Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Cardiology / December 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Higher Vitamin D Supplements Advised for Older Black Women

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Marilyn Mann - 08 Dec 2007 02:16 GMT
Higher Vitamin D Supplements Advised for Older Black Women

By Judith Groch, Senior Writer, MedPage Today
Reviewed by Zalman S. Agus, MD; Emeritus Professor
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine.

MINEOLA, N.Y., Dec. 7 -- Because dark skin acts as a barrier to
sunlight, the vitamin D supplementation recommended for postmenopausal
African-American women may need to be higher, according to researchers
here.

Black women who took 20 μg a day (800 IU) instead of the recommended
daily allowance of 10 to 15 μg (400-600 IU) had a relatively rapid
rise in serum vitamin D compared with a baseline period and a placebo
group, John F. Aloia, M.D., of Winthrop University Hospital here, and
colleagues reported in the December issue of the American Journal of
Clinical Nutrition.

Nevertheless, they added, still higher amounts, ranging from 50 μg/d
(2000 IU) to 70 μg/d (2800 IU) may be needed.

Reports of the dose response to vitamin D have been conflicting, and
most data were derived from white men and women, while those with dark
skin were generally neglected, Dr. Aloia and colleagues said.

To quantify the response in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations,
the researchers undertook a three-year study that included 208 healthy
postmenopausal black women (mean age 60). All women took calcium
supplements with a daily intake from all sources of approximately
1,349 mg.

Half the women were randomly assigned to consume a daily placebo,
while the other half took 20 μg/d of vitamin D (800 IU) for two years,
followed by 50 μg /d (2,000 IU) for another year.

Compared with the baseline period, supplementation with 20 μg/d (800
IU) of vitamin D produced a relatively rapid increase with a mean
serum 25(OH)D concentration that rose from a baseline 46.9 ±20.6 nmol/
L to 71.4 ±21.5 nmol/L at three months.

During the final year when the vitamin D dose was increased to 50 μg
(2000 IU) a day, serum concentrations again rose, but to a lesser
extent, 87.3 ±27.0 nmol/L.

Although age, weight, and body fat did not influence a woman's
response, a lower baseline measure tended to increase her vitamin D
response, the researchers said.

All participants achieved a serum vitamin D concentration >35 nmol/L
while 95% achieved a concentration >50 nmol/L. However, they said,
only 60% achieved a concentration >75 nmol/L.

The researchers also found a strong positive relationship between
vitamin D and serum calcium, which suggested that vitamin D had a
potentially positive effect on the availability of calcium to the
body. The mean serum calcium concentration among those in the highest
quartile of serum vitamin D was 0.25 mg/dL higher than that of those
in the lowest quartile (P<0.0001).

However, six women in the vitamin D group had isolated episodes of
mild hypercalcemia, which resolved on repeat fasting samples.
Similarly, there were isolated episodes of elevated 24-hour urinary
calcium excretion in three women, which resolved spontaneously in two
participants, while supplements were discontinued in the other woman.

These adverse effects could lead to serious complications, such as
kidney stone formation, the investigators noted.

The researchers also reported that they found no influence of
increasing vitamin D intake on bone loss. African Americans differ
from whites in that they have a more efficient calcium economy, their
bone mass is superior to that of whites, and their risk of fracture is
therefore lower, the researchers said.

Although the calcium requirement is lower among blacks than it is for
white women, the optimal calcium and vitamin D status will be
determined in the future by potential extracalcemic effects in
protecting against hypertension, obesity, diabetes, autoimmune
diseases, and certain cancers, the researchers concluded.

The investigators noted that these results may not apply to other
populations. The study took place in a northern latitude so that among
light-skinned women or where sun exposure is greater, seasonal
adjustments would be a greater consideration.

They also said that their simplified one-measurement, one-dose
adjustment algorithm gave satisfactory results, but given individual
variability in responses to vitamin D, a better result would be
expected if measurements were adjusted a second time.

On the basis of these findings, the researchers suggested an algorithm
for prescribing vitamin D in black women. They recommended a dose of
70 μg/d (2800 IU) for those with a concentration >45 nmol/L and a dose
of 100 μg/d (4000 IU) for those with a low concentration.

None of the authors reported a conflict of interest.

Primary source: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Source reference:
Talward SA, et al "Dose response to vitamin D supplementation among
postmenopausal African-American women" Am J Clin Nutr 2007; 86:
1657-1662.
trigonometry1972@gmail.com - 08 Dec 2007 12:38 GMT
I would suggest that during the fall and winter in the higher
latitudes, both black and whites could take 4000 IU.
A 100 nmol/L seems a reasonable goal for serum
25 OH vitamin D levels. Further, as people
age the UV induced synthesis of vitamin D
is greatly diminished. Moreover, a significant minority
of the human population have diminished absorption
out of the GI of micornutrients so there maybe
concerns here to. Further the "daily burn rate"
in person fully replete in vitamin D is about 3600 IU
and in lactating female the dose may need to
go as high 6000 IU in the absence of sun exposure
such that the mother milk will be a good source
for the nursing infant. Further more is need
during the spring and summer and
not the tiny amounts commonly suggested of sun exposure
with just face and arms exposed.
This of course depends on skin color,  a red
head or blond with their very fair skin can provied they expose an
ample amount
of skin can get a large dose in a short time.
For a black skin over an hour is needed and again
with ample surface area exposure.
IMO.

Talk to your Doc as some have medical conditions
the complicate the story. And it would seem
logical to modulate the higher dose I mentioned
with amounts with the level of effective UV exposure
according to the seasons. At the lower doses
used in this research, a fixed dose year around
would be more logical.

This is not medical advice, rather these are the
comments of some nut on the Usenet....your truly.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.