> > One person was of the opinion:
>
> > "Then you know firsthand that folks with paranoid schizophrenia would
> > shun usenet and other public forums, would be unable to pray, and would
> > decompensate when threatened by others."
>
> > Incorrect, if one had more then a generic survey course and rounds
> > experience with this diagnosis one would know it is not a valid nor
> > complete observation.
>
> > If you wish, a descriptive list of symptoms of this diagnosis can be
> > posted in support of the flaws in the above opinion.
>
> > God bless.
>
> Mental illness cannot be reliably diagnosed over the internet, even by
> psychiatrists.
>I know of no reason to think persons with schizophrenia are unable to
>pray.
Indeed, but 99 percent of the "diagnosis" offered in support groups is
of the same order. In fact in this thread it is not even a question.
The theme is with regard to the above claims made about what a person
with ps can and can not do because of the affliction. One can easily
show this is not the case, even as your last point above indicates.
While a diagnosis can not be made as on the level as would become part
of a formal medical file, some behaviors expressed even by writing alone
exclude all but a few conclusions. One can not prove but one can fail
to disprove what reasonable conclusions fit the behaviors exibited.
As I am posting only in the cardiology group, a discussion of a mental
illness is not on topic. However if you wish to pursue the topic a
generic description of ps and of cycles of decompensation can be posted
as a basis for discussion if you desire to continue.
It would, as you started above, show the claims made at the top are
groundless.
God bless.
Kurt Gavin - 28 Jul 2007 20:48 GMT
You won't hear from Andrew.
He's probably more afraid of you now, than he is of me.
>> > One person was of the opinion:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> God bless.