Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Dentistry / January 2009

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Mad Hatter? your dentist?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
'nam vet. - 30 Dec 2008 13:41 GMT
FDA issues precautionary note on silver fillings

By LAURAN NEERGAARD, AP Medical Writer 1 hour, 1 minute ago

WASHINGTON - Silver dental fillings contain mercury, and the government
for the first time is warning that they may pose a safety concern for
pregnant women and young children. The Food and Drug Administration
posted the precaution on its Web site earlier this month, to settle a
lawsuit ‹ making the move a victory for anti-mercury activists.

The warning is not aimed at the general population, only at two groups
already urged to limit mercury from another source ‹ seafood ‹ because
too much can harm a developing brain.

The fillings, formally known as dental amalgams, "contain mercury, which
may have neurotoxic effects on the nervous systems of developing
children and fetuses," reads the FDA Web posting.

That doesn't mean it truly harms, and the FDA advises against removing
existing fillings.

The agency still is studying whether the small amount of mercury vapor
released by chewing and brushing is enough to cause neurologic disorders
or other problems in youngsters. There have been only a handful of
rigorous studies comparing children given either amalgam fillings or
tooth-colored resin composite fillings that are mercury-free ‹ and those
studies haven't detected any brain problems.

Nor has that research settled the long-simmering scientific controversy.
Two years ago, the FDA's own independent scientific advisers said that
while amalgam fillings were safe for most people, more research was
needed about potential effects on fetuses and children under 6.

And this spring, the FDA put dentists on notice that it is considering
additional controls, including whether to require warnings that would
advise consumers of the mercury in amalgams before they have a cavity
filled, or perhaps even restrict use in small children and certain other
patients. It is accepting public comments until July 28.

more?

http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/consumer/amalgams.html
Signature

When the Power of Love,replaces the Love of Power.
that's Evolution.

Newbie@bix.nex - 31 Dec 2008 07:18 GMT
> FDA issues precautionary note on silver fillings
>
>By LAURAN NEERGAARD, AP Medical Writer 1 hour, 1 minute ago
>
>WASHINGTON -  It is accepting public comments until July 28.

"In 2002, FDA published a proposed rule to classify dental amalgam as
a class II device with special controls.
On April 28, 2008, FDA reopened the comment period for that proposed
rule.
The comment period will be open until July 28, 2008."

>more?
>
>http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/consumer/amalgams.html

"Updated June 3, 2008 "

Above inserted quotes are actual, factual, and from 'the link above'.

Yer a little late to this party georgie,
January 1, 2009 is less than a day away.
doc marten - 18 Jan 2009 14:10 GMT
> > FDA issues precautionary note on silver fillings
> >
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Yer a little late to this party georgie,
> January 1, 2009 is less than a day away.

missed the point, didn't you?
all the "warmth" of a dentist?
Signature

When the Power of Love,replaces the Love of Power.
that's Evolution.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.