Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Cardiology / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Quiting Statins up date

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
rrenaux@gmail.com - 13 Jan 2006 22:53 GMT
Hello,

Some time ago, back in Sept of 2004 I wrote here that I was going to
quit statins on my own since I could not reason with my doctor
regarding muscle weakness problems I had and their possible link to
statins.  Over a short period of time the muscles in my legs, back and
neck were getting weaker and weaker -- even while I was still
excercising 3 times a week.

I did quit zocor for about 6 months and started noticing some
improvement.  But it was very slow -- so slow I had to question my
decision.  After 6 months my doctor talked me into taking zocor again.
It took about two weeks for muscle problems to come back with a
vengence.  My neck became so sore and weak that I could hold it upright
only with great effort and not for very long.  I quit zocor again.

This time it's been about 9 months and I can notice significant
improvement.  I can walk better, and I can hold my head upright when
walking for extended periods -- that's something I haven't been able to
do for almost two years.

I agree with others who have told me that I'm taking a significant risk
by quiting the zocor, and I'm sure not recommending it to anyone
without the participation of a doctor.  I don't know yet if it's worth
the risk for me.  I just know that I'm finally getting better.

robre
Jason - 14 Jan 2006 02:21 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> robre

robre,
I think that you made the correct decision. I also stopped taking statins
due to the side effects. I suggest that you read this book. You should
start taking the alternatives to statins that are mentioned in the book:
"What You Must Know About Statin Drugs and Their Natural Alternatives"
by Jay S. Chohen, M.D.

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

rrenaux@gmail.com - 20 Jan 2006 16:27 GMT
I'm going to have to check that book out.  Thanks for the reference.

I've been hearing about a study that shows almost no benifit for
someone starting statins at my age anyway (just shy of 60).

I was absolutely amazed when my 82-year-old dad was in the hospital a
month ago for heart related problems and the doctor prescribed zocor
for him!!  Good grief!

robre
Sharon Hope - 14 Jan 2006 07:14 GMT
robre,

Congratulations on your improvement.

How unfortunate that your doctors caused you further harm by not heeding the
warnings of the NIH NHLBI, American Heart Association, and American College
of Cardiology to discontinue statins immediately upon symptoms of muscle
pain and weakness.

As you improve, please be cautious in keeping your level of exercise at a
very gradual increase.  If you begin to experience attacks of gout, back off
on the exertion.

The reason: If the statin did damage to the mitochondria within your muscle
tissue (cell walls), the muscle cells will not be fully capable of normal
respiration (OxPhos exchange).  As they become starved, some start to die
off (apoptosis).  There is a mechanism the body uses to halt muscle cell
die-off, it releases excess amounts of uric acid.  That stops the muscle
cell die off, but then the uric acid precipitates into very sharp crystals
and they settle with gravity, usually into the joints of the feet, but they
can go elsewhere.  This causes a severe rheumatism reaction, GOUT.

The gout is extremely painful in and of itself, and the rheumatologist might
assume you have eaten too much beef or other foots that typically cause
gout.  (and gout can be caused that way, of course)

However, if you have not consumed such food and the gout episodes follow
within 24 to 36 hours of our having engaged in some physical activity, be
certain to bring this to the doctor's attention.

By 'exertion' I'm not talking weight lifting or marathon running here,
something as slight as packing for a weekend-trip and lifting the bags into
the car, then out of the car at the destination can cause such a severe gout
reaction as to merit an emergency hospital visit in a person who has
sustained statin muscle damage.

Not much has been published on this phenomenon experienced by many
recovering statin-damaged patients, but several doctors have confirmed that
the relationship exists between gout and statin myopathy.

Best of luck in your continued improvement, and Happy New Year!

Sharon

References:

Dr. Graveline's website discussion of Gout and Statins
http://www.spacedoc.net/statins_gout.htm

From Pub Med:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra
ct&list_uids=15911208&query_hl=2&itool=pubmed_docsum

Clin Geriatr Med. 2005 Aug;21(3):577-88, vii.

Iatrogenic rheumatic syndromes in the elderly.

Quiceno GA, Cush JJ.

Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas, 8200 Walnut Hill Lane, Dallas, TX
75231-4496, USA.

Rheumatic complaints are common in the geriatric population. However,
uncommonly autoimmune or musculoskeletal complaints and disorders may arise
as a consequence of pharmacotherapy. These rare events include statin
myopathy, drug-induced lupus, arthralgias, vasculitis, or tight skin
syndromes. This article will discuss the possible iatrogenic causes of
rheumatic conditions, potential inciting agents, and the various types of
rheumatic manifestations seen in the elderly.

Publication Types:
 a.. Review

PMID: 15911208 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra
ct&list_uids=15914514&query_hl=6&itool=pubmed_docsum

Ann Pharmacother. 2005 Jul-Aug;39(7-8):1358-61. Epub 2005 May 24.

Acute myopathy in a patient with concomitant use of pravastatin and
colchicine.

Alayli G, Cengiz K, Canturk F, Durmus D, Akyol Y, Menekse EB.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical Faculty, Ondokuz
Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey. alayli70@yahoo.com

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of acute myopathy after concomitant use of
colchicine and pravastatin. CASE SUMMARY: A 65-year-old woman was admitted
to the hospital with an acute episode of gout. She had been taking
pravastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 years. On admission, blood urea nitrogen
and serum creatinine levels were 48 mg/dL and 1.3 mg/dL, respectively.
Colchicine 1.5 mg/day was added to the treatment regimen, but 20 days after
the initiation of colchicine therapy, symmetrical proximal muscle weakness
developed in the woman's legs. Physical examination, laboratory findings,
and electromyelogram findings suggested myopathy. The Naranjo probability
scale indicated a probable relationship between myopathy and combined
therapy. Seven days after discontinuation of colchicine and pravastatin, the
patient's weakness improved and enzyme levels returned to normal. Colchicine
was restarted at 1.0 mg/day 5 days later; no myopathy occurred. DISCUSSION:
Hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) and
colchicine are known to cause myopathy. Most of the statins and colchicine
are biotransformed in the liver primarily by the CYP3A4 system, which may
increase the risk of myopathy when concurrent therapy is used. However,
pravastatin is not primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 isoenzymes. The
cause of myopathy in our patient may be related to the interaction of
colchicine and pravastatin via P-glycoprotein. In addition, the presence of
mild renal dysfunction could have contributed to the development of
myopathy. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that clinicians be aware that
neuromuscular toxicity can occur in patients with mild renal dysfunction
with combined use of colchicine and pravastatin.

Publication Types:
 a.. Case Reports

PMID: 15914514 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> robre
rrenaux@gmail.com - 20 Jan 2006 16:47 GMT
Thanks for that info, Sharon.  I'd never heard that before.  I've been
starting exercise again, but I've been limping into it.  I'm still
pretty tickled about being able to walk through the grocery store and
being able to stand up straight.

robre
Javier - 20 Jan 2006 18:21 GMT
I'm going to have to talk to my dr about dropping Vytorin. However,
what else can be done to keep my cholesterol in check? It's not a diet
issue it's genetic.
Jason - 22 Jan 2006 02:42 GMT
> I'm going to have to talk to my dr about dropping Vytorin. However,
> what else can be done to keep my cholesterol in check? It's not a diet
> issue it's genetic.

I suggest that you read this book and start taking the alternatives
mentioned in the book:

"WHAT YOU MUST KNOW ABOUT STATIN DRUGS AND THEIR NATURAL ALTERNATIVES"
by Jay S. Cohen, M.D.

I only wish that I had read the above book before taking statins. I had to
stop taking statins due to the side effects.

Signature

NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.

Hawki63@sbcglobal.net - 22 Jan 2006 05:26 GMT
>> I'm going to have to talk to my dr about dropping Vytorin. However,
>> what else can be done to keep my cholesterol in check? It's not a diet
>> issue it's genetic.
>
> I suggest that you read this book and start taking the alternatives
> mentioned in the book:

I suggest you discuss the options with your health care provider

> "WHAT YOU MUST KNOW ABOUT STATIN DRUGS AND THEIR NATURAL ALTERNATIVES"
> by Jay S. Cohen, M.D.
>
> I only wish that I had read the above book before taking statins. I had to
> stop taking statins due to the side effects.
listener - 22 Jan 2006 18:02 GMT
jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote in news:jason-2101061843190001@66-52-22-
14.lsan.pw-dia.impulse.net:

>> I'm going to have to talk to my dr about dropping Vytorin. However,
>> what else can be done to keep my cholesterol in check? It's not a diet
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I only wish that I had read the above book before taking statins. I had to
> stop taking statins due to the side effects.

Actually, you took statins (2 different ones) for about three months
concurrent with taking Red Yeast Rice capsules (already a mistake),
experienced some muscle pain which quickly dissipated when you stopped and
subsequently diagnosed yourself with "memory problems" which you used as a
reason to (somewhat hastily IMO, based on a self-diagnosis) quit your job.

L.
Larry - 14 Jan 2006 15:14 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> robre

Any sense in trying other statins? Or was Zocor not the first one you
were on? I understand the side affects can differ from statin to statin
and individual to individual.

Larry E
Hawki63@sbcglobal.net - 14 Jan 2006 19:34 GMT
>> Hello,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> on? I understand the side affects can differ from statin to statin and
> individual to individual.

many have side effects with one...and not on another

my hubby started Lipitor after his MI and stent...got terrible muscle
pains...doc stopped it...of course lipids went right back up.....2 months
later started him on Pravachol....5 years later...no repeat problems with
Pravachol..and lipids are lovely...

YMMV

> Larry E
Sharon Hope - 14 Jan 2006 20:56 GMT
Exactly, the dosage is also significant in the likelihood of severe
disabling statin AEs.

Hawki didn't mention the dosage her husband was on for either drug, but an
80 mg/day dose of Pravachol is less potent than a 10 mg/day dose of Lipitor.
There are huge differences in the potency (dose effects) per mg across the
statin class of drugs.

In other words, a patient would need to take more than the maximum
recommended dose of Pravachol to get a dose similar to the weakest available
Lipitor dose.  BTW, Zocor 20 mg/day is a higher dosage than Pravachol 80
mg/day.

ref:
http://www.drugdigest.org/DD/Comparison/NewComparison/0,10621,37-15,00.html

>>> Hello,
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
>> Larry E
Don Kirkman - 15 Jan 2006 01:00 GMT
It seems to me I heard somewhere that <Hawki63@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
article <wncyf.2839$nT6.241@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>:

>>> Hello,

>>> Some time ago, back in Sept of 2004 I wrote here that I was going to
>>> quit statins on my own since I could not reason with my doctor
>>> regarding muscle weakness problems I had and their possible link to
>>> statins.  Over a short period of time the muscles in my legs, back and
>>> neck were getting weaker and weaker -- even while I was still
>>> excercising 3 times a week.

>>> I did quit zocor for about 6 months and started noticing some
>>> improvement.  But it was very slow -- so slow I had to question my
>>> decision.  After 6 months my doctor talked me into taking zocor again.
>>> It took about two weeks for muscle problems to come back with a
>>> vengence.  My neck became so sore and weak that I could hold it upright
>>> only with great effort and not for very long.  I quit zocor again.

>>> This time it's been about 9 months and I can notice significant
>>> improvement.  I can walk better, and I can hold my head upright when
>>> walking for extended periods -- that's something I haven't been able to
>>> do for almost two years.

>>> I agree with others who have told me that I'm taking a significant risk
>>> by quiting the zocor, and I'm sure not recommending it to anyone
>>> without the participation of a doctor.  I don't know yet if it's worth
>>> the risk for me.  I just know that I'm finally getting better.

>> Any sense in trying other statins? Or was Zocor not the first one you were
>> on? I understand the side affects can differ from statin to statin and
>> individual to individual.

>many have side effects with one...and not on another

>my hubby started Lipitor after his MI and stent...got terrible muscle
>pains...doc stopped it...of course lipids went right back up.....2 months
>later started him on Pravachol....5 years later...no repeat problems with
>Pravachol..and lipids are lovely...

OTOH, I was started on Pravachol and its effects were too weak to help,
so my doctor changed me to Lipitor and within a short time raised the
dose to 80mg.  That was over seven years ago and I have had no problems
with muscles or liver function or mental agility (any of those three
could be attributed to age in my case, if they were present).
Signature

Don Kirkman

Hawki63@sbcglobal.net - 15 Jan 2006 23:47 GMT
> It seems to me I heard somewhere that <Hawki63@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
> article <wncyf.2839$nT6.241@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>:
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> with muscles or liver function or mental agility (any of those three
> could be attributed to age in my case, if they were present).

yes...should have mentioned that I too started on pravachol...not much lipid
reducing..but no side effects...then switched to Lipitor...LDL to 100..also
no side effects ...both of us are on pretty low doses as well
Sharon Hope - 14 Jan 2006 20:26 GMT
Larry,

the rate of reoccurrence of statin adverse effects when a patient is
rechallenged by a statin is quite high, regardless of brand.  All are HMG Co
A Reductase Inhibitors, after all.

Also, the higher the dosage, the more likely the AEs (net dosage, not mg of
a brand - Jay Cohen's book is a good source for equivalence of dose across
brand).  That is true for damage by the initial statin and for damage by
rechallenge statin.  Be aware, however, (also from Cohen's book) that the
lowest starting dosage is too high for 50% of the target patient population.

Be aware, too, that there is a diminishing capability for recovery when
there is statin damage.  For example, the highest degree of recovery from
statin cognitive damage seems to be 80% of the pre-statin capability.  Thus,
on rechallenge, the greatest recovery that can be hoped for is 80% of the
remaining 80%.  In other words, a patient who suffers statin cognitive
adverse effects on a first and then a second statin can - at the VERY BEST
RECOVERY POSSIBLE - hope to be left with only 64% of his original cognitive
abilities.

This is from a presentation of study findings that was delivered verbally at
a conference - not linkable via the net.

Similar results also were given for statin re-challenge for the other 2 most
common adverse effects, muscle damage and nerve damage.

In the case of muscle & nerve damage, there were higher rates of AE on third
rechallenge.

In the case of cognitive adverse effects from statins, not one of those
patients left with only 64% or less of their normal cognitive ability (that
is the max recovery, not all achieve the max) was willing to chance going on
a third statin, so there are no numbers for that.

>> Hello,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> Larry E
William Wagner - 14 Jan 2006 21:20 GMT
I've said it before here.  I was given Zocor  10 then a higher dose.  
Still lipid were  flat ( no Change.) Then Lipitor 40  no change, then my
cradio guy's nurse said lipitor 80.  Well after four years of no change
my muscle  calf went to 14 from 18 inches.  Aches and joint pain too.
Still weak by my standards and ldl is  160.   HDL however with niacin
was ~70.

I am currently working on lowering BP and increasing lung capacity  and
muscle growth.  I also ordered 65 calediums  for spring planting  and
was about trimming hardwood plants  today.

No more drugs for me  a secondary kind of guy.  CABG 4  

Bill

Signature

Garden Shade Zone 5 S Jersey USA
This article is posted under fair use rules in accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and is strictly for the educational
and informative purposes. This material is distributed without profit.
Vision Problems?  Look at http://www.ocutech.com/ ~us$1500

Larry - 15 Jan 2006 05:27 GMT
> Larry,
>
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
>>
>>Larry E

Thanks for the info, Sharon. Everyone knows that Statins (along with
lots of other drugs) can have adverse effects. The PDR is full of them.
I was merely pointing out to the OP that everyone is an individual, that
different drugs affect different individuals differently, that in some
cases one can have no or minimal adverse effects from one drug and not
from others in the same class of drugs, and that another statin might be
worth a try.

Larry E.
eldred30@linkamerica.net - 14 Jan 2006 19:56 GMT
If you are concerned about risk by not taking a statin, then you should
read:

http://www.second-opinions.co.uk/mislead.html

When you are through, then you might want to click on the "Fats,
chloresterol and heart disease" link on the bottom of the page.

eldred
Sharon Hope - 14 Jan 2006 20:37 GMT
And the risks of disabling statin AEs, muscle damage, chronic pain, nerve
damage, cognitive damage, short-term memory loss, amnesia, aphasia, retinal
damage, kidney and liver damage need to be considered, too, in going for a
96.8% chance of surviving with statin treatment, when comparing against a
96% likelihood of surviving with no treatment at all.

> If you are concerned about risk by not taking a statin, then you should
> read:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> eldred
Bill - 14 Jan 2006 22:12 GMT
> And the risks of disabling statin AEs, muscle damage, chronic pain, nerve
> damage, cognitive damage, short-term memory loss, amnesia, aphasia, retinal
> damage, kidney and liver damage need to be considered, too, in going for a
> 96.8% chance of surviving with statin treatment, when comparing against a
> 96% likelihood of surviving with no treatment at all.

The article had no such statistics for statins. In the long run there is no
difference between the two - 100% death rate. Thus it is important to give the
time period to which the statistics apply - which the author did not do. In
the absence of that, relative risk reduction is important. Improvements in
areas other than death - such as lower number of strokes - are also important.

Bill

>> If you are concerned about risk by not taking a statin, then you should
>> read:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>
>> eldred
eml - 14 Jan 2006 22:43 GMT
how can relative risk reduction be so important?  what is the absolute
risk reduction?
Bill - 15 Jan 2006 00:12 GMT
> how can relative risk reduction be so important?  what is the absolute
> risk reduction?

Because they don't give you a time period. For example, if you know that
taking this pill improves your chance of staying alive by .5% (absolute) over
the next 1 year that is a very good deal. If it is over 20 years it does not
sound as good. In the absence of anything else, if you know it halves your
risk of dieing, that helps.

Bill
Javier - 16 Jan 2006 00:43 GMT
Robre,

I've been on Vytorin for seven months now and I've heard about these
muscle soreness issues. Can you please tell me if there is a difference
between the muscle sorness I feel after my usual workouts and those
caused by statins?

I'm glad you're feeling better.

Javier
rrenaux@gmail.com - 20 Jan 2006 16:23 GMT
You know I never had a lot of pain.  For me it was like when you work a
muscle to the point where it can barely function.  I had it especially
bad in my legs at first.  I went from walking 1 to 2 miles a day to
where my legs were just completely gone after three blocks.  The last
place it hit was in my upper back and neck.  I literally could not hold
the weight of my head up.  Sitting in a chair I would have to prop my
chin on a crooked arm.

But, the orginal question was about pain.  Like I said, my reaction was
more about weaknes than it was about pain, and any pain that I did have
went away when I was not using the muscle.  I've heard lots of people,
though, talk about terrible pain in their hands and knees.

robre
Sharon Hope - 21 Jan 2006 04:59 GMT
The pain seems to be a mixture of muscle damage and peripheral neuropathy
(several studies have established that statins cause peripheral neuropathy
and polyneuropathy, most notably those by Dr. Gaist).

The muscle weakness - barely functioning - tends to be due to mitochondrial
damage that interferes with the muscle cells' ability to exchange oxygen and
electrons - cellular respiration.  Our lungs 'breathe' for us, but that
oxygen gets carried to the cells and the mitochondria in the cell walls are
what lets the cell breathe.

You are not alone in this - see, for example, very very similar descriptions
by patients like you in the reprint of the Smart Money Magazine article, the
Lipitor Dilemma, by Eleanor Laise:
http://www.n3inc.com/SmartMoneyReprint_103003Web.pdf
I think you will be astonished to see how much like you these people
described their statin muscle effects.  One said, "I couldn't hold a fork to
eat a meal."

Muscle cells contain approximately 20 minutes worth of energy (ATP).  Once
that is expended, the Ox-Phos cycle kicks in and energy is replenished via
the exchange of oxygen and electrons through a healthy mitochondria. (the
runners' call this getting a second wind)  Coenzyme Q10 is something that is
normally manufactured by the body and essential to healthy cell walls (and
it fulfills many other essential roles in the body).  The statins (HMG CoA
Reductase Inhibitors) interrupt this processing and prevent the body from
creating CoQ10, causing a deficiency.

This statin mitochondrial damage to skeletal muscle cells can be verified by
a muscle biopsy, and has been documented by Dr. Phillips and others.

In the case of statin myopathy (muscle damage, muscle pain, muscle wasting,
weakness, with or without elevated CK), the cell is damaged enough that once
the ATP is depleted the cell begins to break down and die (apoptosis).  That
releases toxins into the system and enough of this can cause the kidneys and
liver to fail (rhabdomyolysis).

So, the pain and the muscle weakness can be combined from one cause, or can
appear independently if the pain is more from neurological damage and the
weakness is more from the muscle damage.

So glad you are on the mend.

> You know I never had a lot of pain.  For me it was like when you work a
> muscle to the point where it can barely function.  I had it especially
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> robre
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.