Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Cardiology / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

would david rind or jim chinnis comment on the following?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
eml - 18 Jul 2006 15:12 GMT
Northwestern University

Posted: July 6, 2006

Variations In Detoxifying Genes Linked To Lou Gehrig's Disease
Genetic variations in three enzymes that detoxify insecticides and
nerve gas agents as well as metabolize cholesterol-lowering statin
drugs may be a risk factor for developing sporadic amyotrophic lateral
sclerosis (ALS, or Lou Gehrig's disease), and possibly responsible for
a reported twofold increased risk of ALS in Gulf War veterans.

These findings, from a study led Teepu Siddique, M.D., and colleagues
at Northwestern University, open the door to investigating
gene-environment interactions as a cause of ALS and other illnesses and

to the development of molecular targets for specific treatments. The
study was published in the August 22 online issue (available now) of
the journal Neurology.

Siddique is Les Turner ALS Foundation/Herbert C. Wenske Professor,
Davee Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurosciences, professor of
cell and molecular biology and director of the Neuromuscular Disorders
Program at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.

ALS is a complex neurodegenerative disorder of the motor neurons that
results in muscle weakness, difficulty speaking, swallowing and
breathing and eventual total paralysis and death generally within five
years.

In 1993 Siddique and collaborators determined that mutations in a gene
known as SOD1 account for 20 percent of familial, or inherited, ALS (2
percent of all cases of ALS). However, the cause of sporadic ALS is
still unknown.

In earlier research Siddique and other researchers hypothesized that
sporadic ALS is modulated by variations in multiple genes interacting
with each other and environmental exposures.

The genes for human paraoxanases (PON 1, PON 2 and PON 3), which are
located on chromosome 7q21.3, code for the production of detoxifying
enzymes involved in the metabolism of a variety of drugs,
organophosphate insecticides, such as parathion, diazinon and
chlorpyrifos, and nerve gas agents such as sarin.

Previous research described a possible twofold increased risk for
developing ALS in veterans of the Gulf War, indicating a war-related
environmental exposure to organophosphates and sarin in genetically
susceptible individuals as a possible cause.

PON gene cluster variants have previously been associated with other
neurodegenerative and vascular disorders, including Alzheimer's
disease, Parkinson's disease, coronary artery disease and stroke.

Although the Northwestern DNA study samples were not analyzed for
inclusion of Gulf War veterans, Siddique and co-researchers found
significant evidence that gene variations (polymorphisms) on the
chromosome region encompassing PON2-PON3 were strongly associated with
sporadic ALS.

"Thus, single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping in the intergenic
regions of the PON gene cluster, and replication, gene expression,
gene-gene interaction and PON serum/enzymatic studies may help
elucidate the complexity of PON cluster association with ALS,"
Siddique said.

Siddique hopes to study DNA samples from Gulf War veterans with
increased incidence of sporadic ALS and has applied for their DNA from
the Veterans Administration collection.

Collaborating with Siddique on this research were Mohammad Saeed, M.D.;

Nailah Siddique; Wu-Yen Hung; Elena Usacheva; Erdong Liu, M.D.; Robert
L. Sufit, M.D.; Scott L. Heller, M.D., Northwestern University Feinberg

School of Medicine; Jonathan L. Haines, Vanderbilt University Medical
Center; and Margaret Pericak-Vance, Duke University Medical Center.

This study was supported by grants from the National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Les Turner ALS Foundation; V. E.
Schaff ALS Research Trust; Wenske Foundation; Harold Post
Professorship; Les Turner ALS Foundation/Herbert C. Wenske Foundation
Professorship; Falk Foundation Fund; and The David C. Asselin M.D.,
Memorial Fund.
Jim Chinnis - 20 Jul 2006 02:37 GMT
I found this very interesting and I read it carefully. Unfortunately, I have
no expertise in this area. I'll only say that it looks promising for more
research.

Thanks for the post.

Jim

"eml" <mmlevy46@hotmail.com> wrote in part:

>Northwestern University
>
[quoted text clipped - 79 lines]
>Professorship; Falk Foundation Fund; and The David C. Asselin M.D.,
>Memorial Fund.
--
Jim Chinnis   Warrenton, Virginia, USA
David Rind - 20 Jul 2006 16:59 GMT
> I found this very interesting and I read it carefully. Unfortunately, I have
> no expertise in this area. I'll only say that it looks promising for more
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Jim

For some reason I didn't see the original post in this thread, only Jim
Chinnis' reply.

The article is really preliminary. People are finding gene linkages all
the time that don't really turn out to mean anything.

I can't claim any particular knowledge or expertise in this specific
area (genes associated with sporadic ALS), but I would not make much of
this report until there is future research.

Once you find an association, you can often come up with some theory to
show why that association might explain some observed fact. I just don't
find this article very convincing.

Signature

David Rind
drind@caregroup.harvard.edu

Susan - 20 Jul 2006 22:27 GMT
> For some reason I didn't see the original post in this thread, only Jim
> Chinnis' reply.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> show why that association might explain some observed fact. I just don't
> find this article very convincing.

So, here's a possibly rilly, rilly dumb question from a lay person: is
it possible that allegedly genetically linked illnesses are really the
result of similar environmental exposures to pathogens or other
environmental disruptors of some sort?

I think of neuroborreliosis, as a model, for example.  Fallon has
described bipolar disorder as the single presenting manifestation.
Families live and have tick exposure together.  Or asymptomatic mothers
may carry their children and pass along congenital infections, which is
known to happen with Lyme and ehrlichiosis, for example.

Why not other CNS infections, viral, parasitic and/or bacterial that we
haven't connected to the outcomes?

Since borrelia are known to modulate host immunity, can some of these
changes alter host genetics in any way?

Susan
Jim Chinnis - 21 Jul 2006 01:55 GMT
Susan <nevermind@nomail.com> wrote in part:

>x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>result of similar environmental exposures to pathogens or other
>environmental disruptors of some sort?

Here's a rilly, rilly dumb answer from a lay person: Sure. I assume you mean
that a genetic phenotype makes one capable of developing multiple diseases
if one is exposed to a pathogen, toxin, or such.

>I think of neuroborreliosis, as a model, for example.  Fallon has
>described bipolar disorder as the single presenting manifestation.
>Families live and have tick exposure together.  Or asymptomatic mothers
>may carry their children and pass along congenital infections, which is
>known to happen with Lyme and ehrlichiosis, for example.

It would be hard to demostrate any genetic susceptibilty working within a
family.

>Why not other CNS infections, viral, parasitic and/or bacterial that we
>haven't connected to the outcomes?

Why not?

>Since borrelia are known to modulate host immunity, can some of these
>changes alter host genetics in any way?

I doubt it.

(It's quiet here, so I thought I'd play geneticist and infectious disease
expert.)
--
Jim Chinnis   Warrenton, Virginia, USA
Susan - 21 Jul 2006 15:05 GMT
> Here's a rilly, rilly dumb answer from a lay person: Sure. I assume you mean
> that a genetic phenotype makes one capable of developing multiple diseases
> if one is exposed to a pathogen, toxin, or such.

No, actually.  I meant is the interpretation of the reason for the
incidence incorrect.  That shared exposures are the cause, rather than
genetics.

> (It's quiet here, so I thought I'd play geneticist and infectious disease
> expert.)
> --

Yeah, I thought I'd play rilly, rilly dumb.  ;-)

Susan
William Wagner - 21 Jul 2006 15:46 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Susan

 I think of back ground radiation causing a normal amount of  defects
or possible cancers.  Then with added exposure  like tobacco tars the
defects or cancers may increase.  Same for  diesel exhaust , neural
toxins etc.  We know what TLV  is but multiplied by many potential
immune  challenges remains  unclear.

I try to avoid small particle size dust and  anything that will not rot
easily.

Bill

PS tobacco tars are radio active and stick to a lung cell and may cause
a possible  mutation.

Do not ask for documentation as  this is conjecture  or bull sh.t  on
my part.  TLV  = Threshold  limit values.

Signature

S Jersey USA Zone 5 Shade
This article is posted under fair use rules in accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and is strictly for the educational
and informative purposes. This material is distributed without profit.

David Rind - 22 Jul 2006 02:47 GMT
> So, here's a possibly rilly, rilly dumb question from a lay person: is
> it possible that allegedly genetically linked illnesses are really the
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Susan

It's often hard to figure out whether clustering of conditions is
genetic or environmental. For some diseases the question has been pretty
clearly answered by twin studies: if you look at identical twins growing
up in the same environment, and identical twins separated at birth, you
can make a pretty clean distinction between environmental effects (at
least those occurring after birth) and genetic effects.

That doesn't really have to do with my concerns about the article on
certain genetic linkages with ALS. The issue here is that people will
search  through data for associations between genes and diseases, and
the risk of such data dredging is that you will find associations due to
chance that you mistakenly think represent cause and effect.
Additionally, there might be a causal gene near the gene you are
studying, and so you're just looking at the wrong one.

People with more expertise in bioinformatics/genomics can probably give
a better answer than the above. In general, though, there are a lot of
papers being published reporting genetic linkages that end up not being
confirmed when repeated in other data sets. So I remain skeptical when
hearing about some new genetic linkage, unless the data are overwhelming
 (as recently happened with a gene associated with macular degeneration).

Signature

David Rind
drind@caregroup.harvard.edu

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.