A propensity-matched study of the effects of chronic diuretic therapy
on mortality and hospitalization in older adults with heart failure
Ali Ahmeda, , , James B. Youngb, Thomas E. Lovec, Raynald Levesqued
and Betram Pitte
aUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, and Veterans Affairs Medical
Center, Birmingham, 1530 3rd Avenue South, CH19-219, Birmingham,
Alabama, USA
bCleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
cCase Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
dAon Consulting, Montreal, Canada
eUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Background
Non-potassium-sparing diuretics may increase mortality and
hospitalizations in heart failure patients. Most heart failure
patients are older adults, yet the effect of diuretics on cause-
specific mortality and hospitalizations in older adults with heart
failure is unknown. The objective of this propensity-matched study was
to determine the effect of diuretics on mortality and hospitalizations
in heart failure patients ≥ 65 years.
Methods
Of the 7788 Digitalis Investigation Group participants, 4036 were ≥ 65
years and 3271 (81%) were receiving diuretics. Propensity scores for
diuretic use for each of the 4036 patients were calculated using a non-
parsimonious multivariable logistic regression model incorporating all
measured baseline covariates, and were used to match 651 (85%)
patients not receiving diuretics with 651 patients receiving
diuretics. Effects of diuretics on mortality and hospitalization at 37
months of median follow-up were assessed using matched Cox regression
models.
Results
All-cause mortality occurred in 173 patients not receiving diuretics
and 208 patients receiving diuretics respectively during 2056 and 1943
person-years of follow-up (hazard ratio {HR} = 1.36; 95% confidence
interval {CI} = 1.08–1.71; p = 0.009). All-cause hospitalizations
occurred in 413 patients not receiving and 438 patients receiving
diuretics respectively during 1255 and 1144 person-years of follow-up
(HR = 1.18; 95% CI = 0.99–1.39; p = 0.063). Diuretic use was
associated with significant increased risk of cardiovascular mortality
(HR = 1.50; 95% CI = 1.15–1.96; p = 0.003).and heart failure
hospitalization (HR = 1.48; 95% CI = 1.13–1.94; p = 0.005).
Conclusions
Chronic diuretic use was associated with significant increased
mortality and hospitalization in ambulatory older adults with heart
failure receiving angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and
diuretics.
Corresponding author. University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1530 3rd
Ave South, CH-19, Ste-219, Birmingham AL 35294-2041, USA. Tel.: +1 205
934 9632; fax: +1 205 975 7099.
* * *
I don't understand this. If diuretics have such bad effects in these
patients, why are they prescribed them? I'll have to look into this
further.
Marilyn
David Rind - 25 Aug 2007 15:23 GMT
> A propensity-matched study of the effects of chronic diuretic therapy
> on mortality and hospitalization in older adults with heart failure
[quoted text clipped - 61 lines]
>
> Marilyn
The main answer is not to believe studies like this. It's not that it
couldn't turn out to be correct, but the study design is inherently very
weak.
You are relying on the ability of the statistics and the people
performing the study to match severity of illness between people who do
and do not get treated with diuretics. Since need for diuretics is a
marker for more severe illness you should be very worried that this
matching will have failed.

Signature
David Rind
drind@caregroup.harvard.edu
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 25 Aug 2007 16:50 GMT
> > A propensity-matched study of the effects of chronic diuretic therapy
> > on mortality and hospitalization in older adults with heart failure
[quoted text clipped - 71 lines]
> marker for more severe illness you should be very worried that this
> matching will have failed.
However, there is no reason to discard the observation that diuretic
use is not associated with better clinical outcomes. To answer
Marilyn's question about why doctors prescribe diuretics when we have
made this observation that diuretics do very little to prolong life in
the long run...
... we sense that in someone acutely short of breath because of
pulmonary edema that there is a need for diuresis to help him/her
survive the crisis of congestive heart failure (CHF) exacerbation.
However, for someone who has CHF exacerbations, the prognosis is so
poor that the beneficial effect of diuretics is so vanishingly small
that it would take a very large (and unethical) trial to generate
evidence that support diuretic use.
Thus, medicine will remain an art.
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:
http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/PressRelease
Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist
MarilynMann - 25 Aug 2007 17:17 GMT
> > A propensity-matched study of the effects of chronic diuretic therapy
> > on mortality and hospitalization in older adults with heart failure
[quoted text clipped - 77 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
OK, I think I understand what you are saying about the study design.
My mother-in-law has heart failure and takes a diuretic (when she
feels like taking it) and she has been chugging along for years that
way.
When you say need for diuretics is a marker for more severe illness,
you mean they have worse heart failure, right? In other words, they
are not taking it just for hypertension?
Marilyn
David Rind - 26 Aug 2007 21:01 GMT
> When you say need for diuretics is a marker for more severe illness,
> you mean they have worse heart failure, right? In other words, they
> are not taking it just for hypertension?
Yes, correct.

Signature
David Rind
drind@caregroup.harvard.edu