Medical Forum / General / Cardiology / January 2005
Is Plavix Really Better Than Aspirin?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Peter Rogers - 26 Jan 2005 21:53 GMT I had a quadruple bypass four years ago.
On September 19, I was diagnosed with a probable TIA (mini stroke) and was prescribed Plavix as well as the aspirin I've been taking for four years. y GP stopped that a few days afterwards.
Some weeks later, after a complications and a (private) MRI scan, the diagnosis changed to a haemorrhagic stroke.
I think it's a dangerous drug combination for anyone with risk factors for stroke.
Peter
William Wagner - 26 Jan 2005 22:24 GMT > I had a quadruple bypass four years ago. > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Peter Hang in here Peter. I?m with you, check with your Doc?s like you haven?t already. Plavix just seems too high tech for this stupid guy.
Bill who just shoveled out his drive way, about 180 feet in 4 degree F. Ah... That which does not kill me comes to mind.
?I had a quadruple bypass four years ago? Me to!!!! Sucks
Such is the way it is. Hope your drugs treat you well!
Bill Wagner
 Signature Zone 5 S Jersey USA Shade Serious Vision Problems like Starghart?s ? --> http://www.ocutech.com/
Zee - 27 Jan 2005 00:13 GMT > I had a quadruple bypass four years ago. > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Peter Plavix may not be your problem. If you are taking a statin (Lipitor, Crestor or Zocor are the most commonly prescribed) take note of these adverse events in the clinical trials. Click on the links and each opens to a clincial trial.
Statins, stroke, brain:
Subchronic toxicity of atorvastatin, a hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, in beagle dogs.
"...hemorrhage in gallbladder and brain, demyelination of optic nerve,..."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8 864188&dopt=Abstract
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dr. Beatrice Golomb Statin Adverse Effects: "...the large trials enrolled people at high risk for cardiovascular disease who experience benefit from statins to nonfatal stroke... {however}...there are trends toward increases in fatal stroke with statins in most of the large statin trials,..."
http://www.geriatrictimes.com/g040618.html
Pasternak RC, Smith SC, Bairey-Merz CN et al. (2002), ACC/AHA/NHLBI Clinical Advisory on the Use and Safety of Statins. Stroke 33(9):2337-2341 [see comment].
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Preclinical safety evaluation of cerivastatin, a novel HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor.
"In dogs, the species most sensitive to statins, cerivastatin caused erosions and hemorrhages in the gastrointestinal tract, bleeding in the brain stem with fibroiddegeneration of vessel walls in the choroid plexus, and lens opacity."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9 737641&dopt=Abstract
Jim Chinnis - 27 Jan 2005 00:41 GMT "Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part:
>"...hemorrhage in gallbladder and brain, demyelination of optic >nerve,..." From the abstract: "hepatocellular degeneration, centrilobular bridging, cholecystitis, hemorrhage in gallbladder and brain, demyelination of optic nerve, and skeletal muscle necrosis at > or = 280 mg/kg".
That dose is about 19,090 mg for a person weighing 150 lb (68 kg). That's 1,909 pills per day for me.
I'll be careful not to take 6 years supply at one time.
You know, at that dosage, the liver was basically kaput. The liver affects just about everything, so i wouldn't try to use that result in poisoned dogs to increase fear of a brain hemorrhage, etc., etc. -- Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA
Zee - 27 Jan 2005 00:53 GMT > "Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part: > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > -- > Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA Not one of those injured, including me, took that amount. Still, we were injured. If it is not metabolized properly, for whatever reason, who knows how much is actually floating around in my system? I ate a Seville orange, had a glass of grapefruit juice, already had liver problems (from my statins use?) drank alcohol, took other medications concurrently....
It happened. Even in very controlled clincial trial circumstances it happened. Life isn't like a clinical trial.
Zee
Jim Chinnis - 27 Jan 2005 01:17 GMT "Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part:
>> "Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part: >> [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > >Zee Ah, but the controlled trials data don't seem to support more than a negligible cognitive loss in a very few trial-retrial measures.
What you have are case reports. Hard to interpret. -- Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA
Zee - 27 Jan 2005 01:34 GMT And why? Because negative trials were suppressed, negative data withheld, no one can get enough money for the kind of trial you will pay attention to?
You tell Peter to wait until they can be interpreted.
I, in the meantime, will be warning him. And others.
Because see, I wouldn't want him to be one being slammed because he was too stupid to stop when there were danger signs.
C'est moi.
Zee
Jim Chinnis - 27 Jan 2005 01:47 GMT "Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part:
>And why? Because negative trials were suppressed, negative data >withheld, no one can get enough money for the kind of trial you will >pay attention to? There have been some huge trials that have looked at cognitive effects. Nada. There could be even better trials, and probably there should and will be.
I pay attention to the clinical trials--very close attention! What am I ignoring?
>You tell Peter to wait until they can be interpreted. Plavix is known to cause hemorrhagic stroke; it should, in fact; it's a balancing act--fewer ischemic strokes, more hemorrhagic strokes.
>I, in the meantime, will be warning him. And others. Tell him not to take a lifetime's supply of a statin at one time.
>Because see, I wouldn't want him to be one being slammed because he >was too stupid to stop when there were danger signs. That's fair. I say what I think, too.
>C'est moi. > >Zee -- Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA
Zee - 27 Jan 2005 02:02 GMT There were haemorragic strokes in people too in one of the trials. And then, we do not know, you are right. But I have heard Peter's story over and over and over.
And Plavix and a statin together?
Here. Just for you Jim.
Grapefruit statins, P450 (other drugs, foods, illness and conditions) Further on the impaired metabolism of drugs, including statins (excepting pravastatin).
Nurses Study http://firstword.pslgroup.com/sn.do?pu=1&idö74F5FE75F118C185256F1D00135BCC&mains rc=/LoadMedicalNews.do?contentid80998
DGNews Grapefruit Juice and Medication Can Be a Deadly Mix ROCHESTER, NY -- January 18, 2005 -
-----snip-------
Amy Karch, R.N., M.S., of the School of Nursing at the University of Rochester Medical Center reported on a man from a northern climate who moved to Florida for the winter -- one of tens of thousands of "snowbirds" who head south each winter -- and began drinking two to three glasses of grapefruit juice each day. Two months later the man died, the victim of a deadly interaction between grapefruit juice and his cholesterol-lowering medication.
The patient profiled in Karch's article had high cholesterol and other risk factors for cardiac disease. The doctor put the patient on atorvastatin (Lipitor), and the patient began dieting and exercising. Two months after the patient went to Florida for the winter, he suddenly had muscle pain, fatigue and fever, and went to the emergency room. The patient ended up going into kidney failure and ultimately died.
---------snip---------.
Karch, an expert on drug interactions, explains that grapefruit juice is one of the foods most likely to cause problems with drugs, because it is metabolized by the same enzyme in the liver that breaks down many drugs. The cytochrome P-450 3A4 enzyme breaks down grapefruit
juice into useful components for body, just like it breaks down dozens of medications. Karch says when the system is overloaded, the grapefruit juice can "swamp" the system, keeping the liver busy and blocking it from breaking down drugs and other substances.
Drugs that use the same pathway and interact with grapefruit juice target some of the most common health problems doctors see today. The list consists of more than 50 medications, including some drugs used to treat high cholesterol, depression, high blood pressure, cancer, pain, impotence, and allergies.
-------snip---------
A heart patient might not get the lowered blood pressure that a medication should deliver, or the heart's rhythms might become irregular if an anti-arrhythmia drug can't do its job.
The most severe effects are likely with some cholesterol-lowering medications, Karch says. While the liver devotes its resources to grapefruit juice, the medication can build up to dangerous levels, causing a breakdown of the body's muscles and even kidney failure. This is what happened to the patient discussed in the article.
Drugs that Interact with Grapefruit Juice:
(from the December 2004 issue of the American Journal of Nursing)
Antibiotics: clarithromycin, erythromycin, troleandomycin
Anxiolytics: alprazolam, buspirone, midazolam, triazolam
Antiarrhythmics: amiodarone, quinidine
Anticoagulant: warfarin
Antiepileptic: carbamazepine
Antifungal: itraconazole
Anthelmintic: albendazole
Antihistamine: fexofenadine
Antineoplastics: cyclophosphamide, etoposide, ifosfamide, tamoxifen, vinblastine, vincristine
Antitussive: dextromethorphan
Antivirals: amprenavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir
Benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment: finasteride
â-blockers: carvedilol
Calcium channel blockers: diltiazem, felodipine, nicardipine, nifedipine, nimodipine, nisoldipine, verapamil
Erectile dysfunction drugs: sildenafil, tadalafil
Hormone replacement: cortisol, estradiol, methylprednisolone, progesterone, testosterone
Immunosuppressants: cyclosporine, sirolimus, tacrolimus
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, simvastatin
Opioids: alfentanil, fentanyl, sufentanil
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: fluvoxamine, sertraline
Xanthine: theophylline
SOURCE: University of Rochester Medical Center
http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/167/3/279?maxtoshow=&HITS&hits&RESULTFORMA T=&fulltext=grapefruit+juice+drug+interactions&andorexactfulltext=and&searchid0 6787840721_5561&stored_search=&FIRSTINDEX=0&sortspec=relevance&resourcetype=1&jo urnalcode=cmaj
~~~~~~~~~~ "The interaction: As little as 250 mL of grapefruit juice can change the metabolism of some drugs.3 This drug-food interaction occurs because of a common pathway involving a specific isoform of cytochrome P450 - CYP3A4 - present in both the liver and the intestinal wall. Studies suggest that grapefruit juice exerts its effect primarily at the level of the intestine.4 Ater ingestion, a substrate contained in the grapefruit binds to the intestinal isoenzyme, impairing first-pass metabolism directly and causing a sustained decrease in CYP3A4 protein expression.5 Within 4 hours of ingestion, a reduction in the effective CYP3A4 concentration occurs, with effects lasting up to 24 hours.6 The net result is inhibition of drug metabolism in the intestine and increased oral bioavailability. Because of the prolonged response, separating the intake of the drug and the juice does not prevent interference.
Individuals express CYP3A4 in different proportions, those with the highest intestinal concentration being most susceptible to grapefruit juice-drug interactions.5 An effect is seen with the whole fruit as well as its juice, so caution should be exercised with both.7 The precise chemical compound in grapefruit that causes the interaction has not been identified. There is no similar reaction with orange juice, although there is some suspicion that "sour oranges" such as the Seville variety, may have some effect.8 A recent study, however, that tested the known interference of grapefruit juice with cyclosporine showed no similar effect with Seville oranges.9
There is some interest in the potential therapeutic benefit of adding grapefruit juice to a drug regimen to increase oral bioavailability.3 The limitation is the individual variation in patient response. However, if the chemical that causes grapefruit's CYP3A4 inhibition is elucidated, there may be an opportunity to modulate that pathway in a controlled fashion.
What to do: Much of the data obtained on grapefruit juice-drug interactions involved measuring serum drug concentrations in small numbers of healthy volunteers. Because of the limited data and only occasional case reports,10 it is difficult to quantify the clinical significance for individual patients. One may assume that the interaction occurs primarily with oral medicines, and only with those that share the CYP3A4 metabolism pathway, with the consequence being increased oral bioavailability, higher serum drug concentrations and associated adverse effects.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Don Kirkman - 28 Jan 2005 00:50 GMT It seems to me I heard somewhere that Zee wrote in article <1106791328.581648.38590@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>:
>There were haemorragic strokes in people too in one of the trials. And >then, we do not know, you are right. But I have heard Peter's story >over and over and over.
>And Plavix and a statin together?
>Here. Just for you Jim. [Major snippage has happened]
>Grapefruit statins, P450 (other drugs, foods, illness and conditions) >Further on the impaired metabolism of drugs, including statins >(excepting pravastatin).
>Nurses Study >http://firstword.pslgroup.com/sn.do?pu=1&id=F674F5FE75F118C185256F1D00135BCC&mai nsrc=/LoadMedicalNews.do?contentid=1080998
>DGNews >Grapefruit Juice and Medication Can Be a Deadly Mix >ROCHESTER, NY -- January 18, 2005 -
>-----snip-------
>Amy Karch, R.N., M.S., of the School of Nursing at the >University of Rochester Medical Center reported on a man from a [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >his >cholesterol-lowering medication.
>The patient profiled in Karch's article had high >cholesterol and other risk factors for cardiac disease. The doctor put [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >room. The patient ended up going into kidney failure and ultimately >died.
>Karch, an expert on drug interactions, explains that ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>grapefruit juice is one of the foods most likely to cause problems with ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>drugs, >because it is metabolized by the same enzyme in the liver that breaks >down many drugs. The cytochrome P-450 3A4 enzyme breaks down grapefruit
>juice into useful components for body, just like it breaks down dozens >of medications. Karch says when the system is overloaded, the >grapefruit ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>juice can "swamp" the system, keeping the liver busy and blocking it ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>from >breaking down drugs and other substances.
>Drugs that use the same pathway and interact with ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>grapefruit juice target some of the most common health problems doctors ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>see today. The list consists of more than 50 medications, including >some drugs used to treat high cholesterol, depression, high blood >pressure, cancer, >pain, impotence, and allergies. [. . .]
>~~~~~~~~~~ >"The interaction: As little as 250 mL of grapefruit juice can change ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>the metabolism of some drugs.3 This drug-food interaction occurs ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>because of a common pathway involving a specific isoform of cytochrome >P450 - CYP3A4 - present in both the liver and the intestinal wall. >Studies suggest that grapefruit juice exerts its effect primarily at >the level of the intestine.4 [. . .]
>What to do: Much of the data obtained on grapefruit juice-drug >interactions involved measuring serum drug concentrations in small [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >increased oral bioavailability, higher serum drug concentrations and >associated adverse effects. As has been discussed before in smc and in the media, grapefruit and grapefruit juice can be dangerous when taken with some medications. This article explains the danger and reinforces the warnings that are already out in public.
 Signature Don "I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use. --Galileo Galilei
Zee - 28 Jan 2005 02:18 GMT > It seems to me I heard somewhere that Zee wrote in article > <1106791328.581648.38590@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>: [quoted text clipped - 97 lines] > This article explains the danger and reinforces the warnings that are > already out in public. Indeed it does Donny me boy. The purpose of posting it *now*, in all its redundancy, was to show Chinnis Esq. that there are many things that can come between your statin and your busy, busy P450; including any of those drugs you may be taking concurrently. With, or without, grapefruit, Seville oranges, tangelos, pomelos, and maybe kumquats.
And because the article was new, and several posters to the group are. Too. I thought to post it. All.
Zee
> -- > Don > "I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed > us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their > use. --Galileo Galilei Jim Chinnis - 28 Jan 2005 02:41 GMT "Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part:
>Indeed it does Donny me boy. The purpose of posting it *now*, in all >its redundancy, was to show Chinnis Esq. that there are many things [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >And because the article was new, and several posters to the group are. >Too. I thought to post it. All. I have no problem at all with Zee posting all that stuff. I think most people here who aren't aware of it (like the physicians) will benefit from it.
I simply feel that the issue behind this thread is that plavix (clopidogrel) was prescribed for someone and it resulted in a hemorrhagic stroke. Any statin influence was probably nil.
Actually, there's a recent analysis of this exact cytochrome p450 interaction: http://tinyurl.com/5auow -- Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA
Zee - 28 Jan 2005 03:07 GMT > "Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part: > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > (clopidogrel) was prescribed for someone and it resulted in a > hemorrhagic stroke. Any statin influence was probably nil. You do not know that Jim. Where is your evidence that clopidogrel was causal? The hemorrhagic stroke did happen after he began dosing with clopidogrel but it was also after the he started dosing with Lipitor.
Do you have evidence to show which was causative? Or *if* either was causative? The study you cite says "may" and "no significant" and "suggests"; all those words you to which you take such umbrage in another (related) context.
Zee
> Actually, there's a recent analysis of this exact cytochrome p450 > interaction: http://tinyurl.com/5auow > -- > Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA Jim Chinnis - 28 Jan 2005 03:20 GMT "Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part:
>> I simply feel that the issue behind this thread is that plavix >> (clopidogrel) was prescribed for someone and it resulted in a [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >"suggests"; all those words you to which you take such umbrage in >another (related) context. Huh? Of course we are talking probabilities. I of all people have no problem with that. The danger of plavix is hemorrhage; that's very well established.
Blaming the stroke on Lipitor instead of Plavix is like finding someone with a bullet through his head and saying that his hemorrhage may have been caused by the red wine he drank earlier in the evening, rather than by the bullet through his brainstem. Or arguing that the hemorrhage that killed him was really due not so much to the bullet as to the interaction of the wine and the bullet.
Nonsense, probabilities not withstanding. -- Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA
Don Kirkman - 28 Jan 2005 21:29 GMT It seems to me I heard somewhere that Jim Chinnis wrote in article <939jv0h9rn1gc65jft2ue7cs91iukjduek@4ax.com>:
>"Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part:
>>Indeed it does Donny me boy. The purpose of posting it *now*, in all >>its redundancy, was to show Chinnis Esq. that there are many things >>that can come between your statin and your busy, busy P450; including >>any of those drugs you may be taking concurrently. With, or without, >>grapefruit, Seville oranges, tangelos, pomelos, and maybe kumquats.
>>And because the article was new, and several posters to the group are. >>Too. I thought to post it. All.
>I have no problem at all with Zee posting all that stuff. I think most >people here who aren't aware of it (like the physicians) will benefit >from it. Nor do I, Jim. I was putting her post together with what she had written earlier about Plavix
"Not one of those injured, including me, took that amount. Still, we were injured. If it is not metabolized properly, for whatever reason, who knows how much is actually floating around in my system? I ate a Seville orange, had a glass of grapefruit juice, already had liver problems (from my statins use?) drank alcohol, took other medications concurrently...."
and noted that grapefruit juice was part of the diet, from which I infer that it's hard to blame Plavix alone (or statins mutatis mutandis) for the results without considering the effects of grapefruit juice (and perhaps the alcohol?).
>I simply feel that the issue behind this thread is that plavix >(clopidogrel) was prescribed for someone and it resulted in a >hemorrhagic stroke. Any statin influence was probably nil.
>Actually, there's a recent analysis of this exact cytochrome p450 >interaction: http://tinyurl.com/5auow  Signature Don "I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use. --Galileo Galilei
Zee - 28 Jan 2005 22:47 GMT > It seems to me I heard somewhere that Jim Chinnis wrote in article > <939jv0h9rn1gc65jft2ue7cs91iukjduek@4ax.com>: [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > the results without considering the effects of grapefruit juice (and > perhaps the alcohol?). What I was trying to say: Hard to blame anything alone because apparently all those things, and some I didn't mention affect that P450. So who takes only a statin without also taking some of the others perhaps? Our OP was taking a statin AND plavix.
None of that list applies to me. I was using the personal pronoun for effect. But I did it badly, apparently, and confused some people. Mea Culpa.
Zee
> >I simply feel that the issue behind this thread is that plavix > >(clopidogrel) was prescribed for someone and it resulted in a [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their > use. --Galileo Galilei Steve Marcus - 29 Jan 2005 15:54 GMT >> It seems to me I heard somewhere that Jim Chinnis wrote in article >> <939jv0h9rn1gc65jft2ue7cs91iukjduek@4ax.com>: [quoted text clipped - 47 lines] > > Zee Even though not directed to me, I'll take your last three sentences as an apology, since I have been attacked by you after raising the the issue with you first.
And I'll note for the record:
I'm taking Plavix, *and* aspirin *and* coumadin, along with a statin, a combination Beta blocker/Alpha blocker, a folic acid supplier, Vitamin C and thyroid hormone. (I used to take vitamin A and vitamin E, but after checking with my cardiologist following studies that seemed to indicate either no benefit or substantial ill effects from taking those vitamins, I no longer do *on his advice*.) No side effects have been noted. I am able to exercise regularly (weight training and aerobics on alternate days, 5 or 6 times/week), have cholesterol levels maintained within guidelines for those with coronary artery disease, have no reduction in my ejection fraction from the level it was reduced to from my earlier infarcs, work a full time job with no loss of cognitive abilities, have no enlargement of the heart, and maintain a normal lifestyle. Even with an implanted difibrillator to safe guard against an onset of ventricular tachycardia (a side effect of the earlier infarcs). In no instance of contact with any physician with respect to any of the above matters was there a failure to caution me about side effects, things to avoid to preclude drug interactions, and limitations on what I could and could not do in day-to-day life and in the gym.
Now: am I the exception or the rule? How do you know? Which studies support your answer? Is there an excuse for anyone under a physician's care failing to ask questions, or for tolerating a refusal to answer? Should any drug that is beneficial for millions, but which *may* cause side effects in a minority of those taking it, be "pulled" from the market?
At the end of the day, the above questions are at the heart of things (no pun intended) between you and I. I await your answers, knowing that they likely will not be forthcoming.
Steve
 Signature The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and should not be construed as either. This posting does not represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3
> >> >I simply feel that the issue behind this thread is that plavix [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >> us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their >> use. --Galileo Galilei Zee - 29 Jan 2005 17:36 GMT You have been answered repeatedly. But I will respond to this once more: I have never advocated for the removal of statins. It is not something I have ever thought about or persued. I do not even know if that is possible in my country.
I will no longer read or respond to your posts.
Zee
answered. As early as one year ag
> >> It seems to me I heard somewhere that Jim Chinnis wrote in article > >> <939jv0h9rn1gc65jft2ue7cs91iukjduek@4ax.com>: [quoted text clipped - 103 lines] > >> us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their > >> use. --Galileo Galilei Steve Marcus - 29 Jan 2005 20:03 GMT > You have been answered repeatedly. But I will respond to this once > more: I have never advocated for the removal of statins. It is not [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Zee Here is a URL in which Zee posted a copy of a recall petition for Crestor:
http://tinyurl.com/4xwyw
This post seems to me to evidence support for the position that the drug Crestor, which has been shown to cause harmful (very dangerously so) side effects in some people who have taken it, should be taken off the market.
For Zee to claim that she has "never advocated for the removal of statins" is at worst extremely disingenuous, and at best demonstrable of an inability to communicate what she really means (did she mean never avocated for the removal of *all* statins or never advocated for the removal of *any* statin?). Or did posting the link to the petition, followed by posting the petition itself and posting any article that came her way regarding recall of Crestor indicate a neutral position?
In short, in my previous post, I noted that Zee was apologizing for some of her writing which she conceded was "badly" (her word) done and which " apparently" (her word) "confused some people" (her words). I pointed out that she had taken me to task for questioning the very post for which she now saw fit to apologize for. At the end of my previous post, I gave my personal medical situation, the drugs I take and how I have interacted with my doctors. I then posted some very simple questions including "Should any drug that is beneficial for millions, but which *may* cause side effects in a minority of those taking it, be "pulled" from the market?" Rather than answer that question, and other questions like it, Zee now resorts to the kill file.
So my advice is simply this: People should by all means read what she posts, and heed what she writes if they find it persuasive. But before anyone acts based upon anything she writes, people would be prudent to evaluate her credibility based upon this sort of behavior she has displayed in this post, and should then do their own research, ask their doctors questions and demand answers and then ask about where they can obtain published support for those answers.
Steve
 Signature The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and should not be construed as either. This posting does not represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3
> answered. As early as one year ag >> > [quoted text clipped - 139 lines] > their >> >> use. --Galileo Galilei listener - 29 Jan 2005 20:24 GMT Steve,
I think of all the posters who have "tangled" with zee (and there have been many) you've done it with intelligence, patience and real common sense. I, for one, appreciated your candor in the last post.
Well, you seem to have finally pushed zee's button. Let's see if she lives up to her words. (Note how she states "You have been answered repeatedly"!)
L.
>> You have been answered repeatedly. But I will respond to this once >> more: I have never advocated for the removal of statins. It is not [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > > Steve Steve Marcus - 29 Jan 2005 23:22 GMT > Steve, > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > lives up to her words. (Note how she states "You have been answered > repeatedly"!) What's amazing is that I have never posted to "tangle" with Zee or to push her buttons. My posts are motivated by exactly the same thing that she claims motivates her's. She posts to dissent from what she regards as being an inaccurate position presented by the "pharmas", in order to bring "accurate information" to the readers of this (or these) newsgroup(s). I find her positions to be inaccurate in that they are biased in favor of her point of view (interesting since she considers herself to be a journalist); there is no middle ground for her. Her inability to accept criticism and then discuss the matter, and her willingness to play the "stalking/abusing" card indicate that what's important to her is "her" agenda, not anything approaching the truth on a given issue.
For the record, I view the "truth" with respect to statins as being a compromise middle ground position: statins that clearly cause damage in a large percentage of cases should be avoided and pulled from the market (see Baycol) and where it's indicated, replaced by a different statin, statins that cause damage in a small minority of cases but otherwise work well for the intended purpose ought to be left alone so long as there exist tests that can be performed periodically so that users can be monitored and can be assessed as whether they are being damaged early enough in the course of treatment so that they can stop taking the drug. Those taking statins, and for that matter any pharmaceutical drugs, have to learn to ask questions and demand answers.
> L. Steve
 Signature The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and should not be construed as either. This posting does not represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3 -- The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and should not be construed as either. This posting does not represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3
> >>> You have been answered repeatedly. But I will respond to this once [quoted text clipped - 47 lines] >> >> Steve Steve Marcus - 27 Jan 2005 10:17 GMT >> "Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part: >> [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > problems (from my statins use?) drank alcohol, took other medications > concurrently.... Nothing like taking good care of yourself. No wonder you're so anti-pharma and anti-doctor. Taking responsibility for one's own actions or inactions (aka blaming oneself) is a hard thing to do.
> It happened. Even in very controlled clincial trial circumstances it > happened. Life isn't like a clinical trial. That last sentence is 100% right. Unlike a controlled clinical trial in which what's "done to you" is out of your hands, life permits one to inform oneself, learn to distinguish prudent behavior from imprudent behavior, and to behave accordingly.
> Zee Steve
 Signature The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and should not be construed as either. This posting does not represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3
Zee - 27 Jan 2005 16:50 GMT > >> "Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part: > >> [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > and anti-doctor. Taking responsibility for one's own actions or inactions > (aka blaming oneself) is a hard thing to do. Steve
I am using writing and speech techniques. Speak in the first person to engage the listener. The *I* is everyman: the patient. I will rewrite slightly for you:
"Who knows how much is actually floating around in the patient's system; who possibly ate a Seville orange, had a glass of grapefruit juice, already had liver problems (from statins use?) drank alcohol, took other medications concurrently."
NONE of which applied to me, then or now..
No one can accuse me of not taking responsibility. It is my very being; my ethic.
This post made to David Rind, Dec 20, in sci.med: (http://tinyurl.com/46utw)
"I do not blame any one entity for this situation. My government is responsible, the drug regulatory bodies (FDA and Health Canada) are responsible, the pharmaceutical companies are responsible, and finally yes, the physician on the front line is responsible but mostly; me. I am responsible for this problem. And I am responsible for cleaning it up.
Zee
> > It happened. Even in very controlled clincial trial circumstances it > > happened. Life isn't like a clinical trial. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal > view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3 Zee - 27 Jan 2005 17:13 GMT Your comment Steve to me. This is really getting pathetic. Apply this to what you did this morning when you log on to jump on me, when you have completely misread and misinterpreted because of your blind prejudice.
life permits one to inform
> oneself, learn to distinguish prudent behavior from imprudent behavior, and > to behave accordingly. Yes Steve. Inform yourself before you log on and make a fool of yourself. Again.
Zee
> >> "Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part: > >> [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] > represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal > view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3 Steve Marcus - 27 Jan 2005 23:46 GMT > Your comment Steve to me. This is really getting pathetic. Apply this > to what you did this morning when you log on to jump on me, when you > have completely misread and misinterpreted because of your blind > prejudice. You have too high an opinion of yourself. I didn't "log on to jump" you. I logged on, perused the messages, and decided to comment on your post.
> life permits one to inform >> oneself, learn to distinguish prudent behavior from imprudent [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Yes Steve. Inform yourself before you log on and make a fool of > yourself. Again. Well, then take responsibility for your having used "I" in this sense: "The *I* is everyman: the patient." I can only read what you post, not what you were thinking when you posted it. If your post really meant "I" when you wrote "I", then my response was quite appropriate. And, since you believe that you are helping people when you post, perhaps you ought to re-consider who the fool is, you for writing something that required you to explain what you _really_ meant, or someone reading it who simply took what was written at face value.
> Zee Steve
 Signature The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and should not be construed as either. This posting does not represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3
> >> >> "Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part: [quoted text clipped - 60 lines] >> represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal >> view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3 Zee - 28 Jan 2005 00:04 GMT > > Your comment Steve to me. This is really getting pathetic. Apply this > > to what you did this morning when you log on to jump on me, when you [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > Steve With every correction you make of any error *I* make, you prove my point: once I was accepted to law school; once I was a crack writer. No more. But it is coming back Steve. That I use the technique without thinking shows me my writing chops are coming back. Of course, they will never be what they were. But still, enough to mop the floor with you.
Zee
> The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, > because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and [quoted text clipped - 65 lines] > >> represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal > >> view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3 Steve Marcus - 28 Jan 2005 11:55 GMT >> > Your comment Steve to me. This is really getting pathetic. Apply > this [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > will never be what they were. But still, enough to mop the floor with > you. Riiigggghhhttt.
Post something totally nonresponsive to what I wrote (which pointed out an error in your thought process as per the quote below, and a flaw in how you expressed yourself) and then claim "victory." Coupled with your propensity to claim that people are "abusing" or stalking you" (see your: "Apply this to what you did this morning when you log on to jump on me.") when you cannot reply on the merits to a bit of criticism, and you have the makings of a fine journalist.
BTW. Do you really think that there's someone in North America who takes medication and hasn't heard about avoiding grapefruit juice? Or that there's a doctor who doesn't provide that caution to a patient when prescribing medications that could be interferred with by grapefruit juice? If you do, then do you think that we should pull those drugs because people are uninformed? Or that you should prevent the interaction by grapefruit juice by scaring people away from beneficial drugs?
You truly are a piece of work.
> Zee Steve
 Signature The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and should not be construed as either. This posting does not represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3
<old stuff snipped>
listener - 28 Jan 2005 13:50 GMT >>> > Your comment Steve to me. This is really getting pathetic. Apply >> this [quoted text clipped - 52 lines] > log on to jump on me.") when you cannot reply on the merits to a bit > of criticism, and you have the makings of a fine journalist. Summed up nicely.
> BTW. Do you really think that there's someone in North America who > takes medication and hasn't heard about avoiding grapefruit juice? Or [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > the interaction by grapefruit juice by scaring people away from > beneficial drugs? I missed this thread. When I pick up my presciptions at CVS the inserts clearly caution about grapefruit juice (among other informative things).
> You truly are a piece of work. > >> Zee > > Steve L.
William Wagner - 28 Jan 2005 14:32 GMT > > BTW. Do you really think that there's someone in North America who > > takes medication and hasn't heard about avoiding grapefruit juice? Or [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > the interaction by grapefruit juice by scaring people away from > > beneficial drugs? ......................................................................... http://www.arizonacert.org/consumers/06-grapefruit-juice.htm
Above URL contains a legible table of below list. All sorts of drugs interact with grapefruit and all this discovered by accident too!
Bill
.............................................. In light of the potential for serious adverse outcomes, patients taking medications with a potential for interaction with grapefruit juice should be advised to avoid drinking grapefruit juice. Possible interactions with whole grapefruit have not been evaluated but it would be assumed to have similar effects.
Drug Class (Therapeutic Uses)
Medication
Brand Names
Antidepressant (depression) Sertraline Zoloft
Antihypertensive (high blood pressure) Felodipine Plendil
Nisoldipine Sular
Pranidipine Not available in the United States
Antilipemic (lowers cholesterol) Atorvastatin
Lipitor
Lovastatin Mevacor
Simvastatin
Zocor
Antimalarial (malaria infection)
Artemether
Paluther
Antiretroviral (HIV infection) Saquinavir
Fortovase, Invirase
Anxiolytic (anxiety); Sedative (sleep) Diazepam
Valium
Midazolam
Versed
Triazolam
Halcion
Buspirone
BuSpar
Bronchodilator (asthma, bronchospam) Theophylline Theo-Dur, Slo-bid, others
GI stimulant (stimulates GI motility) Cisapride
Propulsid
Estrogen (birth control, hormone replacement therapy) Ethinyl estradiol
Ortho-Novum, Loestrin, femhrt, others
Immune suppressant (prevents organ rejection) Cyclosporine Neoral, Sandimmune, SangCya
Antifungal (fungal infection) Itraconazole
Sporanox
Antiarryhthmic (heart rhythm) Amiodarone Cordarone, Pacerone
Note: Medication names are hyperlinked to references in PubM
 Signature Zone 5 S Jersey USA Shade Serious Vision Problems like Starghart?s ? --> http://www.ocutech.com/
Zee - 28 Jan 2005 17:26 GMT You two are hilarious. Log on, adjust your crotches at each other, log off.
> >> > Your comment Steve to me. This is really getting pathetic. Apply > > this [quoted text clipped - 54 lines] > BTW. Do you really think that there's someone in North America who takes > medication and hasn't heard about avoiding grapefruit juice? Or that
> there's a doctor who doesn't provide that caution to a patient when > prescribing medications that could be interferred with by grapefruit juice? [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > <old stuff snipped> Steve Marcus - 29 Jan 2005 15:36 GMT > You two are hilarious. Log on, adjust your crotches at each other, log > off. Keep those ad hominems coming. With every post you make in which you do not reply to the critical comments someone else wrote and/or post absurd accusations of being stalked and/or reply with ad hominems alone or in combination with your non-responses or accustations, you damage your own credibility.
BTW, in a post on another thread you opined that with millions of statin users out there, there had to be hundreds of thousands suffering from adverse side effects. Care to support that with any data?
Steve
 Signature The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and should not be construed as either. This posting does not represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3
<old stuff left it since it confirms, with Zee's own posts, the truth of what I've written in the first paragraph above.>
> >> >> > Your comment Steve to me. This is really getting pathetic. Apply [quoted text clipped - 90 lines] >> >> <old stuff snipped> Jim Chinnis - 27 Jan 2005 00:45 GMT petearogers@yahoo.co.uk (Peter Rogers) wrote in part:
>I had a quadruple bypass four years ago. > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >Peter It's a good prescription for many people with risk factors for ischemic stroke. It's a very bad idea for someone with risk factors for (or diagnosis of!) hemorrhagic stroke. -- Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA
Zengirl - 27 Jan 2005 18:09 GMT Peter, how terrible. I must say as I believe that once one begins taking meds it becomes such a complicated and then an increasingly dangerous game. It is very frightening too. Is there any way that you can work with a Holistic Doctor or Practitioner and align yourself with a different path and wean yourself off of the precribed and over-the-counter medications? Isn't Plavix used to help keep blood platelets from sticking?
I will educate you on the following. Please Do Not mix with prescribed and over-the-counter medications since your health is quite fragile and you are in a high risk category considering all that you have been through health wise. Find someone to work with if you decide to change your healing path.
Bladderwrack is a seaweed that is excellent and medicinally effective for blood clots, edema, high blood pressure, low thyroid gland function and obesity. Kelp, another seaweed has an anti-coagulant effect on the blood, a natural fungicide, a diuretic, good for high blood pressure, heart pain, anemia, diabetes, reduces tumors and other growths, guards the heart at high altitudes...enough info on kelp.
The herb Hawthorne Berries is excellent for the heart. It is considered a natural food for the heart, oxygenates the blood, prevents hardening of the arteries, regulates blood pressure (high and low), helps in nervous disorders, fortifies the nerves and the heart also used to help the following ailments: prevents arterisclerosis, cardiac symptoms, congestive heart failure, heart palpitations... PLEASE BE AWARE DO NOT DO NOT use Hawthorne with digitalis and possibly some other prescribed medications because IT INCREASES the medication DOSAGE. The medication Digitalis comes from the herb Foxglove. They studied the botanical, discovered some healing properties, isolated this property and created the drug Digitalis.
Garlic is excellent. It is excellent for circulation. It dissolves cholesterol and loosens it out of the arteries. It is also a probiotic, kills infections, putrefaction, acts on bacteria, viruses, internal parasites, builds the immune system and more.
Cayenne Pepper. It is also excellent for circulation and the heart, strokes, stops bleeding...
Chickweed is an excellent herb for the blood. It is a fat emulsifier. It helps dissolve plaque in blood vessels and fatty tumors. It helps with arteriosclerosis and is a blood purifier.
Oral Chelation also EDTA...cleans the arteries.
Butchers Broom is an excellent herb for circulation, prevents clotting of the blood, strengthens the blood vessels and keeps the veins clean and healthy.
Please good people, take personal responsibility and exercise excellent and keen judgement. You are very smart. Align yourselves with quality people that can assist you. I have enclosed this information for educational and teaching purposes only. I am not a Doctor. I am not a Dietician. I am a Holistic Health Practitioner and certified with the American Association of Drugless Practitioners.
I love studying nutrition and herbs and the health field and teaching and helping people to assist in serving the highest good in humanity.
Good luck to you Peter. Good health to you.
jbro - 30 Jan 2005 05:42 GMT "chelation cleans arteries???? riggghhht...
now I know what you are ....a charlatan
> Peter, how terrible. I must say as I believe that once one begins taking > meds it becomes such a complicated and then an increasingly dangerous game. [quoted text clipped - 59 lines] > -- > Message posted via http://www.medkb.com
|
|
|