Medical Forum / General / Cardiology / January 2008
Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: after being constantly rebuked, satan now too stupid to know that there are no programmed "bot" responses via Google Groups.
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 31 Dec 2007 15:00 GMT Behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/3fe3358358703b25?
May dear neighbors, friends, and brethren have a blessedly wonderful New Years ...
... by being hungrier:
http://TruthRUS.org/KnowingGOD
Hunger is wonderful :-)
It's how we know what GOD wants, which is what is good.
Yes, hunger is our knowledge of good versus evil that Adam and Eve paid for with their and our immortal lives.
Those who suffer from the powerful delusion predicted by the prophecy of 2 Thessalonians 2:9-11 would deny this and perish however:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/CrazyOne
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/BeBlessed
"Blessed are you who hunger NOW...
... for you will be satisfied." -- LORD Jesus Christ (Luke 6:21)
Amen.
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <>< -- Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com Friend to the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
Mike Mordant - 31 Dec 2007 17:27 GMT On Dec 31, 9:00 am, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heartd...@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
> Behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement: > [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > Lawful steward ofhttp://EmoryCardiology.com > Friend to the KING of kings and LORD of lords. "Doctor" Chung is wrong once again. Usenet 'bots date back to the early nineties.
A news group posting 'bot Serdar Argic in 1994, posted tens of thousands of messages to various newsgroups, consisting of identical copies of a political screed relating to the Armenian Genocide. More sophisticated 'bots have been developed since then.
Perhaps the poster is confused by Chung's robotic response -- a clear symptom of his declining mental state. Many of Chung's responses display no real thought and could be easily produced by a simple AI simulator. It's a shame that Chung doesn't seek treatment that would render him fit for some employment where his medical background would be of use but he seems to prefer to waste his time here.
J666 - 31 Dec 2007 17:43 GMT > On Dec 31, 9:00 am, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > [quoted text clipped - 54 lines] > render him fit for some employment where his medical background would > be of use but he seems to prefer to waste his time here. Someone needs to develop a bot to counter BotBrainedBabel so we can have The War of the Bots.
BusinessAccountEmail@gmail.com - 31 Dec 2007 17:53 GMT > > On Dec 31, 9:00 am, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > [quoted text clipped - 57 lines] > Someone needs to develop a bot to counter BotBrainedBabel so we can > have The War of the Bots. Someone psychotic/delusional like Chung, can still function as a troll.
As a matter of fact, how sane could one be to put all the effort Chung does between his web site, self-published book and all the groups and his sockpuppet accounts for all these years. Anyone who is sane and has "a life" would not do this much for this long.
It is a shame that someone obviously capable of getting an MD and a PhD does not get the help needed now so maybe he can do some good rather than all of this. The only plus is, that what he keeps posting is so unreasonable, that most will realize exactly what he is.
R. Preston, PhD - 01 Jan 2008 08:01 GMT BusinessAccountEm...@gmail.com wrote:
> It is a shame that someone obviously capable of getting an MD and a > PhD does not get the help needed now so maybe he can do some good > rather than all of this. The only plus is, that what he keeps posting > is so unreasonable, that most will realize exactly what he is. One has to wonder if someone doesn't have the real one tied up someplace, like in the book/movie Misery. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0100157/plotsummary
R. Preston, PhD - 01 Jan 2008 08:03 GMT BusinessAccountEm...@gmail.com wrote:
> Nice to see a little originality as a change of pace from usual > repetitive stuff posted here, especially from "BotBrainedBabel." I'm considering obtaining a copyright for any description containing the prefix/suffix of "bot" i.e. "BotBrainBabel", "Ad-nauseamBot" et al.
Mike Mordant - 31 Dec 2007 17:46 GMT > On Dec 31, 9:00 am, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > [quoted text clipped - 54 lines] > render him fit for some employment where his medical background would > be of use but he seems to prefer to waste his time here. Mike Mordant - 31 Dec 2007 20:19 GMT > On Dec 31, 9:00 am, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > [quoted text clipped - 54 lines] > render him fit for some employment where his medical background would > be of use but he seems to prefer to waste his time here. J666 - 31 Dec 2007 21:22 GMT > > On Dec 31, 9:00 am, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > [quoted text clipped - 54 lines] > > render him fit for some employment where his medical background would > > be of use but he seems to prefer to waste his time here. Faith by definition does not require proof so a "faith healer," will not practice medicine as a medical doctor would.
R. Preston, PhD - 01 Jan 2008 07:55 GMT > after being constantly rebuked, satan now too stupid to know > that there are no programmed "bot" responses via Google Groups." The fact is that Google Groups has this stipulation in its Terms Of Service:
"5.3 You specifically agree not to access (or attempt to access) any of the Services through any automated means (including use of scripts or web crawlers) and shall ensure that you comply with the instructions set out in any robots.txt file present on the Services."
Keywords: "automated" and "robots" i.e. bots.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 01 Jan 2008 15:56 GMT satan via a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) hissed:
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Keywords: "automated" and "robots" i.e. bots. Correct. Not only are programmed "bot" responses via Google Groups not permitted per the TOS, Google has taken measures to prevent their occurrence.
Bottom line:
"... there are no programmed 'bot' responses via Google Groups" happening here.
Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for HIS compelling you to demonstrate that it remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.
Laus Deo ! ! !
May we, who are Jesus' brethren because we have stopped sinning though we remain sinners, continue to rebuke you before the ever-growing cloud of cheering witnesses both here and in heaven:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/Rebukesatan
<><
May dear neighbors, friends, and brethren have a blessedly wonderful New Years Day ...
... by being hungrier:
http://TruthRUS.org/KnowingGOD
Hunger is wonderful :-)
It's how we know what GOD wants, which is what is good.
Yes, hunger is our knowledge of good versus evil that Adam and Eve paid for with their and our immortal lives.
Those who suffer from the powerful delusion predicted by the prophecy of 2 Thessalonians 2:9-11 would deny this and perish however:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/CrazyOne
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/BeBlessed
"Blessed are you who hunger NOW...
... for you will be satisfied." -- LORD Jesus Christ (Luke 6:21)
Amen.
:-))) R. Preston, PhD - 01 Jan 2008 23:57 GMT > > The fact is that Google Groups has this stipulation in its Terms Of > > Service: [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > not permitted per the TOS, Google has taken measures to prevent their > occurrence. Measures taken to prevent impermissible bots would be to ban a Google Groups account. The fact is that the troll most likely utilizing bots, has had Google Groups accounts banned because they've violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use... so the troll keeps creating new accounts.
> Bottom line: > > "... there are no programmed 'bot' responses via Google Groups" > happening here. The preponderance of evidence based on fact, seems to indicate otherwise.
Bottom line:
"you remain a troll."
R. Preston, PhD - 01 Jan 2008 07:58 GMT Mike Mordant wrote:
> Perhaps the poster is confused by [the troll]'s robotic response Confused about hackneyed troll shtick I've seen played out in one form or another many times? Nah. Accuse me trying to coin "bot" into an all purpose generic term for any form of automated troll assistance, or that which strongly appears to be so.
J666 - 02 Jan 2008 04:15 GMT > It's how we know what GOD wants, which is what is good. We must question the story logic of having an all-knowing, all- powerful God, who creates faulty humans, and then blames them for his own mistakes. - Gene Roddenberry
|
|
|