
around a blind curve in our subdivision to find a jogger in the street
coming out of the mist.  fortunately, I was crawling very slow in my funny
sounding car.

Hey, did you catch my reply to your message about the holistic thingy?
Perhaps we can wrap that up and move on to something else.

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

> Wearing thin
>
[quoted text clipped - 74 lines]
>>
>> Well???
Jan - 27 Oct 2004 01:41 GMT
> Wearing thin
>>
[quoted text clipped - 74 lines]
>>>
>>> Well???
Dr Steve - 27 Oct 2004 13:14 GMT
Carbon paper?

Signature

~+--~+--~+--~+--~+--
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA
....................................................

This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here.  Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect
your health.
......................

>> Wearing thin
>>>
>>> Sr Steve's posts for today 4:10 P.M.
>>>
>>> LOL ! ! ! !

[auto-snip]
Steven Fawks - 27 Oct 2004 17:53 GMT
> Carbon paper?

'Someone' does not realize that discussion involves some degree
of original thought and interpretation/explanation of views.

Therefore, no discussion has occurred and it is extremely unlikely
to develop in the future.

Fawks
Jan - 27 Oct 2004 20:51 GMT
>Subject: Re: More Excuses, NO Answers, NO discussion
>From: Steven Fawks tuthjockey@earthlink.net
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>'Someone' does not realize that discussion involves some degree
>of original thought and interpretation/explanation of views

From: Jan (jdrew63929@aol.com)
Subject: Dan Lost His Dictionary
Newsgroups: sci.med.dentistry
Date: 2004-10-21 22:29:09 PST


>From: "carabelli"
>  At least 10 questions

Dicuss

consideration of a question in open and usually informal debate

> demands

to ask authoritatively or earnestly to be informed

>ntelligent discussion isn't done on this level

Discussion

to investigate by reasoning or argument b : to present in detail for
examination or consideration <discussed plans for the party> c : to talk about
====
>Therefore, no discussion has occurred

http://tinyurl.com/3u9q6

>and it is extremely unlikely
>to develop in the future.

Evidently not.

From: Dr Steve (nospam@home.net)
Subject: Re: Mercury On The Mind
Newsgroups: sci.med.dentistry
Date: 2004-10-15 05:51:02 PST


I'll read the long posting IF you promise to discuss it with any of us.
Otherwise, it just gets deleted.

From: Jan (jdrew63929@aol.com)
Subject: Re: Mercury On The Mind
View: Complete Thread (103 articles)  
Original Format
Newsgroups: sci.med.dentistry
Date: 2004-10-15 17:17:32 PST


>Subject: Re: Mercury On The Mind
>From: "Dr Steve" nospam@home.net
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>I'll read the long posting IF you promise to discuss it with any of us.
>Otherwise, it just gets deleted.

You'll read *IF*???

Just HOW interested, are YOU???

WHY are you placing deals on YOUR descision to delete it? YOUR role of using
this mercury is YOUR choice. Do YOU feel comfortable with using this mercury???

Did you read the DEATHS from mercury vapors???

Do amalgams release mercury vapors??

Do YOU want to be responsible for installing this mercury inches from the
brain???

Do YOU want to be responsible for this steady stream of gaseous mercury
atoms???

Do You want to be responsible for Elemental mercury when released by a dental
amalgam is inhaled and (80
percent of it) absorbed by the lungs and retained in the body?????

> Currently the two most important sources of mercury exposure for
> Americans are dental amalgams and vaccinations.

Helloooooooooooooooooooooo.

>Mainstream medical journals, like Pediatrics and The New England
>> Journal of Medicine, only publish studies that claim thimerosal is
>> safe. And it turns out that these articles are written in large part
>> by researchers in the pay of vaccine makers,

YOU have WHAT to say about that???

>as the Coalition for Safe
>> Minds (Sensible Action For Ending Mercury-Induced Neurological
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> Neurodevelopment Disorders, and Heart Disease in the United States" by
>> Mark and David Geier, which documents a strong association between the
amounts of mercury injected in vaccines and autism.
Such articles can
>> only find acceptance in alternative (i.e., "politically incorrect")
>> journals like the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, where
>> this one was published.

Do discuss this, please!

>Brain cells grown in the laboratory develop the same three
>> pathologic findings when exposed to nanomolar (3.6 × 10-10 molar)
>> doses of mercury, an amount approximating that found in the brains of
people who have a lot of amalgam fillings.

> Dental amalgams are the main source of mercury in an adult's brain. An
>> average-sized amalgam filling contains 750,000 micrograms of mercury
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> through the nose travel up filaments of the olfactory nerve to the
>> hippocampus, which controls memory, and to other critical areas in the
brain. In another study, rats given the same concentration of mercury
>> that people inhale from their amalgams develop the pathologic markers
>> of Alzheimer's disease. People with Alzheimer's disease have mercury
>> levels in their brains that are 2 to 3 times higher than that seen in normal
people.

Discuss away!!!

>The mercury in flu vaccines also plays a role in this disease. One
>> investigator has found that people who received the flu vaccine each
>> year for 3 to 5 years had a ten-fold greater chance of developing
>> Alzheimer's disease than people who had zero, 1, or 2 shots.

Waiting for your response.

>> Another important factor with regard to mercury on the mind, which
>> officials at the CDC, FDA and the professors in the IOM do not
>> consider, is synergistic toxicity - mercury's enhanced effect when
>> other poisons are present. A small dose of mercury that kills 1 in 100
>> rats and a dose of aluminum that will kill 1 in 100 rats, when combined have
a striking effect: all the rats die. Doses of mercury
>> that have a 1 percent mortality will have a 100 percent mortality rate
>> if some aluminum is there. Vaccines contain aluminum.

Nice combination huh??

> Why do officials at the CDC, FDA, and leaders of the medical and
>> dental establishment discount or ignore all these important facts?

Uh hmmmmmmmmm.

WHY indeed??

> Some of them being in the pay of vaccine makers is one reason

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.

> Thespecter of litigation for having sanctioned thimerosal and amalgams
>> and, in the case of the FDA, not doing appropriate safety studies on
>> them is another.

AS *I* have been saying. You think, I am wrong? If so why?

>. But it is more complicated than that. The hypothesis
>> that mercury causes autism and Alzheimer s disease is a new
>> truth. And as Schopenhauer points out (see my article on him), each
>> new truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed.

AMEN!!! Along with the messegner who has the guts to post it. Do you agree???

> Second, it is violently opposed.

We see it HERE!!!!!

>And third, it is accepted as self-evident.
The mercury truth is now in the second stage.

<snip more about vaccines for now>

>> Today the medical establishment, led by the AAP, AAFP, AMA, CDC, and
>> IOM, has gone to the other extreme.

<snip>

>> Avoiding flu shots that contain thimerosal, and having dentists stop
>> implanting mercury amalgams in people's mouths would lower the
>> incidence of Alzheimer's disease. If you have amalgam fillings,
>> particularly if there is a family history of Alzheimer's disease, you
>> might consider having them removed. Be sure to have a dentist do it who
follows the protocol established by The International Academy of
>> Oral Medicine & Toxicology for safely removing them.

Discussion open.

<snip>

>> If your dentist parrots the American Dental Association stance on this
>> subject and says that "silver" - i.e., mercury - amalgams are
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> to for a number of years. When he chose to ignore it, I changed
>> dentists - to a mercury-free one and had him remove all my amalgam fillings.

Jan
W_B - 27 Oct 2004 23:46 GMT
>> Carbon paper?
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Fawks

I think Dr. Steve owe me a grand or two by now.
Might be up to 10K but who knows ?

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
Dr. Steve - 28 Oct 2004 02:28 GMT
>>> Carbon paper?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>I think Dr. Steve owe me a grand or two by now.
>Might be up to 10K but who knows ?

Remind me next time I am in DC
..
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan, USA

Writing on a tablet PC,so forgive me if the PC misreads my poor handwriting.
Jan - 27 Oct 2004 18:51 GMT
>Subject: Re: More Excuses, NO Answers, NO discussion
>From: "Dr Steve" nospam@home.net
>Date: 10/27/2004 4:14 AM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <piMfd.18720$w8.3918@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com>
>
>Carbon paper?

> More Excuses, NO Answers, NO discussion
Dr Steve - 28 Oct 2004 13:09 GMT
>> More Excuses, NO Answers, NO discussion

Thank you, that means you have to answer the question?
W_B - 27 Oct 2004 23:29 GMT
>Carbon paper?

We did away with that when we installed the paperless bathroom...

....errr... I meant office.

--
W_B

wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
Adenosine - 27 Oct 2004 23:49 GMT
>>Carbon paper?
>
>We did away with that when we installed the paperless bathroom...
>
>....errr... I meant office.

That's one way to cut down on bathroom breaks by employees.

Adenosine
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.