Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Cardiology / March 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Anticlot therapy: PT% and INR

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Uplbet - 26 Mar 2007 18:14 GMT
I have intermittent afib and have been on Coumadin for years.
The result of my PT/INR check of today came out as:
-PT activity 26%
-INR 2.49 (my target range is 2 - 3).
Looks fine, but I'm a bit puzzled with the low PT%: matter of fact,
values such as low as 26% show in my history file as associated with
INR values around 3.
The lab double checked and confirmed PT activity 26% and INR 2.49.
Any comment?

Regards  
---
Uplbet
Bala - 29 Mar 2007 14:00 GMT
> I have intermittent afib and have been on Coumadin for years.
> The result of my PT/INR check of today came out as:
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> ---
> Uplbet

I am wondering if you are mistaking the result. Unit of measurement in
PT is "seconds" (It is the number of seconds it takes for the blood to
clot under certain laboratory conditions) and not %. So, I would
guess, 26 represents "seconds" and not percentage of normal. The INR
value is more important than the PT value since it is a ratio arrived
by comparing it to the concentration of ingredients in the reagent
used for analysis. Since the lab reagent varies in its concentration
from batch to batch, INR is calculated each time when this test is
run. So, forget about the PT value, and concentrate on INR value. Hope
this helps.

D. Balaguru
Uplbet - 29 Mar 2007 15:54 GMT
Il 29 Mar 2007 06:00:24 -0700, "Bala" <dbalaguru@gmail.com> ha
scritto:

>I am wondering if you are mistaking the result.

I do not think so: matter of fact, the lab explains 26% as being the
"percentage of prothrombinic activity".
I do not yet know their evaluation of the so called "Prothrombin time"
(in seconds).

>The INR
>value is more important than the PT value since it is a ratio arrived
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>run. So, forget about the PT value, and concentrate on INR value. Hope
>this helps.

very clear, got the message, thanks a lot
---
Uplbet
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.