Mon Jan 14, 4:02 PM ET
MONDAY, Jan. 14 (HealthDay News)-- The long-awaited results of a trial of
Zetia, a cholesterol-lowering drug prescribed to about a million
Americans, shows the drug confers no medical benefit to users.
In fact, the pace at which artery-clogging plaques formed within vessels
almost doubled in patients taking Zetia (ezetimibe) along with another
cholesterol-lowering drug, Zocor (simvastatin), compared to those taking
Zocor alone, the study found.
The two medications -- ezetimibe plus simvastatin -- are also marketed in
one prescription pill, called Vytorin. About 60 percent of U.S. patients
who are taking Zetia now receive the drug as part of Vytorin.
But the new two-year trial of 720 patients sheds doubt on whether it
makes any sense for people battling cholesterol to take Vytorin versus
Zocor alone, experts said. The study was funded by the two companies that
make Zetia, Merck and Schering-Plough.
"This wraps it up," said Dr. Steven E. Nissen, chairman of cardiology at
the Cleveland Clinic. "That's all there is. There just isn't any evidence
that adding ezetimibe to simvastatin produces any advantage."
No one is disputing that Zetia can lower levels of LDL "bad" cholesterol
by 15 percent to 20 percent -- that had been shown in previous trials.
However, whether that reduction led to any greater lowering of heart
attack or stroke risk had remained unclear.
The new ENHANCE trial -- which involved patients with a genetic condition
that causes abnormally high levels of blood cholesterol -- found no such
added benefit. According to a statement released by the two drug
companies Monday, researchers found no statistically significant
difference in heart attacks or stroke among trial participants who took
Zetia plus Zocor, a widely used cholesterol-lower drug, versus those who
got Zocor alone.
The study also noted that the speed at which arteries thickened with
plaque almost doubled among those on the two-drug regimen compared to
those taking Zocor alone.
Safety profiles were similar for Zetia/Zocor versus Zocor alone, the team
added.
"These results are very important considerations on how we treat patients
with elevated cholesterol and will very likely impact the way we choose
drugs to lower cholesterol and eliminate plaque," said Dr. Howard
Weintraub, clinical director of the Center for the Prevention of Cardio-
Vascular Disease at New York University Medical Center, New York City,
and clinical associate professor at the NYU School of Medicine.
"ENHANCE found that plaque got slightly worse when the drug combination
was used," Weintraub noted in a statement. "But, the real take-home
message here is that getting LDL down is important, and that's not
something that should be lost as a consequence of this study."
The ENHANCE study was completed in April 2006, but the results were only
released Monday by Merck and Schering-Plough after continual prodding by
medical professionals. According to The New York Times, the companies had
initially planned to release the findings by March 2007, but then missed
several self-imposed deadlines, blaming the delay on the complexities of
necessary data analysis.
Now that the results have arrived, Zetia and Vytorin should be viewed as
"drugs of last resort," for patients not helped by standard statin
therapy, Nissen said. Only if you can't tolerate full doses of
simvastatin should you take ezetimibe, he said.
"This is one of the most widely advertised and widely used drugs out
there, so it's obviously good to get these study results," Nissen added.
Another group questioned why patients should be prescribed more expensive
cholesterol-lowering drugs, such as Vytorin, versus cheaper, generic
statins such as Zocor.
"We already know that millions of people who take these brand drugs
probably don't need to; they could be taking a less expensive generic
instead. This study lends support to that cost-saving strategy for the
health system and for consumers," said Steven Findlay, managing editor of
Consumer Reports Best Buy Drugs, a public information and education
project of Consumers Union, publisher of Consumer Reports.
"If there is no apparent clinical benefit, why take a drug that cost
three or four times more?" Findlay said in a statement. "Most people do
not need that magnitude of cholesterol reduction anyway."
Sales of Zetia and Vytorin totaled $3.7 billion in the nine months ending
Sept. 30, up 33 percent from a year ago. Analysts estimate that about 70
percent of Schering-Plough's earnings depend on the drugs, the Times
noted.
Jim Chinnis - 15 Jan 2008 03:57 GMT
listener <listener@nospam.net> wrote in part:
>The study also noted that the speed at which arteries thickened with
>plaque almost doubled among those on the two-drug regimen compared to
>those taking Zocor alone.
This is something of a misinterpretation. The difference was not
statistically significant by any common standard.
This looks like another loss for the cholesterol hypothesis. Or maybe
another beating for a dead horse.
--
Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA
bigvince - 15 Jan 2008 04:20 GMT
> listener <liste...@nospam.net> wrote in part:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> --
> Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA
Jim as a recent Lancet study proclaimed great benefit of lowering LDL.
And in the enhance study vytorin significantly lowered LDL levels
compared to zocor why the disconnect in the results. If statins have
effects other than cholestorol lowering ;and the evidence is those
effects are molecule dependent than how can statins as a group be said
to have equal effect based primarily on the effect they have on
lipids
Thanks Vince
listener - 15 Jan 2008 04:37 GMT
bigvince <Vince.Miraglia@gmail.com> wrote in news:6f0834fd-3c82-4b89-b121-
25b3f2b1b6aa@l32g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
>> listener <liste...@nospam.net> wrote in part:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> lipids
> Thanks Vince
Zetia is not a statin.
Jim Chinnis - 15 Jan 2008 17:44 GMT
bigvince <Vince.Miraglia@gmail.com> wrote in part:
>Jim as a recent Lancet study proclaimed great benefit of lowering LDL.
Reference?
>And in the enhance study vytorin significantly lowered LDL levels
>compared to zocor why the disconnect in the results.
The most likely explanation is that simvastatin has benefits on mortality
and morbidity but that Zetia does not. LDL reduction is obviously not the
only relevant mechanism.
> If statins have
>effects other than cholestorol lowering ;and the evidence is those
>effects are molecule dependent than how can statins as a group be said
>to have equal effect based primarily on the effect they have on
>lipids
If you are saying that it has been argued that statins that are equipotent
in reducing LDL are equipotent in reducing hard clinical outcomes, I don't
know how good the evidence is for that. One really has to look at hard
clinical outcomes where they are available for the drug or treatment in
question. I don't know that one should consider statins to be equally
effective if they reduce LDL equally, though that could be true due to there
being a related molecular action in reducing LDL and in doing whatever it is
that statins do to improve atherosclerosis outcomes.
--
Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA
sphynx.red@gmail.com - 15 Jan 2008 22:45 GMT
>I don't know that one should consider statins to be equally
> effective if they reduce LDL equally, though that could be true due to there
> being a related molecular action in reducing LDL and in doing whatever it is
> that statins do to improve atherosclerosis outcomes.
(I know that I read this somewhere but have lost the cite) There are
members of the statin family which don't lower cholesterol --I.e. they
don't stop mevalonate synthesis -- but still lessen atherosclerosis in
animal models.
Does this ring a bell?
Adam Becker Sr
Jim Chinnis - 16 Jan 2008 00:06 GMT
sphynx.red@gmail.com wrote in part:
>>I don't know that one should consider statins to be equally
>> effective if they reduce LDL equally, though that could be true due to there
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Adam Becker Sr
No, and I'd love to read about that...
--
Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA
Bill - 15 Jan 2008 12:50 GMT
> Mon Jan 14, 4:02 PM ET
>
[quoted text clipped - 86 lines]
> percent of Schering-Plough's earnings depend on the drugs, the Times
> noted.
Thanks for the post. Look at the date at below.
Bill
..............................
Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Jan;62(1):88-96.
Links
Ezetimibe-associated adverse effects: what the clinician needs to know.
Florentin M, Liberopoulos EN, Elisaf MS.
Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina,
Ioannina, Greece.
Objective: Ezetimibe is a relatively new lipid lowering agent, which is
indicated for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia, either as
monotherapy or in combination with other hypolipidaemic drugs. The
objective of the present article was to review the side effects
attributed to ezetimibe administration and discuss their possible
underlying mechanisms. Moreover, we aimed to comment on the possible
drug interactions of ezetimibe and present current guidelines regarding
its safe use. Methods: Relevant articles were identified through a
PubMed search (up to June 2007). Results: Compelling evidence from the
majority of the data reviewed here showed that adverse effects
associated with ezetimibe use are few and mild without having been
associated with serious clinical outcomes. In most studies ezetimibe has
not been associated with increased rates of myopathy or rhabdomyolysis,
whether used alone or in combination with statins, although there have
been some case reports of myopathy attributed to this agent. Moreover,
ezetimibe has been associated with mild elevations of liver
transaminases, mainly in combination with a statin. Other side effects
are extremely rare. It should be noted, however, there are no long-term
safety data or outcome studies for ezetimibe yet. Conclusions: Ezetimibe
is a safe alternative option for hyperlipidaemic patients intolerant to
other lipid lowering drugs as well as a beneficial supplementary agent
for patients who do not reach the recommended serum cholesterol level
with their current hypolipidaemic treatment. However, as is the case
with all new medications, physicians should be alert to recognise
adverse effects associated with ezetimibe and report them to regulatory
authorities.
PMID: 18173814 [PubMed - in process]

Signature
Garden in shade zone 5 S Jersey USA
ICAO = KMIV Millvile Weather
Bill - 15 Jan 2008 17:33 GMT
In article
<b2forewagner-0DE834.07501915012008@sn-indi.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>,
> > Mon Jan 14, 4:02 PM ET
> >
[quoted text clipped - 124 lines]
> authorities.
> PMID: 18173814 [PubMed - in process]
Further reflection musing. Seems no matter what the diet interfering
with our digestive system may not be a good idea. Double plaque and
animal studies did not notice. Scary.
Bill horse beater

Signature
Garden in shade zone 5 S Jersey USA
ICAO = KMIV Millvile Weather