> > Catheterization (coronary angiography) remains the gold standard for
> > evaluating occlusive coronary atherosclerotic disease.
>
> Catheterization is orders of magnitude more invasive and risky than the
> multiple detector cat scans.
It is. For this reason, it is usually done after an abnormal stress
test.
> I would like to know how they compare
> qualitatively.
Non-invasive imaging whether by CT scan or by MRI are continuing to
improve in resolution to rival the *anatomical* information that is
achieved with invasive angiography.
However, they remain *non-invasive* evaluations of *anatomy* which limit
their usefulness on two levels.
> Do you have experience with them Dr. Chung?
Yes.
> Many
> thanks for any information.
>
> --Hua Kul
You are welcome.
May God bless those who read the following:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?I24E5151A
May what I have written enlighten you and others.
Such is the work being done here for Christ's glory
(http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A).
Servant to the humblest person in the universe,
Andrew
--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/
**
Who is the humblest person in the universe?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048
What is all this about?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A
Is this spam?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?D13B21FF9