 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Cardiology / June 2009Andrew B. Chung, homosexual usenet creep
Andrew B. Chung, You are a supreme egoist, You are a sick a.shole, You are a hated internet creep and troll, There is NOTHING "spiritual" about what you do here, or anywhere else, It's all EGO. Your whole life is nothing but EGO, You are a loser, You have NO friends, You never will have friends. Nobody likes an a.shole, And that's what you are. And always will be. And now let us pray for usenet creep Andrew's perishing a.shole soul: ----------------------------------------- The Internet Lord's Prayer by GreatSageItchy (c) 2009 ----------------------------------------- Our Lord who lives in the sky, We acknowledge that you are all powerful, and that Andrew B. Chung is a sick a.shole. We worship you Lord, in the knowledge that you will soon bring a glorious day when Andrew Chung will no longer be a total a.shole, loser and usenet creep... But until then, he's lazy and stupid, so can you spare him some bread, SkyDude? And as you know, SkyGod, Andrew Chung is a weak, perverted, worthless creep, but please protect him from those who try to take advantage of his weakness, perversion, and stupidity... And stop him from doing creepy things he will later regret.. Because, SkyGod, he wants to be a winner who does the right thing, but he's a loser and pervert, so he needs your help... For you are the Great Overlord and his Master, SkyGod, and only you can save his broke loser faggot a.s. Amen. ---------------------------------------------- And now, Andrew B. Chung, can you now publicly say "Jesus is a SKELETON" ? Love in the truth, -Great Sage Itchy, Greater than Heaven and God combined! -- His Holiness Great Sage Itchy, GS, GTH/AGC God-certified Great Sage, and Author of "The Internet Lords Prayer", now translated into 167 languages. > Andrew B. Chung, > You are a supreme egoist, [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] > and Author of "The Internet Lords Prayer", now translated into 167 > languages. Like all your vitriol, it is all just a projection of yourself upon others. It is you that is the arsehole and the egotist, and the evidence is right before you. Michael Christ > > Andrew B. Chung, > > You are a supreme egoist, [quoted text clipped - 56 lines] > It is you that is the arsehole and the egotist, and the evidence is right > before you. > Michael Christ Another usenet phony religious a.shole. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/1f6680ac6aa285d0? Truth is simple. May GOD soften your heart, GSI, so that you would come to trust the truth, Who is Jesus: http://T3WiJ.com Amen. Love in the truth, Andrew <>< -- Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD Board-certified Heart Doctor and Author of "Be Hungry" http://NetCabal.com "Don't be left behind as were Cleopas and Simon ... ... -----------------> be hungry ! ! !" "... no one can say 'Jesus is LORD' except by the Holy Spirit." (1 Cor 12:3) http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/035c93540862751c? What are the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven? http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/980b41e6999de315? Only the truth can cure the "hunger is starvation" delusion: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/74281ab7d7ce78de? The USENET STALKERAZZI have since their "Griz cult" collaboration, whipped themselves up into a frenzy looking for their next kooks award victim. Clearly they're baying for blood and want to kill someone off... Bruno (Sasha Baron Cohen) makes and interesting point about relationship fidelity and autonomic rights in relation to i-Pod (how do you know its stolen property which has no contact information and has a short life for street kids with no place to recharge it): "[He] talked to the mother and gave her an iPod in exchange for the child. But Ich had real welfare concerns. "Ich was really, really worried about the welfare of that iPod, because the village where Ich met the woman was actually 2000 miles (about 3220 km) from the nearest Apple store. There was no chance for wi-fi update." [http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25694744-2902,00.html] And while cafes such as Battuta Cafe Restraunt in 179 Oxford Street Sydney provide WiFi access, this is no replacement for cheerful and equitable service. Microsoft is also increasingly being fascist (family oriented) and unresponsive in their vilification of those who don't conform to their nuclear family as autonomic model which denies the individual right. But just how safe is your Apple I-Pod and the information it contains? Is it possible that you could plan to do someone over by simply deploying the semantics in the songs as discrete objects. I'm not interested in providing anymore foundational cognitive elements for multi-media Alice-In-Wonderland marketing opportunities. Whilst it doesn't have any form of its own, what relationship does this have within media, radio, television and the arts who might derive some benefit from this stalking and elimination of any reference to a person? Leonard Talmy's Toward a cognitive semantics says, "The relationship of any of these categories or their members to the 'cognitive systems' adduced is a heuristic matter to be worked on in the course of time. The first heuristic psychological category includes the 'foundational' cognitive systems that underlie or mediate the other psychological functions. It includes consciousness and the accessibility of other cognitive systems to consciousness, attention, perspective, perception, memory, and motor control. That may be considered a category of 'executive' functions includes agency, intention, volition, goal pursuit, planning and decision." So if you guess the Lyrics prematurely, it disrupts their continuum --and they have to start again. This one goes back a long way back when they first mentioned the cover versions of this song (by Leonard Cohen) and deliberately excluded the Canadian Lesbian kd.Lang from mention: I've heard there was a secret chord that David played, and it pleased the Lord But you don't really care for music, Do you? It goes like this, the fourth, the fifth The minor Fall, The major lift, The baffled king composing, hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Your faith was strong but you needed proof You saw her bathing on the roof Her beauty in the moonlight overthrew you She tied you to a kitchen chair, she broke your throne she cut your hair and from your lips she drew the halleujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Maybe I've been here before I know this room, I've walked this floor I used to live alone before I knew you I've seen your flag on the marble arch love is not a victory march it's a cold and it's a broken Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah There was a time you let me know What's real and going on below but now you never show it to me, do you? And remember when I moved in you the holy dove was moving too And every breath we drew was Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Maybe there's a God above And all I ever learned from love Was how to shoot at someone who outdrew you It's not a cry you can hear at night It's not somebody who's seen the light it's a cold and it's a broken Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah… The word is "hallelujah" meaning "God be praised (uttered in worship or as an expression of rejoicing)" and there was a distinct relation between this and frenzy by these ATHIEST MONKEYS as USENET STALKERAZZI: - Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> - Sanity's Little Helper <elvish@noshpam.org> - AndrewJH <ahilliker3@yahoo.com> - Budikka666 <budikka1@netscape.net> Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> wrote: > dolf wrote: >> Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> Do you have any relationship with media, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > I don't believe you. Prove it. Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> Do you have any relationship with media, >> radio, television and the arts that might derive some benefit from [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> >> Because I'm not into organized crime... Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Sanity's Little Helper <elvish@noshpam.org> wrote: >>> Andy, can you publicly say "Mary had a little lamb"? > > Pure quote fabrication. > > "dolf", you're a dishonest person. Shame on you. You should buy a gun, at least one bullet, and do the honorable thing. > Thank you. Sorry that your transformation didn't go to plan--sure you might seek to dump a few last minute adjectives and nouns into irrational sentences so you close your parallel and cross market pitch--loop cycle... But we are wise to you who are bruised ... I <Iam@home0000298> wrote: > ";;;Matt;;;" wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > They have forgotten that Christians are allowed to disagree with each other. Paul disagreed with Peter. PROTEST-ants disagreed with Catholics. Disagreements do not nullify one's stance as a Christian. #298 --- inaccessible, steep; ore. --- son(s) of the gods. --- n. "Ruddy". --- to fence around, enclose; to sing, to sound forth bright and clear; to be bright or green, to bloom; court, yard; a village. --- n. "Autumn Rain". --- to cut in, to scratch; to cut to a point, to sharpen; to decide; to gird oneself, to be active; loins; to shine, glitter. --- n. "Help of Yah". --- n. "Mouse". >>> Andrew B. Chung, >>> You are a supreme egoist, [quoted text clipped - 59 lines] > > Another usenet phony religious a.shole. The USENET STALKERAZZI have since their "Griz cult" collaboration, whipped themselves up into a frenzy looking for their next kooks award victim. Clearly they're baying for blood and want to kill someone off... Bruno (Sasha Baron Cohen) makes and interesting point about relationship fidelity and autonomic rights in relation to i-Pod (how do you know its stolen property which has no contact information and has a short life for street kids with no place to recharge it): "[He] talked to the mother and gave her an iPod in exchange for the child. But Ich had real welfare concerns. "Ich was really, really worried about the welfare of that iPod, because the village where Ich met the woman was actually 2000 miles (about 3220 km) from the nearest Apple store. There was no chance for wi-fi update." [http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25694744-2902,00.html] And while cafes such as Battuta Cafe Restraunt in 179 Oxford Street Sydney provide WiFi access, this is no replacement for cheerful and equitable service. Microsoft is also increasingly being fascist (family oriented) and unresponsive in their vilification of those who don't conform to their nuclear family as autonomic model which denies the individual right. But just how safe is your Apple I-Pod and the information it contains? Is it possible that you could plan to do someone over by simply deploying the semantics in the songs as discrete objects. I'm not interested in providing anymore foundational cognitive elements for multi-media Alice-In-Wonderland marketing opportunities. Whilst it doesn't have any form of its own, what relationship does this have within media, radio, television and the arts who might derive some benefit from this stalking and elimination of any reference to a person? Leonard Talmy's Toward a cognitive semantics says, "The relationship of any of these categories or their members to the 'cognitive systems' adduced is a heuristic matter to be worked on in the course of time. The first heuristic psychological category includes the 'foundational' cognitive systems that underlie or mediate the other psychological functions. It includes consciousness and the accessibility of other cognitive systems to consciousness, attention, perspective, perception, memory, and motor control. That may be considered a category of 'executive' functions includes agency, intention, volition, goal pursuit, planning and decision." So if you guess the Lyrics prematurely, it disrupts their continuum --and they have to start again. This one goes back a long way back when they first mentioned the cover versions of this song (by Leonard Cohen) and deliberately excluded the Canadian Lesbian kd.Lang from mention: I've heard there was a secret chord that David played, and it pleased the Lord But you don't really care for music, Do you? It goes like this, the fourth, the fifth The minor Fall, The major lift, The baffled king composing, hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Your faith was strong but you needed proof You saw her bathing on the roof Her beauty in the moonlight overthrew you She tied you to a kitchen chair, she broke your throne she cut your hair and from your lips she drew the halleujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Maybe I've been here before I know this room, I've walked this floor I used to live alone before I knew you I've seen your flag on the marble arch love is not a victory march it's a cold and it's a broken Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah There was a time you let me know What's real and going on below but now you never show it to me, do you? And remember when I moved in you the holy dove was moving too And every breath we drew was Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Maybe there's a God above And all I ever learned from love Was how to shoot at someone who outdrew you It's not a cry you can hear at night It's not somebody who's seen the light it's a cold and it's a broken Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah… The word is "hallelujah" meaning "God be praised (uttered in worship or as an expression of rejoicing)" and there was a distinct relation between this and frenzy by these ATHIEST MONKEYS as USENET STALKERAZZI: - Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> - Sanity's Little Helper <elvish@noshpam.org> - AndrewJH <ahilliker3@yahoo.com> - Budikka666 <budikka1@netscape.net> Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> wrote: > dolf wrote: >> Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> Do you have any relationship with media, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > I don't believe you. Prove it. Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> Do you have any relationship with media, >> radio, television and the arts that might derive some benefit from [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> >> Because I'm not into organized crime... Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Sanity's Little Helper <elvish@noshpam.org> wrote: >>> Andy, can you publicly say "Mary had a little lamb"? > > Pure quote fabrication. > > "dolf", you're a dishonest person. Shame on you. You should buy a gun, at least one bullet, and do the honorable thing. > Thank you. Sorry that your transformation didn't go to plan--sure you might seek to dump a few last minute adjectives and nouns into irrational sentences so you close your parallel and cross market pitch--loop cycle... But we are wise to you who are bruised ... I <Iam@home0000298> wrote: > ";;;Matt;;;" wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > They have forgotten that Christians are allowed to disagree with each other. Paul disagreed with Peter. PROTEST-ants disagreed with Catholics. Disagreements do not nullify one's stance as a Christian. #298 --- inaccessible, steep; ore. --- son(s) of the gods. --- n. "Ruddy". --- to fence around, enclose; to sing, to sound forth bright and clear; to be bright or green, to bloom; court, yard; a village. --- n. "Autumn Rain". --- to cut in, to scratch; to cut to a point, to sharpen; to decide; to gird oneself, to be active; loins; to shine, glitter. --- n. "Help of Yah". --- n. "Mouse". >>> Andrew B. Chung, >>> You are a supreme egoist, [quoted text clipped - 59 lines] > > Another usenet phony religious a.shole. The USENET STALKERAZZI have since their "Griz cult" collaboration, whipped themselves up into a frenzy looking for their next kooks award victim. Clearly they're baying for blood and want to kill someone off... Bruno (Sasha Baron Cohen) makes and interesting point about relationship fidelity and autonomic rights in relation to i-Pod (how do you know its stolen property which has no contact information and has a short life for street kids with no place to recharge it): "[He] talked to the mother and gave her an iPod in exchange for the child. But Ich had real welfare concerns. "Ich was really, really worried about the welfare of that iPod, because the village where Ich met the woman was actually 2000 miles (about 3220 km) from the nearest Apple store. There was no chance for wi-fi update." [http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25694744-2902,00.html] And while cafes such as Battuta Cafe Restraunt in 179 Oxford Street Sydney provide WiFi access, this is no replacement for cheerful and equitable service. Microsoft is also increasingly being fascist (family oriented) and unresponsive in their vilification of those who don't conform to their nuclear family as autonomic model which denies the individual right. But just how safe is your Apple I-Pod and the information it contains? Is it possible that you could plan to do someone over by simply deploying the semantics in the songs as discrete objects. I'm not interested in providing anymore foundational cognitive elements for multi-media Alice-In-Wonderland marketing opportunities. Whilst it doesn't have any form of its own, what relationship does this have within media, radio, television and the arts who might derive some benefit from this stalking and elimination of any reference to a person? Leonard Talmy's Toward a cognitive semantics says, "The relationship of any of these categories or their members to the 'cognitive systems' adduced is a heuristic matter to be worked on in the course of time. The first heuristic psychological category includes the 'foundational' cognitive systems that underlie or mediate the other psychological functions. It includes consciousness and the accessibility of other cognitive systems to consciousness, attention, perspective, perception, memory, and motor control. That may be considered a category of 'executive' functions includes agency, intention, volition, goal pursuit, planning and decision." So if you guess the Lyrics prematurely, it disrupts their continuum --and they have to start again. This one goes back a long way back when they first mentioned the cover versions of this song (by Leonard Cohen) and deliberately excluded the Canadian Lesbian kd.Lang from mention: I've heard there was a secret chord that David played, and it pleased the Lord But you don't really care for music, Do you? It goes like this, the fourth, the fifth The minor Fall, The major lift, The baffled king composing, hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Your faith was strong but you needed proof You saw her bathing on the roof Her beauty in the moonlight overthrew you She tied you to a kitchen chair, she broke your throne she cut your hair and from your lips she drew the halleujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Maybe I've been here before I know this room, I've walked this floor I used to live alone before I knew you I've seen your flag on the marble arch love is not a victory march it's a cold and it's a broken Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah There was a time you let me know What's real and going on below but now you never show it to me, do you? And remember when I moved in you the holy dove was moving too And every breath we drew was Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Maybe there's a God above And all I ever learned from love Was how to shoot at someone who outdrew you It's not a cry you can hear at night It's not somebody who's seen the light it's a cold and it's a broken Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah… The word is "hallelujah" meaning "God be praised (uttered in worship or as an expression of rejoicing)" and there was a distinct relation between this and frenzy by these ATHIEST MONKEYS as USENET STALKERAZZI: - Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> - Sanity's Little Helper <elvish@noshpam.org> - AndrewJH <ahilliker3@yahoo.com> - Budikka666 <budikka1@netscape.net> Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> wrote: > dolf wrote: >> Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> Do you have any relationship with media, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > I don't believe you. Prove it. Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> Do you have any relationship with media, >> radio, television and the arts that might derive some benefit from [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> >> Because I'm not into organized crime... Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Sanity's Little Helper <elvish@noshpam.org> wrote: >>> Andy, can you publicly say "Mary had a little lamb"? > > Pure quote fabrication. > > "dolf", you're a dishonest person. Shame on you. You should buy a gun, at least one bullet, and do the honorable thing. > Thank you. Sorry that your transformation didn't go to plan--sure you might seek to dump a few last minute adjectives and nouns into irrational sentences so you close your parallel and cross market pitch--loop cycle... But we are wise to you who are bruised ... I <Iam@home0000298> wrote: > ";;;Matt;;;" wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > They have forgotten that Christians are allowed to disagree with each other. Paul disagreed with Peter. PROTEST-ants disagreed with Catholics. Disagreements do not nullify one's stance as a Christian. #298 --- inaccessible, steep; ore. --- son(s) of the gods. --- n. "Ruddy". --- to fence around, enclose; to sing, to sound forth bright and clear; to be bright or green, to bloom; court, yard; a village. --- n. "Autumn Rain". --- to cut in, to scratch; to cut to a point, to sharpen; to decide; to gird oneself, to be active; loins; to shine, glitter. --- n. "Help of Yah". --- n. "Mouse". >>> Andrew B. Chung, >>> You are a supreme egoist, [quoted text clipped - 59 lines] > > Another usenet phony religious a.shole. The USENET STALKERAZZI have since their "Griz cult" collaboration, whipped themselves up into a frenzy looking for their next kooks award victim. Clearly they're baying for blood and want to kill someone off... Bruno (Sasha Baron Cohen) makes and interesting point about relationship fidelity and autonomic rights in relation to the Apple i-Pod (how do you know its stolen property which has no contact information and has a short life for street kids with no place to recharge it): "[He] talked to the mother and gave her an iPod in exchange for the child. But Ich had real welfare concerns. "Ich was really, really worried about the welfare of that iPod, because the village where Ich met the woman was actually 2000 miles (about 3220 km) from the nearest Apple store. There was no chance for wi-fi update." [http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25694744-2902,00.html] And while cafes such as Battuta Cafe Restaurant in 179 Oxford Street Sydney provide WiFi access, this is no replacement for cheerful and equitable service. Microsoft is also increasingly being fascist (family oriented) and unresponsive in their vilification of those who don't conform to their nuclear family as autonomic model which denies the individual right. But just how safe is your Apple I-Pod and the information it contains? Is it possible that you could plan to do someone over by simply deploying the semantics in the songs as discrete objects. I'm not interested in providing anymore foundational cognitive elements for multi-media Alice-In-Wonderland marketing opportunities. Whilst it doesn't have any form of its own, what relationship does this have within media, radio, television and the arts who might derive some benefit from this stalking and elimination of any reference to a person? Leonard Talmy's Toward a cognitive semantics says, "The relationship of any of these categories or their members to the 'cognitive systems' adduced is a heuristic matter to be worked on in the course of time. The first heuristic psychological category includes the 'foundational' cognitive systems that underlie or mediate the other psychological functions. It includes consciousness and the accessibility of other cognitive systems to consciousness, attention, perspective, perception, memory, and motor control. That may be considered a category of 'executive' functions includes agency, intention, volition, goal pursuit, planning and decision." So if you guess the Lyrics prematurely, it disrupts their continuum --and they have to start again. This one goes back a long way back when they first mentioned the cover versions of this song (by Leonard Cohen) and deliberately excluded the Canadian Lesbian kd.Lang from mention: I've heard there was a secret chord that David played, and it pleased the Lord But you don't really care for music, Do you? It goes like this, the fourth, the fifth The minor Fall, The major lift, The baffled king composing, hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Your faith was strong but you needed proof You saw her bathing on the roof Her beauty in the moonlight overthrew you She tied you to a kitchen chair, she broke your throne she cut your hair and from your lips she drew the halleujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Maybe I've been here before I know this room, I've walked this floor I used to live alone before I knew you I've seen your flag on the marble arch love is not a victory march it's a cold and it's a broken Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah There was a time you let me know What's real and going on below but now you never show it to me, do you? And remember when I moved in you the holy dove was moving too And every breath we drew was Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Maybe there's a God above And all I ever learned from love Was how to shoot at someone who outdrew you It's not a cry you can hear at night It's not somebody who's seen the light it's a cold and it's a broken Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah… The word is "hallelujah" meaning "God be praised (uttered in worship or as an expression of rejoicing)" and there was a distinct relation between this and frenzy by these ATHIEST MONKEYS as USENET STALKERAZZI: - Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> - Sanity's Little Helper <elvish@noshpam.org> - AndrewJH <ahilliker3@yahoo.com> - Budikka666 <budikka1@netscape.net> Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> wrote: > dolf wrote: >> Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> Do you have any relationship with media, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > I don't believe you. Prove it. Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> Do you have any relationship with media, >> radio, television and the arts that might derive some benefit from [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> >> Because I'm not into organized crime... Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Sanity's Little Helper <elvish@noshpam.org> wrote: >>> Andy, can you publicly say "Mary had a little lamb"? > > Pure quote fabrication. > > "dolf", you're a dishonest person. Shame on you. You should buy a gun, at least one bullet, and do the honorable thing. > Thank you. Sorry that your transformation didn't go to plan--sure you might seek to dump a few last minute adjectives and nouns into irrational sentences so you close your parallel and cross market pitch--loop cycle... But we are wise to you who are bruised ... I <Iam@home0000298> wrote: > ";;;Matt;;;" wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > They have forgotten that Christians are allowed to disagree with each other. Paul disagreed with Peter. PROTEST-ants disagreed with Catholics. Disagreements do not nullify one's stance as a Christian. #298 --- inaccessible, steep; ore. --- son(s) of the gods. --- n. "Ruddy". --- to fence around, enclose; to sing, to sound forth bright and clear; to be bright or green, to bloom; court, yard; a village. --- n. "Autumn Rain". --- to cut in, to scratch; to cut to a point, to sharpen; to decide; to gird oneself, to be active; loins; to shine, glitter. --- n. "Help of Yah". --- n. "Mouse". >>> Andrew B. Chung, >>> You are a supreme egoist, [quoted text clipped - 59 lines] > > Another usenet phony religious a.shole. The USENET STALKERAZZI have since their "Griz cult" collaboration, whipped themselves up into a frenzy looking for their next kooks award victim. Clearly they're baying for blood and want to kill someone off... Bruno (Sasha Baron Cohen) makes and interesting point about relationship fidelity and autonomic rights in relation to the Apple i-Pod (how do you know its stolen property which has no contact information and has a short life for street kids with no place to recharge it): "[He] talked to the mother and gave her an iPod in exchange for the child. But Ich had real welfare concerns. "Ich was really, really worried about the welfare of that iPod, because the village where Ich met the woman was actually 2000 miles (about 3220 km) from the nearest Apple store. There was no chance for wi-fi update." [http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25694744-2902,00.html] And while cafes such as Battuta Cafe Restaurant in 179 Oxford Street Sydney provide WiFi access, this is no replacement for cheerful and equitable service. Microsoft is also increasingly being fascist (family oriented) and unresponsive in their vilification of those who don't conform to their nuclear family as autonomic model which denies the individual right. But just how safe is your Apple I-Pod and the information it contains? Is it possible that you could plan to do someone over by simply deploying the semantics in the songs as discrete objects. I'm not interested in providing anymore foundational cognitive elements for multi-media Alice-In-Wonderland marketing opportunities. Whilst it doesn't have any form of its own, what relationship does this have within media, radio, television and the arts who might derive some benefit from this stalking and elimination of any reference to a person? Leonard Talmy's Toward a cognitive semantics says, "The relationship of any of these categories or their members to the 'cognitive systems' adduced is a heuristic matter to be worked on in the course of time. The first heuristic psychological category includes the 'foundational' cognitive systems that underlie or mediate the other psychological functions. It includes consciousness and the accessibility of other cognitive systems to consciousness, attention, perspective, perception, memory, and motor control. That may be considered a category of 'executive' functions includes agency, intention, volition, goal pursuit, planning and decision." So if you guess the Lyrics prematurely, it disrupts their continuum --and they have to start again. This one goes back a long way back when they first mentioned the cover versions of this song (by Leonard Cohen) and deliberately excluded the Canadian Lesbian kd.Lang from mention: I've heard there was a secret chord that David played, and it pleased the Lord But you don't really care for music, Do you? It goes like this, the fourth, the fifth The minor Fall, The major lift, The baffled king composing, hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Your faith was strong but you needed proof You saw her bathing on the roof Her beauty in the moonlight overthrew you She tied you to a kitchen chair, she broke your throne she cut your hair and from your lips she drew the halleujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Maybe I've been here before I know this room, I've walked this floor I used to live alone before I knew you I've seen your flag on the marble arch love is not a victory march it's a cold and it's a broken Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah There was a time you let me know What's real and going on below but now you never show it to me, do you? And remember when I moved in you the holy dove was moving too And every breath we drew was Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Maybe there's a God above And all I ever learned from love Was how to shoot at someone who outdrew you It's not a cry you can hear at night It's not somebody who's seen the light it's a cold and it's a broken Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah… The word is "hallelujah" meaning "God be praised (uttered in worship or as an expression of rejoicing)" and there was a distinct relation between this and frenzy by these ATHIEST MONKEYS as USENET STALKERAZZI: - Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> - Sanity's Little Helper <elvish@noshpam.org> - AndrewJH <ahilliker3@yahoo.com> - Budikka666 <budikka1@netscape.net> Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> wrote: > dolf wrote: >> Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> Do you have any relationship with media, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > I don't believe you. Prove it. Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> Do you have any relationship with media, >> radio, television and the arts that might derive some benefit from [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> >> Because I'm not into organized crime... Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Sanity's Little Helper <elvish@noshpam.org> wrote: >>> Andy, can you publicly say "Mary had a little lamb"? > > Pure quote fabrication. > > "dolf", you're a dishonest person. Shame on you. You should buy a gun, at least one bullet, and do the honorable thing. > Thank you. Sorry that your transformation didn't go to plan--sure you might seek to dump a few last minute adjectives and nouns into irrational sentences so you close your parallel and cross market pitch--loop cycle... But we are wise to you who are bruised ... I <Iam@home0000298> wrote: > ";;;Matt;;;" wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > They have forgotten that Christians are allowed to disagree with each other. Paul disagreed with Peter. PROTEST-ants disagreed with Catholics. Disagreements do not nullify one's stance as a Christian. #298 --- inaccessible, steep; ore. --- son(s) of the gods. --- n. "Ruddy". --- to fence around, enclose; to sing, to sound forth bright and clear; to be bright or green, to bloom; court, yard; a village. --- n. "Autumn Rain". --- to cut in, to scratch; to cut to a point, to sharpen; to decide; to gird oneself, to be active; loins; to shine, glitter. --- n. "Help of Yah". --- n. "Mouse". >>> Andrew B. Chung, >>> You are a supreme egoist, [quoted text clipped - 59 lines] > > Another usenet phony religious a.shole. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.