Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Cardiology / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Thiamin Deficiency Common In Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dan - 15 Jan 2006 17:19 GMT
Among patients hospitalized with heart failure, about one in three has
deficient levels of thiamin, although thiamin deficiency was less
common among those patients who were taking vitamin supplements,
according to a new study in the Jan. 17, 2006, issue of the Journal of
the American College of Cardiology.

http://debunkbigpharma.blognation.us/blog/_archives/2006/1/15/1676293.html
Robert - 15 Jan 2006 19:38 GMT
> Among patients hospitalized with heart failure, about one in three has
> deficient levels of thiamin, although thiamin deficiency was less
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> http://debunkbigpharma.blognation.us/blog/_archives/2006/1/15/1676293.html

Thank God for big pharm supplements, vitamins when people should just eat
right.
just Ed - 16 Jan 2006 04:29 GMT
> > Among patients hospitalized with heart failure, about one in three has
> > deficient levels of thiamin, although thiamin deficiency was less
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Thank God for big pharm supplements, vitamins when people should just eat
> right.

Cite please.
Robert - 16 Jan 2006 06:17 GMT
> > > Among patients hospitalized with heart failure, about one in three has
> > > deficient levels of thiamin, although thiamin deficiency was less
> > > common among those patients who were taking vitamin supplements,
> > > according to a new study in the Jan. 17, 2006, issue of the Journal of
> > > the American College of Cardiology.

http://debunkbigpharma.blognation.us/blog/_archives/2006/1/15/1676293.html

> > Thank God for big pharm supplements, vitamins when people should just eat
> > right.
>
> Cite please.

Cite what? That people need to eat a well balanced diet with all the
essential nutrients or that people are making money off of vitamins and
supplements?
just Ed - 16 Jan 2006 23:38 GMT
> > > > Among patients hospitalized with heart failure, about one in three has
> > > > deficient levels of thiamin, although thiamin deficiency was less
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> essential nutrients or that people are making money off of vitamins and
> supplements?

Show citation(s) that CHF patients' thiamin deficiency is
reversed or prevented through 'eating right'.

PMID: 10809999, shows that the stored thiamin in these folks
is not reduced.  "This change is most likely not an expression of a
thiamine deficiency, but rather of an altered metabolism of thiamine,
which is not understood at present."  Adequate thiamin there, but it
wasn't making it to the active form.

PMID: 10482308 verified that furosemide increases urinary thiamin loss.

PMID: 12845243 studied dietary intake of a group of these folks, said
thiamin level was below recommended levels.  That doesn't say that
'eating right' would have made enough difference to matter.  You seem
to know that it will.
Robert - 17 Jan 2006 07:51 GMT
> > > > > Among patients hospitalized with heart failure, about one in three has
> > > > > deficient levels of thiamin, although thiamin deficiency was less
> > > > > common among those patients who were taking vitamin supplements,
> > > > > according to a new study in the Jan. 17, 2006, issue of the Journal of
> > > > > the American College of Cardiology.

http://debunkbigpharma.blognation.us/blog/_archives/2006/1/15/1676293.html

> > > > Thank God for big pharm supplements, vitamins when people should just
> > eat
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> 'eating right' would have made enough difference to matter.  You seem
> to know that it will.

It does not negate the fact that people should not eat properly. It only
proposes that thiamine be elevated to drug status.
It is one drug along with many other drugs that can be used in treating
disease. It is a product of big commercial companies feeding off of each
other. Watch the price of any nutrient go up when it's proven to be
effective in anything.
rs1000@techemail.com - 18 Jan 2006 20:28 GMT
> Cite what? That people need to eat a well balanced diet with all the
> essential nutrients or that people are making money off of vitamins and
> supplements?

Hi Robert.

In various lifespan studies, animals eating a balanced and nutritious
diet including various vitamins and minerals have shorter lifespans
than animals eating a nutritious diet plus the addition of higher
supplemental dosages of certain natural substances that cannot be
obtained at this dosage through diet alone, including some of the B
vitamins.  Numerous human trials with various nutritional supplements
also show health benefits that nutritious diet alone does not provide.

I think one of the misconceptions here is that supplements may only be
good for preventing deficiencies, and that if the right foods are eaten
to give the RDA of such vitamins and minerals that there will be no
benefit to extra supplementation.  This is not the case.

As one example, every time you ingest sugar during your life, some of
this binds to proteins in your body through a process called glycation.
This is especially the case with fructose (juices, soda pop), which
glycates at about 7 times the rate of table sugar.  These glycated
proteins crosslink over time and form what are known as "advanced
glycation end products" or AGE's.  AGE's are permanent, and lead to
permanent damage and stiffening of blood vessels and heart tissue, and
damage to tissue in the rest of the body.  One of the more proven ways
to extend lifespan in healthy animals is to inhibit this process using
AGE and glycation inhibitors including carnosine, and B vitamin
products like pyridoxamine, thiamine, and benfotiamine.  The RDA for
pyridoxamine(B6) is 2mg per day, but the optimal dose for inhibiting
glycation is likely four hundred miligrams or more.    [Favorable
Effects of Pyridoxine HCl on the aging process. Lindseth K, Dictor M &
Miquel J in AGE 5(4), 143, 1982. Late middle-age intervention gave mean
total lifespan extension of 11% over healthy controls in mice].
Pyridoxamine is much better than the pyridoxine form for this and other
purposes, so the lifespan extension may be much greater.  It's been
proven that B vitamin products like pyridoxamine and the thiamine
derivative benfotiamine are very effective at blocking AGE formation in
humans.  For instance, one human trial found that benfotiamine at
600mg/day blocked at least one third of AGE formation in human tissue.
The health and life extending benefits from B vitamins are by no means
limited to inhibition of glycation, this is just one of many.

As to thiamine, the RDA may be set at 1.5mg in males, but based on
cumulative information from published human and animal studies, optimal
dosing in humans may actually be hundreds of times this amount, taken
in balance with the other B vitamins at appropriate dosages.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.