Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Cardiology / December 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

was: Internationally Clueless About Obesity

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
br - 08 Dec 2004 21:13 GMT
And what about the American community? Have you ever taken a BOEING in
economy class? BOEING does not solely cater to midgets. I'm sure the size of
the seats was NOT dictated by the average American butt width, but by
max.money thinking. Look around you, first, before talking about ignorance
or refusal to acknowledge.

>>Fat Americans, apparently, are "news" to the international community of
>>manufacturers of chairs and fixtures.

>>What?  There are no American tourists in France?

>>This is further confirmation of what I had feared. That the word on the
>>inclining obesity of Americans (in particular) has, somehow, magically,
>>been missed, ignored or refused to be acknowledged by much of America and,
>>obviously, most of Europe.
MU - 08 Dec 2004 22:05 GMT
did u want me to answer the firs post or the third one?

> And what about the American community? Have you ever taken a BOEING in
> economy class? BOEING does not solely cater to midgets. I'm sure the size of
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>>>been missed, ignored or refused to be acknowledged by much of America and,
>>>obviously, most of Europe.
br - 08 Dec 2004 22:23 GMT
both

> did u want me to answer the firs post or the third one?

.
MU - 09 Dec 2004 00:06 GMT
> And what about the American community? Have you ever taken a BOEING in
> economy class? BOEING does not solely cater to midgets. I'm sure the size of
> the seats was NOT dictated by the average American butt width, but by
> max.money thinking. Look around you, first, before talking about ignorance
> or refusal to acknowledge.

How many BOEING seats have you seen collapse?
br - 09 Dec 2004 13:03 GMT
Yes, you're right; I mistook human confort for product reliability, but it's
all the same in the end;  nobody really cares about how much you weigh, or
how big your butt is, as long as minimal investment reaps maximum profits.
Why bother using heavy-duty, more expensive seating on a cruise ship when
the "average/normal" client won't have any problems (and if Americans are
too fat, that's their problem)? That's practically the same reasoning used
for the choice of BOEING's seating.

I deliberately left out, for clarity's sake, the discussion about fat
Australians and Nigerians. (does QUANTAS fly BOEING?)

> > And what about the American community? Have you ever taken a BOEING in
> > economy class? BOEING does not solely cater to midgets. I'm sure the size of
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> How many BOEING seats have you seen collapse?
MU - 09 Dec 2004 16:26 GMT
> Yes, you're right; I mistook human confort for product reliability, but it's
> all the same in the end;  nobody really cares about how much you weigh, or
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> too fat, that's their problem)? That's practically the same reasoning used
> for the choice of BOEING's seating.

The seating on a cruise ship is apples-oranges to an airplane seat. First
there are hundreds of varieties of seating choices on a cruise ship, only
two or three on an aircraft. Their usages are entirely different.

There is also a line where maximizing profits meets (contingent) liability.
br - 09 Dec 2004 18:12 GMT
Lol
That just proves that the French liner company is a hundred times more
interested in satisfying non-average butts than BOEING.

> The seating on a cruise ship is apples-oranges to an airplane seat. First
> there are hundreds of varieties of seating choices on a cruise ship, only
> two or three on an aircraft. Their usages are entirely different.
Jim Chinnis - 09 Dec 2004 18:30 GMT
"br" <brandall@wanadoo.fr> wrote in part:

>That just proves that the French liner company is a hundred times more
>interested in satisfying non-average butts than BOEING.

Most commercial Boeing aircraft offer at least two sizes of seats. The larger
seats are usually near the front of the aircraft.
--
Jim Chinnis   Warrenton, Virginia, USA
MU - 09 Dec 2004 23:43 GMT
>> The seating on a cruise ship is apples-oranges to an airplane seat. First
>> there are hundreds of varieties of seating choices on a cruise ship, only
>> two or three on an aircraft. Their usages are entirely different.

> Lol
> That just proves that the French liner company is a hundred times more
> interested in satisfying non-average butts than BOEING.

Dood, the QM2 is owned by Carnival (CCL) an American company.
br - 10 Dec 2004 17:46 GMT
Lol
So it was an American company that put those cheap chairs on that boat?
I beleive that takes care of your original post, doesn't it

>>>Fat Americans, apparently, are "news" to the international community of
>>>manufacturers of chairs and fixtures.

> Dood, the QM2 is owned by Carnival (CCL) an American company.
MU - 11 Dec 2004 17:04 GMT
Internationally Clueless About Obesity; waht about this title means
"Americans only"?

> Lol
> So it was an American company that put those cheap chairs on that boat?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>> Dood, the QM2 is owned by Carnival (CCL) an American company.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.