Andrew B Chung, hospital privileges

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

outsor@citynet.net - 28 Jul 2006 21:29 GMT

Regarding an assertion of weight status:

"Then the prayers have worked."

Whose prayers when? My normal BMI has been stable for 5 years.

The question of the false witness in the original assertion is a proper
matter for prayer and repentance and asking the pardon of the person
against which it was falsely leveled.

The topic here of asserting hospital privileges by a false witness of an
ommission of the complete truth is a matter for prayer also. Only a
simple "no or "yes" is required to correct the ommission:

Is the AMA listing of 3 hospitals with hospital privileges current and
valid as listed for you?

Reply to this Message

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 29 Jul 2006 00:29 GMT

> Regarding an assertion of weight status:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> matter for prayer and repentance and asking the pardon of the person
> against which it was falsely leveled.

Prove that you are not obese and I would be more than happy to write
that I have been in error in believing that you are.

> The topic here of asserting hospital privileges by a false witness of an
> ommission of the complete truth is a matter for prayer also. Only a
> simple "no or "yes" is required to correct the ommission:
>
> Is the AMA listing of 3 hospitals with hospital privileges current and
> valid as listed for you?

No.

However, the information they use for listing hospital privileges does
not come from me and it remains my choice to not supply this
information if asked (so don't bother), as I have oft-written before.

Still praying for you, dear neighbor.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew B. Chung
Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit

Message for the wolves in sheepskin who serve the anti-christ:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/4f43855be1cfa795?
or
http://tinyurl.com/fcx3f (awaiting the frantic foot-stomping antics of
the anti-christ

Message for my brethren who know the way, the truth, and the life:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/7bff7f0b57577900?
or
http://tinyurl.com/lyrl7 (expecting the anti-christ to have a coronary
here)

Message for the anti-christ, who serves satan:
LORD GOD Almighty is the Source of all intelligence, which clearly HE
has dialed down in your case.

Reply to this Message

The Cunning Linguist :Þ- Cmdr. Usenet OperAtions - 29 Jul 2006 19:21 GMT

>> Regarding an assertion of weight status:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> not come from me and it remains my choice to not supply this
> information if asked (so don't bother), as I have oft-written before.

You will give medical advice online but you won't list your hospital
privileges? You are a fraud and a quack Dr Chung
And you have done more to turn people away from xianity than anyone else I
know. How does jayzus feel about you leading all those people to hell, "dear
neighbor"?

Signature

Talesin- The Bad Boy of Witchcraft (tm)

To give Tales his due, he is a talented and able witch. However he is a
negative energy and will show you the "highlights" of a negatively applied
system.

http://home.kc.rr.com/pendragonsloft

© 2006 by Talesin- The Bad Boy of Witchcraft. All rights reserved

Reply to this Message

outsor@citynet.net - 29 Jul 2006 02:18 GMT

"Prove that you are not obese and I would be more than happy to write
that I have been in error in believing that you are."

Prove you have hospital privileges first, which after all is the topic
here. Short of a meeting anything offered would not be accepted so it
would be an infinite regression of demands.

That is unlike hospital privileges which are easily confirmed by
contacting the hospital. It says something about that you would make
the assertion in the first place not knowing me at all, a mere matter of
spite comes to mind. You and I have not in past discussed my weight but
your mind jumped to that conclusion. In usual civil consideration that
alone is enough for a pardon to be asked of me.

Are the AAMA listings current and valid:

"No.

However, the information they use for listing hospital privileges does
not come from me and it remains my choice to not supply this information
if asked (so don't bother), as I have oft-written before."

So, the AMA either stole or made up or some other way got this
information without your input, you want us to accept this? I have seen
you offer this transperent dodge before. On the flip side you say the
listings local to you don't have them either because you choose not to
include them when providing other standard information. A nice circular
bit of foot work that. Taken as a whole, you can not support your claim
to have hospital privileges and those at the AMA are not current or
valid because they got them somehow.

Now here is the clincher, in a past post you confirmed to another poster
that the AMA list was valid, it can be posted. What fancy foot work are
we in for now to explain that post?

Reply to this Message