I'm reading a book related to understanding blood test results.
What's the "expected range" or "reference" for
Urine Potassium?
Thanks in advance

Signature
NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.
> I'm reading a book related to understanding blood test results.
> What's the "expected range" or "reference" for
> Urine Potassium?
>
> Thanks in advance
Seeing that it can be related to SMC in terms of diuretic use in K sparing
or not then I am game for it.
There use to be reference ranges for 24 hr collection specimens that were
dependent on diet and on adequate collection.
In normal individuals made hypokalemic by K deprivation K urine levels are
as low as 10-15 mmol/day.
In hyperkalemia values as high as 400 mmol/day have been noted.
Normal 60-80 mmol/day
24 hr collection are rarely done anymore.
Measurement of urine K by itself is of limited use as it reflects the
K/water ratio so in order to interpret that then the volume or the urine
osmolality or the K to creatinine ratio is used.
For random specimens usually under 20 Meq/L is K retention and over that
amount is K excretion by the kidneys.
Normal 6-8 mmol/mmol creatinine
Hypokalemia 1-1.5 mmol/mmol/creatinine
Hyperkalemia 10-15 mmol/mmol/creatinine
The fractional excretion of K Fe(K) can be used in which simultaneous urine
and blood levels of K can be used in a formula but then it would have to be
evaluated using a nomogram.
One can also use the sodium/potassium ration as an index for
mineralcorticoid action in the presence of a normal intake of sodium.
Finally you have the TTKG or the Transtubular K Gradient which looks at the
= Kurine/(urine/plasma)osmolality/Kplasma
In hypokalemia the TTKG is under 2 and in hyperkalemia it is greater than
10.
The common thread in all of this is that K is under homeostatic control and
if one is hypokalemic then an appropriated urine response should follow and
so forth with hyperkalemia.
If it does not match that response then it is a clue to the origin of the
abnormality. There is no "normal" range because of homeostasis.
One needs to order a urine K when investigating a low or high K blood level.
If you have a low K blood level then your urine should be conserving or
retaining urine K leading to a low urine K level.
If you have a high blood K level then the urine should be high in K
indicating excretion.
A person with a low blood K and a high K urine level indicates inappropriate
K handling as with the action of a diuretic or abnormal hormonal levels.
Jason - 30 Sep 2005 22:39 GMT
> > I'm reading a book related to understanding blood test results.
> > What's the "expected range" or "reference" for
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
> A person with a low blood K and a high K urine level indicates inappropriate
> K handling as with the action of a diuretic or abnormal hormonal levels.
Thanks for your post. I made a hard copy and will study it later. I now
understand why the doctor that wrote the book did not state the "expected
range" in relation to K like he did with many other subjects such as
Glucose and calcium. Keep up the great work.
Jason

Signature
NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.