Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Cardiology / January 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Is Plavix Really Better Than Aspirin?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Peter Rogers - 26 Jan 2005 21:53 GMT
I had a quadruple bypass four years ago.

On September 19, I was diagnosed with a probable TIA (mini stroke) and
was prescribed Plavix as well as the aspirin I've been taking for four
years.  y GP stopped that a few days afterwards.

Some weeks later, after a complications and a (private) MRI scan, the
diagnosis changed to a haemorrhagic stroke.

I think it's a dangerous drug combination for anyone with risk factors
for stroke.

Peter
William Wagner - 26 Jan 2005 22:24 GMT
> I had a quadruple bypass four years ago.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Peter

Hang in here Peter.  I?m  with you,  check with your Doc?s  like you
haven?t already.  Plavix   just seems too high tech for this stupid guy.

Bill who just shoveled  out his drive way, about 180 feet in 4 degree F.  
Ah... That which does not kill me comes to mind.

?I had a quadruple bypass four years ago?  Me to!!!!  Sucks

Such is the way it is.  Hope your drugs treat you well!

Bill Wagner

Signature

Zone 5 S Jersey USA Shade
Serious Vision Problems like Starghart?s ?
--> http://www.ocutech.com/ 

Zee - 27 Jan 2005 00:13 GMT
> I had a quadruple bypass four years ago.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Peter

Plavix may not be your problem. If you are taking a statin (Lipitor,
Crestor or Zocor are the most commonly prescribed) take note of these
adverse events in the clinical trials. Click on the links and each
opens to a clincial trial.

Statins, stroke, brain:

Subchronic toxicity of atorvastatin, a hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A
reductase inhibitor, in beagle dogs.

"...hemorrhage in gallbladder and brain, demyelination of optic
nerve,..."

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8
864188&dopt=Abstract


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Dr. Beatrice Golomb Statin Adverse Effects:
"...the large trials enrolled people at high risk for cardiovascular
disease who experience benefit from statins to nonfatal stroke...
{however}...there are trends toward increases in fatal stroke with
statins in most of the large statin trials,..."

http://www.geriatrictimes.com/g040618.html

Pasternak RC, Smith SC, Bairey-Merz CN et al. (2002), ACC/AHA/NHLBI
Clinical Advisory on the Use and Safety of Statins. Stroke
33(9):2337-2341 [see comment].

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Preclinical safety evaluation of cerivastatin, a novel HMG-CoA
reductase inhibitor.

"In dogs, the species most sensitive to statins, cerivastatin caused
erosions and hemorrhages in the gastrointestinal tract, bleeding in the
brain stem with fibroiddegeneration of vessel walls in the choroid
plexus, and lens opacity."

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9
737641&dopt=Abstract

Jim Chinnis - 27 Jan 2005 00:41 GMT
"Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part:

>"...hemorrhage in gallbladder and brain, demyelination of optic
>nerve,..."

From the abstract: "hepatocellular degeneration, centrilobular bridging,
cholecystitis, hemorrhage in gallbladder and brain, demyelination of optic
nerve, and skeletal muscle necrosis at > or = 280 mg/kg".

That dose is about 19,090 mg for a person weighing 150 lb (68 kg). That's
1,909 pills per day for me.

I'll be careful not to take 6 years supply at one time.

You know, at that dosage, the liver was basically kaput. The liver affects
just about everything, so i wouldn't try to use that result in poisoned dogs
to increase fear of a brain hemorrhage, etc., etc.
--
Jim Chinnis   Warrenton, Virginia, USA
Zee - 27 Jan 2005 00:53 GMT
> "Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part:
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> --
> Jim Chinnis   Warrenton, Virginia, USA

Not one of those injured, including me, took that amount. Still, we
were injured. If it is not metabolized properly, for whatever reason,
who knows how much is actually floating around in my system? I ate a
Seville orange, had a glass of grapefruit juice, already had liver
problems (from my statins use?) drank alcohol, took other medications
concurrently....

It happened. Even in very controlled clincial trial circumstances it
happened. Life isn't like a clinical trial.

Zee
Jim Chinnis - 27 Jan 2005 01:17 GMT
"Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part:

>> "Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
>Zee

Ah, but the controlled trials data don't seem to support more than a
negligible cognitive loss in a very few trial-retrial measures.

What you have are case reports. Hard to interpret.
--
Jim Chinnis   Warrenton, Virginia, USA
Zee - 27 Jan 2005 01:34 GMT
And why? Because negative trials were suppressed, negative data
withheld, no one can get enough money for the kind of trial you will
pay attention to?

You tell Peter to wait until they can be interpreted.

I, in the meantime, will be warning him. And others.

Because see, I wouldn't want him to be one  being slammed because he
was too stupid to stop when there were danger signs.

C'est moi.

Zee
Jim Chinnis - 27 Jan 2005 01:47 GMT
"Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part:

>And why? Because negative trials were suppressed, negative data
>withheld, no one can get enough money for the kind of trial you will
>pay attention to?

There have been some huge trials that have looked at cognitive effects.
Nada. There could be even better trials, and probably there should and
will be.

I pay attention to the clinical trials--very close attention! What am I
ignoring?

>You tell Peter to wait until they can be interpreted.

Plavix is known to cause hemorrhagic stroke; it should, in fact; it's a
balancing act--fewer ischemic strokes, more hemorrhagic strokes.

>I, in the meantime, will be warning him. And others.

Tell him not to take a lifetime's supply of a statin at one time.

>Because see, I wouldn't want him to be one  being slammed because he
>was too stupid to stop when there were danger signs.

That's fair. I say what I think, too.

>C'est moi.
>
>Zee

--
Jim Chinnis   Warrenton, Virginia, USA
Zee - 27 Jan 2005 02:02 GMT
There were haemorragic strokes in people too in one of the trials. And
then, we do not know, you are right. But I have heard Peter's story
over and over and over.

And Plavix and a statin together?

Here. Just for you Jim.

Grapefruit  statins, P450 (other drugs, foods, illness and conditions)
Further on the impaired metabolism of drugs, including statins
(excepting pravastatin).

Nurses Study
http://firstword.pslgroup.com/sn.do?pu=1&idö74F5FE75F118C185256F1D00135BCC&mains
rc=/LoadMedicalNews.do?contentid80998


DGNews
Grapefruit Juice and Medication Can Be a Deadly Mix
ROCHESTER, NY -- January 18, 2005 -

-----snip-------

Amy Karch, R.N., M.S., of the School of Nursing at the
University of Rochester Medical Center reported on a man from a
northern climate who moved to Florida for the winter -- one of tens of
thousands  of "snowbirds" who head south each winter -- and began
drinking two to  three glasses of grapefruit juice each day. Two months
later the man
died, the victim of a deadly interaction between grapefruit juice and
his
cholesterol-lowering medication.

The patient profiled in Karch's article had high
cholesterol and other risk factors for cardiac disease. The doctor put
the
patient on atorvastatin (Lipitor), and the patient began dieting and
exercising. Two months after the patient went to Florida for the
winter, he
suddenly had muscle pain, fatigue and fever, and went to the emergency
room. The patient ended up going into kidney failure and ultimately
died.

---------snip---------.

Karch, an expert on drug interactions, explains that
grapefruit juice is one of the foods most likely to cause problems with
drugs,
because it is metabolized by the same enzyme in the liver that  breaks
down many drugs. The cytochrome P-450 3A4 enzyme breaks down grapefruit

juice into useful components for body, just like it breaks down dozens
of medications. Karch says when the system is overloaded, the
grapefruit
juice can "swamp" the system, keeping the liver busy and blocking it
from
breaking down drugs and other substances.

Drugs that use the same pathway and interact with
grapefruit juice target some of the most common health problems doctors
see  today. The list consists of more than 50 medications, including
some drugs used  to treat high cholesterol, depression, high blood
pressure, cancer,
pain, impotence, and allergies.

-------snip---------

A heart patient might not get the lowered blood pressure that a
medication should deliver, or the heart's rhythms might become
irregular if
an anti-arrhythmia drug can't do its job.

The most severe effects are likely with some cholesterol-lowering
medications, Karch says. While the liver devotes its resources to
grapefruit
juice, the medication can build up to dangerous levels, causing a
breakdown
of the body's muscles and even kidney failure. This is what happened to
the
patient discussed in the article.

Drugs that Interact with Grapefruit Juice:

(from the December 2004 issue of the American Journal of Nursing)

Antibiotics: clarithromycin, erythromycin,
troleandomycin

Anxiolytics: alprazolam, buspirone, midazolam,
triazolam

Antiarrhythmics: amiodarone, quinidine

Anticoagulant: warfarin

Antiepileptic: carbamazepine

Antifungal: itraconazole

Anthelmintic: albendazole

Antihistamine: fexofenadine

Antineoplastics: cyclophosphamide, etoposide,
ifosfamide, tamoxifen,
vinblastine, vincristine

Antitussive: dextromethorphan

Antivirals: amprenavir, indinavir, nelfinavir,
ritonavir, saquinavir

Benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment: finasteride

â-blockers: carvedilol

Calcium channel blockers: diltiazem, felodipine,
nicardipine, nifedipine,
nimodipine, nisoldipine, verapamil

Erectile dysfunction drugs: sildenafil, tadalafil

Hormone replacement: cortisol, estradiol,
methylprednisolone, progesterone,
testosterone

Immunosuppressants: cyclosporine, sirolimus,
tacrolimus

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: atorvastatin,
fluvastatin, lovastatin,
simvastatin

Opioids: alfentanil, fentanyl, sufentanil

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: fluvoxamine,
sertraline

Xanthine: theophylline

SOURCE: University of Rochester Medical Center

http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/167/3/279?maxtoshow=&HITS&hits&RESULTFORMA
T=&fulltext=grapefruit+juice+drug+interactions&andorexactfulltext=and&searchid0
6787840721_5561&stored_search=&FIRSTINDEX=0&sortspec=relevance&resourcetype=1&jo
urnalcode=cmaj


~~~~~~~~~~
"The interaction: As little as 250 mL of grapefruit juice can change
the metabolism of some drugs.3 This drug-food interaction occurs
because of a common pathway involving a specific isoform of cytochrome
P450 - CYP3A4 - present in both the liver and the intestinal wall.
Studies suggest that grapefruit juice exerts its effect primarily at
the level of the intestine.4
Ater ingestion, a substrate contained in the grapefruit binds to the
intestinal isoenzyme, impairing first-pass metabolism directly and
causing a sustained decrease in CYP3A4 protein expression.5 Within 4
hours of ingestion, a reduction in the effective CYP3A4 concentration
occurs, with effects lasting up to 24 hours.6 The net result is
inhibition of drug metabolism in the intestine and increased oral
bioavailability. Because of the prolonged response, separating the
intake of the drug and the juice does not prevent interference.

Individuals express CYP3A4 in different proportions, those with the
highest intestinal concentration being most susceptible to grapefruit
juice-drug interactions.5 An effect is seen with the whole fruit as
well as its juice, so caution should be exercised with both.7 The
precise chemical compound in grapefruit that causes the interaction has
not been identified. There is no similar reaction with orange juice,
although there is some suspicion that "sour oranges" such as the
Seville variety, may have some effect.8 A recent study, however, that
tested the known interference of grapefruit juice with cyclosporine
showed no similar effect with Seville oranges.9

There is some interest in the potential therapeutic benefit of adding
grapefruit juice to a drug regimen to increase oral bioavailability.3
The limitation is the individual variation in patient response.
However, if the chemical that causes grapefruit's CYP3A4 inhibition is
elucidated, there may be an opportunity to modulate that pathway in a
controlled fashion.

What to do: Much of the data obtained on grapefruit juice-drug
interactions involved measuring serum drug concentrations in small
numbers of healthy volunteers. Because of the limited data and only
occasional case reports,10 it is difficult to quantify the clinical
significance for individual patients. One may assume that the
interaction occurs primarily with oral medicines, and only with those
that share the CYP3A4 metabolism pathway, with the consequence being
increased oral bioavailability, higher serum drug concentrations and
associated adverse effects.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Don Kirkman - 28 Jan 2005 00:50 GMT
It seems to me I heard somewhere that Zee wrote in article
<1106791328.581648.38590@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>:

>There were haemorragic strokes in people too in one of the trials. And
>then, we do not know, you are right. But I have heard Peter's story
>over and over and over.

>And Plavix and a statin together?

>Here. Just for you Jim.

[Major snippage has happened]

>Grapefruit  statins, P450 (other drugs, foods, illness and conditions)
>Further on the impaired metabolism of drugs, including statins
>(excepting pravastatin).

>Nurses Study
>http://firstword.pslgroup.com/sn.do?pu=1&id=F674F5FE75F118C185256F1D00135BCC&mai
nsrc=/LoadMedicalNews.do?contentid=1080998

>DGNews
>Grapefruit Juice and Medication Can Be a Deadly Mix
>ROCHESTER, NY -- January 18, 2005 -

>-----snip-------

>Amy Karch, R.N., M.S., of the School of Nursing at the
>University of Rochester Medical Center reported on a man from a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>his
>cholesterol-lowering medication.

>The patient profiled in Karch's article had high
>cholesterol and other risk factors for cardiac disease. The doctor put
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>room. The patient ended up going into kidney failure and ultimately
>died.

>Karch, an expert on drug interactions, explains that
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>grapefruit juice is one of the foods most likely to cause problems with
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>drugs,
>because it is metabolized by the same enzyme in the liver that  breaks
>down many drugs. The cytochrome P-450 3A4 enzyme breaks down grapefruit

>juice into useful components for body, just like it breaks down dozens
>of medications. Karch says when the system is overloaded, the
>grapefruit
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>juice can "swamp" the system, keeping the liver busy and blocking it
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>from
>breaking down drugs and other substances.

>Drugs that use the same pathway and interact with
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>grapefruit juice target some of the most common health problems doctors
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>see  today. The list consists of more than 50 medications, including
>some drugs used  to treat high cholesterol, depression, high blood
>pressure, cancer,
>pain, impotence, and allergies.

[. . .]

>~~~~~~~~~~
>"The interaction: As little as 250 mL of grapefruit juice can change
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>the metabolism of some drugs.3 This drug-food interaction occurs
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>because of a common pathway involving a specific isoform of cytochrome
>P450 - CYP3A4 - present in both the liver and the intestinal wall.
>Studies suggest that grapefruit juice exerts its effect primarily at
>the level of the intestine.4

[. . .]

>What to do: Much of the data obtained on grapefruit juice-drug
>interactions involved measuring serum drug concentrations in small
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>increased oral bioavailability, higher serum drug concentrations and
>associated adverse effects.

As has been discussed before in smc and in the media, grapefruit and
grapefruit juice can be dangerous when taken with some medications.
This article explains the danger and reinforces the warnings that are
already out in public.
Signature

Don
"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed
us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their
use.                                --Galileo Galilei

Zee - 28 Jan 2005 02:18 GMT
> It seems to me I heard somewhere that Zee wrote in article
> <1106791328.581648.38590@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>:
[quoted text clipped - 97 lines]
> This article explains the danger and reinforces the warnings that are
> already out in public.

Indeed it does Donny me boy. The purpose of posting it *now*, in all
its redundancy, was to show Chinnis Esq. that there are many things
that can come between your statin and your busy, busy P450; including
any of those drugs you may be taking concurrently. With, or without,
grapefruit, Seville oranges, tangelos, pomelos, and maybe kumquats.

And because the article was new, and several posters to the group are.
Too. I thought to post it. All.

Zee

> --
> Don
> "I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed
> us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their
> use.                                --Galileo Galilei
Jim Chinnis - 28 Jan 2005 02:41 GMT
"Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part:

>Indeed it does Donny me boy. The purpose of posting it *now*, in all
>its redundancy, was to show Chinnis Esq. that there are many things
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>And because the article was new, and several posters to the group are.
>Too. I thought to post it. All.

I have no problem at all with Zee posting all that stuff. I think most
people here who aren't aware of it (like the physicians) will benefit
from it.

I simply feel that the issue behind this thread is that plavix
(clopidogrel) was prescribed for someone and it resulted in a
hemorrhagic stroke. Any statin influence was probably nil.

Actually, there's a recent analysis of this exact cytochrome p450
interaction: http://tinyurl.com/5auow
--
Jim Chinnis   Warrenton, Virginia, USA
Zee - 28 Jan 2005 03:07 GMT
> "Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part:
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> (clopidogrel) was prescribed for someone and it resulted in a
> hemorrhagic stroke. Any statin influence was probably nil.

You do not know that Jim. Where is your evidence that clopidogrel was
causal? The hemorrhagic stroke did happen after he began dosing with
clopidogrel but it was also after the he started dosing with Lipitor.

Do you have evidence to show which was causative? Or *if* either was
causative? The study you cite says "may" and "no significant" and
"suggests"; all those words you to which you take such umbrage in
another (related) context.

Zee

> Actually, there's a recent analysis of this exact cytochrome p450
> interaction: http://tinyurl.com/5auow
> --
> Jim Chinnis   Warrenton, Virginia, USA
Jim Chinnis - 28 Jan 2005 03:20 GMT
"Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part:

>> I simply feel that the issue behind this thread is that plavix
>> (clopidogrel) was prescribed for someone and it resulted in a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>"suggests"; all those words you to which you take such umbrage in
>another (related) context.

Huh? Of course we are talking probabilities. I of all people have no
problem with that. The danger of plavix is hemorrhage; that's very well
established.

Blaming the stroke on Lipitor instead of Plavix is like finding someone
with a bullet through his head and saying that his hemorrhage may have
been caused by the red wine he drank earlier in the evening, rather than
by the bullet through his brainstem. Or arguing that the hemorrhage that
killed him was really due not so much to the bullet as to the
interaction of the wine and the bullet.

Nonsense, probabilities not withstanding.
--
Jim Chinnis   Warrenton, Virginia, USA
Don Kirkman - 28 Jan 2005 21:29 GMT
It seems to me I heard somewhere that Jim Chinnis wrote in article
<939jv0h9rn1gc65jft2ue7cs91iukjduek@4ax.com>:

>"Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part:

>>Indeed it does Donny me boy. The purpose of posting it *now*, in all
>>its redundancy, was to show Chinnis Esq. that there are many things
>>that can come between your statin and your busy, busy P450; including
>>any of those drugs you may be taking concurrently. With, or without,
>>grapefruit, Seville oranges, tangelos, pomelos, and maybe kumquats.

>>And because the article was new, and several posters to the group are.
>>Too. I thought to post it. All.

>I have no problem at all with Zee posting all that stuff. I think most
>people here who aren't aware of it (like the physicians) will benefit
>from it.

Nor do I, Jim.  I was putting her post together with what she had
written earlier about Plavix

"Not one of those injured, including me, took that amount. Still, we
were injured. If it is not metabolized properly, for whatever reason,
who knows how much is actually floating around in my system? I ate a
Seville orange, had a glass of grapefruit juice, already had liver
problems (from my statins use?) drank alcohol, took other medications
concurrently...."

and noted that grapefruit juice was part of the diet, from which I infer
that it's hard to blame Plavix alone (or statins mutatis mutandis) for
the results without considering the effects of grapefruit juice (and
perhaps the alcohol?).

>I simply feel that the issue behind this thread is that plavix
>(clopidogrel) was prescribed for someone and it resulted in a
>hemorrhagic stroke. Any statin influence was probably nil.

>Actually, there's a recent analysis of this exact cytochrome p450
>interaction: http://tinyurl.com/5auow
Signature

Don
"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed
us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their
use.                                --Galileo Galilei

Zee - 28 Jan 2005 22:47 GMT
> It seems to me I heard somewhere that Jim Chinnis wrote in article
> <939jv0h9rn1gc65jft2ue7cs91iukjduek@4ax.com>:
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> the results without considering the effects of grapefruit juice (and
> perhaps the alcohol?).

What I was trying to say: Hard to blame anything alone because
apparently all those things, and some I didn't mention affect that
P450. So who takes only a statin without also taking some of the others
perhaps? Our OP was taking a statin AND plavix.

None of that list applies to me. I was using the personal pronoun for
effect. But I did it badly, apparently, and confused some people. Mea
Culpa.

Zee

> >I simply feel that the issue behind this thread is that plavix
> >(clopidogrel) was prescribed for someone and it resulted in a
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their
> use.                                --Galileo Galilei
Steve Marcus - 29 Jan 2005 15:54 GMT
>> It seems to me I heard somewhere that Jim Chinnis wrote in article
>> <939jv0h9rn1gc65jft2ue7cs91iukjduek@4ax.com>:
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>
> Zee

Even though not directed to me, I'll take your last three sentences as an
apology, since I have been attacked by you after raising the the issue with
you first.

And I'll note for the record:

I'm taking Plavix, *and* aspirin *and* coumadin, along with a statin, a
combination Beta blocker/Alpha blocker, a folic acid supplier, Vitamin C and
thyroid hormone.  (I used to take vitamin A and vitamin E, but after
checking with my cardiologist following studies that seemed to indicate
either no benefit or substantial ill effects from taking those vitamins, I
no longer do *on his advice*.)  No side effects have been noted.  I am able
to exercise regularly (weight training and aerobics on alternate days, 5 or
6 times/week), have cholesterol levels maintained within guidelines for
those with coronary artery disease, have no reduction in my ejection
fraction from the level it was reduced to from my earlier infarcs, work a
full time job with no loss of cognitive abilities, have no enlargement of
the heart, and maintain a normal lifestyle.   Even with an implanted
difibrillator to safe guard against an onset of ventricular tachycardia (a
side effect of the earlier infarcs).  In no instance of contact with any
physician with respect to any of the above matters was there a failure to
caution me about side effects, things to avoid to preclude drug
interactions, and limitations on what I could and could not do in day-to-day
life and in the gym.

Now:  am I the exception or the rule?  How do you know?  Which studies
support your answer?  Is there an excuse for anyone under a physician's care
failing to ask questions, or for tolerating a refusal to answer?  Should any
drug that is beneficial for millions, but which *may* cause side effects in
a minority of those taking it, be "pulled" from the market?

At the end of the day, the above questions are at the heart of things (no
pun intended) between you and I.  I await your answers, knowing that they
likely will not be forthcoming.

Steve

Signature

The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice,
because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and
should not be construed as either.  This posting does not
represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
view.  To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3

>
>> >I simply feel that the issue behind this thread is that plavix
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>> us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their
>> use.                                --Galileo Galilei
Zee - 29 Jan 2005 17:36 GMT
You have been answered repeatedly. But I will respond to this once
more: I have never advocated for the removal of statins. It is not
something I have ever thought about or persued. I do not even know if
that is possible in my country.

I will no longer read or respond to your posts.

Zee

answered. As early as one year ag

> >> It seems to me I heard somewhere that Jim Chinnis wrote in article
> >> <939jv0h9rn1gc65jft2ue7cs91iukjduek@4ax.com>:
[quoted text clipped - 103 lines]
> >> us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their
> >> use.                                --Galileo Galilei
Steve Marcus - 29 Jan 2005 20:03 GMT
> You have been answered repeatedly. But I will respond to this once
> more: I have never advocated for the removal of statins. It is not
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Zee

Here is a URL in which Zee posted a copy of a recall petition for Crestor:

http://tinyurl.com/4xwyw

This post seems to me to evidence support for the position that the drug
Crestor, which has been shown to cause harmful (very dangerously so) side
effects in some people who have taken it, should be taken off the market.

For Zee to claim that she has "never advocated for the removal of statins"
is at worst extremely disingenuous, and at best demonstrable of an inability
to communicate what she really means (did she mean never avocated for the
removal of *all* statins or never advocated for the removal of *any*
statin?).  Or did posting the link to the petition, followed by posting the
petition itself and posting any article that came her way regarding recall
of Crestor indicate a neutral position?

In short, in my previous post, I noted that Zee was apologizing for some of
her writing which she conceded was "badly" (her word) done and which "
apparently" (her word) "confused some people" (her words).  I pointed out
that she had taken me to task for questioning the very post for which she
now saw fit to apologize for.  At the end of my previous post, I gave my
personal medical situation, the drugs I take and how I have interacted with
my doctors.  I then posted some very simple questions including "Should any
drug that is beneficial for millions, but which *may* cause side effects in
a minority of those taking it, be "pulled" from the market?"  Rather than
answer that question, and other questions like it, Zee now resorts to the
kill file.

So my advice is simply this:  People should by all means read what she
posts, and heed what she writes if they find it persuasive.  But before
anyone acts based upon anything she writes, people would be prudent to
evaluate her credibility based upon this sort of behavior she has displayed
in this post, and should then do their own research, ask their doctors
questions and demand answers and then ask about where they can obtain
published support for those answers.

Steve
Signature

The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice,
because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and
should not be construed as either.  This posting does not
represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
view.  To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3

> answered. As early as one year ag
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 139 lines]
> their
>> >> use.                                --Galileo Galilei
listener - 29 Jan 2005 20:24 GMT
Steve,

I think of all the posters who have "tangled" with zee (and there have
been many) you've done it with intelligence, patience and real common
sense. I, for one, appreciated your candor in the last post.

Well, you seem to have finally pushed zee's button. Let's see if she
lives up to her words. (Note how she states "You have been answered
repeatedly"!)

L.

>> You have been answered repeatedly. But I will respond to this once
>> more: I have never advocated for the removal of statins. It is not
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>
> Steve
Steve Marcus - 29 Jan 2005 23:22 GMT
> Steve,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> lives up to her words. (Note how she states "You have been answered
> repeatedly"!)

What's amazing is that I have never posted to "tangle" with Zee or to push
her buttons.  My posts are motivated by exactly the same thing that she
claims motivates her's.  She posts to dissent from what she regards as being
an inaccurate position presented by the "pharmas", in order to bring
"accurate information" to the readers of this (or these) newsgroup(s).  I
find her positions to be inaccurate in that they are biased in favor of her
point of view (interesting since she considers herself to be a journalist);
there is no middle ground for her.  Her inability to accept criticism and
then discuss the matter, and her willingness to play the "stalking/abusing"
card indicate that what's important to her is "her" agenda, not anything
approaching the truth on a given issue.

For the record, I view the "truth" with respect to statins as being a
compromise middle ground position:  statins that clearly cause damage in a
large percentage of cases should be avoided and pulled from the market (see
Baycol) and where it's indicated, replaced by a different statin, statins
that cause damage in a small minority of cases but otherwise work well for
the intended purpose ought to be left alone so long as there exist tests
that can be performed periodically so that users can be monitored and can be
assessed as whether they are being damaged early enough in the course of
treatment so that they can stop taking the drug.  Those taking statins, and
for that matter any pharmaceutical drugs, have to learn to ask questions and
demand answers.

> L.

Steve

Signature

The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice,
because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and
should not be construed as either.  This posting does not
represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
view.  To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3
--
The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice,
because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and
should not be construed as either.  This posting does not
represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
view.  To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3

>
>>> You have been answered repeatedly. But I will respond to this once
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>>
>> Steve
Steve Marcus - 27 Jan 2005 10:17 GMT
>> "Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> problems (from my statins use?) drank alcohol, took other medications
> concurrently....

Nothing like taking good care of yourself.  No wonder you're so anti-pharma
and anti-doctor.  Taking responsibility for one's own actions or inactions
(aka blaming oneself) is a hard thing to do.

> It happened. Even in very controlled clincial trial circumstances it
> happened. Life isn't like a clinical trial.

That last sentence is 100% right.  Unlike a controlled clinical trial in
which what's "done to you" is out of your hands, life permits one to inform
oneself, learn to distinguish prudent behavior from imprudent behavior, and
to behave accordingly.

> Zee

Steve
Signature

The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice,
because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and
should not be construed as either.  This posting does not
represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
view.  To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3

Zee - 27 Jan 2005 16:50 GMT
> >> "Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part:
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> and anti-doctor.  Taking responsibility for one's own actions or inactions
> (aka blaming oneself) is a hard thing to do.

Steve

I am using writing and speech techniques. Speak in the first person to
engage the listener. The *I* is everyman: the patient. I will rewrite
slightly for you:

"Who knows how much is actually floating around in the patient's
system; who possibly ate a Seville orange, had a glass of grapefruit
juice, already had liver problems (from statins use?) drank alcohol,
took other medications concurrently."

NONE of which applied to me, then or now..

No one can accuse me of not taking responsibility. It is my very being;
my ethic.

This post made to David Rind, Dec 20, in sci.med:
(http://tinyurl.com/46utw)

"I do not blame any one entity for this situation. My government is
responsible, the drug regulatory bodies (FDA and Health Canada) are
responsible, the pharmaceutical companies are responsible, and finally
yes, the
physician on the front line is responsible but mostly; me. I am
responsible for this problem. And I am responsible for cleaning it up.

Zee

> > It happened. Even in very controlled clincial trial circumstances it
> > happened. Life isn't like a clinical trial.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
> view.  To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3
Zee - 27 Jan 2005 17:13 GMT
Your comment Steve to me. This is really getting pathetic. Apply this
to what you did this morning when you log on to jump on me, when you
have completely misread and misinterpreted because of your blind
prejudice.

life permits one to inform
> oneself, learn to distinguish prudent behavior from imprudent behavior, and
> to behave accordingly.

Yes Steve. Inform yourself before you log on and make a fool of
yourself. Again.

Zee

> >> "Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part:
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
> represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
> view.  To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3
Steve Marcus - 27 Jan 2005 23:46 GMT
> Your comment Steve to me. This is really getting pathetic. Apply this
> to what you did this morning when you log on to jump on me, when you
> have completely misread and misinterpreted because of your blind
> prejudice.

You have too high an opinion of yourself.  I didn't "log on to jump" you.  I
logged on, perused the messages, and decided to comment on your post.

> life permits one to inform
>> oneself, learn to distinguish prudent behavior from imprudent
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Yes Steve. Inform yourself before you log on and make a fool of
> yourself. Again.

Well, then take responsibility for your having used "I" in this sense:  "The
*I* is everyman: the patient."  I can only read what you post, not what you
were thinking when you posted it. If your post really meant "I" when you
wrote "I", then my response was quite appropriate.  And, since you believe
that you are helping people when you post, perhaps you ought to re-consider
who the fool is, you for writing something that required you to explain what
you _really_ meant, or someone reading it who simply took what was written
at face value.

> Zee

Steve
Signature

The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice,
because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and
should not be construed as either.  This posting does not
represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
view.  To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3

>
>> >> "Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in part:
[quoted text clipped - 60 lines]
>> represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
>> view.  To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3
Zee - 28 Jan 2005 00:04 GMT
> > Your comment Steve to me. This is really getting pathetic. Apply this
> > to what you did this morning when you log on to jump on me, when you
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Steve

With every correction you make of any error *I* make, you prove my
point: once I was accepted to law school; once I was a crack writer. No
more. But it is coming back Steve. That I use the technique without
thinking shows me my writing chops are coming back. Of course, they
will never be what they were. But still, enough to mop the floor with
you.

Zee

> The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice,
> because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and
[quoted text clipped - 65 lines]
> >> represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
> >> view.  To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3
Steve Marcus - 28 Jan 2005 11:55 GMT
>> > Your comment Steve to me. This is really getting pathetic. Apply
> this
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> will never be what they were. But still, enough to mop the floor with
> you.

Riiigggghhhttt.

Post something totally nonresponsive to what I wrote (which pointed out an
error in your thought process as per the quote below, and a flaw in how you
expressed yourself) and then claim "victory."  Coupled with your propensity
to claim that people are "abusing" or stalking you"  (see your:  "Apply this
to what you did this morning when you log on to jump on me.") when you
cannot reply on the merits to a bit of criticism, and you have the makings
of a fine journalist.

BTW.  Do you really think that there's someone in North America who takes
medication and hasn't heard about avoiding grapefruit juice?  Or that
there's a doctor who doesn't provide that caution to a patient when
prescribing medications that could be interferred with by grapefruit juice?
If you do, then do you think that we should pull those drugs because people
are uninformed?  Or that you should prevent the interaction by grapefruit
juice by scaring people away from beneficial drugs?

You truly are a piece of work.

> Zee

Steve
Signature

The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice,
because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and
should not be construed as either.  This posting does not
represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
view.  To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3

<old stuff snipped>

listener - 28 Jan 2005 13:50 GMT
>>> > Your comment Steve to me. This is really getting pathetic. Apply
>> this
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
> log on to jump on me.") when you cannot reply on the merits to a bit
> of criticism, and you have the makings of a fine journalist.

Summed up nicely.


> BTW.  Do you really think that there's someone in North America who
> takes medication and hasn't heard about avoiding grapefruit juice?  Or
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the interaction by grapefruit juice by scaring people away from
> beneficial drugs?

I missed this thread. When I pick up my presciptions at CVS the inserts
clearly caution about grapefruit juice (among other informative things).


> You truly are a piece of work.
>
>> Zee
>
> Steve

L.
William Wagner - 28 Jan 2005 14:32 GMT
> > BTW.  Do you really think that there's someone in North America who
> > takes medication and hasn't heard about avoiding grapefruit juice?  Or
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> > the interaction by grapefruit juice by scaring people away from
> > beneficial drugs?
.........................................................................
http://www.arizonacert.org/consumers/06-grapefruit-juice.htm

Above URL contains a legible table  of  below list.
All sorts of drugs interact with grapefruit and all this discovered by
accident too!

Bill

..............................................
In light of the potential for serious adverse outcomes, patients taking
medications with a potential for interaction with grapefruit juice
should be advised to avoid drinking grapefruit juice. Possible
interactions with whole grapefruit have not been evaluated but it would
be assumed to have similar effects.

Drug Class (Therapeutic Uses)

Medication

Brand Names

Antidepressant (depression)
Sertraline  
Zoloft

Antihypertensive (high blood pressure)
Felodipine  
Plendil

Nisoldipine  
Sular

Pranidipine  
Not available in the United States

Antilipemic (lowers cholesterol)
Atorvastatin  

Lipitor

Lovastatin  
Mevacor

Simvastatin  

Zocor

Antimalarial (malaria infection)

Artemether

Paluther

Antiretroviral (HIV infection)
Saquinavir

Fortovase, Invirase

Anxiolytic (anxiety); Sedative (sleep)
Diazepam  

Valium

Midazolam

Versed

Triazolam

Halcion

Buspirone  

BuSpar

Bronchodilator (asthma, bronchospam)
Theophylline  
Theo-Dur, Slo-bid, others

GI stimulant (stimulates GI motility)
Cisapride

Propulsid

Estrogen (birth control, hormone replacement therapy)
Ethinyl estradiol  

Ortho-Novum, Loestrin, femhrt, others

Immune suppressant (prevents organ rejection)
Cyclosporine
Neoral, Sandimmune, SangCya

Antifungal (fungal infection)
Itraconazole

Sporanox

Antiarryhthmic (heart rhythm)
Amiodarone  
Cordarone, Pacerone

Note: Medication names are hyperlinked to references in PubM

Signature

Zone 5 S Jersey USA Shade
Serious Vision Problems like Starghart?s ?
--> http://www.ocutech.com/ 

Zee - 28 Jan 2005 17:26 GMT
You two are hilarious. Log on, adjust your crotches at each other, log
off.

> >> > Your comment Steve to me. This is really getting pathetic. Apply
> > this
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
> BTW.  Do you really think that there's someone in North America who takes
> medication and hasn't heard about avoiding grapefruit juice?  Or that

> there's a doctor who doesn't provide that caution to a patient when
> prescribing medications that could be interferred with by grapefruit juice?
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> <old stuff snipped>
Steve Marcus - 29 Jan 2005 15:36 GMT
> You two are hilarious. Log on, adjust your crotches at each other, log
> off.

Keep those ad hominems coming.  With every post you make in which you do not
reply to the critical comments someone else wrote and/or post absurd
accusations of being stalked and/or reply with ad hominems alone or in
combination with your non-responses or accustations, you damage your own
credibility.

BTW, in a post on another thread you opined that with millions of statin
users out there, there had to be hundreds of thousands suffering from
adverse side effects.  Care to support that with any data?

Steve

Signature

The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice,
because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and
should not be construed as either.  This posting does not
represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
view.  To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3

<old stuff left it since it confirms, with Zee's own posts, the truth of
what I've written in the first paragraph above.>

>
>> >> > Your comment Steve to me. This is really getting pathetic. Apply
[quoted text clipped - 90 lines]
>>
>> <old stuff snipped>
Jim Chinnis - 27 Jan 2005 00:45 GMT
petearogers@yahoo.co.uk (Peter Rogers) wrote in part:

>I had a quadruple bypass four years ago.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Peter

It's a good prescription for many people with risk factors for ischemic
stroke. It's a very bad idea for someone with risk factors for (or diagnosis
of!) hemorrhagic stroke.
--
Jim Chinnis   Warrenton, Virginia, USA
Zengirl - 27 Jan 2005 18:09 GMT
Peter, how terrible.  I must say as I believe that once one begins taking
meds it becomes such a complicated and then an increasingly dangerous game.
It is very frightening too.  Is there any way that you can work with a
Holistic Doctor or Practitioner and align yourself with a different path
and wean yourself off of the precribed and over-the-counter medications?
Isn't Plavix used to help keep blood platelets from sticking?

I will educate you on the following.  Please Do Not mix with prescribed and
over-the-counter medications since your health is quite fragile and you are
in a high risk category considering all that you have been through health
wise.  Find someone to work with if you decide to change your healing path.

Bladderwrack is a seaweed that is excellent and medicinally effective for
blood clots, edema, high blood pressure, low thyroid gland function and
obesity.  Kelp, another seaweed has an anti-coagulant effect on the blood,
a natural fungicide, a diuretic, good for high blood pressure, heart pain,
anemia, diabetes, reduces tumors and other growths, guards the heart at
high altitudes...enough info on kelp.

The herb Hawthorne Berries is excellent for the heart.  It is considered a
natural food for the heart, oxygenates the blood, prevents hardening of the
arteries, regulates blood pressure (high and low), helps in nervous
disorders, fortifies the nerves and the heart also used to help the
following ailments: prevents arterisclerosis, cardiac symptoms, congestive
heart failure, heart palpitations...  PLEASE  BE       AWARE           DO
NOT       DO NOT       use Hawthorne with digitalis and possibly some other
prescribed medications  because    IT INCREASES    the medication
DOSAGE.   The medication Digitalis comes from the herb Foxglove.  They
studied the botanical, discovered some healing properties, isolated this
property and created the drug Digitalis.

Garlic is excellent.  It is excellent for circulation.  It dissolves
cholesterol and loosens it out of the arteries.  It is also a probiotic,
kills infections, putrefaction, acts on bacteria, viruses, internal
parasites,  builds the immune system and more.

Cayenne Pepper.  It is also excellent for circulation and the heart,
strokes, stops bleeding...

Chickweed is an excellent herb for the blood.  It is a fat emulsifier.  It
helps dissolve plaque in blood vessels and fatty tumors.  It helps with
arteriosclerosis and is a blood purifier.

Oral Chelation also EDTA...cleans the arteries.

Butchers Broom is an excellent herb for circulation, prevents clotting of
the blood, strengthens the blood vessels and keeps the veins clean and
healthy.

Please good people, take personal responsibility and exercise excellent and
keen judgement.  You are very smart.  Align yourselves with quality people
that can assist you.  I have enclosed this information for educational and
teaching purposes only.  I am not a Doctor. I am not a Dietician.  I am a
Holistic Health Practitioner and certified with the American Association of
Drugless Practitioners.

I love studying nutrition and herbs and the health field and teaching and
helping people to assist in serving the highest good in humanity.

Good luck to you Peter.  Good health to you.
jbro - 30 Jan 2005 05:42 GMT
"chelation cleans arteries???? riggghhht...

now I know what you are ....a charlatan

> Peter, how terrible.  I must say as I believe that once one begins taking
> meds it becomes such a complicated and then an increasingly dangerous game.
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
> --
> Message posted via http://www.medkb.com
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.