Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Cardiology / October 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Managing AF in the setting of a prolonged QTc interval?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
douglas - 27 Oct 2008 04:16 GMT
What drugs would be useful for managing AF in the setting of a
prolonged QTc interval? I'm guessing diltiazem, verapamil, and
digoxin, b/c I haven't seen any evidence that they do prolong the QTc
interval from reading studies.

The reason I'm asking is b/c I'll be shadowing a cardiologist on
Friday, and I want to bone up on my cardiac pharmacotherapy knowledge.
He'll be teaching me all sorts of stuff over the next weeks, such as
reading ECGs, TTEs, MUGAs, nuclear and non-nuclear stress tests,
cardiopulmonary physiology, etc., lots of cool stuff.

Btw, what counts as a "prolonged" QTc interval, > 440 ms for men, and
> 450 ms for women?

Thanks!
Truth - 29 Oct 2008 00:34 GMT
> What drugs would be useful for managing AF in the setting of a
> prolonged QTc interval? I'm guessing diltiazem, verapamil, and
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Thanks!

Go read about amiodarone. I'm not saying that it is the most
appropriate drug in this case, but you can read about it and have some
questions to ask when you meet with this cardiologist. If I remember,
you are an undergrad. There's a lot to learn.
douglas - 29 Oct 2008 03:06 GMT
> > What drugs would be useful for managing AF in the setting of a
> > prolonged QTc interval? I'm guessing diltiazem, verapamil, and
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

For managing in the acute scenario, of course I'd use amiodarone, just
like everyone else. But I'm talking about for long-term management;
amiodarone can have some pretty nasty side-effects. Verapamil or
diltiazem would have less side-effects and not prolong the QTc.
Truth - 29 Oct 2008 05:05 GMT
> > > What drugs would be useful for managing AF in the setting of a
> > > prolonged QTc interval? I'm guessing diltiazem, verapamil, and
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> amiodarone can have some pretty nasty side-effects. Verapamil or
> diltiazem would have less side-effects and not prolong the QTc.

You have a lot to learn, Douglas. Don't come off as a smart a.s to the
cardiologist you are going to shadow. He's had years more training and
practical experience than you have. A little bit of medical knowledge
misapplied is a dangerous thing. Especially when accompanied by
arrogance.
Harrrumph - 29 Oct 2008 05:56 GMT
Truth <yamantaka@aol.com> wrote in news:12ed186b-663b-4938-96b8-
003810e4bb7a@u46g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:

>> > > What drugs would be useful for managing AF in the setting of a
>> > > prolonged QTc interval? I'm guessing diltiazem, verapamil, and
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> misapplied is a dangerous thing. Especially when accompanied by
> arrogance.

I don't see where Douglas has appeared arrogant in this thread, or written
anything to warrant this seeming attack.

H.
douglas - 29 Oct 2008 17:05 GMT
> Truth <yamant...@aol.com> wrote in news:12ed186b-663b-4938-96b8-
> 003810e4b...@u46g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Yes, and besides, do you want me to come off as completely clueless?
What's wrong w/ researching the pharmaceuticals involved, as well as
diseases and conditions, and how to interpret diagnostics? Don't you
want me to appear interested in the field w/ a passion? What if you
came to a rotation in medical school and followed your own advice;
what would your attending think? Would he think you're very interested
in medicine?

And beside, he said he'll be quizzing me on stuff like this. My Mom,
an RN, also told me to thouroughly research things like this.
Truth - 29 Oct 2008 20:09 GMT
> > Truth <yamant...@aol.com> wrote in news:12ed186b-663b-4938-96b8-
> > 003810e4b...@u46g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:
[quoted text clipped - 56 lines]
> And beside, he said he'll be quizzing me on stuff like this. My Mom,
> an RN, also told me to thouroughly research things like this.

Why don't you start off then by explaining here what the Q and T are
and how they apply to the stages of function of the heart during its
cycles? Please describe it here so that we can see you have grasped
that concept first.  You're 17 years old, correct? If you start
talking to the cardiologist with lines like, "of course I'd use
amiodorone just like everyone else" you won't get far with an
experienced cardiologist. Yes, appear interested but appropriate to
your level of education and experience.

I went to medical school before you were even born. You rhetorical
question about my medical school years has no place at all in this
discussion. It's not my intention to "attack" you. Take my advice or
leave it. I don't care.
douglas - 29 Oct 2008 20:22 GMT
> > > Truth <yamant...@aol.com> wrote in news:12ed186b-663b-4938-96b8-
> > > 003810e4b...@u46g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:
[quoted text clipped - 72 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Yes, I do know what the waves on an ECG mean: P is atrial
depolarization, Q is the first downward deflection after the P wave, R
is ventricular depolarization, S is the first downward deflection
after the R-wave, and T is ventricular repolarization.

And of course I wouldn't spout off lines like that. I'm not a moron.

This is what the cardiologist said to me "Wow, I'd love to help you
further your knowledge; you seem more knowledgeable about cardiology
then some of the med students I get."

Please don't underestimate my knowledge. The cardiologist I'm
shadowing sure didn't.
Truth - 29 Oct 2008 20:59 GMT
> > > > Truth <yamant...@aol.com> wrote in news:12ed186b-663b-4938-96b8-
> > > > 003810e4b...@u46g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:
[quoted text clipped - 86 lines]
> Please don't underestimate my knowledge. The cardiologist I'm
> shadowing sure didn't.

But you spouted off that line here, to me.

There's a difference between knowledge / intelligence and knowledge
from experience. This cardiologist doesn't expect you to respond like
a cardiology fellow, resident or even a medical student. If you are
intelligent and interested it will show. Just beware that a little bit
of knowledge from reading a book or article is no match for years of
having read books, articles, attended conferences and treated
thousands of patients. In the past in your posts I have detected
arrogance.
douglas - 29 Oct 2008 21:43 GMT
> > > > > Truth <yamant...@aol.com> wrote in news:12ed186b-663b-4938-96b8-
> > > > > 003810e4b...@u46g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:
[quoted text clipped - 99 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Okay.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.