Joel M. Eichen <joeleichen@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> How extensive was the ameloblastoma?
Hi Joel;
To quote my surgeon:
"...the right mandible involving the right mandibular
angle from the mesial of tooth #31 up into the coronoid
process... the overall size of the lesion is 6.5cm/3cm."
So the tumor was removed along with a 1cm margin -
which means teeth 30 & 31 were removed, and a plate
was screwed in to bridge between there and the condyle.
What are your thoughts?
(if my surgeon reads this, he'll recognize it - so just
in case - Hi Doc!)
Joel M. Eichen - 26 Oct 2004 14:44 GMT
>Joel M. Eichen <joeleichen@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>(if my surgeon reads this, he'll recognize it - so just
>in case - Hi Doc!)
REPLY
This is beyond our field of expertise. That said, all bone REGENERATES
on its own, if a scaffolding exists for the repair.
There are Kensey-Nash products that are being developed for that
purpose (orthopedic surgery). These OPLA products will drift down into
dentistry in ten years or so.
The repair (osteoblastic activity, osteoclastic activvity) means that
if it were like a pot hole, that the hole would fill in by itself
although there would be a noticeable dip in the highway.
Whether or not bone additives reduce the dip is questionable. Some say
yes, while others including me, say no noticeable difference.
Controlled studies are almost impossible to do here.
Joel
Dave King - 26 Oct 2004 15:13 GMT
>Joel M. Eichen <joeleichen@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>(if my surgeon reads this, he'll recognize it - so just
>in case - Hi Doc!)
Sorry to jump in midstream and to hear of your problem.
Your surgeon has definately treated the lesion adequately and his plan
is, IMO, the way to go. Other reconstructive options exist but this
will leave you with an edentulous span (no teeth) that is very
reliable in reconstruction. Hip bone is the best source for a donor
graft. I perfrom several of these per year and have had excellent
results.
The posterior hip is with less complications than harvesting from the
anterior hip. It will add an hour or two to the operative time but you
will have plenty of bone, usually more than what you can get from the
front hip, so the reconstructive portion of the case will be
unhampered. Is he usuing a cadaveric crib to place the graft in or is
he using block grafts?
Good luck.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
David A. King, D.M.D.
Diplomate, American Board of OMS
Fellow, American Association of OMS
HTTP://WWW.DEOMFS.COM
W_B - 26 Oct 2004 18:05 GMT
>Joel M. Eichen <joeleichen@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>(if my surgeon reads this, he'll recognize it - so just
>in case - Hi Doc!)
Hey Deja,
check your mailbox, I sent some information for you.
--
W_B
Take out the G'RBAGE
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com