I had a nuclear stress test done about two years ago and despite some
initial findings, it was deduced to be a false positive and the test itself
was negative.

However, after the cardiologist looked at the test he decided I wasn't on
the tread long enough, it seemed to take him a while to realize this!
Actually, I put it off for a while myself too.

I have been having episodes of atypical chest pain that are usually relieved
with antacids, more sharp pain than pressure of any kind.  However, given
the scope of the potential problem, I have decided to go through with
another test.

My question is, how safe is the test itself?  I mean, they really get your
heart rate up there and if you've been inactive, like I have, I am concerned
about that part of the test.  I know the radiation they use is safe but with
is the tread itself, to get your heart rate up that high?  I guess the only
alternative would be something invasive.  There were about four people in
the room before so I'm assuming they are ready for problems that might
arise.  Secondly, how acurrate is the test?  If you have two that come back
negative in two years (in addition to dozens of negative resting EKG's)
should you start looking elsewhere?  I realize that resting EKG's are not
significant but when you've had as many as I've had, you'd think something
would show up while your having symptoms.

Thanks,

Zach