No offense, but I wouldn't rush to anyone with an MD degree
for a likely dental condition. Oral surgeon, that's OK.
It doesn't 'sound like' any cancer I've ever seen in 30 years,
but that doesn't mean much either.
I would think just about any decent dentist could identify what is
going on, or send the patient to a dental specialist.
The reason I am concerned about physician involvement early in
the process is that I've seen too many cases of unnecessary
CAT scans, X-rays, MRI's, and even sinus surgery to correct
a simple abcessed tooth!
If I don't *know* what's going on, I refer to the dental school
pathology department, or an oral surgeon. They get to the
bottom of things quickly, and will involve medical doctors the
minute they are needed, but not before.
My 2¢,
D
>>I posted here a couple months ago about a hard moveable bump on my
>>upper gum. Since then I have been to two periodontists. They said it
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> me that if you are that concerned about this, some sort of biopsy
> should be done, even if it is only to assuage your fears of CA.
tenthmed - 16 Apr 2009 17:20 GMT
> No offense, but I wouldn't rush to anyone with an MD degree
> for a likely dental condition. Oral surgeon, that's OK.
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> > me that if you are that concerned about this, some sort of biopsy
> > should be done, even if it is only to assuage your fears of CA.
I agree with lots of what you say. However, I've been following the
OP's previous thread and he never seems to be satisfied with the
diagnosis of his general dentist, periodontist, and now a second
periodontist. If he is unwilling to accept their diagnoses and has
obvious doubts, then he should pursue further evaluation to either
help back-up his various dentists, or in the infinitesimally small
chance that all three dental clinicians are mistaken, prove them
wrong.
If I had a similar situation in my office, I would definitely refer if
I was not willing to biopsy the bumps myself and the patient refused
to accept my diagnosis. That, unfortunately, is good risk-management.
You need to cover all possibilities. Jim Sokolove anybody?
Richard - 16 Apr 2009 18:20 GMT
> > No offense, but I wouldn't rush to anyone with an MD degree
> > for a likely dental condition. Oral surgeon, that's OK.
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
They haven't given me a diagnosis to "accept" (except the first
doctor, how diagnosed it as "nothing"). All three have not been able
to explain the burning and inflamation. The last doctor said "it could
be the beta blockers" then on the way out the door he says "but it
doesn't make sense why its localized in this one area". When the
doctor is unsure, you can bet the patient (me) will be concerned. I'm
scheduled to see the periodontist again next week for a follow up
(he's been taking pictures with his camera). I guess he will refer me
somewhere if needed. otherwise I guess I'd try a dental school or an
ENT.
Thanks,
Richard
New B. - 16 Apr 2009 21:46 GMT
>> - Show quoted text -
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>Thanks,
>Richard
Could even be that your constant rubbing and checking the area has
aggravated it. Could be something as simple as a fibroma, that you
constantly keep irritating.
I'd go see an Oral Maxillo Facial Surgeon, many of whom also have an
MD in addition to their DDS.
Steven Fawks - 18 Apr 2009 05:06 GMT
Point well taken.
Steve
> I agree with lots of what you say. However, I've been following the
> OP's previous thread and he never seems to be satisfied with the
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> to accept my diagnosis. That, unfortunately, is good risk-management.
> You need to cover all possibilities. Jim Sokolove anybody?