Are we being told the Truth on this?

Anyone can check these Facts out for themselves. Don't rely on a
Middleman!

Reference 1:

Did you know for decades, we have been told a lie, a lie that has led
to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans and the weakening
of the immune systems of tens of millions more. This lie is called
fluoridation. A process we were led to believe was a safe and
effective method of protecting teeth from decay is in fact a fraud. In
recent years it's been shown that fluoridation is neither essential
for good health nor protective of teeth. What it does is poison the
body. We should all at this point be asking how and why public health
policy and the American media continue to live with and perpetuate
this scientific sham.

Sourced from ---> http://rense.com/health/fluoride1.htm

Reference 2:

FLUORIDE FANTASIES



"...ll surveys both here and in Western Europe show that the reduction
in (dental) caries over the past 20 years is just as great in
unfluoridated as in fluoridated communities."

John R. Lee, MD.



Even "...the Journal of the American Dental Association (states) that
'the current reported decline in caries in the US and other Western
industrialised countries has been observed in both fluoridated and
non-fluoridated communities, with percentage reductions in each
community apparently the same."

Chemical & Engineering News, August 1, 1988.



A computer analysis of the data from the largest dental survey ever
done - of nearly 40,000 school children - by the National Institutes
of Dental Research revealed no correlation between tooth decay and
fluoridation. In fact, many of the non-fluoridated cities had better
tooth decay rates than fluoridated cities. The city with the lowest
rate of tooth decay was not fluoridated. Of the three with the highest
rate of decay, two were partially fluoridated.



The Missouri State Bureau of Dental Health "had conducted a survey of
more than 6,500 lifelong resident second- and sixth-grade children in
various parts of Missouri and found that overall.. 'there were no
significant differences between children drinking optimally
fluoridated water and children drinking suboptimally fluoridated
water."

Albert W. Burgstahler, PhD., Professor of Chemistry, University of
Kansas



"...school districts reporting the highest caries-free rates, were
totally unfluoridated. How does one explain this?"

A.S.Gray DDS., Journal of the Canadian Dental Association, no.10,1987.





INFANT MORTALITY RATES ARE HIGHEST IN FLUORIDATED CITIES



Figures released by the National Centre for Health Statistics reveal
that infant mortality is a big problem in the United States. This data
shows that the ten cities with the worst rate of infant mortality have
all been artificially fluoridated at least 17 years or longer!



After the first full year of fluoridation Kansas city, Missouri's
infant mortality increased 13%.

The Kansas City Star, November 21, 1982.



After the fifth year of fluoridation in Kansas City, infant mortality
increased 36%

The Kansas City Star, February 26, 1987



Japan, with no fluoridation, has the lowest infant mortality rate in
the industrialised world, and the longest life expectancy.











FLUORIDATION - Mind Control of the Masses

Ian E. Stephen.



Extracted from his self-published booklet "The Dickinson Statement: A
Mind-Boggling Thesis" published in NEXUS magazine August-September
1995 issue.



Despite damning evidence on fluoride toxicity, bureaucracies and
multinationals continue to pollute our drinking water and mess with
our physical and mental health.



Part 1.



This story has a beginning, it has a middle but it has no ending. The
'ending' will undoubtedly be written in countless hospital records, on
tiny gravestones, in the bones of the crippled and on the hearts of
the bereaved. Even so, the true cause of the 'ending' will never be
advertised. One record that slipped past the establishment net is
duplicated herein but, believe it or not, the existence of this 'death
certificate' has been denied, in writing and to overseas scientific
inquiry, by Australian administrators.

What follows is but a fractional part of the 'middle' of a story that
began before the turn of the century and which was provoked by a
statement contained in an 'Address in Reply to the Government's Speech
to Parliament", as recorded in Victorian Hansard of 12 August 1987, by
Mr Harley Rivers Dickinson, Liberal Party Member of the Victorian
Parliament for South Barwon. Hence the title.

The relevant Hansard abstract is reproduced herewith. It is emphasised
that the writer imputes Mr Dickinson with no other responsibility for
the contents of this thesis than being the parliamentary 'trigger'
which motivated it and the researched data which it contains.



   "At the end of the Second World War, the United States Government
sent Charles Eliot Perkins, a research worker in chemistry,
biochemistry, physiology and pathology, to take charge of the vast
Farben chemical plants in Germany.

   "While there he was told by the German chemists of a scheme which
had been worked out by them during the war and adopted by the German
General Staff.

   "This was to control the population in any given area through mass
medication of drinking water. In this scheme, sodium fluoride occupied
a prominent place.

   "Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time
reduce an individual's power to resist domination by slowly poisoning
and narcotising a certain area of the brain and will thus make him
submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him.

   "Both the Germans and the Russians added sodium fluoride to the
drinking water of prisoners of war to make them stupid and docile."

   

In a book written by Dr. Hans Mollenburgh of Haarlem, Holland, called
Fluoride - The Freedom Fight, the author describes the ultimately
successful endeavours to free the Dutch people from water
fluoridation. (Those endeavours included the only properly conducted
double-blind study ever done anywhere in the world into the effects of
tap water fluoridated at one part of fluoride to 1,000,000 parts of
water (1p.p.m.)

One brief passage is headed "Perkins", and a reproduction of that
section gives sufficient confirmation, by a remote and independent
source, of the "Dickinson Statement" as printed in Hansard, to
reinforce the need for additional investigation into this one
'behaviour control' aspect of the fluoride debate and relate it to
1987. (The entire "Perkins" paragraph is reproduced below.)

Elsewhere in this book, Dr Mollenburgh also relate how that first
"Perkins" anecdote was confirmed in differing ways and from the
reliable independent sources.



"Perkins"

"When 1971 was drawing to a close, I received a paper containing a
strange story. This story was to haunt us repeatedly throughout the
long, drawn-out battle. It was a story resembling science fiction -
bizarre and unbelievable. There are those who warned me not to even
mention this story, and I can appreciate why. On the other hand, the
task of an historian is not to relate things as they should have
happened, but as they actually did happen.

"..The Perkins saga was different from other fluoride stories.

"The story of industries hoodwinking the public into buying a
pollutant as a medicine id simply 'whodunit'. Grotesque though it may
sound, it is no more than 'the consumer fraud of this polluted
century' (as described in Fluoridation and Truth Decay by Gladys
Caldwell). But the story I now read was different: it gave one the
cold shivers. It told of a chemical engineer, Mr. Perkins, who related
how immediately after the Second World War he was one of the Americans
put into the well-known I.G. Farben Company in Germany. There he
discovered that I.G. Farben had developed plans during the war to
fluoridate the occupied countries, because it had been found that
fluoridation caused slight damage to a specific part of the brain.
This damage had a very particular effect. It made it more difficult
for the person affected to defend his freedom. he became more docile
towards authority.

"Scientists in the camps of both opponents and proponents of fluoride
have always dismissed this story as mere poppycock, but it had a life
of its own and reared its head time and again. It fed the suspicions
of many people that 'there was more to fluoridation than meets the
eye'.

"As far as I know, there is no one who has done any serious research
into whether the fluoridated person is really more docile, easier to
rule, more impressed by authority than the non-fluoridated ones. There
is, though, one peculiar thing: every Dutch doctor has a medical
reference book for 1984. one of the chapters is entitled
"Tranquillisers". Looking at the 'minor tranquillisers' I find
twenty-four substances: their chemical formulae do not show any
connection with fluoride. However, there is also a heading, "major
tranquillisers". Of those there are twenty-seven, and seven of them
are a fluoride compound. One of theses is Semap. It is one of the
strongest anti-psychotic substances we know. This means that
twenty-five per cent of the major tranquillisers are connected with
fluoride. i do not draw any conclusions. the only thing one can say at
this point is, with Alice: "curiouser and curiouser!"



Induced Apathy

Actually there is little that is novel in the concept of controlling
the minds and manners of the multitude by chemical/dietary means. That
is was practised by Hitler's regime is made the more credible when we
know that as far back as 1938 the US Government, an ally to boot, and
the government of a democratic Christian country, was considering the
transformation of American citizens and others into 'zombies' by a
number of proposed techniques. The US Army searched for 'the perfect
incapacitating agent', according to General Fellenz, "to put in the
enemy's water supply". Included in the drugs tested were the
hallucinogenic LSD and the amnesiac BZ (10 times more potent than
LSD), and a 'schizophrenic agent called bulbocapine".

The "Rockefeller Report" to the United States President on CIA
activities said: "The drug program was part of a much larger CIA
program to study possible means of controlling human behaviour".

One drug which received special attention in the 'fifties and early
sixties, under the cryptonym of MK-ULTRA, was suxamethonium chloride
(listed under a number of product names including Anectine), a
halogenated anti-cholinergic agent with all the symptomatic
side-effects up to and including cardiac arrest ascribed to these
agents in the medical literature.

Please retain the term 'anti-cholinergic' in mind, for owing to the
health implications attendant on this particular anti-metabolic
activity, it figures repeatedly in this thesis.

Note: An adviser to the US Government on hypnotism or psychological
behaviour control, Dr. George Estabrooks, later became Chairman,
Department of Psychology, Colgate University. Internationally, Colgate
was and remains the most ardent producer and advocate for the
fluoridation of a domestic product - fluoridated toothpaste.

Now, should the reader's mind be already boggled to the point of
disbelief, there are two facts which, if known about and/or
remembered, may instil sufficient confidence in that which is even
more 'boggling' and is yet to come.

Bromine (or Bromide) tea was administered to the enlisted men during
the First and Second World Wars.

The halogen (bromine) ingredient was said to quell the libido of the
men and thus limit likely forays into the 'dens of iniquity' and the
acquisition of venereal disease.

The second fact is that, today, all Australian military establishments
provide their own halogenated (fluoridated) water for the troops
resident therein, for the official reason that the element is good for
the developing teeth.

Either we have a very immature military force, all under that age of
twelve years when the mythical effect of fluoride ceases to exist, or
else there is another more obscure, less altruistic reason for this
drug 'treatment' of the troops.

Later on in this text we will recall certain happenings relative to
ex-trainees from these establishments and the paradoxical effects of
fluorides on behaviour of the human being.



The Cartel

The Parliamentary "Dickinson Statement" refers to the "vast Farben
chemical plants in Germany."

It has been said by Anthony C. Sutton in his book, Wall Street and the
Rise of Hitler: "Without the capital supplies by Wall Street, there
would have been no I.G. Farben in the first place, and almost
certainly no Adolph Hitler and World War II."

Interssen Gemeinschaft Farben (Interssen Gemeinschaft der Deuschen
Teerfarbenindustrie or, simply, I.G. Farben) was a German chemical
manufacturing concern that supplied the chlorine gas used by Germany
during the First World War, but the eventual creation of the huge I.G.
Farben cartel began in 1924 when American bankers began to arrange
foreign loans in what Professor Carroll Quigley terms "the Dawes Plan,
largely a J.P. Morgan production."

In 1928 Henry Ford merged his German assets with I..Farben, to be
followed by the American Standard Oil Company (the Rockefellers) who,
in concert with I.G. Farben developed the coal-to-oil hydrogenation
process.

In a letter to Roosevelt from Berlin in the early thirties, the US
Ambassador in Germany, William Dodd, said:



   "At the present moment, more than a hundred American corporations
have subsidiaries here or co-operative understandings.

   "The Duponts have their allies in Germany that are aiding in the
armament business. Their chief ally is the I.G. Farben Company, a part
of the government which gives 200,000 marks a year to one propaganda
organisation operating on American opinion.

   "Standard Oil Company... sent US$2,000,000 here in December 1993
and has made US$500,000 a year helping Germans make ersatz (a
substitute) gas (the hydrogenation process of converting coal to
gasoline) for war purposes: but Standard Oil cannot take any of its
earnings out of the country except in goods.

   "The International Harvester Company president told me their
business here rose 33% a year (arms manufacture I believe) but they
could take nothing out.

   "Even out airplanes people have secret arrangements with Krupps.

   "General Motors Company and Ford do enormous business here through
their subsidiaries and take no profits out."



The I.G. Farben assets in America were controlled by a holding
company, American I.G .Farben, which listed on its Board of Directors:
Edsel Ford, President of the Ford Motor Company; Chas.E. Mitchell,
President of Rockefeller's National City Bank of New York; Walter
Teagle, President of Standard Oil of New York; Paul Warburg, Chairman
of the Federal Reserve and brother of Max Warburg, financier of
Germany's war effort; and Herman Metz, a director of the Bank of
Manhattan, controlled by the Warburgs.

It is a very interesting fact of history that three other members of
the Board of American I.G. Farben were tried and convicted as German
'war criminals' for their 'crimes against humanity' during World War
II, while serving on the I.G. Farben Board of Governors. None of the
Americans who sat on the same board as those convicted was ever tried
as a 'war criminal'.

Throughout the entire Second World War conflict, not one bomb fell on
the I.G. Farben headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany, allegedly as a
consequence of Allied orders.

In 1938, I.G. Farben borrowed 500 tons of tetra-ethyl lead, the
gasoline additive, from Standard Oil.

During 1939, the year Germany invaded Austria and Poland, the Standard
Oil Company of New Jersey loaned I.G. Farben US$20,000,000 worth of
high-grade gasoline.

In 1939 the American Aluminium Company (Alcoa), then probably the
world's largest producer of sodium fluoride, transferred its
technology to Germany (the Alted Agreement). The Dow Chemical Company
transmitted its experience and technology in that same period.

Germany's two largest tank manufacturers were Opal, a subsidiary of
General Motors (J.P. Morgan), and the German subsidiary of the Ford
Motor Company.

Even with the purchase of oil from non-German sources, the major
supplier of oil was still the Farben cartel. The I.G. Farben-Standard
Oil co-operation for the production of synthetic oil gave the I.G.
Farben cartel a monopoly on German gasoline production. Just under one
half of the Germans' high-octane gasoline in 1945 was produced
directly by I.G. Farben, and most of the balance by its affiliated
companies.

So in 1941 when cylinders of Zyklon B, the deadly cyanide-based
extermination gas made by I.G. Farben, were lethally unvalved on
inmates of Auschwitz Bitterfeld, Walfen, Hoescht, Agfa, Ludwigshafen
and Buchenwald, there were more than substantial links between huge
American technology and German manufacturers.

Two questions must be asked here: (a) Was I.G. Farben associated with
the formulation of Sarin and/or Soman, the German-developed
fluorinated nerve gases that made Zyklon B little more than an
underarm deodorant by comparison?; and (b) What of I.G. Farben today?

The answer to (a) is an unequivocal yes! As for (b), I.G. Farben
signed cartel agreements with such companies as Imperial Chemical
Industries(ICI), Borden, Carnation, General Mills, M.W. Kellogg Co.,
Nestle and Pet Milk, and I.G. Farben either owns outright, has had a
substantial interest in or has had other cartel agreements with Owl
Drug, Parke-Davis and Co., Bayer and Co., Whitehall Laboratories,
Chef-Boy-Ar-Dee Foods, Bristol Meyers and Squibb and Sons. the list
goes on and on and on and includes Proctor and Gamble who
'domesticated' the word "fluoride" with official encouragement in
1958, being the originators of the infamous "Crest" fluoridated
toothpaste campaign.

The only reference to "Farben" traceable in a limited search of modern
literature was in the 25th Edition of Martindale, under" FBA
Pharmaceutical Limited: Products of Farbenfabriken Bayer."

All corporate traces of the huge I.G cartel have been absorbed by the
hundreds, if not thousands, of one-time cartel members, but the
'malady lingers on'...





Foundations

In Australia, the Dental Health and Research Foundation which has such
names as Colgate, Kellogg and other ex-I.G. Farben associates listed
among its governors and contributors had been irreverently but
accurately dubbed "the fluoride mafia". Closely allied with this
Sydney University 'foundation' in its printed promotional claims for
fluorides and fluoridation, is Foundation 41. Unfortunately, the data
of the 'thorough investigations' said to have been carried out by the
latter 'foundation' into the halogen fluoride, its benefits and its
hazards, have never been made available despite numerous appeals. An
ABC science show's examination of the scientific integrity of
Foundation 41 may explain the elusive (or is the word illusory?) data.

America is literally bursting at the seams with such foundations, but
amongst the earlier names were the Rockefeller Foundation, The
Carnegie Foundation and the Ford Foundation. it is necessary to
mention these specifically because they were the first foundations to
make grants in the population (control) field, and the Carnegie family
merged with the Mellon family Institute to create Carnegie-Mellon
University in Pittsburgh in 1967.

The Mellon family were the founders of the original Mellon Institute
whence came the "amazing (but totally fallacious) sodium
fluoride/dental caries prevention discovery" - the discovery that
literally turned 'garbage into gold'. The Mellon family also founded
the American Aluminium Company (Alcoa), the largest producer of the
waste toxin, sodium fluoride, which up to this point of 'caries
discovery' had a relatively little known commercial or industrial
value, was an environmental hazard of great public concern, and was
very costly in terms of safe disposal.

So we retrace our steps to the "Dickinson Statement" in Hansard and
Chas Eliot Perkins.

In a letter abstracted from Fluoridation and Lawlessness (published by
the Committee for Mental Health and National Security) to the Lee
Foundation for Nutritional Research, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on 2nd
October 1954, a Charles Eliot Perkins, scientist and author of
Washington DC, and one must assume, that same Charles Eliot Perkins of
the "Dickinson Statement" to the Victorian Parliament, said this (and
the words of the last two lines of the second paragraph cannot be
overemphasised):

   "We are told by the fanatical ideologists who are advocating the
fluoridation of the water supplies in this country that their purpose
is to reduce the incidence of tooth decay in children, and it is the
plausibility of this excuse, plus the gullibility of the public and
the cupidity of public officials that is responsible for the present
spread of artificial water fluoridation in this country.

   "However - and I want to make this very definite and positive -
the real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children's
teeth. If this were the real reason, there are many ways in which it
could be done which are much easier, cheaper and far more effective.
The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance
of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty...

   "Wen the Nazis, under Hitler, decided to go into Poland... the
German General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged
scientific and military ideas, plans and personnel and the scheme of
mass control through water medication was seized upon by the Russian
Communists because it fitted ideally into their plan to Communize the
world...

   "I say this in all earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who
has spent nearly 20 years research into the chemistry, bio-chemistry,
physiology and pathology of fluorine: any person who drinks
artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or more will
never again be the same person, mentally or physically."



Mr. Perkins does not involve America, American institutions or
individuals in his assertions, but when Major George Racey Jordan was
in charge of the massive 'lend-lease airlift' operations from Great
Falls, Montana, to Russia via Alaska, he queried the transshipment of
considerable amounts of sodium fluoride via Fairbanks, Alaska, to
Russia. He was told 'frankly' that it was to put into the drinking
water in the prisoner-of-war camps to take away their will to resist.

The published knowledge that sodium fluoride was known for this mind-
and behaviour-changing potential was available at the start of this
century, as witness such entries as "Fluoricum Acidum" (Encyclopedia
of Pure 'Materia Medica', vol. ix, p.333).

America has long been interested in behaviour and mind control by
chemical means. Americans who were at once financiers, industrialists
and population-control advocates were intimately involved with Germany
where chemical extermination and chemical behaviour control by, inter
alia, sodium fluoride, were placed into practice. America transferred
this knowledge and material, inter alia, to Russia during its
'lend-lease' co-operation. An American major producer of aluminium was
the world's major source of sodium fluoride. American 'education and
research' funded by (a) the major sodium fluoride producer, and (b) a
'foundation' involved in population control, was the origin of 'the
dental caries prevention myth' associated with sodium fluoride.

A predominantly American company was the first to exploit this concept
in dentifrice production, and American 'medical research' figured
largely in the 'fluorination' processes that converted the negative
embarrassment of mounting industrial waste to huge positive profit
increase - processes that other countries hastened to emulate:
processes which include the enormous outlet for fluorides in the
fluoridation of water supplies.

Although fertiliser production has not been a part of this thesis, the
following 'connections' with this point should be made. The
manufacturing processes for synthetic dyes, explosives and fertiliser
are almost chemically synonymous, and I.G. Farben was expert in all
production phases of these 'necessities'. Sodium silico-fluoride was a
waste constituent from the refining of phosphate rock, until a 'use'
could be found or created for the waste.

A letter (reproduced below) for the United States Environmental
Protection Agency throws the spotlight on the unique 'waste disposal
via the public kidney' concept that was created.





UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Washington DC. 20460

Mar 30 1983

OFFICE OF WATER

Leslie A. Russell, DMD

363 Walnut Street

Newtonville, Mass. 02160



   Dear Dr. Russell:

   Thank you for your letter of March 9, 1983, in regard to the
fluoridation of drinking water.

   The information available to the Environmental Protection Agency
is that fluoridation is a safe and effective means for reducing the
occurrence of dental caries. The fluoridation process has been
endorsed by several Presidents of the United States and by several
Surgeons General, including the current Surgeon General,Dr. C. Everett
Koop. A copy of Dr. Koop's statement on fluoridation is enclosed.

   Water treatment chemicals, including fluorosilic acid, have been
evaluated for their potential for contributing to the contamination of
drinking water. The Water Treatment Chemicals Codex, published by the
National Academy of Sciences, prescribes the purity requirements for
fluorosilic acid and other fluoridation chemicals.

   In regard to the use of fluorosilic acid as a source of fluoride
for fluoridation, this Agency regards such use as an ideal
environmental solution to a long-standing problem. By recovering
by-product fluorosilic acid from fertiliser manufacturing, water and
air pollution are minimized, and water utilities have a low-cost
source of fluoride available to them. I hope this information
adequately responds to your concern.

   

   Sincerely yours,

   

   Rebecca Hanmer

   Deputy Assistant Administrator for Water

   

   

So What?

The question raised by the Hansard "Dickinson Statement", and perhaps
aggravated by this dissertation and data, is this: Was the Australian
Government, in 1962-3 when it illegally (Australian Constitution,
Section 51 [xxiiiA]) introduced "fluoridation of water supplies" to
Australia, aware of its grotesque actions and of the grave results?
The 'shonky' method of introduction, plus legal and official
correspondence at that time, indicates in the affirmative.

Was the Crisp Royal Commission, when it 'found' in favour of
fluoridation, and, incidentally, in favour of the major polluter and
producer of fluoride in Tasmania (Electrolytic Zinc Corp., Risdon,
Hobart), aware of the consequences of any such favourable findings?
Conditions than and since mingle with some incredible documented
coincidences, and unbelievable but documented official behaviour,
including that of premiers and health ministers, and the paucity of
current State parliamentary investigations into fluorine-based
environmental problems, to convince the most sceptical that it was.

was the Victorian Premier (Sir Rupert Hamer, who was later to publicly
declare the dictatorial credo, "It was always tempting to override the
people and impose a new order"), aware of these background facts when
he instituted indemnified water fluoridation legislation and a
subsequent fraudulently conceived and executed cover-up 'inquiry'?
(Ballarat Courier, 6 October 1982) Irrespective of the obvious
familial supplier advantages, it seems certain that he was so aware.
Widespread publicity regarding subsequent alleged complex land company
fraud transactions would seemingly underwrite the existence of the
necessary character attributes to perform as implied.

Are the lies, denials, fabrications and evasions evident in Geelong
with two fluoride pollution sources (aluminium smelting and fertiliser
production), and Portland with ditto sources, no more than 'job
protection' and 'rate protection' scares as is claimed, or is there a
deeper, wider federal or international instructional background behind
the unmonitored pollution, with the health detriment therefrom and the
'secrecy legislation' invoked for the Victorian aluminium industry?

[Was] Mrs Thatcher's astronomical expenditure of United Kingdom's
revenue on a fluoridation campaign in Northern Ireland a matronly
concern for the youngsters' teeth, or perhaps an attempt to sedate the
people and render them subservient to her autocratic dictates?
Remember this. Mrs Thatcher has a background of academic chemistry and
would be far from ignorant of the tranquillising effects of the
halogens and their halides.

Similarly, her legal and political shenanigans (that is the only word
to describe her behaviour) in the England fluoridation scene offer
many avenues for questioning of her motives.

Are the lies, fabrications, omissions, evasions and official hysteria
in the federal government and bureaucracy at the very mention of
fluorides, fluoride pollution or water fluoridation, also common to
the state governments and bureaucracies, and repeatedly backed up by
the most lunatic science (as witness, the ministerially approved and
internationally derided propaganda from the National Health and
Medical research Council), royal and vice-regal intransigence, a
frightening exhibition of this grim foreknowledge, all of which has
abundant documentary support, or simply no more than a dastardly
coincidence?







Part 2



A Multinational Can of Worms

The link between Colgate and 'mind control' was mentioned earlier.
That company's reputation with fluoride as a toothpaste ingredient is
a promotional legend, particularly in Kenya where a ban on the TV
advertising of fluoridated toothpaste produced some extraordinary
pecuniary persuasion from Colgate in attempts to preserve the status
quo for the company's benefit.

When official fluoridation corruption was exposed in New Zealand, a
'scientific study' was hurriedly executed to try to justify the
original government/industry claims and repair the damage done to the
fluoride empire. The accreditation appended to that study is
reproduced here, with emphasis added:



   "ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS"

   "We are grateful to the Director and staff of the Division of
Dental Health, Department of Health, for the administrative and
logistic support in the Auckland area. In particular we wish to
mention Supervising Dental Nurses R. Patchett and K. Hyde, and
assistant V. Clarke for their excellent arrangements and help in
contacting, screening, and arranging the transportation of children to
the examination centres. Mr Garth Stewart, bus driver, contributed
much above and beyond his normal duties. The tremendous help and
cooperation from principals and staff of all schools is most
appreciated.

   "Financial support for this study was provided by the Colgate
Palmolive Company (NZ)."

   

Earlier, the name Kellogg was tied into the I.G. Farben corporate
machinations. The words below are reproduced from the cover of a
recent World Health Organisation (WHO) publication advocating
fluoridation/fluorides, Appropriate Use of Fluorides for Human Health
(underlining added): "Published under the joint sponsorship of the
International Dental Federation, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, and the
World Health Organisation."

The intertwining, overlapping, interlocking co-incidence between
erstwhile I.G. Farben companies and the continuing degradation of
human health, our ecology and environment in exchange for the
corporate dollar is virtually endless. But simply, as one example, the
Nestle Company, once accused of selling nutritionally barren milk
formula to third-world babies, has recently been found guilty of
marketing "Pure Apple Juice" which was anything but "pure" and had
never been anywhere near an apple.

The Nestle Company has been nominated by the Ecologist as one of
several multinational companies involved in the destruction of "the
lungs of the Earth", the Brazilian rainforests.





It Really Gets In!

The following pages make slight transition from historically recorded
fact and logic to indisputable fact, biochemical fact and medical
literature fact.

The pharmaceutical nomenclature and biochemical data involve
fluorine/fluorides, with or without other ingredients, in virtually
every phase of mind and behaviour control from mild sedation through
'controlled' unconsciousness to death.

'Side-effects' of all drugs have in common the 'paradoxical'
characteristic of having an effect, on some individuals, exactly
opposite of that which was the intentional effect, converting, for
example, a tranquilliser into a potent stimulant, and thus the
consumer from a 'pussy cat' into a slavering maniac.

Think back to the dosing of service personnel who are trained to hunt,
maim and kill their fellow man while under the influence of this or
other forms of chemical behaviour-control, and consider the possible
reaction of such 'trainees' when discharged into the mainstream of
society.

Are any of the terrorist activities around the globe, including
otherwise inexplicable recent happenings in Australia, the grim result
of such biochemical paradox?



Fluoridated Propellants and Refrigerants - Fluoridated Hole in the
Ozone Layer

Halogenated hydrocarbons (sometimes called fluorocarbons or, when the
name of the weapon must be changed to protect the guilty, just CFCs)
are too numerous to list, being over 150 in number. In 'asthma'
sprays, the warning exists in all product literature (available only
to the doctor, not to the patient): "Excessive use of such inhalers or
abuse of any aerosol propellant may result in toxic effects on the
heart, and deaths have been reported." (Remember to term
"anti-cholinergic".)

Another stark warning from "restricted distribution" literature:
"Abuse. Of 110 deaths associated with the 'sniffing of solvents'
between 1962 and 1969, fifty-nine were related to the use of
fluorinated aerosol propellants."

The most frequently used fluorides under this heading (with their
identifying numbers in parentheses) are:

1 - Trichlorofluoromethane (11)

2 - Dichlorodifluoromethane (12)

3 - Chorotrifluoromethane (13)

4 - tetrafluoromethane (14)

5 - dichlorofluoromethane (21)

6 - Chlorodifluoromethane (22)

7 - Tetrachlorodifluoromethane (112)

8 - Trichlorofluoroetane (113)

9 - Dichlorofluorotetraethane (114)

10 - Chloropentafluoroethane (115)

11 - Difluoroethane (152a).

The side-effects of exposure to these fluorides, ranging from the
'more common' to the 'rarely reported' are as follows: cardiac
toxicity (heart injury), respiratory depression (or breathing
difficulties), bradycardia (or slowed pulse rate), convulsions (or
central nervous system effects), psychomotor aberrations (or brain
dysfunction), transient sedation (or heart and lung effects), ataxia
(or brain problems), irritation of the upper respiratory tract,
rise/fall in blood pressure, apnoea (or impaired lung function
damage), tachycardia (or increased pulse rate), broncho-constriction
(or asthma), palpitations (or irregular heart beat), narcosis (or
brain 'drugging' again), and death.

All of the above 'side-effects' are associated with either the acute
or the chronic symptoms of "anti-cholinergic" toxicity. And there is
that word 'anti-cholinergic' again.

With a sufficient amount of these fluorocarbons (CFCs) being used (in
the aerosol form alone) to threaten the world's atmospheric and
climate conditions through deterioration of the ozone layer, it is not
remarkable that this volume represents an environmentally hazardous
anti-cholinergic (or anti-metabolic, ganglion-blocking) agent for all
humanity.

Discharges from certain industrial processes carry substantial amounts
of gaseous fluoride. In particular, hydrogen fluoride, when washed
from the atmosphere by rain, forms a solution of hydrofluoric acid
(0.7 ppm in Mojave Desert rainfall and 0.3 ppm in Siberian snows), so
these anti-cholinergic discharges offer an additional threat by
contributing to the fluoridated hole in the ozone layer.

One must assume it is owing to the enormous economic impact of this
decaying ozone on the casual industries that sources of culprit
industrial discharges have not featured in the current spate of
international scientific concern nor in the records of the world's
atmospheric/climatic monitors.

As an example of administratively approved industrial output, the
first stage of the Portland (Victoria, Australia) smelter was issued
with a pollution licence to discharge to the environment 70 tonnes per
year of fluoride in gaseous and particulate forms. It is possible that
this amount had been greatly exceeded because no monitoring of the
discharges has thus far been executed.

Within a short 12 months after starting of smelting operations, an
unknown but allegedly high number of pot-room workers at the smelter
acquired 'pot-room asthma' - a convenient euphemism for
anti-cholinergic damage.



Fluorinated Pharmaceuticals - Fluoridated Income Generation

In an effort to increase the bio-availability of the remedial
ingredient or ingredients, many pharmaceutical products are
halogenated. There are still many chlorinated and a few brominated
products designed as nostrums for human disease states. Of recent
years, the catalogue of fluoridated pharmaceuticals has doubled and
redoubled until any representative listing would be beyond the scope
of this paper.

The proclaimed intention of the pharmacist in fluorinating a product
is to enhance still further its metabolic activity and therefore its
alleged remedial qualities. For example, fludrocortisone acetate has
glucocoricoid actions about 15 times as potent as hydrocortisone
(unfluorinated), and mineralocorticoid effects more than 100 times as
potent.

But, in potentiating the remedial effect, the undesirable side-effects
are also worsened and the 'therapeutic' industry gets an income from
two sources: from treating the original disease condition and,
subsequently, from repairing the iatrogenic effects of the initial
drug treatment.

Literature quote: "Muscular weakness is an occasional side-effect of
most corticosteroids (hormones).. most evident with (1)
fludrocortisone and (2) triamcinilone (both fluorinated hormones). It
has been suggested that this effect is more pronounced when a fluorine
atom is present in the 9th position."

A useful example here is fluorinated toothpaste which has the
long-term effect not of improving dental health but, by chronic
anti-metabolic processes, of severely destroying it. Thus every
Australian city with or without fluoridated water supplies has as much
as doubled the number of registered dentists since the advent of
fluorinated toothpaste, fluorinated gels and fluorinated rinses.

Or take the more extreme example of little Jason Burton who had
non-prescription fluorinated dental decay-prevention tablets (sodium
fluoride) provided for him by loving parents who were in total
ignorance of their fluoride toxic hazard. Jason ingested a lethal dose
of these tablets and died. We only know about Jason

because the doctor recognised accurately and conscientiously
registered the cause of his death. The existence of the death
certificate has actually been denied by pro-fluoride Australian
'scientists' in reply to queries from overseas scientists.

It should be clear from the foregoing and what follows that human
disease conditions, ranging from 'pot-room asthma' through the various
perilous stages of anti-cholinergic response to expiration, can be
accidentally or deliberately induced by an interminable list of
fluoride pollution and fluorinated compounds which include a
fluorinated environment, fluorinated atmosphere and a fluorinated
drinking water supply.

It may be difficult for the 'man in the street' to believe that a
substance with so many industrial, commercial and medical
'applications' could be derived from or structured around a
scientifically recognised toxic waste product. This thesis should
illustrate that the chemical, pharmaceutical, commercial and political
worlds are well aware of the deadly potential of this halogen and
intend to exploit that potential to everlasting human detriment.



Fluorinated Tranquillisers - Fluoridated Acquiescence, Lethargy,
Apathy, Stupidity.

There are two basic forms of halogenated tranquilliser: major and
minor. The minor tranquillisers are halogenated with either chlorine
or bromine. The major tranquillisers, albeit of variable potency, are
those numerically listed hereunder and are all fluorinated. All are
anti-cholinergic agents with intentional effects on central nervous
systems allied with cardiac and respiratory depression. The figure
after the hyphen is the number of proprietary products each
classification, in addition to the base chemical (in capitals).

1 - 3 BENPERIDOL: Anquil, Frenactil, Glianimon

2 - 4 DROPERIDOL: Droleptan, Dridol, Inaspin, Inapsine

3 - 1 FLUANISONE: Sedalande

4 - 1 FLUBUPERONE HYDROCHLORIDE: Buronil

5 - 1 FLUNITRAZEPAM: Rohypnol

6 - 3 FLUOPROMAZINEH: Psyquil, Siquil, Vesprin

7 - 1 FLUOESONE: Bripidan

8 - 1 FLURBIPROFEN: Froben

9 - 0 FLOPENTHIXOL DECANOATE

10 - 3 FLOPENTHIXOL HYDROCHLORIDE: Depixol, Fluanxol, Emergil

11 - 0 FLUPHENAZINE DECANOATE

12 - 0 FLUPHENAZINE ENANTHATE

13 - 11 FLUPHENAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE: Modecate, Moditen, Anatensol,
Daptum, Lyogen, Omce, Pancinol, Siqualone Permitil, Prolixin,Sevinol.

Notes: No. 5 FLUNITTRAZEPAM (Rohypnol),which is fluorinated Valium,
was recently prescribed for a youth in Wesrtern Australia and was
blamed for his subsequent death.

Valium (Diazepam) was the "tranquilliser most involved" in road
accident victims, according to a study carried out by Sydney
University (Prof. Graham Starmer, Quantum, 26 April 1988). An obvious
question: What aggravated effect would the increased potency of the
fluorinated variety (Rohypnol) have on the road fatalities?

Rohypnol and Valium are proprietary names of Roche products. Roche was
a Swiss member of the I.G. Farben cartel and is probably more infamous
for the terrible Stanley Adams family tragedy accurately immortalised
in the film, A Song For Europe.

The ABC TV program, 7.30 Report (12 May 1988), told how the Western
Australian penal system routinely administered both Serapax and
Rohypnol (synergistic drugs) to prisoners to "make them into little
robots most of the time" - including, it was alleged, throughout
pregnancy.

14 - 2 FLURAZEPAM HYDROCHLORIDE: Dalmane, Dalmadorm

15 - 2 FLUSPIRILLINE: Redeptin, Imap

16 - 2 HALOPERIDOL: Haldol, Serenace

17 - 1 PENFLUORIDOL: Semap

18 - 2 PIPAMPERONE: Dipiperon, Proptian

19 - 18 TRIFLUOPERAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE: Amylozine Spansules, Stelabid
Elixir, Stelabid Forte tabs, Stelazine, Eskazine, Calmazine,
Chemflurazine, Clinazine, Fluazine, Novofluazine, Pentazine, Solazine,
Trifluoper-Ez-Ets, Triflurin, Jatroneural, Terfluzin, Terfluzine

20 - 0 TRIFLUPERIDOL

21 - 2 TRIFLUPERIDOL HYDROCHLORIDE: Triperidol, Psicoperidol.

This is a total of 21 fluorinated tranquillising compounds plus an
additional 58 brand-name major tranquillisers using a fluoride as an
ingredient. Undoubtedly many others have been added to this list since
the reference work was published in June 1977.

Relevant Footnotes:

Florida International University (Rotton, Tikovsky and Feldman) showed
that: "..minute amounts (0.45ppm) of sodium fluoride solution...impair
visual sensorimotor performance" with a consequent slowing down in
mental and physical reaction times (sedative or tranquillising
effect)(JAP vol.67:2). This finding is of relevance when driving or
operating machinery, if of no other consequence. Nevertheless,
attempts over a number of years to draw the attention of those
authorities allegedly concerned with driver/industrial safety, have
been met only with silence or obstruction.

Early in 1987, Swedish researchers linked tranquillisers to birth
defects, nominating (in Lancet) the drug benzodiazepine (Diazapam or
Valium) as a particular culprit.)



Fluorinated Anaesthetics - Fluoridated Unconsciousness (The
penultimate in mind and behaviour control)

As with fluorinated tranquillisers, there are a number of anaesthetics
halogenated with chlorine and bromine. The 'popular' modern
anaesthetics are those listed here, which are all fluorinated. Once
again, all are anti-cholinergic agents with intentional, designed
effects on central human nervous systems, accompanied by cardiac and
respiratory depression.

1 - FLUOXENE

2 - ISOFLURANE: Forane

3 - METHOXYFLURANE: Penthrane

4 - ENFLURANE: Ethrane

5 - HALOTHANE: FLuorothane, Somnothane.

Note: There are scientific studies which demonstrate that the progeny
of anaesthetists have a higher rate of birth defect than does the
general community. A significant statistic in the established
perinatal (SIDS) mortality/fluorine connection.

Some of the hazardous side-effects given in the medical literature for
fluorinated anaesthetics are difficult to separate from those effects
intended to induce a hopefully controllable unconscious state. For
example, under "toxic effects" are listed "respiratory depression",
"depressant action on the cardiovascular system", "Bradycardia and
profound hypotension (or slowing pulse and drop in blood
pressure),"hepatic dysfunction" (or liver damage), "Halothane blocks
the transmission of nerve impulses through ganglia" (or central
nervous system inhibition), and "cardiac arrest" (or death).

In other words, all of the anti-cholinergic effects variously intended
or variously inherent are induced by the fluorinated propellants,
fluorinated pharmaceuticals and/or fluorinated tranquillisers and
fluorinated exterminators.

So far, these "data" pages illustrate how fluorine and fluoridation
have been sold, packaged and/or prescribed for both public and
professional credibility on 'health' grounds. The final page deals
with the same halogen as it really is, really was and always will be,
and as it is employed in those products listed. It is one of the
deadliest, multi-functional and insidious poisons known to mankind.

It is significant, in the context of deliberate government
mind-control and physical/chemical intervention, to note that in
Australia the hazardous fluorinated anti-metabolic agents and
anti-cholinergic agents enjoy federal and state government approval
and subsidised distribution, whilst the safe nutritional substances,
vitally necessary to combat and repair systemic chronic toxic injury
wrought by the "free drugs", are available only at considerable cost
to the victim. Furthermore, the same bureaucracy that approved the
'killers' has sought to restrict public access to the remedial
supplements. Some local councils even infringe the laws of medical
prescription and issue free sodium fluoride tablets for dosing of
children without any warning, muchless any advice on antidotes.

And those same government instrumentalities and ministerial 'heads'
that oppose the ready availability of nutritional supplements are the
same ministers and public servants who lie, cheat, defraud, defame,
blackmail and coerce to increase the distribution or compel the
ingestion of fluorides and fluoride-bearing products: the same as
those who, in defence of the Australian Constitution (section 51
[xxiiia]), legislated to have the chemical dumped into our drinking
water supplies.

To sum up the above, the killer drugs are approved, encouraged or
enforced and subsidised, while the vital remedial nutrients and
metabolites (rendered necessary by the 'free' hazardous drugs) are not
subsidised but availability is officially discouraged and obstructed.



FLUORINATED EXTERMINATORS - Fluoridated Death (The Ultimate in Mind
and Behaviour Control)

As with tranquillisers and anaesthetics, chemical warfare gases are
halogenated. Riot-control gases, tear gas or lacrimators employ either
chlorine (chlorinated, e.g. mace) or bromine (brominated) as
halogenators, but the lethal German-developed (I.G. Farben) nerve
gases Soman and Sarin are both fluorinated and replaced the earlier
chlorinated Tabun for speed and efficacy in killing the enemy by their
immediate anti-cholinergic agency.

1 - SARIN: Isopropyl methylphosphonofluoidate

2 - SOMAN: Pinacolyl methlphosphonofluoridate.

The almost immediate death caused by exposure to nerve gases is a
result of instantaneous 'blocking' of catalysis and nerve action by
the fluorinated gas, by acute anti-cholinergic agency (enzymatic
'blocking') and consequent cessation of heart and lung function.

Included here are two medical fluorinated compounds called:

3 - DYFLOS (DI-isopropyl fluorophosphate): Designed to treat, inter
alia, the eye disease glaucoma, it is described in the literature as
an "irreversible cholinesterase inhibitor (anti-cholinergic agent) and
the toxic effects may be prolonged. Systemic toxicity occurs after
inhalation of the vapour."

4 - FLUOROURACIL: Uracil is an essential human metabolite. It is
fluorinated in a 'last resort' attempt to control the growth and/or
destroy cancer cells through enzyme (DNA and RNA) 'blocking' activity.
"The toxic effects are severe and sometimes fatal." It is often
paradoxical in action and actually provokes cancer. Side-effects, all
severe and numerous, are those associated with other fluorinated
anti-cholinergic agents set out previously.

The physiological consequences attending this deliberate fluorination
of a human metabolite illustrates the deadly peril of any fluorination
process but, in particular, the fluorination of a vital metabolite
(rendering it anti-metabolic in action), human electrolyte or
essential nutrient such as water.

5 - FLUOROACETAMIDE (Compound 1081): Another instance of a vital
metabolite, ;acetamide' being converted (halogenated) to a potent
anti-metabolite by fluorination.

In Britain, this product, a close chemical cousin to the stuff used to
fluorinate water supplies and toothpastes, etc., "is restricted to the
extermination of rats in ships and sewers."

6 - HYDROFLUOROSILICIC ACID (fluorosilicic acid, hydrofluoric acid): A
toxic 'waste product' of the fertiliser industry, it is now used for
fluoridation of drinking water.

To quote from medical literature, "Warning: Inhalation Hazard.
Inhalation of hydrofluorosilicic acid from soaked cotton clothing
could cause irreversible lung damage in one minute" due to
anti-cholinergic activity.

7 - SODIUM FLUORIDE: A 'waste product' of the aluminium industry and
used in fluoridation of drinking water, this hazardous intractable
garbage has become, by dint of promotion and sly public re-education,
the active ingredient in fluorinated pesticides, fungicides,
nematodides, rodenticides, anaesthetics, tranquillisers, fluorinated
medications (pharmaceuticals), a number of industrial and domestic
products, fluorinated dental gels, rinses and toothpastes.

In other words, sodium fluoride is so much a part of
multibillion-dollar industrial and pharmaceutical income that any
withdrawal for any reason by the promoters, the fluoridationists or by
anyone who has supported them for whatever purpose is impossible on a
financial basis, embarrassing on a reputation basis, and unthinkable
on a legal basis.

8 - SODIUM FLUOROCETATE (Compound 1080, as No.5 above): This seems to
be the preferred 'exterminator' for rodents, etc., on the proclaimed
grounds that it is slightly less hazardous for humans. Death by 1080
will take a little longer and be slightly less painful than death by
1081. It will, however, be no less permanent.

9 - SODIUM SILICOFLUORIDE: This waste product of the fertiliser
industry is used in fluoridation of drinking water. By international
law it must be removed from fertiliser so that pastures, crops, sheep
and cattle will not be harmed. That it is then sold for disposal
through the community kidneys is not a matter of international
concern. Until this more profitable use was found, it was used almost
exclusively as an insecticide and rodenticide - an exterminator.

While this thesis is directed at the 'grass roots' where people are
most likely to be affected (as a result of being screened from the
truth), there will be some who, retaining the foolish but implanted
'reference complex', will need to verify the content. This will be a
simple matter for their own or public library sources without biased
prompting by the author.

That said, the author acknowledges the considerable value of the
following for evidential support of this thesis:

* The Extra Pharmacopoeia, Martindale, editions nos. 25 and 27.

* Encyclopedia Britannica, ed. no. 15

* The Unseen Hand, by Ralph Epperson.

* The Case Against Fluoridation, by Lee Hardy.

* Operation Mind Control, by Walter Bowart

* World Without Cancer, by G. Edward Griffin.

* The Crime and Punishment of I. G. Farben, by Joseph Borkin.

* Certain unrefuted, unchallenged correspondence, allegations and
scientific papers by the author.



EPILOGUE

Since it was the parliamentary activities of Harley Rivers Dickinson,
Member for South Barwon (Victoria), that prompted the research that
led to writing of this thesis, it is fitting that the epilogue should
refer to more representational work on the same subject (fluoridation
of water supplies) by the same Member in the same Parliament.

In February 1983, , Harley Dickinson placed two "questions on notice"
to the then Minister for Health, .Roper, on behalf of his Geelong
district constituents. The first question was in 10 parts and the
second in eight parts, affording some excuse for delay in preparing
comprehensive answers.

The questions were answered and recorded in Hansard of 7 April 1988 by
the now-displaced T. Roper, on behalf of the present Minister for
Health, D. White, more than five years after the asking - a period of
waiting intolerable in a health matter, even were the questions
answered in a generally responsible fashion which they certainly were
not.

Without going into the detail of questions and answers, having pointed
out the extreme and perilous lassitude of the (Victorian) State
Government, suffice it to remark that the answers varied from patent
falsehood to inadvertent exposure of ministerial fraud: from the
repeated quoting of proven fraudulent 'evidence' to accurate but
selected part-quotations of literature evidence: from admissions of
impropriety by the Victorian bureaucracy to baseless assertions.



CONCLUSION

This story is full of overlapping, interwoven, interlocking
circumstance beyond the statistical or reasonable bounds of chance or
coincidence. Pursuing each facet, each tortuous avenue from "The
Dickinson Statement" as a starting point will confound and dumbfound
the pursuer with still more mind-boggling information.

The histories of Cecil Rhodes, Rhodes Scholarships, the Bilderbergers,
the US Federal Reserve, the Illuminati, international banking, the
House of Rothschild and General Aniline and Film, are just a few of
the 'avenues' to be explored that will make your hair 'stand on end'!

Sourced from ---> http://www.trunkerton.fsnet.co.uk/fluoride_fantasies.htm

Reference No.3:

FLUORIDE - The Greatest Fraud of the Twentieth Century

"Water fluoridation is the greatest case of scientific fraud of this
century, if not of all time." Dr Robert Carton, former President of
the Union of Government Scientists at the US Environmental Protection
Agency.

Enforced fluoridation will not prevent tooth decay, but it will
destroy an essential aspect of consumer choice over the basic resource
of drinking water. And it could have a strongly adverse effect on the
health of children as well as adults.

Mass studies in North America and New Zealand reveal no significant
difference in decayed, missing and filled teeth (DMFT) between
fluoridated and non-fluoridated areas.

Most European countries do not fluoridate… so where are all the
toothless Europeans? Tooth decay is caused by poor dental hygiene and
high consumption of refined sugar products. Enforced fluoridation does
nothing whatsoever to address either of these problems. If anything,
it could even be counter-productive if people neglect dental hygiene
because they think fluoride in their drinking water will solve the
problem for them.

Medicating everyone on the grounds that this will, debatably, help a
small percentage of the population, is simply not logical. It's even
worse when we consider the wealth of scientific evidence that fluoride
can have nasty side effects ranging from cancer to cavities in tooth
enamel. Fluoride is, in fact, highly poisonous, and the following
outlines the long list of health problems associated with it, with
copious scientific references.

Selwyn Johnston, Independent Senate Candidate for Queensland is
opposed to mass medication. We are opposed to the destruction of
consumer choice in a matter so basic as drinking water. We believe the
precautionary principle should be applied… that if you can't prove
fluoridation is harmless, then you do NOT fluoridate. And we believe
in strong, sensible measures to improve health. Enforced fluoridation
is definitely NOT one of them.

Selwyn Johnston, Independent Senate Candidate for Queensland want to
improve dental hygiene through education. There is no other sensible
way that we know of. We intend to exert ourselves in alerting the
public to the full story of fluoridation, thus allowing an informed
public to decide if the government should enforcing it upon them.

Summary (see Appendix for references)
    Fluoride is a known toxin. It is more toxic than lead and only
marginally less poisonous than arsenic

    Fluoride is described by its manufacturers' safety data as a
'hazardous waste'. It is illegal to dump it at sea

    The contents of a family-size tube of fluoridated toothpaste are
enough to kill a 12.5 kilo child

    Fluoride consumption by human beings increases the general cancer
death rate

    Fluoride exposure disrupts the synthesis of collagen and leads to the
breakdown of collagen in bone, tendon, muscle, skin, cartilage, lungs,
kidney and trachea

    Fluoride inhibits antibody formation in the blood

    Fluorides have a disruptive effect on various tissues in the body

    Fluoride confuses the immune system and causes it to attack the
body's own tissues, and increases the tumour growth rate in cancer
prone individuals

    Fluoride kills red blood cells and damages gastric mucosa, resulting
in the symptoms of 'Irritable Bowel Syndrome'

    Fluorides are medically categorized as protoplasmic poisons, which is
why they are used to kill rodents

    Fluoride is a cumulative poison… we excrete about half what we
ingest. The rest is stored, mainly in the bones, where it increases
the density but changes the internal architecture of the bone. This
makes bones more brittle and prone to fracture. (Eight papers
published in reputable medical journals have described the increased
risk of hip fracture in elderly people living in fluoridated areas)

Where does fluoride come from?

This is a 'commercial secret', which successive Governments don't want
you to know. However, Selwyn Johnston, Independent Senate Candidate
for Queensland does want you to know.

'Fluoride' is hexafluorosilicic acid - a toxic industrial waste
by-product derived from the super-phosphate fertiliser, and aluminium,
industries.

The suppliers' Safety Data Sheet for hexafluorosilicic acid clearly
states: "DO NOT let this chemical enter the environment. Dispose of
this product as hazardous waste. Consult the supplier to see if he
will take it back. Readily filters into soil. Recover cleaning water
and dispose of at a specialist site."

What's wrong with fluoride?

Scientific studies have shown:
    Fluoride is implicated in genetic disorders, cancer and low IQ levels
in children

    Calcium levels in the body decrease as fluoride levels rise

    Fluoride induces pitting and cavity formation on the surface of tooth
enamel (cavities distinctly different from those formed as a result of
dental caries)

    Blood fluoride levels rise continuously with prolonged use of
fluoridated toothpaste

    People who ingest fluoride risk problems as the muscles, connective
tissues and bone tissue undergo degenerative changes.

The appendix gives copious scientific references to support the case
against enforced fluoridation.

Fluoride does NOT stop tooth decay!

Large-scale studies of the official school dental data of tens of
thousands of children in the US, New Zealand and Canada show that
there is no difference in the incidence of decayed, missing and filled
teeth between fluoridated and non-fluoridated areas.

Tests in fluoridated West Midlands (UK) have found a high proportion
of children suffering discoloration of the teeth due to fluoride, and
a high proportion of adults with up to four times the 'safe' level of
fluoride in their body.

European children don't have worse teeth than those in fluoridated
parts of Britain.

The National Pure Water Association has repeatedly asked the UK
Department of Health to cite one scientific or laboratory study from
anywhere in the world which proves that fluoridation reduces tooth
decay in humans. They have failed to do so.

"There is not a single scientific, or laboratory, study from anywhere
in the world which proves that fluoridation reduces tooth decay in
humans. There are, however, hundreds of published scientific papers
which show that water fluoridation is dangerous to human, animal,
plant and aquatic life, which is no surprise, since fluoride is more
toxic than lead and only marginally less so than arsenic." National
Pure Water Association, UK

Who opposes fluoridation?

Most European governments oppose fluoridation. So do most local
authorities in Australia. So do many health-promotion organisations
around the world.

The Netherlands tried fluoridation and banned it after doctors
discovered adverse health effects.

In 1997, more than 1,000 members of the union working at the
Environmental Protection Agency HQ in Washington DC, who are directly
responsible for the implementation of the US Safe Drinking Water Act,
voted unanimously to ban water fluoridation.

"Our members' review of the body of evidence over the last eleven
years, including animal and human epidemiological studies, indicate a
causal link between fluoride/fluoridation and cancer, genetic damage,
neurological impairment and bone pathology. Of particular concern are
the recent epidemiological studies linking fluoride exposure to lower
I.Q. in children. As professionals charged with assessing the safety
of drinking water, we conclude that the health and welfare of the
public is not served by the addition of this substance to the public
water supply," Vice-President of the National Federation of Federal
Employees, USA.

Since 1997 fluoridated toothpaste in the USA has carried the following
warning: "If you accidentally swallow more than is needed for brushing
[sic] seek professional help or contact a Poisons Control Centre."

The American Dental Association opposed this health warning. They make
$billions from "accreditation" of fluoride products and certainly
didn't want to see a poisons warning on their nice "clean" mega-buck
earner. The British Dental Association and the British Dental Health
Foundation also make tens of thousands of pounds annually in
"accreditation" of similar products.

Consumer choice, or involuntary mass 'medication'?

If you are convinced of the efficacy of fluoride, you can of course
buy fluoride toothpaste. It is readily available and costs no more
than fluoride-free toothpaste. You have the right to make that choice.
But if the 'fluoride lobby' gets its way, you will never, ever, have
the choice not to swallow fluoride repeatedly every day. You will
always have to imbibe a cumulative poison every time you drink a glass
of water or a cup of tea.

"No physician in his right senses would prescribe for someone he has
never met, whose medical history he does not know, a substance which
is intended to create bodily change, with the advice: 'Take as much as
you like, but you will take it for the rest of your life because some
people say that it can reduce tooth decay in children." Dr Peter
Mansfield, Director, Templegarth Trust.

Despite a wealth of evidence from around the world, Government
bureaucrats still insist that "Water fluoridation is safe and
effective and no adverse effects have ever been found..."

The NHS even lacks a facility for testing fluoride levels in blood and
urine. No wonder it doesn't spot the adverse effects, when it isn't
looking for them.

In 1998 Dr. Peter Mansfield, Director of the Templegarth Trust, tested
over 200 volunteers from the fluoridated West Midlands (UK). He found
that 60% of them were ingesting up to four times the amount of
fluoride considered to be "safe". He sent the results to the very
highest levels at the Department of Health… and was ignored. But he
has been attacked by leading pro-fluoride promoters. He commented:
"They have no results of their own and are not willing to replicate my
tests. It is obvious that the symptoms of joint pain and stiffness
suffered by many of these volunteers are misdiagnosed. This is most
serious negligence."

Successive Australian governments have rejected a call for a full
public inquiry into the effects of fluoridation, preferring instead to
close its eyes to the evidence.

Meanwhile it uses taxpayers' money to promote fluoridation.

The government now wants to allow local authorities to order enforced
fluoridation. Cairns and Brisbane are among the regions in Queensland
that have been singled out as targets.

What needs to be done?

Tooth decay is caused by poor dental hygiene and excessive consumption
of refined sugar products. Fluoridation won't improve dental hygiene,
but it will destroy consumer choice and add a known toxin to the
drinking water of millions… against their will.

Source ---> http://www.johnston-independent.com/fluoride.html

Reference No.4:


TOP FLUORIDE EXPERT APOLOGIZES FOR PUSHING POISON

DR. HARDY LIMEBACK'S APOLOGY

Dear All,

Jeff green forwarded us this article, and says: We had pre-arranged
with Barry Forbes to obtain his permission to reproduce this column
throughout the world. We hope that if you find his writing style and
the specific text of this column as persuasive as we have, that you
will
consider having this article reproduced as a guest column in your
favorite (or previously ungrateful) media outlet. Thank you Barry and
Hardy.

We also urge you to send a copy to your local dentist, doctor,
decisionmaker and any one else you can think of. Let's get this
message around the world.

Paul Connett.

Prominent researcher apologizes for pushing fluoride

by Barry Forbes
The Tribune, Mesa, AZ
Reproduced With Permission

"Why'd you do it, Doc? Why'd you toss the fluoride folks overboard?"

I had just tracked down Dr. Hardy Limeback, B.Sc., Ph.D., in
Biochemistry, D.D.S., head of the Department of Preventive Dentistry
for the University of Toronto, and president of the Canadian
Association for Dental Research.

Dr. Limeback is Canada's leading fluoride authority and, until
recently, the country's primary promoter of the controversial
additive.

In a surprising newsmaker interview this past April, Dr. Limeback
announced a dramatic change of heart. "Children under three should
never use fluoridated toothpaste," he counseled. "Or drink fluoridated
water. And baby formula must never be made up using Toronto tap water.
Never."

Why, I wondered? What could have caused such a powerful paradigm
shift?

"It's been building up for a couple of years," Limeback told me during
a recent telephone interview. "But certainly the crowning blow was the
realization that we have been dumping contaminated fluoride into water
reservoirs for half a century. The vast majority of all fluoride
additives come from Tampa Bay, Florida, smokestack scrubbers. The
additives are a toxic byproduct of the super-phosphate fertilizer
industry."

"Tragically," he continued, "that means we're not just dumping toxic
fluoride into our drinking water. We're also exposing innocent,
unsuspecting people to deadly elements of lead, arsenic and radium,
all of them carcinogenic. Because of the cumulative properties of
toxins, the detrimental effects on human health are catastrophic."

A recent study at the University of Toronto confirmed Dr. Limeback's
worst fears. "Residents of cities that fluoridate have double the
fluoride in their hip bones vis-a-vis the balance of the population.
Worse, we discovered that fluoride is actually altering the basic
architecture of human bones."

Skeletal fluorosis is a debilitating condition that occurs when
fluoride accumulates in bones, making them extremely weak and brittle.
The earliest symptoms?

"Mottled and brittle teeth," Dr. Limeback told me. "In Canada we are
now spending more money treating dental fluorosis than we do treating
cavities. That includes my own practice."

One of the most obvious living experiments today, Dr. Limeback
believes, is a proof-positive comparison between any two Canadian
cities. "Here in Toronto we've been fluoridating for 36 years. Yet
Vancouver - which has never fluoridated - has a cavity rate lower than
Toronto's." And, he pointed out, cavity rates are low all across the
industrialized world including Europe, which is 98% fluoride free. Low
because of improved standards of living, less refined sugar, regular
dental checkups, flossing and frequent brushing. Now less than 2
cavities per child Canada-wide, he said. "I don't get it, Doc. Last
month, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) ran a puff piece all
across America saying the stuff was better than sliced bread.
What's the story?" "Unfortunately," he replied, "the CDC is basing its
position on data that is 50 years old, and questionable at best.
Absolutely no one has done research on fluorosilicates, which is the
junk they're dumping into the drinking water."

"On the other hand," he added, "the evidence against systemic fluoride
in-take continues to pour in."

"But Doc, the dentists."

"I have absolutely no training in toxicity," he stated firmly. "Your
well-intentioned dentist is simply following 50 years of
misinformation from public health and the dental association. Me, too.
Unfortunately, we were wrong."

Last week, Dr. Hardy Limeback addressed his faculty and students at
the University of Toronto, Department of Dentistry. In a poignant,
memorable meetng, he apologized to those gathered before him.

"Speaking as the head of preventive dentistry, I told them that I had
unintentionally mislead my colleagues and my students. For the past 15
years, I had refused to study the toxicology information that is
readily available to anyone. Poisoning our children was the furthest
thing from my mind."

"The truth," he confessed to me, "was a bitter pill to swallow. But
swallow it I did."

South of the border, the paradigm shift has yet to dawn. After half a
century of delusion, the CDC, American Dental Association and Public
Health stubbornly and skillfully continue to manipulate public opinion
in favor of fluoridation.

Meantime, study after study is delivering the death knell of the
deadly toxin. Sure, fuoridation will be around for a long time yet,
but ultimately its supporters need to ready the life rafts. The
poisonous waters of doubt and confusion are bound to get choppier.

"Are lawsuits inevitable?" I asked the good doctor. "Remember
tobacco," was his short, succinct reply. Welcome, Dr. Hardy Limeback,
to the far side of the fluoride equation. It's lonely over here, but
in our society loneliness and truth frequently travel hand in hand.
Thank you for the undeniable courage of your convictions.
===========

Fluoride is a corrosive poison
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/poison.htm

Common pesticides use fluoridation chemicals as their main ingredient
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/fluoride_chemicals.htm

Fluoride: The Hidden Poison in the National Organic Standards
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/fluoride.htm

Shocking News About Fluoride
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/flouride.htm

Fluoride - The Lunatic Drug
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/water.htm

STOP FLUORIODEATION
http://rvi.net/~fluoride/index.htm

           
Fluoridation status of some countries
http://www.fluoridation.com/c-country.htm

Population Control
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/population.htm

WATER
http://www.apfn.org/pdf/water.pdf

Why American's are SHEEPLES: FLUORIDE
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/sheeples.htm

Artificial Sweeteners Conspiracy to Make Americans Sick
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/sick.htm

GOOD TEETH BIRTH TO DEATH - Anti-Fluoride book - Revised Edition, 117
Pages
by:
Dr. Gerard F. Judd, Professor, Chemist and Researcher
Research Publications Co. - 602-412-3955
6615 W. Lupine
Glendale, AZ 85304-3136

SEND $8.00 FOR THIS REPORT + $3.00 S&H - YOU WON'T BE DISAPPOINTED



American Patriot Friends Network