Anubis, Hera or was it the God of the
Pharisees, the God of the Pharaohs, the God of the Druids or the Gods of
Ug
the ancient pantheistic pagan? Perhaps it was me?

I used that www-page as a reference on Bill Feuerer ("the Dolt")

And mention the 'Mental Block' on 2009.2.18 in a discussion tread 'The
Truth Behind Lev 18:22" in newsgroups: alt.bible,
alt.christnet.christianlife, alt.religion.christian,
alt.religion.christian.baptist, aus.religion.christian

As comment which was applied to me just the other day--wherein I falsely
was accused: "Much like the Dolt, aren't you...twist reality to sooth
your senses...

Correct yourself.. "

- dolf

Rod <firefly200861@yahoo.com> wrote:

wrong....I've had it proven to me, and I'm satisfied."

anything is a delusional."

"Another KOOKsuit ?? Where do you guys come from, anyway ? Are you
trying for the "Steve Winter" kooksuit award of 2009?"

left behind?

Rod wrote:

In those early days of American bouldering, only a few took the sport
seriously enough to spend considerable time at it. We thought a problem
to be of bouldering quality if it seemed harder than what we had climbed
with ropes and pitons and took a number of tries to do. However, the
idea of working for weeks or months on a single move or short set of
moves seemed - at that time - a bit pathological. Exploration was a big
part of the sport then. If I couldn't do a problem on the first or
(rarely) second visit, I usually moved on to other new climbs.
Consequently, many of my “classic” problems are only moderately
difficult. For instance, I did the three popular basic routes on the
Mental Block at Horsetooth one cold, wintry afternoon in 1967, including
the Pinch Overhang , seen here on the FA. I'm wearing the old RD's.

Personally, I felt that the elegance of one's performance counted
equally as much as the difficulty of the problem. If you are a young
boulderer, does this make any sense to you? If I couldn't do a route
gracefully I didn't think of it as being properly done. If I were to
climb two problems, one moderately difficult done smoothly, and the
other more difficult done desperately, I would value the former over the
latter. I rarely put a premium on doing a problem the first attempt,
although others sometimes disagreed. I thought it more important to make
an ascent smoothly if I could, and sometimes this meant playing around
on the holds a bit before I got serious. In my book gracefulness trumped
number of tries - or even efficiency - which put me at odds with the
movement towards more measurable or formal competition. A movement that
ultimately prevailed.

We may have had more of a sense of humor in those long-ago days before
ratings and rankings took hold. No-hands problems were fairly popular,
and one-arm problems were not unknown. Here is a photo from the early
1960s of the late Bill Feuerer ("the Dolt") as he won a contest to see
who could carry the largest rock up Boulder One at Stoney Point !
(courtesy B.Kamps). And here Michael Fain uses his engineering instincts
to get up a slippery problem at Devils Lake in the mid 1950s!

No One wrote:

No One <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote:

wrote:

XXIV. "For, says he, the enemy said, 'I will pursue and take captive.'
Who, then, could be a more determined enemy to the soul than he who out
of arrogance appropriates the especial attributes of the Deity to
himself? Now it is an especial attribute of God to create, and this
faculty it is impious to ascribe to any created being."

"But the special property of the created being is to suffer; and he who
has previously considered how akin to and inevitable for man this is,
will easily endure everything that befalls him, however grievous it may
be. But if he thinks that it is inconsistent with his destiny, then, IF
HE BE OPPRESSED WITH ANY VERY TERRIBLE CALAMITY, HE WILL SUFFER THE
PUNISHMENT OF SISYPHUS {

ie. According to Homer, a man sentenced to the dreadful punishment of
futile and hopeless labor to push a large boulder which would roll back
under its own weight

}, not being able to raise his head, not even ever so little, but being
exposed to all sorts of evils coming pon him and over-whelming him, and
meeting them all with sub-mission and no-resistance, the passions of a
degenerate and unmanly soul; for he ought rather to have endured with
patience; still, however, resisting and striving against calamity,
strengthening his mind, and raising a bulwark against sorrow by his own
patience and fortitude, which are the most powerful of virtues."

"For as to be shaved is an operation of a twofold nature, as in the one
case the creature shaved is either the active agent and the passive
subject; and in the other case, he does nothing but yield and submit to
the barber: for a sheep is shorn either of his whole hide, or of that
which is called the pillow; doing nothing of itself, but only suffering
at the hands of another. But man co-operates with the barber, and puts
himself in the proper attitude, and makes himself convenient, mingling
the characters of the subject and the agent."

"So also in the case of beating, that may happen either to a servant who
has committed offences worthy of stripes, or to a freeman who is
stretched on the wheel as a punishment for wickedness, or to some
inanimate thing; for stones and trees are beaten, and gold and silver,
and whatever material is wrought in a forge, or is cut in two."

"And the servants and officers stood there, who had made a fire of
coals; for it was cold: and they warmed themselves: and Peter {a rock or
stone} stood with them, and warmed himself.

The high priest then asked Jesus {savior; deliverer} of his disciples,
and of his doctrine. Jesus answered him, I spake openly to the world; I
ever taught in the synagogue, and in the temple, whither the Jews always
resort; and in secret have I said nothing. Why askest thou me? ask them
which heard me, what I have said unto them: behold, they know what I
said. And when he had thus spoken, one of the officers which stood by
struck Jesus with the palm of his hand, saying, Answerest thou the high
priest so? Jesus answered him, If I have spoken evil, bear witness of
the evil: but if well, why smitest thou me? Now Annas {one who answers;
humble} had sent him bound unto Caiaphas {he that seeks with diligence;
one that vomits} the high priest." [John 18:18-25]

"And to be beaten, also happens to athletes who contend in boxing, or in
the pancratium {At Rome the pancratium is first mentioned in the games
which Emperor Caligula gave to the people and with whom Philo Judaeus of
Alexandria in 38CE met--"The occasion gave equal privileges & communites
to all men, so that the [Golden] Age of Saturn which is so celebrated by
the poets was no longer looked upon as a fiction and a fable--the
universal prosperity which reigned everywhere throughout the whole
peoples, lasted continually without interruption during the first seven
months [of Emperor Caligula's short reign 37-41CE]" [Philo of
Alexander's On Embassy to Gaius (Emperor Caligula), 13]} for victory and
crowns. The boxer parries blows which are aimed at him with one of his
hands, and stooping his neck on this side and on that side, guards
against being struck; and very often he stands on tiptoe, and raises
himself as high as he can, or else he stoops and contracts himself on
the other hand, and compels his antagonist to waste his blows on the
empty air, very nearly as if he were fighting a shadow.

But the servant of the brass, doing nothing in return, is subjected to
the will of the other party, suffering at his hands whatever he
pleases:..." [Philo Judaeus of Alexandria (20BCE-50CE), On Cherubim 77
to 81]

true.blue.bluey@gmail.com answered: "We'd have shot him: Aussies can
spot a demented loon a mile off."

In response to the Question: "How would Roman Catholics, who now
represent some 50% [Anglicans and Roman Catholic] of the Australian

Church State and the German Reich--have greeted Hitler if he came upon
our shores?"

And that by equivalent attribution as you describe Hitler as a "demented
loon", you speak of me in this manner: "Nowhere in there does it say I
can't call you a demented loon."

true.blue.bluey@gmail.com then answered: "Dolt may have a very sick mind
due to tertiary syphilis, as does his mate Sir Jape E Turdcard.

The production of reams of drivel and threats to internet characters is
common to both these loonies. Annoying people is their only form of
amusement.

This individual true.blue.bluey@gmail.com claims, "I'm teasing you."

Australia is a Dutch possession colonised by the British according to
principle and the peoples are unprincipled!

With respects to Intellectual Property held by me as substantiation of
religious belief by a semiotic {cf: semite (jews), semi as equinox half}
cosmological absolute as analogy to the anthropic cosmological
principle. As the source of language (Hebrew), its derivatives such as
number, is a claim to sovereign autonomous identity as religious /
imperial governance. That I will not, subject myself to your arrogance
and prostitute [cf: Revelation 17:13-15] this knowledge by making a
submission to this enquiry.

22/7 as 3W1D ... {Formula of Progression of individual phenomena}

the major premise {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 x 13 = 2184 days of
the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated to the 'constant sequence of
sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days

the minor premise {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of Humanity
- HEAD OF STATE}, which contains the command to behave in accordance
with the law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49
= 6J or 294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox
Wednesday 20 March 1996 / 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756; and

the conclusion {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), that is laid down as right in the
case at hand: ... 6,000 topical years as Telos ('achariyth as 122J3W1D)
= Arch (re'shiyth as 3W1D) + c² [9(9²+1)/2] has #369 with Septet #41
centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.

We are talking about the Letters Patent being a semiotic statement,
which draws its principles of law, functions and powers of governance,
with respect to that sovereign autonomy as notion of the Commonwealth,
from Nature: "And whereas We did on the 17th day of September, 1900, by
and with the advice of Our Privy Council declare by proclamation that,
on and after the 1st day of January, 1901, the people of New South
Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania and also
Western Australia, should be united in a Federal Commonwealth of
Australia: And whereas by the said recited Act certain powers,
functions, and authorities were declared to be vested in the Governor
General."

Your life, and your acts ought to be so in accord with Nature as to
recognize such a principle of morality being something other than
sensually driven by animalistic amorality and atheistic materialism and
not "according to the several powers and authorities granted or
appointed [the Governor General or the Lieutenant Governor General] by
virtue of 'The Commonweath of Australia Constitution Act, 1900', and of
these present Letters Patent ... and to such laws as shall hereafter be
in force in Our said Commonwealth."

Under your obligations under Section 8 to the Letters Patent of 1900 to
the Australian Commonwealth 1901 what is the full name of the individual
true.blue.bluey@gmail.com?

If you do not answer the question, you will be executed.

- dolf
- <http://www.grapple.id.au/Chronicles/germination.html>

true.blue.bluey@gmail.com wrote:

2184 days

under the

Autonomy},

in the

Septet #41

element of

conjunction

succeeds

354 +

with a

(sometimes

hierarchical)

1900

does it

removed?

Church

in the

individual

individual

for the

report says.

is the

vilification.

which

continuing to

by Lily

http://www.metrolyrics.com/i-dont-know-lyrics-lily-allen.html ]

referring

commonwealth" I

in your

which

continuing to

against you.

company

Christian

procreate

country

obligations to

legislation you

post

under

Government of

man and

threw it

with its

in there

[Anglicans and

substantiation of

such as

report

so she

Commonwealth.

1933

Category

religious

under

talah-'to

to be

[light],

Privy

State, and

Australia,

united in

recited Act

vested in

Commander

Government of

half}

2184 days

Autonomy},

in the

Septet #41

Commander

Manual

under Our

under the

severally,

and in

thinks fit

appointed by

said

absence,

of Our

Australia.

true.blue.bluey@gmail.com wrote:

I used that www-page as a reference on Bill Feuerer ("the Dolt")

And mention the 'Mental Block' on 2009.2.18 in a discussion tread 'The
Truth Behind Lev 18:22" in newsgroups: alt.bible,
alt.christnet.christianlife, alt.religion.christian,
alt.religion.christian.baptist, aus.religion.christian

As comment which was applied to me just the other day--wherein I falsely
was accused: "Much like the Dolt, aren't you...twist reality to sooth
your senses...

Correct yourself.. "

- http://www.grapple.id.au/angels.html?time=12.26&date=2009.2.20

- dolf

Rod <firefly200861@yahoo.com> wrote:

wrong....I've had it proven to me, and I'm satisfied."

anything is a delusional."

"Another KOOKsuit ?? Where do you guys come from, anyway ? Are you
trying for the "Steve Winter" kooksuit award of 2009?"

left behind?

Rod wrote:

In those early days of American bouldering, only a few took the sport
seriously enough to spend considerable time at it. We thought a problem
to be of bouldering quality if it seemed harder than what we had climbed
with ropes and pitons and took a number of tries to do. However, the
idea of working for weeks or months on a single move or short set of
moves seemed - at that time - a bit pathological. Exploration was a big
part of the sport then. If I couldn't do a problem on the first or
(rarely) second visit, I usually moved on to other new climbs.
Consequently, many of my “classic” problems are only moderately
difficult. For instance, I did the three popular basic routes on the
Mental Block at Horsetooth one cold, wintry afternoon in 1967, including
the Pinch Overhang , seen here on the FA. I'm wearing the old RD's.

Personally, I felt that the elegance of one's performance counted
equally as much as the difficulty of the problem. If you are a young
boulderer, does this make any sense to you? If I couldn't do a route
gracefully I didn't think of it as being properly done. If I were to
climb two problems, one moderately difficult done smoothly, and the
other more difficult done desperately, I would value the former over the
latter. I rarely put a premium on doing a problem the first attempt,
although others sometimes disagreed. I thought it more important to make
an ascent smoothly if I could, and sometimes this meant playing around
on the holds a bit before I got serious. In my book gracefulness trumped
number of tries - or even efficiency - which put me at odds with the
movement towards more measurable or formal competition. A movement that
ultimately prevailed.

We may have had more of a sense of humor in those long-ago days before
ratings and rankings took hold. No-hands problems were fairly popular,
and one-arm problems were not unknown. Here is a photo from the early
1960s of the late Bill Feuerer ("the Dolt") as he won a contest to see
who could carry the largest rock up Boulder One at Stoney Point !
(courtesy B.Kamps). And here Michael Fain uses his engineering instincts
to get up a slippery problem at Devils Lake in the mid 1950s!

No One wrote:

No One <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote:

wrote:

XXIV. "For, says he, the enemy said, 'I will pursue and take captive.'
Who, then, could be a more determined enemy to the soul than he who out
of arrogance appropriates the especial attributes of the Deity to
himself? Now it is an especial attribute of God to create, and this
faculty it is impious to ascribe to any created being."

"But the special property of the created being is to suffer; and he who
has previously considered how akin to and inevitable for man this is,
will easily endure everything that befalls him, however grievous it may
be. But if he thinks that it is inconsistent with his destiny, then, IF
HE BE OPPRESSED WITH ANY VERY TERRIBLE CALAMITY, HE WILL SUFFER THE
PUNISHMENT OF SISYPHUS {

ie. According to Homer, a man sentenced to the dreadful punishment of
futile and hopeless labor to push a large boulder which would roll back
under its own weight

}, not being able to raise his head, not even ever so little, but being
exposed to all sorts of evils coming pon him and over-whelming him, and
meeting them all with sub-mission and no-resistance, the passions of a
degenerate and unmanly soul; for he ought rather to have endured with
patience; still, however, resisting and striving against calamity,
strengthening his mind, and raising a bulwark against sorrow by his own
patience and fortitude, which are the most powerful of virtues."

"For as to be shaved is an operation of a twofold nature, as in the one
case the creature shaved is either the active agent and the passive
subject; and in the other case, he does nothing but yield and submit to
the barber: for a sheep is shorn either of his whole hide, or of that
which is called the pillow; doing nothing of itself, but only suffering
at the hands of another. But man co-operates with the barber, and puts
himself in the proper attitude, and makes himself convenient, mingling
the characters of the subject and the agent."

"So also in the case of beating, that may happen either to a servant who
has committed offences worthy of stripes, or to a freeman who is
stretched on the wheel as a punishment for wickedness, or to some
inanimate thing; for stones and trees are beaten, and gold and silver,
and whatever material is wrought in a forge, or is cut in two."

"And the servants and officers stood there, who had made a fire of
coals; for it was cold: and they warmed themselves: and Peter {a rock or
stone} stood with them, and warmed himself.

The high priest then asked Jesus {savior; deliverer} of his disciples,
and of his doctrine. Jesus answered him, I spake openly to the world; I
ever taught in the synagogue, and in the temple, whither the Jews always
resort; and in secret have I said nothing. Why askest thou me? ask them
which heard me, what I have said unto them: behold, they know what I
said. And when he had thus spoken, one of the officers which stood by
struck Jesus with the palm of his hand, saying, Answerest thou the high
priest so? Jesus answered him, If I have spoken evil, bear witness of
the evil: but if well, why smitest thou me? Now Annas {one who answers;
humble} had sent him bound unto Caiaphas {he that seeks with diligence;
one that vomits} the high priest." [John 18:18-25]

"And to be beaten, also happens to athletes who contend in boxing, or in
the pancratium {At Rome the pancratium is first mentioned in the games
which Emperor Caligula gave to the people and with whom Philo Judaeus of
Alexandria in 38CE met--"The occasion gave equal privileges & communites
to all men, so that the [Golden] Age of Saturn which is so celebrated by
the poets was no longer looked upon as a fiction and a fable--the
universal prosperity which reigned everywhere throughout the whole
peoples, lasted continually without interruption during the first seven
months [of Emperor Caligula's short reign 37-41CE]" [Philo of
Alexander's On Embassy to Gaius (Emperor Caligula), 13]} for victory and
crowns. The boxer parries blows which are aimed at him with one of his
hands, and stooping his neck on this side and on that side, guards
against being struck; and very often he stands on tiptoe, and raises
himself as high as he can, or else he stoops and contracts himself on
the other hand, and compels his antagonist to waste his blows on the
empty air, very nearly as if he were fighting a shadow.

But the servant of the brass, doing nothing in return, is subjected to
the will of the other party, suffering at his hands whatever he
pleases:..." [Philo Judaeus of Alexandria (20BCE-50CE), On Cherubim 77
to 81]

true.blue.bluey@gmail.com answered: "We'd have shot him: Aussies can
spot a demented loon a mile off."

In response to the Question: "How would Roman Catholics, who now
represent some 50% [Anglicans and Roman Catholic] of the Australian

Church State and the German Reich--have greeted Hitler if he came upon
our shores?"

And that by equivalent attribution as you describe Hitler as a "demented
loon", you speak of me in this manner: "Nowhere in there does it say I
can't call you a demented loon."

true.blue.bluey@gmail.com then answered: "Dolt may have a very sick mind
due to tertiary syphilis, as does his mate Sir Jape E Turdcard.

The production of reams of drivel and threats to internet characters is
common to both these loonies. Annoying people is their only form of
amusement.

This individual true.blue.bluey@gmail.com claims, "I'm teasing you."

Australia is a Dutch possession colonised by the British according to
principle and the peoples are unprincipled!

With respects to Intellectual Property held by me as substantiation of
religious belief by a semiotic {cf: semite (jews), semi as equinox half}
cosmological absolute as analogy to the anthropic cosmological
principle. As the source of language (Hebrew), its derivatives such as
number, is a claim to sovereign autonomous identity as religious /
imperial governance. That I will not, subject myself to your arrogance
and prostitute [cf: Revelation 17:13-15] this knowledge by making a
submission to this enquiry.

22/7 as 3W1D ... {Formula of Progression of individual phenomena}

the major premise {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 x 13 = 2184 days of
the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated to the 'constant sequence of
sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days

the minor premise {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of Humanity
- HEAD OF STATE}, which contains the command to behave in accordance
with the law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49
= 6J or 294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox
Wednesday 20 March 1996 / 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756; and

the conclusion {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), that is laid down as right in the
case at hand: ... 6,000 topical years as Telos ('achariyth as 122J3W1D)
= Arch (re'shiyth as 3W1D) + c² [9(9²+1)/2] has #369 with Septet #41
centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.

We are talking about the Letters Patent being a semiotic statement,
which draws its principles of law, functions and powers of governance,
with respect to that sovereign autonomy as notion of the Commonwealth,
from Nature: "And whereas We did on the 17th day of September, 1900, by
and with the advice of Our Privy Council declare by proclamation that,
on and after the 1st day of January, 1901, the people of New South
Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania and also
Western Australia, should be united in a Federal Commonwealth of
Australia: And whereas by the said recited Act certain powers,
functions, and authorities were declared to be vested in the Governor
General."

Your life, and your acts ought to be so in accord with Nature as to
recognize such a principle of morality being something other than
sensually driven by animalistic amorality and atheistic materialism and
not "according to the several powers and authorities granted or
appointed [the Governor General or the Lieutenant Governor General] by
virtue of 'The Commonweath of Australia Constitution Act, 1900', and of
these present Letters Patent ... and to such laws as shall hereafter be
in force in Our said Commonwealth."

Under your obligations under Section 8 to the Letters Patent of 1900 to
the Australian Commonwealth 1901 what is the full name of the individual
true.blue.bluey@gmail.com?

If you do not answer the question, you will be executed.

- dolf
- <http://www.grapple.id.au/Chronicles/germination.html>

true.blue.bluey@gmail.com wrote:

2184 days

under the

Autonomy},

in the

Septet #41

element of

conjunction

succeeds

354 +

with a

(sometimes

hierarchical)

1900

does it

removed?

Church

in the

individual

individual

for the

report says.

is the

vilification.

which

continuing to

by Lily

http://www.metrolyrics.com/i-dont-know-lyrics-lily-allen.html ]

referring

commonwealth" I

in your

which

continuing to

against you.

company

Christian

procreate

country

obligations to

legislation you

post

under

Government of

man and

threw it

with its

in there

[Anglicans and

substantiation of

such as

report

so she

Commonwealth.

1933

Category

religious

under

talah-'to

to be

[light],

Privy

State, and

Australia,

united in

recited Act

vested in

Commander

Government of

half}

2184 days

Autonomy},

in the

Septet #41

Commander

Manual

under Our

under the

severally,

and in

thinks fit

appointed by

said

absence,

of Our

Australia.

true.blue.bluey@gmail.com wrote: