Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Cardiology / December 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

How accurate are multiple detector cat scans?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Hua Kul - 22 Dec 2004 13:32 GMT
Are they as accurate/helpful/informative as catheterization?

--Hua Kul
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 22 Dec 2004 14:14 GMT
> Are they as accurate/helpful/informative as catheterization?
>
> --Hua Kul

Catheterization (coronary angiography) remains the gold standard for
evaluating occlusive coronary atherosclerotic disease.

Hope the above information helps you.

Such is the work being done here for Christ's glory
(http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A).

Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

**
Who is the humblest person in the universe?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048

What is all this about?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A

Is this spam?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?D13B21FF9
Hua Kul - 24 Dec 2004 05:59 GMT
> Catheterization (coronary angiography) remains the gold standard for
> evaluating occlusive coronary atherosclerotic disease.

Catheterization is orders of magnitude more invasive and risky than the
multiple detector cat scans.  I would like to know how they compare
qualitatively.  Do you have experience with them Dr. Chung?  Many
thanks for any information.

--Hua Kul
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 24 Dec 2004 13:44 GMT
> > Catheterization (coronary angiography) remains the gold standard for
> > evaluating occlusive coronary atherosclerotic disease.
>
> Catheterization is orders of magnitude more invasive and risky than the
> multiple detector cat scans.

It is.  For this reason, it is usually done after an abnormal stress
test.

>  I would like to know how they compare
> qualitatively.

Non-invasive imaging whether by CT scan or by MRI are continuing to
improve in resolution to rival the *anatomical* information that is
achieved with invasive angiography.

However, they remain *non-invasive* evaluations of *anatomy* which limit
their usefulness on two levels.

>  Do you have experience with them Dr. Chung?

Yes.

> Many
> thanks for any information.
>
> --Hua Kul

You are welcome.

May God bless those who read the following:

http://makeashorterlink.com/?I24E5151A

May what I have written enlighten you and others.

Such is the work being done here for Christ's glory
(http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A).

Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

**
Who is the humblest person in the universe?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048

What is all this about?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A

Is this spam?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?D13B21FF9
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.