Utility of Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Versus Other
Lipoprotein Measures in Detecting Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Young
Adults (The Bogalusa Heart Study)
Frontini et al., Am J Cardiology, articles in press.
Direct comparative data on the utility of non-high-density lipoprotein
(HDL) cholesterol versus low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL
cholesterol, triglycerides, apolipoprotein (apo) B, apo A-I, ratio to
total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol, and ratio of apo B to apo A-I in
detecting increased carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), a validated
measurement of subclinical atherosclerosis, in asymptomatic younger
adults are scant. This aspect was examined in 1,203 black and white
subjects (71% white, 43% men) 24 to 43 years of age. In multivariate
logistic regression analysis of each lipoprotein measurement (top
quartile vs lower 3 quartiles specific for age, race, and gender) for
detecting increased carotid IMT (top decile vs lower 9 deciles
specific for age, race, and gender), only non-HDL cholesterol, total
cholesterol/HDL cholesterol, and apo B emerged as significant
correlates with respective odds ratios of 1.75 (95% confidence
interval [CI] 1.10 to 2.78), 2.02 (95% CI 1.27 to 3.19), and 2.13 (95%
CI 1.38 3.29), after adjusting for body mass index, systolic blood
pressure, and other lipoprotein measurements. Regarding discriminating
values of different lipoprotein measurements in detecting increased
carotid IMT, area (c-value) under the receiver operating
characteristic curve analysis for each lipoprotein measurement
adjusted for age, race, gender, body mass index, and systolic blood
pressure indicated that the c-value for non-HDL cholesterol (0.73) was
similar to those for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (0.76), total
cholesterol/HDL cholesterol (0.72), apo B/apo A-I (0.71), and HDL
cholesterol (0.70), but significantly (p <0.001) higher than that for
apo A-I (0.69), triglycerides (0.64), and apo B (0.64). In conclusion,
non-HDL cholesterol is as good as or better than other widely
recommended lipoprotein measurements in the identification of
subclinical atherosclerosis in young adults.
This study was supported by Grant AG-16592 from the National Institute
of Aging and Grant HL-38844 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood
Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Corresponding author: Tel: 504-988-7197; fax: 504-988-7194.
* * *
Marilyn
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 26 May 2007 23:37 GMT
It should be noted that high levels of Non-High-Density Lipoprotein
Cholesterol is a surrogate marker for metabolic syndrome (MetS)
May GOD bless you in HIS mighty way making you hungrier than ever.
Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://EmoryCardiology.com
"Unlike the 2PD-OMER Approach, weight loss diets can't be combined
with well-balanced diets."
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love/TheTruth
> Utility of Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Versus Other
> Lipoprotein Measures in Detecting Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Young
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> Marilyn
truth@is-better.com - 27 May 2007 00:39 GMT
"It should be noted that high levels of Non-High-Density Lipoprotein
Cholesterol is a surrogate marker for metabolic syndrome (MetS)"
Which means it is also a similar marker for any of the risk factors of
the individual items of the cluster of mets. Which is why some
researchers are now saying mets is a simple epiphenomena and not a
causal factor in its own right.
God bless.
Juhana Harju - 31 May 2007 10:51 GMT
"MarilynMann" <mannm@comcast.net> kirjoitti
viestissä:1180211065.688386.119570@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
: Utility of Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Versus Other
: Lipoprotein Measures in Detecting Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Young
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
: cholesterol/HDL cholesterol (0.72), apo B/apo A-I (0.71), and HDL
: cholesterol (0.70),
They did not measure hs-CRP, which I guess would have been as good risk
factor as those mentioned above.
--
Juhana
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 31 May 2007 11:37 GMT
Measurement of the VAT by "waist to hip ratio" (WHR) will likely
directly correlate with hsCRP which is downstreamof the cascade fueled
by the inflammatory cytokines coming from the VAT.
May GOD bless you in HIS mighty way making you hungrier than ever.
Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://EmoryCardiology.com
"Unlike the 2PD-OMER Approach, weight loss diets can't be combined
with well-balanced diets."
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love/TheTruth
> "MarilynMann" <mannm@comcast.net> kirjoitti
> viestissä:1180211065.688386.119570@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> --
> Juhana
truth@is-better.com - 31 May 2007 14:38 GMT
"Measurement of the VAT by "waist to hip ratio" (WHR) will likely
directly correlate with hsCRP which is downstreamof the cascade fueled
by the inflammatory cytokines coming from the VAT."
And the vat is the product of what disorder? All who overeat don't have
it, just a hint to sppeed you on your way to an answer.
In past you dismissed research contrary to your trash two pound diet if
there was not confirmation by imaging of the presence of vat. This was
research showing that exercise selectively reduces vat more quickly then
does weight loss. I then produced research showing a very strong
correlation between imaging of vat and other measures, such as the
above.
Now you embrace a non-imaging test, smile. This is not the first time
by my efforts you have later quietly changed your tune on some point of
science and theology and other areas because you could not sustain on
the evidence your opinion that was in error.
God bless.