Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Cardiology / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Statin Drug Labels must carry WARNING in Canada

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Sharon Hope - 14 Jan 2006 05:29 GMT
Another example of how drugs are different between Canada and the US.  In
Canada the labels warn the patients of dangers.

http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_T
ype1&c=Article&cid=1137107416336&call_pageid=968332188492&col=968793972154&t=TS_
Home


Per an article in today's Toronto Star:

Statin drugs must carry health warning
Jan. 13, 2006. 03:33 AM
ELAINE CAREY
MEDICAL REPORTER

Excerpts:

"Statins, the popular cholesterol-lowering drugs used by more than 3 million
Canadians every day, can lead to serious muscle damage in some patients,
Health Canada is now warning."

"The makers of all the drugs, which include Lipitor, Zocor, Pravachol,
Mevacor and Crestor, must include a warning and description of the risk in
patient safety-information sheets, the department said yesterday."

"An analysis of the Canadian adverse drug-reaction database shows a statin
was suspected as the cause of 1,739 adverse event reports filed between 1988
and 2003. Of those, 1,024 were considered serious."
Bill - 14 Jan 2006 05:54 GMT
The PI sheet is not a label. In the US they also warn of risks.

Bill

> Another example of how drugs are different between Canada and the US.  In
> Canada the labels warn the patients of dangers.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> was suspected as the cause of 1,739 adverse event reports filed between 1988
> and 2003. Of those, 1,024 were considered serious."
Tony Wesley - 14 Jan 2006 15:55 GMT
> Another example of how drugs are different between Canada and the US.  In
> Canada the labels warn the patients of dangers.
> http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_T
ype1&c=Article&cid=1137107416336&call_pageid=968332188492&col=968793972154&t=TS_
Home

This link produces the following message for me:

Invalid asset ID!
Can not load an asset of type Article with ID '1137107416336'. Please
supply a valid asset ID and try again.
Sharon Hope - 14 Jan 2006 20:31 GMT
Please learn to use google.  Also, please understand that the Toronto Star
is free to make available its articles for only as long as it determines per
it's corporate decisionmakers.  Often the availability of news articles is 1
day, so use the cache option on your favorite search engine.

>> Another example of how drugs are different between Canada and the US.  In
>> Canada the labels warn the patients of dangers.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Can not load an asset of type Article with ID '1137107416336'. Please
> supply a valid asset ID and try again.
Tony Wesley - 15 Jan 2006 18:28 GMT
> Please learn to use google.

It's wonderful how you some people accept criticism.

You posted an invalid link.

If you want people to use google, you should form your links in this
manner:

 http://news.google.com/news?q=statins+canada+warning

You're welcome.
Sharon Hope - 15 Jan 2006 19:20 GMT
Google offers alerts - anyone can request them.

For this particular link, which came to me as a response to a longstanding
Google alert, you should have done a search on the exact title of the
article.

Again, if the link has been expired by the provider, you will need to view
the cached version.

>> Please learn to use google.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> You're welcome.
MEM, MD - 14 Jan 2006 22:46 GMT
>Another example of how drugs are different between Canada and the US.  In
>Canada the labels warn the patients of dangers.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>was suspected as the cause of 1,739 adverse event reports filed between 1988
>and 2003. Of those, 1,024 were considered serious."

Using the data in this article, statins have been the cause of 1739
AE's in 45 million person-years, or 1 AE per 25,876 person-years.  I'm
sure that WAY underestimates the actual number of statin-related AEs
(since most go un-reported), but it certainly makes this article a bit
lame in my opinion.  

The addition of a safety warning in the Canadian PI (if that is what
they are referring to) makes Canada and the US more alike, actually.  
I may be misunderstanding what is meant by "patient safety info
sheet"- perhaps in Canada statin scripts come with a specific patient
info sheet, like what is supposed to happen with Amiodorone or
dofetilide in the US.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.