>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>Bottom line concerning your having less free will:
What a dumb-a.s sentence. If free will is given to us by god, then how
is it given in variable amounts? How is it altered? Is it not given to
everyone? Is it "perishable"? Do fundamentalist god-bot zealots like
you think you can decide who has any specific amount of free will?
Why is it that you denigrate people that actually demonstrate
autonomous thought ("free will" if you like) when you are
brain-shackled by a myth and show no real signs of independent
thought, through unquestioned stupid belief after stupid belief?
Bottom line is
"you're whacked".
Thom Madura - 09 Aug 2008 16:04 GMT
>>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Bottom line is
> "you're whacked".
He is worse off than he thinks
Unlike the typical quack talking about medical situations on the
internet - Andrew is actually a licensed Physician.
WHere the quack's suggestion are taken at your own risk - Andrew is
LEGALLY responsible for the advice he gives on the internet. It is also
likely that the advice he gives here is not covered by his malpractice
insurance - because he does not include disclaimers you would normally
find from a doctor.
All Andrew would need is one person to take him seriously about his
"hunger" treatment - when it is contraindicated for that person's
particular problem - and if something were to go very wrong - he could
lose both his license and everything he has.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 10 Aug 2008 06:05 GMT
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/3238bedb3f52c95f
<><
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/4128be9f9918d825?
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> you to unwittingly provide a tell that betrays the despair in your
> heart.
I put this in for Non-Sequitur of the Month To Date. Seconds?
-- cary
> Bottom line concerning your having less free will:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/a88f3caf4697e3e7?
And another!
> May we, who are Christians (either Jew or gentile), continue to pray
> for your perishing soul, dear Cary:
And yet another!!
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/5c7bedfac3f61358?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> --
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/4128be9f9918d825?
And yet one more! Is there no limit to this man's talent
for irrelevance?
-- cary
SkyEyes - 11 Aug 2008 18:39 GMT
> In article <5fe4948b-9f31-4e68-8607-274087ab9...@79g2000hsk.googlegroups.com> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> writes:
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> I put this in for Non-Sequitur of the Month To Date. Seconds?
Seconded. For what it's worth.
> >http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/4128be9f9918d825?
>
> And yet one more! Is there no limit to this man's talent
> for irrelevance?
Apparently not. But then, Andrew's elevator doesn't go all the way to
the top floor, as we all know.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
BAAWA Knight
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 12 Aug 2008 01:29 GMT
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> I put this in for Non-Sequitur of the Month To Date. Seconds?
Bottom line concerning your comprehension difficulties:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/773bdee360f7775e?
<><
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/4128be9f9918d825?