Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Cancer / April 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Laparoscopic proctocolectomy with restorative ileal-anal pouch.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Doc Harman - 09 Apr 2005 17:04 GMT
Gill TS, Karantana A, Rees J, Pandey S, Dixon AR.

Department Colorectal Surgery, North Bristol NHS Trust, Frenchay
Hospital, Bristol BS16 1LE, UK.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to analyse the outcome of
restorative proctocolectomy carried out by laparoscopic surgery.
METHODS: A prospectively collected electronic database of all
colorectal laparoscopic procedures performed between April 2001 and
July 2003 has been used to identify surgical outcomes in 14 consecutive
patients who have undergone laparoscopic RPC. RESULTS: Fourteen
patients (5 male), median BMI 24 kg/m(2) have undergone restorative
laparoscopic proctocolectomy over a two year period: 13 (ulcerative
colitis, one with cancer) and 1 (FAP). The median operation time was
260 min; time has not decreased with experience. There were no
intra-operative surgical complications or deaths. Patient controlled
analgesia continued for a median of 36 h. The median time to diet was
48 h and median hospital stay 7 days; three patients required
nasogastric aspiration for delayed gastric emptying. Eighteen regional
lymph nodes were retrieved local to the carcinoma. There was one
anastomotic leak. All covering stomas were closed by 6 months (12 by
eight weeks). All 14 patients are fully continent, able to suppress
urgency and have a median pouch frequency of 4/24 h. None admit to
having problems with potency, orgasm sensation, ejaculation,
micturition. One lady reports dysparunia. All are highly satisfied with
functional outcome and cosmesis. CONCLUSION: We are encouraged to
continue to offer our patients the option of a laparoscopic resection.
Tim Jackson - 09 Apr 2005 22:05 GMT
...snip quoted summary of ostomy paper...

I am not sure that all of these articles are on topic for all the
selected newsgroups.  This one for example does not seem relevant to
alt.support.cancer.breast

Can I suggest a little more selectivity in cross-posting.

Thanks.

Signature

Tim Jackson

J - 10 Apr 2005 01:39 GMT
> ...snip quoted summary of ostomy paper...
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Can I suggest a little more selectivity in cross-posting.

Hi Tim,
I already told him to post them to sci.med.diseases.cancer or (other)
relevant newsgroups.
Just imagine, if 40 posters did that every day, our newsgroups would be
flooded with these.
He doesn't respond and continues posting.
It's one kook after another here.
Google doesn't care about complaints about such.
Hotmail and Yahoo don't seem to have newsgroup policies. (unless you know
different)
All we have is the choice of filtering him and some don't have filtering
systems.

Actually, Tim, the burglar of turds who was impersonating me the other
day, has NNTP Host 66.167.130.17
and this one has 66.167.135.204
When I do a whois on both, I get whoismelbourneit.com (newsserver?) and
seems to me that leads to New South Wales in Australia, but I'm not an
expert at chasing these things down.  So it could be the same guy

do you know who and how to complain about these posts/posters?
Thanks
J
Tim Jackson - 10 Apr 2005 11:16 GMT
>>...snip quoted summary of ostomy paper...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> Thanks
> J

The address range 66.166.0.0 to 66.167.255.255 is allocated to Covad
Communications of 2510 Zanker Road San Jose California 95131 (By
American Registry for Internet Numbers - www.arin.net)

Abuse reports to abuse-isp@covad.com or Covad Abuse Reporting Team 3420
Central Expressway Santa Clara CA 95051

Individual addresses within the group are apparently sub-allocated by
laserlink.net administered by
WebReg, RN of 4200 Wisconsin Avenue #106-190 Washington DC 20016

Beyond that the trail seems to go cold, but if you look at the
laserlink.com website you get a lot of popups and stuff, which might be
a clue.  Laserlink offer a referral-whois server, but of course it
doesn't answer.

I'm not sure what trail led you to MelbourneIt but a lot of domains are
registered there, not just by companies operating out of Australia.  But
in this case you don't apparently have a domain name to research, just
an IP address.

The trouble with the Hotmail/Yahoo - Google structure is that no-one can
enforce rules.  The mailbox provider may close the account or Google
might block it, but it is easy to set up another one.  I suppose if
there are enough complaints Yahoo and Hotmail might refuse further
accounts to a particular individual, but although they do now require
personal identification, I guess it's still pretty easy to get around.

Signature

Tim Jackson

-Who needs to pay Microsoft?  Free Open Source Software-
www.mozilla.org       FIREFOX Web Browser,  THUNDERBIRD Email/News
www.openoffice.org      Office Suite

J - 10 Apr 2005 18:52 GMT
> [...]
> > I already told him to post them to sci.med.diseases.cancer or (other)
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> a clue.  Laserlink offer a referral-whois server, but of course it
> doesn't answer.

[...]
Thanks Tim.
I'm taking this off-newgroup from hereon.
Regards,
J

For those who want to filter him, in the meantime.

If you are using Outlook Express, as with other troublemakers here,
either use the Message Rules (which is similar to Netscape or Mozilla)
Follow this guideline, for "news" https://support.nuvox.net/index.php/999
to copy/paste the posting name and email address into the rules

or plonk,  Highlight/select the post.
Click on 'message' between 'tools and help' at the top of OE...
then click on block sender..
They may not disappear immediately, only when you exit the newsgroup
and come back in.

For Netscape (and possibly Mozilla, Firefox etc), Edit, Message Filters.

If you are using newsreader Forte Agent, here's how to plonk him on every
newsgroup (under that email address).
Global filters in Forte Agent:
(I assume, like other newsreaders one selects that poster's post), then:
It's just 'Ctrl & K'  followed by 'I'
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.