 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Cardiology / June 2006Question for Chung
Chung: Have you EVER been wrong on a question of religion? In view of GOD in omni....and source of every thing and being, mostly no one can be wrong in nature but can look different to others due to different forms, constitution, language, difference in names, self interests and requirements etc. As I said, a lion and a man with gun standing against each other, want to kill each other. Both have purpose to kill i.e. defence and hunger respectively. Who is wrong in natural sense? One may try to understand real logic behind any "shown picture" and "said words" which can be indirect and complex for anyone due to time and language change. Best. >In view of GOD in omni....and source of every thing and being, mostly no one can be wrong in nature but can look different to others due to different forms, constitution, language, difference in names, self interests and requirements etc. As I said, a lion and a man with gun standing against each other, want to kill each other. Both have purpose to kill i.e. defence and hunger respectively. Who is wrong in natural sense? One may try to understand real logic behind any "shown picture" and "said words" which can be indirect and complex for anyone due to time and language change. Best. ----nominated, "Psychobabble Non-Answer of the Year, 2006" > >In view of GOD in omni....and source of every thing and being, mostly no one can be wrong in nature but can look different to others due to different forms, constitution, language, difference in names, self interests and requirements etc. > As I said, a lion and a man with gun standing against each other, want [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > ----nominated, "Psychobabble Non-Answer of the Year, 2006" Repeat; One may try to understand real logic behind any "shown picture" and "said words" which can be indirect and complex for anyone due to time and language change. Best. > > >In view of GOD in omni....and source of every thing and being, mostly no one can be wrong in nature but can look different to others due to different forms, constitution, language, difference in names, self interests and requirements etc. > > As I said, a lion and a man with gun standing against each other, want [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > "said words" which can be indirect and complex for anyone due to time > and language change. Best. Except to manage chlorophyll in demilitarized zones, of course. Aggressively asserting fundamental daylight at the crossroads of historical evidence. Many times are the notations of insects collected in the subjugation arena. -Panama Floyd, Atl. aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA! EAC Martian Commander "..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next." -Mark Twain Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones: http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html >Except to manage chlorophyll in demilitarized zones, of course. Aggressively asserting fundamental daylight at the crossroads of historical evidence. Many times are the notations of insects collected in the subjugation arena. Agreed. This is self-evident; yet, paradoxically, this is reversed on alternate Tuesdays. > >Except to manage chlorophyll in demilitarized zones, of course. Aggressively asserting fundamental daylight at the crossroads of historical evidence. Many times are the notations of insects collected in the subjugation arena. > > Agreed. This is self-evident; yet, paradoxically, this is reversed on > alternate Tuesdays. Absolutely. High-flying family fun on several planes of detail! -Panama Floyd, Atl. aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA! EAC Martian Commander "..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next." -Mark Twain Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones: http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html > > > >In view of GOD in omni....and source of every thing and being, mostly no one can be wrong in nature but can look different to others due to different forms, constitution, language, difference in names, self interests and requirements etc. > > > As I said, a lion and a man with gun standing against each other, want [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones: > http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html These words or shown pictures are indirect and complex for me. > > > > >In view of GOD in omni....and source of every thing and being, mostly no one can be wrong in nature but can look different to others due to different forms, constitution, language, difference in names, self interests and requirements etc. > > > > As I said, a lion and a man with gun standing against each other, want [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > These words or shown pictures are indirect and complex for me. Yer a `bot, ain't cha? Did I get ya? -PF > In view of GOD in omni....and source of every thing and being, mostly > no one can be wrong in nature but can look different to others due to > different forms, constitution, language, difference in names, self > interests and requirements etc. Another frigging whacko, IMHO > Chung: Have you EVER been wrong on a question of religion? I don't answer questions about religion. Would be glad to answer any questions your may have about Christianity. Still praying for your endangered soul, dear Al. Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love, Andrew http://tinyurl.com/jjl29 >> Chung: Have you EVER been wrong on a question of religion? > > I don't answer questions about religion. > > Would be glad to answer any questions your may have about Christianity. Aaaaaahhhhh ... yet another evasive bullshit answer from Chung... > >> Chung: Have you EVER been wrong on a question of religion? > > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Aaaaaahhhhh ... yet another evasive bullshit answer from Chung... Sorry the truth continues to bother you so terribly. Please forgive all my iniquities. Still praying for your endangered soul, dear Al. Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love, Andrew http://tinyurl.com/jjl29 >>> Would be glad to answer any questions you may have about Christianity. >> Aaaaaahhhhh ... yet another evasive bullshit answer from Chung... > > Sorry the truth continues to bother you so terribly. Please forgive > all my iniquities. AND ANOTHER!!! > >>> Would be glad to answer any questions you may have about Christianity. > >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > AND ANOTHER!!! Will continue to pray for your endangered soul, dear Al. Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love, Andrew http://tinyurl.com/jjl29 > > >>> Would be glad to answer any questions you may have about Christianity. > > >> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Andrew > http://tinyurl.com/jjl29 True people may be nailed. Indicative. Probably truth, doing undue good etc. is not according to HIS law/system for the current time...which may be a destruction phase. But good people still may have a constitution, predisposition or addiction of doing good...so can't change even though nailed occasionally by people or by HIM. Kuchung wrote: > True people may be nailed. Indicative. Probably truth, doing undue good > etc. is not according to HIS law/system for the current time...which > may be a destruction phase. But good people still may have a > constitution, predisposition or addiction of doing good...so can't > change even though nailed occasionally by people or by HIM. Are you just pulling words out of a hat? Even Chang makes more sense than you. Stick to the biochemistry questions. JC > Kuchung wrote: > > True people may be nailed. Indicative. Probably truth, doing undue good [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > JC Anything wrong in my words? Why nailed? > Kuchung wrote: > > True people may be nailed. Indicative. Probably truth, doing undue good [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Are you just pulling words out of a hat? Even Chang makes more sense > than you. Now we know who writes those user manuals. > Stick to the biochemistry questions. > > JC > True people may be nailed. Indicative. Probably truth, doing undue good > etc. is not according to HIS law/system for the current time...which > may be a destruction phase. But good people still may have a > constitution, predisposition or addiction of doing good...so can't > change even though nailed occasionally by people or by HIM. Absolute bullshit doubletalk. From a sockpuppet. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD threw his rattle into alt.atheism with the following: > Waaah! > http://tinyurl.com/hkach tiny url fixed > Will continue to pray for your endangered soul, dear Al. Then, you dirty bastard, you must want to harm me, as prayer has been PROVEN not to do a frigging thing, and may even WORSEN conditions. > >>> Would be glad to answer any questions you may have about Christianity. > >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > AND ANOTHER!!! Will continue to pray for your endangered soul, dear Al. Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love, Andrew http://tinyurl.com/jjl29 > Will continue to pray for your endangered soul, dear Al. Pray for your cock, Andyboy > > Will continue to pray for your endangered soul, dear Al. > > > Pray for your cock, Andyboy Many thanks to GOD for using you to make all of HIS followers seem infinitely more righteous. Still praying for your soul, dear Al. Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love, Andrew http://tinyurl.com/jjl29 > > > Will continue to pray for your endangered soul, dear Al. > > > > > Pray for your cock, Andyboy > > Many thanks to GOD for using you to make all of HIS followers seem > infinitely more righteous. You mean self-righteous. > > > > Will continue to pray for your endangered soul, dear Al. > > > > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > You mean self-righteous. No. Simply righteous. Still praying for your soul, dear Jessie. Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love, Andrew http://tinyurl.com/jjl29 > Will continue to pray for your endangered soul, dear Al. There's no such thing as a soul. > > Will continue to pray for your endangered soul, dear Al. > > There's no such thing as a soul. Actually, there is. Proof of its existence has already been given and resides in the Google archives. You will be in my prayers, dear neighbor. Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love, Andrew http://tinyurl.com/jjl29 YOU ARE ABSOLUTLY RIGHT-NO SUCH THING AS A SOUL,GOD,DEVIL. ITS ALL MADE UP AND THAT IS ALL MY LITTLE BRAIN CAN HANDLE!!! SUCK A COCK FOR CHRIST! > > > Will continue to pray for your endangered soul, dear Al. > > > > There's no such thing as a soul. > > Actually, there is. Liar. > Proof of its existence has already been given and resides in the Google > archives. Then it should be easy for you to point it out to everyone. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.