Medical Forum / General / Cardiology / May 2008
Pediatric Fatty Liver Boosts Cardiovascular Disease Risk
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 03 May 2008 23:59 GMT COLORADO SPRINGS — Pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is strongly associated with multiple cardiovascular risk factors, often in excess of clinical thresholds for considering pharmacotherapy, Dr. Stephen Cook said at a conference of the American Heart Association.
Moreover, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is twice that seen in equally obese youths without the hepatic disease, according to Dr. Cook, of the University of Rochester (N.Y.) Medical Center.
He added that these new findings from a 300-patient case-control study underscore the importance of routine screening for NAFLD in obese youth as recently recommended by an expert panel comprising representatives of 15 professional organizations (Pediatrics 2007;120:S163–288).
NAFLD is “a severe precursor which, if not reversed, is going to be one of the leading causes of liver failure in adulthood,” Dr. Cook said in an interview.
The cardiovascular risk profiles documented in this study raise the prospect that youths with NAFLD may be predisposed to highly premature cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, he noted.
Dr. Cook reported on 150 severely obese children and adolescents with biopsy-proven NAFLD and an equal number of age-, gender-, and obesity- matched controls with normal liver function tests and no hepatomegaly or other signs of NAFLD.
“Across the board, these obese kids with fatty liver had far higher triglycerides, LDL, fasting blood glucose, insulin, blood pressure, and lower HDL than matched controls who were just as obese,” he said.
Overall, 80 youths with NAFLD and 35 controls met the three-component definition for metabolic syndrome.
In a logistic regression analysis controlled for age, race, gender, insulin resistance, and body mass index, subjects with NAFLD were two- to sixfold more likely than were controls to exceed treatable thresholds for various cardiovascular risk factors. (See box.)
The recent expert panel recommendations included comprehensive reports on the treatment, prevention, and assessment of pediatric obesity. Panelists recommended that lipid profiles routinely be obtained in youths who are at or above the 85th percentile for BMI, and recommended liver function tests, fasting blood glucose, and lipid profiles in all those at or above the 95th percentile.
Although liver biopsy is required for definitive diagnosis of NAFLD, there is considerable interest in noninvasive screening. Magnetic resonance imaging is probably the best method at present, followed by CT with contrast. Ultrasound is the least informative method, but fatty infiltration does cause the liver to light up on ultrasound, and the attenuation can be compared with the spleen, Dr. Cook said.
*******
A simple parable given in hopes of promoting much greater understanding:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Parable
Life in industrialized nations is life in feed lots. It is up to parents to figure out what is the right amount of food for their children. Because the right amount for the parents is 32 ounces, the right amount for their children will be varying degrees less.
<><
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Counsels
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 04 May 2008 00:03 GMT Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
http://internalmedicinenews.com/article/PIIS1097869008704529/fulltext
> COLORADO SPRINGS � Pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is > strongly associated with multiple cardiovascular risk factors, often [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] > fatty infiltration does cause the liver to light up on ultrasound, and > the attenuation can be compared with the spleen, Dr. Cook said. http://internalmedicinenews.com/article/PIIS1097869008704529/fulltext
> ******* > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > children. Because the right amount for the parents is 32 ounces, the > right amount for their children will be varying degrees less. <><
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Counsels
yamantaka@aol.com - 04 May 2008 16:06 GMT On May 3, 3:59 pm, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdo...@emorycardiology.com> wrote: able
> Life in industrialized nations is life in feed lots. It is up to > parents to figure out what is the right amount of food for their > children. Because the right amount for the parents is 32 ounces, the > right amount for their children will be varying degrees less. Backpedaling a little here Chung? Now it's up to parents to determine the right amount of food for their children rather than feeding then 32 ounces of food per day?
Of course children need varying amounts of food according to their activities, age and weight. Just like every other human in the world. There is not one ounce, not one iota of scientifically derived evidence that shows that 32 ounces of food per day is the *right* amount.
If you put your usual nonsense links calling me Satan in response to my reply it will prove what a sick, twisted brain you have.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 04 May 2008 17:06 GMT http://HeartMDPhD.com/Valuelesssatan
<><
http://HeartMDPhD.com/TruthCutssatan
yamantaka@aol.com - 04 May 2008 17:52 GMT On May 4, 9:06 am, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdo...@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
> http://HeartMDPhD.com/Valuelesssatan > > <>< > > http://HeartMDPhD.com/TruthCutssatan Once again Andrew proves what a sick and twisted brain he has and that he is no longer fit to practice medicine. Any reasonable person would be man enough to admit he made a mistake about insisting that two pounds per day was the optimal amount of food for everyone. But now, Andrew persists in his delusion that anyone who questions him is Satan.
J666 - 04 May 2008 18:11 GMT > Once again Andrew proves what a sick and twisted brain he has and that > he is no longer fit to practice medicine. Any reasonable person would > be man enough to admit he made a mistake about insisting that two > pounds per day was the optimal amount of food for everyone. But now, > Andrew persists in his delusion that anyone who questions him is > Satan. The 2PD Blah Blah was originally two pounds of food so that 2 pounds of chocolate was the same as 2 pounds of sugar-free Jello, but a while back the Oracle Of Mableton (OOM) opinied that it was to be a balanced diet.
I have no doubt that the OOM will change the 2PDer for adults and not children.
Though, since the 2PDer Omer is based on Exodus and manna from heaven, there is no mention of children having less, so the Biblical interpretation relies on manna and not other foods - but just as an omer is a volume and not a weight, that is not important to OOM
Since the OOM is delusional, conistency and reason are not needed, and would not be expected.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 04 May 2008 19:54 GMT http://HeartMDPhD.com/CrazySockPuppets
<><
http://HeartMDPhD.com/TruthCutssatan
yamantaka@aol.com - 04 May 2008 20:23 GMT On May 4, 11:54 am, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdo...@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
> http://HeartMDPhD.com/CrazySockPuppets > > <>< > > http://HeartMDPhD.com/TruthCutssatan Good, Andrew. I'm glad you agree that you have been a liar and a source of medical misinformation and a tax fraud in the past. It is now time for you to change your way.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 05 May 2008 00:52 GMT http://HeartMDPhD.com/TooStupidsatan
<><
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Warns
yamantaka@aol.com - 05 May 2008 02:42 GMT On May 4, 4:52 pm, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdo...@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
> http://HeartMDPhD.com/TooStupidsatan > > <>< > > http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Warns Good Andrew. Good to see that you finally realize that your idea that 2 pounds of food per day for everyone was stupid. Perhaps you are heeding the warning that your stupidity in this matter and your inability to practice medicine due to mental illness have come to the attention of the Georgia Medical Board investigators.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 05 May 2008 03:44 GMT http://HeartMDPhD.com/Valuelesssatan
<><
http://HeartMDPhD.com/TruthCutssatan
yamantaka@aol.com - 05 May 2008 03:56 GMT On May 4, 7:44 pm, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdo...@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
> http://HeartMDPhD.com/Valuelesssatan > > <>< > > http://HeartMDPhD.com/TruthCutssatan Good. Finally Chung you realize that there is no value to the stupid crap you post everyday about 2 pounds per day for everyone. Indeed, the truth is that people need to adjust their intake according to their weight, activity, age and medical condition.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 05 May 2008 07:55 GMT http://HeartMDPhD.com/DumbCrazysatan
<><
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Warns
yamantaka@aol.com - 05 May 2008 08:09 GMT On May 4, 11:55 pm, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdo...@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
> http://HeartMDPhD.com/DumbCrazysatan > > <>< > > http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Warns Yes, Chung. We all already know that you are crazy and getting dumber by the day due to your mental illness. Plus you are a personality disordered liar and a tax fraud and a dissembler of Scriptures to fit your delusional view of the world.. You are a failure at real life and a failure in your fantasy life too. It must suck to be you, so desperate and flailing, playing with your imaginary friend the Holy Spirit...putting words in it's mouth.
And now you are trying to pretend that you haven't been pushing 2 pounds per day for everyone, of every age, build, constitution and weight. You are busted. You have publically admitted the 2PD diet is bullshit and not the *right* amount of food for everyone.
You don't have to keep posting crap admitting what a dishonest, mentally ill wretch you are. Although it is rather amusing to see how compulsive and delusional you can be. You have no free will. You are compelled to respond to each post.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 05 May 2008 08:55 GMT http://HeartMDPhD.com/Feeblesatan
<><
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Warns
yamantaka@aol.com - 05 May 2008 08:58 GMT On May 5, 12:55 am, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdo...@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
> http://HeartMDPhD.com/Feeblesatan > > <>< > > http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Warns See? Chung, you couldn't resist posting. I controlled you.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 05 May 2008 11:26 GMT http://HeartMDPhD.com/DumbCrazysatan
<><
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Warns
yamantaka@aol.com - 05 May 2008 15:44 GMT On May 5, 3:26 am, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdo...@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
> http://HeartMDPhD.com/DumbCrazysatan > > <>< > > http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Warns And you posted again Chung. You have no free will. You do my bidding now, Chung
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 06 May 2008 10:03 GMT http://HeartMDPhD.com/Valuelesssatan
<><
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Warns
yamantaka@aol.com - 04 May 2008 18:02 GMT On May 3, 3:59 pm, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdo...@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
> COLORADO SPRINGS — Pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is > strongly associated with multiple cardiovascular risk factors, often [quoted text clipped - 67 lines] > > http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Counsels
> Life in industrialized nations is life in feed lots. It is up to > parents to figure out what is the right amount of food for their > children. Because the right amount for the parents is 32 ounces, the > right amount for their children will be varying degrees less. I've reposted Chung's admission that 2 pounds per day isn't optimal for everyone in order to ensure that this admission is forever archived on Google Groups for future reference, and his original post and context is archived. This is further proof that Chung is the liar we all know him to be. Let's see him try to wiggle out of this one this time.
Hey Chung, better get cracking on that tax form 990 for 2007. The IRS is interested in your claim of 2 million dollars.
|
|
|