Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Cardiology / May 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

questions on angiography

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
jerry.ranch@pioneer.com - 01 May 2008 21:59 GMT
I'm getting information second hand about my mother-in-law, but this
is what I know. She's 85, and a few days ago she felt odd,and she was
taken to a local ER where they said she had some kind of arrythmia.
Atria and ventricles were not coordinated, apparently. So she had an
angiogram yesterday, and at most, a vessel was 75% blocked, and one
was 50% blocked.  However, the report I get from one of her daughters
(who is freaking out BTW and I'm having a difficult time getting
reliable info from her, because she is feeling sorry for herself, and
NOT her mother -  that's another story)  is that my mother-in-law has
some kid of anatomical malformation of her coronary arteries. She has
two, where the cardiologist expected three.  First of all, the
cardiologist claimed he had never seen a patient with only two
coronary arteries, but a review of the web indicates that this not
uncommon (so I wonder about his experience ??, or the veracity of the
web).  So they want to do a ACV angiogram?  What is that.  I've had
enough angiograms to know that if an artery is blocked you won't see
it.  So how can they determine if the lack of proper contrast dye is
due to an antomical malformation, or a 100% blocked artery.

The info I get is that EKG apparently is fine (how can it be fine with
an arrythmia?), as well as other blood and functional workup

I'm hoping I can get on a 3-way call with my sister-in-law and her
mom's cardiologist so I can get some unfiltered answers.  I want to
know if the apparent anatomical malformation is the cause of the
arrythmia.  And what tests/procedures are really necessary.

Jerry
Bill - 01 May 2008 22:44 GMT
> I'm getting information second hand about my mother-in-law, but this
> is what I know. She's 85, and a few days ago she felt odd,and she was
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Jerry

Bill says in third person. What .......

Don't fear the reaper! Who thinks you are a nut case.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_expectancy

Signature

Garden in shade zone 5 S Jersey USA

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 01 May 2008 22:45 GMT
neighbor Jerry (jerry.ra...@pioneer.com) wrote:

> I'm getting information second hand about my mother-in-law, but this
> is what I know. She's 85, and a few days ago she felt odd,and she was
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> uncommon (so I wonder about his experience ??, or the veracity of the
> web).  So they want to do a ACV angiogram?

Suspect what they heard was "a CT angiogram."

>  What is that.

A computed tomography (CT) angiogram is doing a coronary angiogram
using newer 64 slice CT scanners:

http://www.medicinenet.com/ct_coronary_angiogram/article.htm

However, this may not be a good idea for your mother-in-law because of
the arrhythmia.

>  I've had enough angiograms to know that if an artery is blocked you won't see
> it.

We would either see a "stump" or "feel" the catheter "engage."

> So how can they determine if the lack of proper contrast dye is
> due to an antomical malformation, or a 100% blocked artery.

Largely by experience.

> The info I get is that EKG apparently is fine (how can it be fine with
> an arrythmia?), as well as other blood and functional workup

Perhaps, the arrhythmia was transient.  If so, then a CT coronary
angiogram would now be possible.

> I'm hoping I can get on a 3-way call with my sister-in-law and her
> mom's cardiologist so I can get some unfiltered answers.  I want to
> know if the apparent anatomical malformation is the cause of the
> arrythmia.

It would not be else she would have had the arrhythmia for as long as
she has had the congenitally anomalous coronary arteries, which would
be for 85 years since birth.

> And what tests/procedures are really necessary.

Being that your mother-in-law is 85 years old so that she has done
well without such tests/procedures for 85 years to check for something
she would have had for 85 years, your concerns about medical necessity
are justified.

Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be healthier:

http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/BeHealthier

Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com
A latter-day disciple of the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/DiscipleNow
jerry.ranch@pioneer.com - 02 May 2008 17:14 GMT
Dr Chung
I have the angio diagram. She is missing what the Dr has identified as
the LQ, but it looks like there is no CX to me.  I presume typically
the CX branches off the same stem from which the LAD arises?  Thats
what the drawing shows.  He also said the RCA has produced lots of
collaterals.
I'm at work, but my wife is at hoem and she'll be chatting with the
cardiiologist very soon.  He said if we don't have surgery, its
suicide.  Whihc, unless she is having symptoms, I think is a very bad
thing to say to try to force her to have surgery.

Jerry
yamantaka@aol.com - 02 May 2008 17:26 GMT
On May 2, 9:14 am, jerry.ra...@pioneer.com wrote:
> Dr Chung
> I have the angio diagram. She is missing what the Dr has identified as
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Jerry

Jerry,

Chung is a mentally ill, religious whadadoo, quack who has not
practiced medicine since being thrown out of his first post-fellowhip
job in Florida in 2001. Read several of his posts and you'll get the
idea. Additionally, he will call me Satan for having pointed this out
to you. Is that how a real cardiologist would respond?

Get a second opinion from a real, practicing, competent cardiologist
that your mother sees face-to-face. Nothing that Chung says about any
subject is useful or reliable. Don't let your mother's care be
compromised.
J666 - 02 May 2008 17:27 GMT
> Dr Chung
> I have the angio diagram. She is missing what the Dr has identified as
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Jerry

Since you are still requesting Chung's advice, then you must be a sockpuppet
of Chung or an idiot, and if that is not the case, then get yourself to
Cnung's office in Mableton Geargia so he can personally see her and evaluate
all your studies and if you need surgery, and it is not amenable to his
2PD Blah Blah, then he can refer her to one of the surgeons he personally
know.

So if you want to put your wife's life in Chung's hands, then do it
completely.
jerry.ranch@pioneer.com - 02 May 2008 17:45 GMT
actually I read the handwriting wrong, it is labeled as LCX, not LQ

>I have the angio diagram. She is missing what the Dr has identified as
>the LQ, but it looks like there is no CX to me.  I presume typically
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>suicide.  Whihc, unless she is having symptoms, I think is a very bad
>thing to say to try to force her to have surgery.
J666 - 01 May 2008 22:59 GMT
Read some of Chung's other posts, even if only in the last 24 hours, before
you take anything serious from him.

Beware!!!
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 02 May 2008 03:32 GMT
http://HeartMDPhD.com/ARF

<><

http://HeartMDPhD.com/ChristianBrethren
zob - 02 May 2008 06:47 GMT
>http://HeartMDPhD.com/ARF
>
><><
>
>http://HeartMDPhD.com/ChristianBrethren

Wow, yet another satanic morph of this user name to killfile!

Zob
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 02 May 2008 07:06 GMT
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/PrayForZob

<><

http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Love
jerry.ranch@pioneer.com - 02 May 2008 18:22 GMT
shes marginally diabetic too, managed by diet alone
Phobos - 02 May 2008 18:39 GMT
> shes marginally diabetic too, managed by diet alone

This keeps getting better and better.
jerry.ranch@pioneer.com - 02 May 2008 20:47 GMT
ain't it the truth !
but to her credit, she didn't want to take injections, so she
dramatically changed her diet, lost weight, is very active, and she
looks great....sometimes we need our lives shaken up before we
make/take the appropriate life-style changes that are most beneficial
to a healthy existence

>> shes marginally diabetic too, managed by diet alone
>
>This keeps getting better and better.
yamantaka@aol.com - 02 May 2008 20:56 GMT
On May 2, 12:47 pm, jerry.ra...@pioneer.com wrote:
> ain't it the truth !
> but to her credit, she didn't want to take injections, so she
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

>This keeps getting better and better.

> ain't it the truth !

Whooosh...Right over his head.
J666 - 02 May 2008 21:45 GMT
> so she
> dramatically changed her diet

How did shge do that?
Jerome Ranch - 02 May 2008 23:17 GMT
Don't know exactly because we live in Iowa and she in Chicago, so I
don't see her much.
But she stayed away from candy, processed flour goods, limited her
caloric intake, has litter "junk" food, lots of veggies, lean meat
(mostly chicken), complex carbs (I think she limited her potatoes and
rice) walks a LOT

I think she'd say staying away from the baked goods and staying fit
Jerry

>How did shge do that?
Jerome Ranch - 02 May 2008 23:25 GMT
Got further data

here is a usual heart
www.jerrysbigworld.com/usual.jpg

this is hers
www.jerrysbigworld.com/MIL.JPG

she is missing the LCX.

My wife spoke with her mom'scardiologist today - he seems very
competent.I think the mixed messages we were getting was from the
mis-interpreation of the ditzy daughter who lives near her in Chicago.
She tends to exaggerate everything.  The Dr said he's been practicing
for 30 years, and he's seen congential malformations of the coronary
arteries, but that this particular one was quite rare (maybe they'll
get a publication out of it ??), so the dauughter interprets this as
the Dr has never seen anything like this and doesn't know what to do.
On the contrary, the Dr is very cautious because the MIL has done well
for 87 years with this defect, and she is symptomless.  He is
concerned that intervention is a greater risk than doing nothing.

Anyway, they will do a CT angiogram tomorrow (Sat) gather more
information, and hopefuly set the path of treatment more definitively.
He does not yet know if they need to do a bypass, or use stents.

Jerry
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD - 03 May 2008 11:11 GMT
> Got further data
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> for 87 years with this defect, and she is symptomless.  He is
> concerned that intervention is a greater risk than doing nothing.

Without symptoms, the risks of intervening may indeed be greater than
benefit.

> Anyway, they will do a CT angiogram tomorrow (Sat) gather more
> information, and hopefuly set the path of treatment more definitively.

The utility of the CT angiogram would be primarily to double-check
that indeed there is no LCx and will not really "set the path of
treatment more definitively."

> He does not yet know if they need to do a bypass, or use stents.

It would still be wise for your MIL to seek a cure for her diabetes
regardless of whether or not she gets a coronary intervention by
eating less, down to the optimal amount:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/BeHealthy

It is likely that her original problem with feeling funny is due more
to her diabetes than her occlusive coronary disease.

May GOD bless you and yours in HIS mighty way making you healthier
(hungrier) than ever, in Jesus' awesome name.

Amen.

Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be healthier:

http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/BeHealthier

Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com
A latter-day disciple of the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/DiscipleNow
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.