If you say their not i.e. chiropractic profession or those who look
for relationships in teeth in the rest of the body are all quacks then
where do you draw line i.e. at what point does a dentist who uses
these methods become acceptable as opposed to just woo ?
Mark & Steven Bornfeld - 24 Mar 2009 15:22 GMT
> If you say their not i.e. chiropractic profession or those who look
> for relationships in teeth in the rest of the body are all quacks then
> where do you draw line i.e. at what point does a dentist who uses
> these methods become acceptable as opposed to just woo ?
Most of what dentists are permitted and not permitted to do is codified
in the state dental practice act.
Using restorative materials is a professional choice; a dentist is free
to accept or reject a material or technique or procedure as their
professional judgment dictates. They are of course responsible for the
results of their treatment decisions. Generally they may NOT do a
dental procedure with the express intent of curing a medical condition
outside the scope of dentistry. I'm sure it would be OK on prescription
of a licensed physician. There is in fact a long history of this. Back
in the day dentists extracted the teeth of patients scheduled to undergo
radiotherapy for head/neck tumors--something that had to be medically
justifiable. Dentists work closely with physicians all the time. The
problem is making treatment decisions unilaterally without medical input.
Steve

Signature
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001
John & Ninetta - 25 Mar 2009 13:11 GMT
> If you say their not i.e. chiropractic profession or those who look
> for relationships in teeth in the rest of the body are all quacks then
> where do you draw line i.e. at what point does a dentist who uses
> these methods become acceptable as opposed to just woo ?
As an aside, I found this book a very interesting read:
http://www.amazon.com/Spin-Doctors-Chiropractic-Industry-Examination/dp/155002406X
John