Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Cardiology / February 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

an egg a day

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
fyfpoon@gmail.com - 15 Feb 2008 11:18 GMT
Would an egg a day be too much of a heart attack risk?  Some links say
yes while others say no.  Some suggest 2 per week is the maximum.

Your take?
Newsreader - 15 Feb 2008 22:24 GMT
> Would an egg a day be too much of a heart attack risk?  Some links say
> yes while others say no.  Some suggest 2 per week is the maximum.
>
> Your take?

After my heart attack the nutritionist told me 3 yolks per week,
maximum.  I've pretty much stopped them completely, except for the
occasion few pieces in a salad at a restaurant.

52 years old, decent cholesterol levels.
Pramesh Rutaji - 15 Feb 2008 23:24 GMT
>> Would an egg a day be too much of a heart attack risk?  Some links say
>> yes while others say no.  Some suggest 2 per week is the maximum.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> 52 years old, decent cholesterol levels.

Since having a heart attack, I've upped my egg intake to about a dozen a
week, usually free range organic.  If you are worried about cholesterol
in eggs, you're completely wasting your time.  My HDL now runs in the
upper 60s.  I cannot imagine that eggs are a heart attack risk and the
issue of eggs containing cholesterol being a problem for the heart was
debunked a long time ago.

Signature

Pramesh Rutaji

p297tongue6221@newsguy.com - remove tongue to reply

fyfpoon@gmail.com - 16 Feb 2008 02:43 GMT
> > fyfp...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> Would an egg a day be too much of a heart attack risk?  Some links say
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> issue of eggs containing cholesterol being a problem for the heart was
> debunked a long time ago.

Can you show a link? Tks

> --
>
> Pramesh Rutaji
>
> p297tongue6...@newsguy.com - remove tongue to reply
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 16 Feb 2008 13:05 GMT
Smarter to simply eat less, down to the right amount:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/BeSmart

Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:

http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/BeHealthy

Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com
Swordbearer for the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Sword

> > > fyfp...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >> Would an egg a day be too much of a heart attack risk? �Some links say
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Can you show a link? Tks
fyfpoon@gmail.com - 16 Feb 2008 02:45 GMT
> fyfp...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Would an egg a day be too much of a heart attack risk?  Some links say
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> 52 years old, decent cholesterol levels.

Doing away with eggs completely does not make much sense while cutting
it down makes a lot.  Eggs contain nutrients that are very good for
your eyes.

You need to do exercise, I mean harsh exercises, preferrably harsh
work in order to get your body working.

Here in China, some farmers eat anything and smoke anything and drink
anything and they are as healthy as buffalos.  The secret is harsh
work...
mortonmullens@hotmail.com - 16 Feb 2008 18:05 GMT
On Feb 15, 5:18 am, "fyfp...@gmail.com"
> Would an egg a day be too much of a heart attack risk?  Some links say
> yes while others say no.  Some suggest 2 per week is the maximum.
>
> Your take?

As with many questions, there is not one answer fits all.  Can depend
on what your lab tests show, your family history, your medical
history, your level of activities, what other foods you eat.
J666 - 16 Feb 2008 18:29 GMT
On Feb 16, 12:05 pm, mortonmull...
> As with many questions, there is not one answer fits all.  Can depend
> on what your lab tests show, your family history, your medical
> history, your level of activities, what other foods you eat.

Beware of those offering a simple "one size fits all" answers - if it
were that simple, there would be no need for these medical types of
groups.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 17 Feb 2008 06:22 GMT
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/Idiotsatan
fyfpoon@gmail.com - 17 Feb 2008 14:49 GMT
> On Feb 16, 12:05 pm, mortonmull...
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> were that simple, there would be no need for these medical types of
> groups.

But these days given the amount of work and exercises we do, eating
less may be a blessing.  As I said, if you were like some Chinese
farmers who labor all day long, eating or even smoking anything is
well tolerated.  But for 'civilized' people who sit on their a.ses all
day long, eating less is recommended.  Then again, how much to eat in
terms of eating less is an individual thing, i suppose.
J666 - 17 Feb 2008 15:49 GMT
The more active you are, the more calories you burn up, so can eat
more without gaining weight - generally, overeat calories gain weight,
undereat calories lose weight. Also, in general, being more active is
better than being less active.

On Feb 17, 8:49 am, "fyfp...@gmail.com"

> But these days given the amount of work and exercises we do, eating
> less may be a blessing.  As I said, if you were like some Chinese
> farmers who labor all day long, eating or even smoking anything is
> well tolerated.  But for 'civilized' people who sit on their a.ses all
> day long, eating less is recommended.  Then again, how much to eat in
> terms of eating less is an individual thing, i suppose.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 17 Feb 2008 18:19 GMT
> But these days given the amount of work and exercises we do, eating
> less may be a blessing.  As I said, if you were like some Chinese
> farmers who labor all day long, eating or even smoking anything is
> well tolerated.  But for 'civilized' people who sit on their a.ses all
> day long, eating less is recommended.  Then again, how much to eat in
> terms of eating less is an individual thing, i suppose.

Not according to LORD Almighty GOD, Who created us (Exodus 16:16).

It remains smarter to eat less, down to the right amount:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/BeSmart

Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:

http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/BeHealthy

Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com
Swordbearer for the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Sword
J666 - 17 Feb 2008 18:27 GMT
On Feb 17, 12:19 pm, "Andrew B. Chung,
> friend Francis Poon
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Not according to LORD Almighty GOD, Who created us (Exodus 16:16).

Of course Moses et al in Exodus were wandering in the desert and not
being "couch potatoes" eating potato chips and Twinkies and smoking
and drinking beer while watching TV so their caloric intake was
different.

Best to stick to medical science for health care.  For those of faith,
God would not have created the scientific method if He did not want us
to use it unless you believe the scientific method is like the Apple
in the Garden of Eden
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 17 Feb 2008 19:40 GMT
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/Idiotsatan
J666 - 17 Feb 2008 19:46 GMT
On Feb 17, 1:40 pm, "Andrew B. Chung,
> http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/Idiotsatan

Your response sums up perfectly what you have to say and how everyone
should accept it  - well said. All your education, training and
experience shines through.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 17 Feb 2008 21:08 GMT
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/CrazySockPuppet
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.