>Subject: Root Canal Therapy
>From: dobe1776@yahoo.com (dobe snyder)
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>Dobe
>http://www.zip.com.au/~rgammal/RCTframeset.htm
>
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>clean and sterilize this canal and fill it with a sterile, non toxic inert
>material. This usually renders this tooth serviceable and non painful;
however,
>the entire inner hard core of the tooth is made of dentin which has several
>million dentinal tubules. These tubules allow the circulation of lymphatic
type
>fluid to circulate from the vital organs of the root canal to the outside of
>the tooth. This is a viable circulatory phenomenon which has a purpose. It
>services the periodontal ligament as well as the sensory aspect of the nerve
>and blood centers in the root canal. If the body chemistry is healthy, the
flow
>of lymphatic fluid is from the root canal to the outside of the tooth. This
>creates an irrigation for the tooth and usually prevents the accumulation of
>plaque to form. When the body chemistry is not healthy, then the circulation
is
>from the outside of the tooth to the inner root canal. This allows for no
>irrigation, but rather an accumulation of plaque to form. There are many more
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>I do not recommend root canals for anyone. Each individual has a right to
their
>decisions. Many people simply do not wish to lose a member of their body. I
>respect this, and I always discuss the consequences.
>
>The next area of discussion is whether the root canal filling actually
>sterilizes the apical end of the tooth. There are so many lateral canals at
the
>root end of the tooth where bacteria can harbor that it is unlikely that a
>complete aseptic condition exists. This, however, is a debateable subject.
[quoted text clipped - 84 lines]
>
>Jan
Joel M. Eichen - 03 Oct 2004 11:09 GMT
>>Subject: Root Canal Therapy
>>From: dobe1776@yahoo.com (dobe snyder)
>>Date: 10/2/2004 4:52 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>Message-id: <dd390566.0410021652.3dab2a96@posting.google.com>
>>
>>Hi:
THANKS Jan!
I never heard this before. This is certainly useful information.
Unfortuantely its incorrect.
PS- Are you in de-NILE? We got dentists here you know.
Joel
2 canals ? Its strange.What kind of teeth ?
It is possible but It happens hardly ever !
What about X-ray pictures ?
> Hi:
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Dobe
Joel M. Eichen - 03 Oct 2004 11:10 GMT
>2 canals ? Its strange.What kind of teeth ?
>It is possible but It happens hardly ever !
>What about X-ray pictures ?
UPPER first bicuspid ..........
>Hi:
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Dobe
Hi Dob .....
Some teeth (front ones) have ONE CANAL. Some teeth (side ones) have
two canals, one in each root ........
Some teeth (back ones - molars) have three or four canals distributed
in two or three roots, depending on if it is upper or lower ....
So yours is a side tooth ........ PREMOLAR, also called BICUSPID.
Joel
>Hi:
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Dobe
Sorry that doesn't make sense to me either.
Most bicuspids have two canals, most molars have three,
and a significant number of molars have four canals.
All canals are treated in any particular tooth and are
treated at the same time.
--
W_B
wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
Take out the G'RBAGE
The Real Paul - 04 Oct 2004 15:07 GMT
Front desk error?? It happens..
> >Hi:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
> Take out the G'RBAGE
Steven Fawks - 05 Oct 2004 19:52 GMT
It should also be noted that the difficulty of any particular root canal
is not *always* related to how many canals are present! I know that's
how insurance codes the procedure, but it really isn't a very accurate
method of determining a fee.
JMO,
Fawks
> Front desk error?? It happens..
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>>wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com
>>Take out the G'RBAGE