jeffrey e bouqot and robert e. mcmahon, " Charlatans in Dentistry:
Ethics of the Nico Wars," p.38 vol. 70 no.3, J. of the American
College of Dentists 2003 is must reading.
on page 38 it says "Dr. Bouquot can be reached at bouquot@aol.com."
while on page 41 it says "We welcome critical comments of our work or
any other work relative to this fascinating topic, but we aske that
the discussion remain on a professional level."
Doctor Bouquot should put forth for public evaluation and discussion
the public record of the cases in the California State courts in which
he has been sued.
If the plaintiffs have no case it should be clear from the public
record as it develops that the plaintiffs have no case.
If the plaintiffs do have a case it should be clear from the public
court record as it develops that the plaintiffs do have a case.
The article by doctors Bouquot and McMahon refers to a Dr. Baratz.
Perhaps Dr. Baratz is also a member of the public interested in the
California Court cases involving Dr. Bouquot.
Dr. McMahon and Dr. Bouquot appear to have fundamental difference of
opinion with Dr. Baratz.
Joel M. Eichen, D.D.S. - 29 May 2004 17:58 GMT
>jeffrey e bouqot and robert e. mcmahon, " Charlatans in Dentistry:
>Ethics of the Nico Wars," p.38 vol. 70 no.3, J. of the American
>College of Dentists 2003 is must reading.
I am not so sure ........ I believe NICO is puire BS, but Bouquot is
highly skilled and may know something we do not ...... I have not
written him off yet!
JOEL
>on page 38 it says "Dr. Bouquot can be reached at bouquot@aol.com."
>while on page 41 it says "We welcome critical comments of our work or
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>Dr. McMahon and Dr. Bouquot appear to have fundamental difference of
>opinion with Dr. Baratz.